CSO: Ireland had 6th most expensive food prices in 2024
In its publication 'Price levels of food, beverages and tobacco 2024: How Ireland compares', a total of 36 countries in Europe were surveyed.
The most expensive country for food was Switzerland, with Ireland ranked sixth having food prices which were 12% above the EU27 average and the least expensive listed as North Macedonia.
Ireland was the third most expensive country in the Eurozone for 'bread & cereals', the sixth most expensive country for 'fruits, vegetables, & potatoes', the eighth most expensive for both 'milk, cheese & eggs, and fis'h, the ninth most expensive for 'meat', and the 12th most expensive for 'oils & fats'.
In terms of alcoholic beverages, the most expensive country in the study was Iceland, while Ireland ranked fifth and Italy was the least expensive for alcoholic drinks.
Ireland topped the list of countries for the most expensive non-alcoholic beverages and also tobacco in 2024, with prices for such beverages 40% higher than the EU27 average,
The non-alcoholic beverages category included: coffee; tea; cocoa; mineral waters; soft drinks; concentrates; fruit juices; and vegetable juices.
Turkiye was the least expensive for tobacco and North Macedonia had the cheapest non-alcoholic beverages.
Commenting on the results, senior statistician in the Prices Division at CSO Ireland, Edel Flannery said: 'Looking at how the price levels of food, beverages, and tobacco in Ireland compared with other European countries in 2024, Ireland was the second most expensive country in the Eurozone and third most expensive of the 27 European Union (EU27) countries for food, with prices 12% above the average for the EU27.
'Of the 36 countries surveyed, food was the most expensive in Switzerland at 61% above the EU27 average, and the least expensive in North Macedonia at 27% below the EU27 average.'
CSO
The information is compiled from data collected as part of the Eurostat-OECD Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) programme, under which price data on food, beverages and tobacco in 2024 was collected by 36 European national statistical offices.
Information for Ireland was collected by the Central Statistics Office (CSO).
The countries included in the analysis, in 2024, were:
The 27 member states of the European Union (EU);
The three European Free Trade Association (EFTA) countries (Iceland, Norway, and Switzerland);
The six candidate countries (Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Serbia, and Turkiye).
In the 'Food, Beverages & Tobacco 2024' survey, prices were collected for 456 individual items covering the main broad categories including: Bread & Cereals; Meat; Fish; Milk, Cheese & Eggs; Oils & Fats; Fruits, Vegetables & Potatoes; Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco.
The results presented are based on the price levels for a fixed basket of items.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on Ireland's response to tariffs: there is a need for strategic thinking
The outline trade agreement between the EU and the US, provided it holds, removes some immediate economic risk for Ireland. But as well as the initial response, it also underlines the line for longer-term strategic thinking about the Irish economy. In the short term, there are calls for supports for Irish businesses exporting to the US to deal with the additional cost. Care is needed here. Companies need assistance to look for new markets. And the Government also needs to examine other ways it can improve their competitiveness in the short term. However, the State cannot provide an ongoing subsidy for businesses to help them to sell to the US at tariff levels that are likely to be in place for some time. Companies can be helped to adjust to the new reality, but there is no point in State support for exports that are no longer economic. Over the coming months, the Government also needs to reexamine its budget sums. As it appears a full-scale trade war can be avoided, the assumptions made in drawing up the Summer Economic Statement, the key pre-budget document published last week, may need to be tweaked rather than torn up. A lot will depend on the details of how different sectors will be affected. READ MORE Ireland must also focus on the longer term. Ireland's economic model has been based in large part on attracting foreign direct investment (FDI) from the US and acting as a bridge between the American and European markets. Of course the State needs to do what it can to protect this and to hope that the framework trade deal is a sign of somewhat calmer times. However, Donald Trump remains determined to attract multinationals in sectors such as pharmaceuticals back to manufacture in the US. And, more fundamentally, the era of relentless globalisation overseen by the World Trade Organisation is over, even if what replaces it is far from clear. And so it is incumbent on Ireland to spread its bets – to diversify its export markets and to work harder to develop indigenous industry. These are both long-term projects and new approaches cannot transform the economy overnight. However, Ireland has focused in policy terms on measures to attract FDI. While domestic firms are supported , too, they often take second place in terms of the allocation of resources and policy attention. This needs to change. Improving the environment for both FDI and indigenous investment also requires vital upgrading of key infrastructure and also human capital – the skills and abilities of the workforce. These areas have been given insufficient attention for some years now – and the price has become clear. The Government's new strategy for competitiveness, promised in the autumn, needs to take a serious view of these issues. It can not be a rehash of current policy.
Irish Examiner
4 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
MSD won't close Irish sites as part of $3bn cutbacks
Pharmaceutical giant MSD is slashing $3bn (€2.59bn) from its annual spending as part of global job cut but said it will not be closing any of its Irish sites. MSD yesterday announced a global cost-cutting exercise as it prepares for generic competition to its Irish-manufactured cancer drug Keytruda, the world's best-selling medicine, which is predominantly made in Ireland. The company will cut administrative, sales and research jobs, with increased focus on the US market. It has not said where the roles will be lost or if any Irish workers will be among those affected. However, a spokesperson told the Irish Examiner: "The restructuring announced today does not include site closures in Ireland." MSD employs more than 3,000 people at eight locations in Ireland. These include MSD Brinny in Co Cork specialising in development and manufacture of innovative novel vaccines and testing of immuno-oncology medicines; three facilities in Dublin (MSD Biotech, MSD Blackrock, and MSD Red Oak North); MSD Carlow; MSD Dunboyne in Co Meath; MSD Ballydine in Co Tipperary, the company's first Irish site; and MSD Dundalk, the former WuXi Vaccines sites acquired in January. The cost cuts will include $1.7bn (€1.47bn) in annual savings from the elimination of certain administrative, sales and R&D positions, MSD said. The company expects the restructuring to be completed by the end of 2027, the year before Keytruda's key patents expire and the drug faces US government price cuts. The company said it plans to reinvest the savings into developing new drugs and launching new products. EU-branded medicines will face 15% import tariffs under the new transatlantic trade deal agreed between the European bloc and the US at the weekend. Like many other pharmaceutical firms based in Ireland, MSD had stockpiled doses of Keytruda manufactured in Ireland, to protect itself from tariffs imposed in 2025. MSD previously disclosed plans to invest more than $9bn (€7.78bn) in US manufacturing over the next four years, part of an effort to make more of its medicines in the US. The company reiterated that it expects to spend $200m (€172m) on tariffs in 2025, a number that reflects levies already in place and doesn't account for future tariffs on pharmaceuticals.
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
X loses High Court challenge brought against Coimisiún na Meán safety code
Social media giant X has lost a High Court challenge brought against Ireland's broadcasting and online media regulator, Coimisiún na Meán, over its online safety code. X International Unlimited Company, which operates X, formerly known as Twitter, had alleged that the media regulator engaged in 'regulatory overreach' in its approach to restrictions on certain video content. Coimisiún na Meán's online safety code, which was adopted last October and came into effect earlier this month, sets out legally binding rules for video-sharing platforms. It is aimed at protecting the public, and especially children, from harmful online content. X, owned by Elon Musk, had sought a High Court order compelling the commission to quash its decision to adopt certain sections of the code. It also sought the court to overturn the commission's decision to apply the code to its platform. READ MORE In a judgment, Mr Justice Conleth Bradley on Tuesday said he was refusing the reliefs sought by X. The judge dismissed several arguments made by the platform in the proceedings, including that the code was out of step with European legislation. The judge found the code did not go beyond what is permitted by the Audiovisual Media Service Directive (AVMSD), a European Union directive that underpins the code. He said the code was not in conflict with the Digital Services Act, an EU regulation that also sets out rules for online content. In the context of this case, the judge noted the Digital Services Act treats provisions in the AVMSD 'in a complementary manner'. The latter directive is not 'displaced or substantially curtailed' by the Digital Services Act, the judge said, as had been submitted by X. The AVMSD complements the Digitial Services Act in 'providing specific rules in determining what content can be harmful to minors', the judge said. X had submitted that in adopting the sections complained of in the safety code, Coimisiún na Meán went beyond what is permitted by the AVMSD, allowing for a total ban or prohibition of certain online content. X saidthe directive only allows for measures to control access to certain online content. X also argued that parts of the code strayed into the regulation of matters within the scope of the Digital Services Act. Further to this, X argued the code was in conflict with the provisions of the act. The judgment will be formalised later in the week. Mr Justice Bradley said he was minded to make an order for costs in favour of the commission, given it has been entirely successful in defending the action.
