logo
NSW farmers fear job cuts at DPIRD could leave them open to biosecurity threats

NSW farmers fear job cuts at DPIRD could leave them open to biosecurity threats

Farmers fear proposed cuts to research and development roles at the NSW Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (DPIRD) could leave the state vulnerable to biosecurity and climate threats.
The NSW government on Tuesday announced plans to cut 165 jobs from the department, equating to a 4 per cent reduction in staff.
The Public Service Association (PSA) told the ABC 55 of those jobs would be from the DPIRD's agriculture and biosecurity teams.
Farmers in the north of the state are concerned the cuts will leave the agriculture industry open to biosecurity threats at a state and federal level.
Toorooka cattle farmer David Duff pointed to biosecurity issues producers were already facing.
"We've had varroa mite, we've had tropical soda apple and we've got red fire ants that are on the march over the border down into New South Wales," he said.
"If you haven't got the staff on the ground to be able to implement biosecurity measures when we have outbreaks of whatever it is, the consequences to primary industry production are massive, and then to the country."
Mr Duff said safeguarding the agriculture industry needed to be a priority.
Moree-based NSW Farmers Association vice president Rebecca Reardon said the job cuts were a "short-sighted" move and fewer boots on the ground could be "devastating" for biosecurity in the state.
"We've got so many challenges in agriculture — around climate change, input costs, biosecurity threats, pressure to decrease emissions, productivity issues — that to cut back on research when we're aiming to be a $30 billion output industry just seems very short-sighted on the government's part," Ms Reardon said.
She said with threats such as lumpy skin disease and mad cow disease "on the back doorstep," maintaining strong biosecurity was vital.
"Any savings they make by cutting staff and those on the ground, well they'll be blown out of the water if we have one of these incursions," Ms Reardon said.
DPIRD secretary Steve Orr previously told the ABC the job cuts were set to affect roles that were made permanent despite only having temporary funding, back office administrative roles and duplicate management positions across several divisions.
He said there would not be an impact on frontline services offered by the department.
The Wollongbar Primary Industries Institute, which tests soil and water quality following floods and fires, will be significantly impacted by the cuts.
The PSA said all 12 to 13 jobs at the institute's environmental lab would be lost.
Earlier this week, a DPIRD spokesperson said there would be no changes to its office locations and all impacted staff would have the opportunity to be redeployed across the department or other parts of the NSW public service.
The union said the planned relocation of the environment lab, from northern NSW to Wagga Wagga in the state's south-west, would complicate the redeployment of its staff.
Greens MP and rice farmer Sue Higginson said she had seen firsthand the research and development work conducted at the site.
"We can't afford any job losses in our region right now, particularly ones that are doing this kind of deeper scientific research about how to build our resilience, how to understand our changing climate and how we adapt," she said.
The ABC has contacted the NSW Agriculture Minister Tara Moriarty and Lismore MP Janelle Saffin for comment.
Mr Orr was also contacted for further comment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

DEEP DIVE: How does recognising Palestinian statehood help Gaza?
DEEP DIVE: How does recognising Palestinian statehood help Gaza?

ABC News

time12 minutes ago

  • ABC News

DEEP DIVE: How does recognising Palestinian statehood help Gaza?

Most of the world recognises Palestine as a state, but Australia and some of its closest allies have refused to. Until this week. A growing list of Western countries — including Canada and the UK — have announced plans to recognise Palestinian statehood. And pressure is mounting for Australia to do the same. But what does statehood recognition mean? And will it lead to peace in Gaza? In this extended episode, leading international law expert Ben Saul shares his time with us for the third time since the war began. We ask him all about Palestinian statehood, the allegations of genocide against Israel, and how much power countries like Australia have in helping to end the war. Guest: Ben Saul, UN Special Rapporteur on Human Rights and Counter-terrorism Get the whole story from Hack:

Judgement to be handed down over legality of pro-Palestinian Sydney Harbour Bridge march
Judgement to be handed down over legality of pro-Palestinian Sydney Harbour Bridge march

ABC News

timean hour ago

  • ABC News

Judgement to be handed down over legality of pro-Palestinian Sydney Harbour Bridge march

A judgement due to be handed down this morning will decide the legality of a pro-Palestinian march across the Sydney Harbour Bridge on Sunday. The Palestinian Action Group was referred to the Supreme Court by NSW Police after it announced plans to march over the bridge in support of Palestinians as the war rages on in Gaza. NSW Police sought a prohibition order over the event, which would not ban people from attending and participating, but would mean those who did participate would not be protected against offences such as blocking roads or traffic. The court heard from counsel for both the Palestine Action Group and police on Friday. Under cross-examination, Acting Assistant Commissioner Adam Johnson said he had public safety concerns about the event. "Imagine a scenario where the public assembly remains authorised. In that situation, are you saying police would not facilitate safe conduct of the event?" barrister Felicity Graham, representing the organisers, asked. "We would always do our best to ensure public safety, but in these timeframes, no. We'd be unable to guarantee public safety," he replied. "It's a certainty that a very large group of people attend even if the public assembly is not authorised, do you agree?" Ms Graham asked. "It's a possibility," the witness replied. Acting Assistant Commissioner Johnson told the court the bridge would still need to be closed if the gathering was authorised. He also raised concerns about plans for attendees to first gather at Lang Park — situated on the corner of York, Grosvenor and Lang streets — to approach the harbour bridge. "Fifty thousand people at Lang Park, whether it's authorised or unauthorised, has significant public safety risks," he said. Before the hearing began on Friday, Josh Lees from Palestine Action Group told media the crisis in Gaza had not abated and it was an "urgent and horrific situation". "It's why we called it over the harbour bridge, because we need to do something bigger than what we've already done," he said. Mr Lees said the bridge had been shut previously for "much less significant reasons", including for a movie to be filmed, and said an argument that a closure required more planning time did not add up. He said the plans had attracted "unprecedented support" and claimed NSW Police had not accepted the alternative plans suggested by the group, including delaying the event for several weeks. The group took to Instagram to announce several union groups were backing the march, including the United Workers Union and the Nurses and Midwives' Association. Premier Chris Minns said on Friday the government acknowledged the demand for the march, but that the "last thing" police wanted was "chaos" in Sydney streets. "We recognise people want to protest, we're hopeful, depending on the outcome of the court case... ... [that] common sense can prevail and people are given an opportunity to express their voice," he said. The "March for Humanity" is scheduled for Sunday afternoon. Justice Belinda Rigg will hand down her verdict at 10am Saturday.

‘Not woke stuff': Trump administration bars US officials from Australia defence talks
‘Not woke stuff': Trump administration bars US officials from Australia defence talks

The Age

time2 hours ago

  • The Age

‘Not woke stuff': Trump administration bars US officials from Australia defence talks

Confidential talks canvassing strategies to prevent a war with China and deepen the United States-Australia alliance have been scrapped after the Trump administration abruptly blocked senior defence officials from travelling to Canberra next week. National security experts fear an array of exchanges between US and Australian counterparts will dry up following a sweeping Pentagon edict, announced this week, suspending all participation in think tank and research events because it suspects they do not align with Donald Trump's 'America First' agenda. The edict comes as the US reviews the future of the AUKUS nuclear-powered submarine pact and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese prepares for a potential first meeting with Trump in September after months of no discussions between the pair. US and Australian officials were planning to meet some of the nations' top defence experts in Canberra on Monday and Tuesday next week for the fifth round of the US-Australia Indo-Pacific Deterrence Dialogue, but the event was suddenly called off on Wednesday when the American officials were told they were no longer allowed to travel to the event. Around 40 American and Australian national security figures would have gathered to discuss issues such as military integration, nuclear deterrence and strategic interaction with China at the closed-door dialogue, which involved months of planning. The so-called '1.5 track' event brings together current military leaders, government officials and diplomats with non-government researchers. Discussions are held under the Chatham House rule to foster frank discussions on sensitive and complex topics, with the participants' identities kept secret. This would have been the first time the dialogue has been held since Trump's re-election. Chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said in a statement: 'In order to ensure the Department of Defence is not lending its name and credibility to organisations, forums, and events that run counter to the values of this administration, the Department's Office of Public Affairs will be conducting a thorough vetting of every event where Defence officials are invited to participate.' Rory Medcalf, head of the Australian National University's National Security College, said the 'cancellation of this dialogue is disappointing and counterproductive for alliance interests'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store