
Israel's agonizing choice over which hostages to save
'It's Schindler's list," said Anat Angrest, the mother of captive soldier Matan Angrest, 22, who said her son was injured. 'I don't understand how the state can choose who should stay in hell."
Israel and Hamas are now hammering out a deal that would see the release of 10 living hostages and the bodies of 18 others in exchange for a 60-day cease-fire and the release of Palestinian prisoners held in Israel. A deal appears to be closer than at any point in recent months.
In two previous cease-fire rounds, the decisions, while painful, were easier to rationalize in some ways. Priority was given to civilian women, children and the elderly. Next in line were female soldiers or men who were injured.
Now, all of the living hostages are men, and they are all likely to be in a deteriorating mental and physical state. For the families still waiting, the decision is creating deep despair.
The Israeli Prime Minister's Office didn't respond to a request for comment about how it chooses which hostages should be released.
Ilay David knows that his brother, Evyatar David, 24, who was kidnapped from the Nova music festival, is likely not a top priority for release as he is young and uninjured, even if he faces harsh conditions in captivity.
'We understood early on that Evyatar…was never going to be among the first," David said. But for Evyatar to be left behind again would shatter him, he said. 'This knowledge that your brother is still there, still suffering, is really unbearable. I pray that we won't reach a situation where he is left there."
Hostage families have insisted that any deal should include the release of all hostages at once rather than in phases. Many families are angry at the Israeli government over the partial deals it has negotiated. Hamas has said it would release all the hostages in exchange for an end to the war, something Israel refuses to do until the group is defeated.
'By insisting on choosing partial deals, the Israeli government has created with its own hands the system of selection," said the Hostages and Missing Families Forum, a group that represents most of the families.
In addition to the 20 men Israel believes to be alive, there are also two men whom Israel has said it has 'severe concern for their lives," language typically used by the military when hostages are likely to be deceased but haven't yet been declared dead. There are also 28 bodies of hostages that are being held in the Gaza Strip.
For hostage families, the impending deal is fostering a sense of panic over whether their loved ones will make it onto the list. The inclusion of one hostage means another won't make it out, making any choice a painful outcome for families who have bonded and lobbied the world together over 21 months of war.
Macabit Mayer, whose twin nephews Gali and Ziv Berman, 27, are being held in Gaza, says she can't sleep. She closes her eyes, but finds herself in a state of constant tension, ready to grab her phone or turn on the television for breaking news. Her heart beats faster and she dreads a phone call informing her of the worst.
'It's like a nightmare you just can't wake up from," Mayer said. 'Everyone is in a very extreme situation," she said, referring to hostage families waiting to see if they will make the list.
While the exact criteria for inclusion on the list are still unclear, there is speculation it could include the injured, wounded or men with children, say people close to the families. Many hostage families are emphasizing the poor medical condition of their relatives in interviews and some are compiling medical files in hope it could influence authorities.
But some medical professionals say that giving priority to the most vulnerable after 21 months will prove professionally impossible because of limited information and ethical implications.
'I really don't think that the medical teams at this point in time can determine who is more at risk and who is less at risk," said Hagai Levine, a doctor who heads the health team for the Hostages and Missing Families Forum.
Levine, who has compiled medical files for each hostage since the start of the war, says there isn't up-to-date information on the precise medical state of each hostage and that he relies on released hostages' testimonies and Hamas videos. 'It's like treating a patient with a heart disease based on his EKG from three months ago," he said.
In recent days, Einav Zangauker, whose son Matan, 25, was kidnapped from a kibbutz, met with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his wife, Sara, whom she hugged. It was a surprising display of affection toward the Netanyahus. Zangauker has been one of the prime minister's fiercest critics over his refusal to end the war for the release of all the hostages. She later said that Netanyahu had assured her in the meeting he would free all the hostages. She declined to comment for this article.
The deal being discussed in Doha includes a stipulation that the two sides are supposed to immediately enter into negotiations for a second stage that would end the war and free the remaining hostages.
Some fear the second stage will never come. A previous cease-fire deal earlier this year never reached a second stage after Israel resumed fighting in the enclave. Hamas has sought stronger guarantees from mediators that talks will proceed to an end for the war, something Israel has so far refused.
Parents of soldiers held in Gaza are especially worried because they have heard from released hostages that soldiers are treated worse than civilians and face violence and interrogations by militants. Previous cease-fire deals placed soldiers in the last category for release. They fear they could be left for last. Out of the 20, two were soldiers captured in uniform.
Some families of soldiers say they feel betrayed by their government because it failed to protect their loved ones during the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas-led attacks that started the war, and now could be leaving them behind again. Edan Alexander, an American-Israeli citizen, is the only soldier captured in uniform who has so far been freed in a deal. That deal was between the U.S. and Hamas and didn't include Israel.
In Israel, where military service is mandatory at age 18, many Israelis believe that the oath taken by a soldier to protect the state means the country will do everything to protect him in return.
'My Matan is a soldier and our country didn't fight for the soldiers as part of the deals," Angrest said. 'This contract has been broken."
Write to Anat Peled at anat.peled@wsj.com

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Wire
38 minutes ago
- The Wire
The ‘Symbol of Shame' an Israeli Minister Saw in Biafra 55 Years Ago Haunts His Nation Today from Gaza
Eitay Mack But inside Israel, starvation due to its conduct in Gaza is being denied, just as the pandemic was some years ago. In a plenary session of the Knesset held on January 14, 1970, Israel foreign minister Abba Eban addressed the war in Biafra: 'Greater and more terrible than the suffering of war was the disaster of the siege, whose victims were civilians – most of them children – who came into the world only to live a brief and tragic life full of torment. Upon the people of Biafra was fulfilled the horrifying verse from the Book of Lamentations: 'Those killed by the sword are better off than those who die of hunger'.' Eban added, 'The Biafran child – with his swollen belly, emaciated limbs and wide, pleading eyes – became the symbol of this generation's shame.' To many around the world today, Israel's conduct in the war in Gaza is seen as the shame of our own generation. In August 1968, Emmanuel Ron, Israel's chargé d'affaires in Lagos at the time, reported that senior figures in Nigeria's federal government – who were suppressing the Biafran rebellion – defended themselves against international criticism by saying: 'Starvation is a legitimate weapon in warfare. It was used as a lawful method by the advanced nations in their wars, and there is no reason Nigeria should act differently'. Similarly, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's far-right government and its supporters claim that Israel is being unfairly criticised by the international community for the blockade it has imposed on Gaza. Israel has avoided seriously addressing international criticism – shared by most Western democracies – and confronting undisputed facts: On March 2, the Netanyahu government completely halted the entry of humanitarian aid into Gaza; It subsequently approved an aid plan that, from the outset, promised only a 'minimum amount of food'; and even during the limited implementation of this plan, Israeli forces killed hundreds of starving human beings who came to receive food. Meanwhile, a disturbing 'national sport' has emerged in Israel: the debunking of photographs coming from Gaza. This campaign involves officials, journalists, influencers and others, all working to discredit visual evidence of suffering rather than addressing its root causes. The investigation carried out by participants in this 'sport' is not complicated, as in many cases information about the pre-existing health conditions of the children and infants shown in the footage has already been published by the international press or shared by their families and doctors in Gaza. The widespread surprise is difficult to understand – naturally, it is logical that the first victims would be individuals from at-risk groups, with pre-existing health issues and weakened immune systems, who require specialised food and medical care and are especially vulnerable to the consequences of the overall health deterioration affecting the entire population densely concentrated by Israel. Therefore, the denial of the starvation in Gaza most closely resembles the denial of the COVID-19 pandemic in Israel. Back then, too, there were those who conducted 'investigations' to reveal to the public that hospitalised patients and the deceased had pre-existing health conditions. This was despite the fact that the Ministry of Health was transparent on the issue and its representatives repeatedly emphasised that the pandemic posed a particular danger to these individuals and other at-risk groups. The reality created by a series of reckless decisions made by Netanyahu's government has even managed to penetrate the walls of the White House. US Vice President J.D. Vance stated, 'I don't know if you've all seen these images. You have got some really, really heartbreaking cases. You've got little kids who are clearly starving to death … Israel's got to do more to let that aid in.' President Donald Trump remarked, 'We can save a lot of people, I mean some of those kids. That's real starvation; I see it and you can't fake that […] I want to make sure they get the food.' In response, the Netanyahu government paradoxically claims that there is no hunger. However, if hunger does exist, it blames solely Hamas and the UN. Despite this, the government has agreed to airlift humanitarian aid and allow additional ground routes for aid to enter the Gaza Strip. This must not be a temporary gimmick designed merely to ride out the wave of criticism until global attention shifts elsewhere. After 21 months of war, the health damage to the starving people in Gaza is cumulative, and small, short-term relief will not be enough to repair it until Israel enforces the next halt. Consistently, polls show that most Israelis support ending the war and the release of all hostages held in Gaza. However, this is not enough. Until the long-awaited end of the war, these same Israelis must also raise their voices about how the war is being conducted and demand the removal of all barriers to the free entry of humanitarian aid into Gaza. An Israeli citizen cannot claim that the Netanyahu government does not represent them while remaining silent in the face of one of its most immoral and brutal actions. There were times when the Knesset thought the same way. On July 22, 1968, it passed a resolution regarding the war in Biafra, calling on the warring parties to 'allow the transfer of substantial aid to those in need, by land, sea and air. Until the conflict is resolved, essential aid to save the lives of women and children, and to ensure food and assistance for the Ibo population and other tribes who are starving and suffering, must not be blocked.' This was true for Biafra then, and it is true for Gaza today. Eitay Mack is an Israeli human rights lawyer and activist who represents Palestinian victims of terror. This article first appeared on the Hebrew media platform The Seventh Eye. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.


News18
2 hours ago
- News18
Palestinian Islamic Jihad Releases Video Of Israeli Hostage Shown Gaza Hunger Footage
Last Updated: The ongoing war has uprooted nearly 90 per cent of Gaza's population, with Israel continuing to destroy infrastructure and homes. The Israel-Hamas war has been ongoing for 21 months, and Gaza's Health Ministry recently revealed that more than 60,000 Palestinians have been killed so far in the conflict. Amid the war, the Palestinian Islamic Jihad terror group on Thursday shared a video of an Israeli-German hostage, Rom Braslavski. In October 2023, Braslavski was captured in the Gaza Strip—an incident that ignited a full-scale war in the region. In the video, he looks pale and thin as he appeals to the Israeli government for help in securing his freedom. He appears weak, lying on the ground in Gaza while watching news coverage of the region's hunger crisis. view comments First Published: August 02, 2025, 07:06 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
3 hours ago
- First Post
World economies reel as Trump delivers blow with new modified reciprocal tariff
Trump announced late Thursday that dozens of economies, including the European Union, will face new tariff rates of between 10 and 41 percent. read more Global markets reeled Friday after President Donald Trump's tariffs barrage against nearly all US trading partners as governments looked down the barrel of a seven-day deadline before higher duties take effect. Trump announced late Thursday that dozens of economies, including the European Union, will face new tariff rates of between 10 and 41 percent. However, implementation will be on August 7 rather than Friday as previously announced, the White House said. This gives governments a window to rush to strike deals with Washington setting more favorable conditions. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Neighboring Canada, one of the biggest US trade partners, was hit with 35 percent levies, up from 25 percent, effective Friday – but with wide-ranging, current exemptions remaining in place. The tariffs are a demonstration of raw economic power that Trump sees putting US exporters in a stronger position, while encouraging domestic manufacturing by keeping out foreign imports. But the muscular approach has raised fears of inflation and other economic fallout in the world's biggest economy. Stock markets in Hong Kong, London and New York slumped as they digested the turmoil, while weak US employment data added to worries. Trump's actions come as debate rages over how best to steer the US economy, with the Federal Reserve this week deciding to keep interest rates unchanged, despite massive political pressure from the White House to cut. Data Friday showed US job growth missing expectations for July, while unemployment ticked up to 4.2 percent from 4.1 percent. On Wall Street, the S&P 500 dropped 1.6 percent, while the Nasdaq tumbled 2.2 percent. Political goals Trump raised duties on around 70 economies, from a current 10 percent level imposed in April when he unleashed 'reciprocal' tariffs citing unfair trade practices. The new, steeper levels listed in an executive order vary by trading partner. Any goods 'transshipped' through other jurisdictions to avoid US duties would be hit with an additional 40 percent tariff, the order said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD But Trump's duties also have a distinctly political flavor, with the president using separate tariffs to pressure Brazil to drop the trial of his far-right ally, former president Jair Bolsonaro. He also warned of trade consequences for Canada, which faces a different set of duties, after Prime Minister Mark Carney announced plans to recognize a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly in September. In targeting Canada, the White House cited its failure to 'cooperate in curbing the ongoing flood of fentanyl and other illicit drugs' – although Canada is not a major source of illegal narcotics. By contrast, Trump gave more time to Mexico, delaying for 90 days a threat to increase its tariffs from 25 percent to 30 percent. But exemptions remain for a wide range of Canadian and Mexican goods entering the United States under an existing North American trade pact. Carney said his government was 'disappointed' with the latest rates hike but noted that with exclusions the US average tariff on Canadian goods remains one of the lowest among US trading partners. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Tears up' rule book With questions hanging over the effectiveness of bilateral trade deals struck – including with the EU and Japan – the outcome of Trump's overall plan remains uncertain. 'No doubt about it – the executive order and related agreements concluded over the past few months tears up the trade rule book that has governed international trade since World War II,' said Wendy Cutler, senior vice president of the Asia Society Policy Institute. On Friday, Trump said he would consider distributing a tariff 'dividend' to Americans. Notably excluded from Friday's drama was China, which is in the midst of negotiations with the United States. Washington and Beijing at one point brought tit-for-tat tariffs to triple-digit levels, but have agreed to temporarily lower these duties and are working to extend their truce. Those who managed to strike deals with Washington to avert steeper threatened levies included Vietnam, Japan, Indonesia, the Philippines, South Korea and the European Union. Among other tariff levels adjusted in Trump's latest order, Switzerland now faces a higher 39 percent duty.