As Iranian missiles approached a US base, one nation stepped in to avert a wider war in West Asia
On the evening of June 23, when Iranian missiles raced toward the largest American military base in the Gulf, senior Qatari officials were deep in high-level talks about defusing regional tensions.
They didn't expect the conflict to reach their doorstep — until the walls began to shake.
According to Qatar's foreign ministry spokesperson Majed Al-Ansari, defense personnel interrupted a meeting with the Qatari Prime Minister in Doha on Monday with urgent warnings: Iranian missiles were incoming. Moments later, the thunder of interceptors filled the skies above the Qatari capital, Ansari told CNN.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
The Easiest Way to Get Your Passport in 2025.
GovPlus
Learn More
Undo
The attack came days after U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities and pushed the region to the brink of a broader war.
Gulf capitals braced for impact. In Kuwait, shelters were opened. In Bahrain, roads were closed. Some residents in Dubai and Abu Dhabi rushed to buy supplies or book flights out.
Live Events
At
Al Udeid Air Base
, the largest U.S. installation in the region, American military personnel had already begun evacuating. Qatar, meanwhile, activated its early warning radar system and scrambled 300 troops to deploy Patriot missile batteries. 'Towards the end it was very clear… Al Udeid Base was going to be targeted,' a Qatari defense official told CNN.
19 missiles in the air, a ceasefire on the line
At around 7 p.m. local time, radar confirmed that Iranian missiles were airborne. According to Al-Ansari, Qatar's military intercepted seven missiles over the Persian Gulf, and another eleven over Doha. A single missile struck an uninhabited area near Al Udeid, causing minimal damage.
U.S. President Donald Trump later said that 14 missiles had been fired, but Qatar's account put the number at 19. Al-Ansari told CNN the missile defense operation was 'Qatari-led', though coordinated with U.S. forces.
While Tehran had warned Gulf nations months earlier that any U.S. attack on Iranian territory would make American bases across the region 'legitimate targets,' Al-Ansari said no specific warning was given ahead of this strike. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi reportedly reiterated that stance in Istanbul just one day earlier, telling Gulf counterparts that retaliation was imminent if the U.S. escalated.
After the attack, Iran's National Security Council said the strikes posed 'no dangerous aspect to our friendly and brotherly country of Qatar and its noble people.' But Al-Ansari dismissed speculation that Qatar had quietly allowed the strike in exchange for a future diplomatic opening.
'We do not take it lightly for our country to be attacked by missiles from any side,' he told CNN. 'I would not put my daughter under missiles coming from the sky just to come out with a political outcome. This was a complete surprise to us.'
A phone call, and a breakthrough
Just as Qatar's leadership was weighing how to respond, a call came from President Trump to Emir Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani. Trump relayed that Israel was willing to agree to a ceasefire, and asked Qatar to relay that message to Iran.
'As we were discussing how to retaliate to this attack… this is when we get a call from the United States that a possible ceasefire, a possible avenue to regional security had opened,' Al-Ansari said.
The country's chief negotiator, Mohammed bin Abdulaziz Al-Khulaifi, reached out to Tehran. Simultaneously, Prime Minister Al Thani spoke to U.S. Vice President JD Vance. With both channels active, a deal was quickly arranged.
'All options were on the table that night,' Al-Ansari recalled. 'But we also realized that was a moment that could create momentum for peace in a region that hasn't been there for two years now.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
24 minutes ago
- Mint
Judges rule against human rights groups claim that the UK is illegally arming Israel
LONDON — Human rights groups lost their legal challenge Monday to the British government's decision to supply Israel with parts for F-35 fighter jets and other military equipment. The Palestinian group Al-Haq and the U.K.-based Global Legal Action Network alleged that the government broke domestic and international law and was complicit in atrocities against Palestinians by allowing essential components for the warplanes to be supplied to Israel. The government last year suspended about 30 of 350 existing export licenses for equipment deemed to be for use in the conflict in Gaza because of a 'clear risk' the items could be used to violate international humanitarian law. Equipment included parts for helicopters and drones. But an exemption was made for some licenses related to components of F-35 fighter jets, which are indirectly supplied to Israel through the global spare parts supply chain and have been linked to bombing the Gaza Strip. While rights groups argued the U.K. shouldn't continue to export parts through what they call a 'deliberate loophole' given the government's own assessment of Israel's compliance with international humanitarian law, the government said the parts were distributed to a collaboration involving the U.S. and six other partners to produce the jets. Components manufactured in the U.K. are sent to assembly lines in the U.S., Italy and Japan that supply partners — including Israel — with jets and spare parts, the court said. Two High Court judges ruled that the issue was one of national security because the parts were considered vital to the defense collaboration and the U.K.'s security and international peace. They said it wasn't up to the courts to tell the government to withdraw from the group because of the possibility the parts would be supplied to Israel and used to violate international humanitarian law in Gaza. 'Under our constitution that acutely sensitive and political issue is a matter for the executive, which is democratically accountable to Parliament and ultimately to the electorate, not for the courts," Justices Stephen Males and Karen Steyn wrote in a 72-page judgment. Compared with major arms suppliers such as the U.S. and Germany, British firms sell a relatively small amount of weapons and components to Israel. The Campaign Against Arms Trade nonprofit group estimates that the U.K. supplies about 15% of the components in the F-35 stealth combat aircraft, including its laser targeting system.
Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
India hardens stance on farm sector concessions as India-US trade talks stretch
India-US trade deal (Representative AI image) NEW DELHI: As India-US trade talks stretch into a new week with both sides chasing the July 9 deadline, government has hardened its stance on offering concessions in the farm sector. 'The Indian team may stay longer as crucial talks are continuing, but we don't just want to open up whatever is the demand (from the US) on agriculture as lives of millions of farmers are involved,' said a government source. Last week, India's chief negotiator Rajesh Agarwal and other officials had gone to the US on a two-day visit, but the talks have stretched as the US is also keen to conclude some deals before the pause on reciprocal tariffs – 26% in India's case -- ends in. In fact, on Thursday, US president Donald Trump had announced that a 'very big deal' with India is likely – the seventh time that he had announced an agreement. The Indian industry is also being prepared for dealing with reciprocal tariffs, in case the early tranche of the proposed bilateral trade deal does not work out. For India, a key concern is allowing lower duty import on agricultural products like maize, soybean and dairy products, which is being demanded by the US side. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 2025 Top Trending Local Enterprise Accounting Software [Click Here] Accounting ERP Click Here Undo Privately, several industry representatives have met commerce department brass and suggested that India should agree to the demands from the Trump administration, but government is keen to ensure that it is not a one-sided deal. Officials also conveyed to exporters on Monday that the limited deal, if it works out, will cover only a limited set of products with more tranches likely in the coming months. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump threatened University of Virginia with funding cuts unless President resigned, Senator warns of dangerous precedent
The University of Virginia (UVA) faced an 'explicit' threat from the Trump administration to slash funding, eliminate jobs, and suspend student visa programmes unless its president, Jim Ryan, resigned over his support for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives, according to Virginia Senator Mark Warner. Appearing on CBS's Face the Nation on Sunday, Warner revealed that the White House delivered a pointed message to Ryan: Either step down or watch the university suffer sweeping federal retribution. The senator, a Democrat and former Virginia governor, condemned what he described as an unprecedented and politically motivated abuse of federal power. 'This is the most outrageous action the Trump administration has taken on education since returning to office,' Warner said as reported by The Guardian, calling the ultimatum a direct assault on institutional autonomy and academic freedom. According to Warner, Ryan was told that if he refused to resign by a specified deadline last week, UVA would face severe consequences, including mass job losses, research funding cuts, cancelled student financial aid, and the suspension of international student visas. Ryan resigns under pressure Jim Ryan, who had served as UVA's president since 2018 and was widely respected for fostering diversity and civic engagement on campus, resigned on Friday. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Adidas Three Shorts With 60% Discount, Limited Stock Available Original Adidas Shop Now Undo In a message to the university community, Ryan acknowledged the mounting federal pressure and said he could not justify putting students, faculty, and staff at risk to preserve his position. 'I cannot make a unilateral decision to fight the federal government in order to save my own job,' Ryan wrote in a resignation letter to the university community as reported by The Guardian. His resignation came as the university faced a Justice Department investigation into its DEI practices, a focus that has drawn the ire of Trump and his allies, who have increasingly targeted diversity programmes at institutions across the country. A pattern of federal overreach? Warner warned that the Trump administration's action against UVA was not an isolated incident, citing the administration's similar clashes with Harvard University over foreign student visas and DEI initiatives. 'They are doing damage to our flagship university,' Warner said. 'And if they can do it here, they'll do it elsewhere' as reported by The Guardian. He accused federal agencies of overreach, stating that education and justice officials were weaponising their authority to undermine institutions that do not align with the president's ideological agenda. Academic freedom under threat The senator's remarks come amid growing national concern that the Trump administration is systematically dismantling DEI programmes under the guise of rooting out 'wokeness' from American higher education. Analysts warn the move could have chilling effects on academic freedom, university governance, and the ability of US institutions to attract global talent. 'If we don't have some level of academic freedom,' Warner cautioned, 'then what kind of country are we?' As the fallout continues, legal experts and university administrators across the nation are watching closely, concerned that the UVA episode may signal a broader campaign to reshape the landscape of American higher education through coercion rather than policy. Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
