Polish central bank seen keeping rates steady on Wednesday: Reuters poll
All but one of the 30 analysts in the poll forecast the NBP would hold its key rate steady at 5.25%. The central bank cut the cost of credit by 50 basis points in May, the first easing since October 2023.
NBP Governor Adam Glapinski said following the cut that it did not mark the beginning of an easing cycle and that it was doubtful the Monetary Policy Council (MPC) would risk a further cut in June.
"In post-MPC comments on May 8, NBP President Adam Glapinski essentially pre-announced an on-hold decision in the June meeting," Goldman Sachs analysts economists wrote in a note, adding they expected the NBP to recommence easing in the third quarter, most likely July.
According to HSBC analysts, positive inflation data, with core moderating faster than expected, warranted last month's easing, but they pointed to wage volatility and stronger than expected first quarter economic growth as arguments against a subsequent cut.
Data last month showed Poland's corporate sector wage growth jumped sharply toward double-digit territory in April, from which it had fallen since December. On Monday, an economic output reading for the first quarter confirmed an earlier, faster than expected 3.2% annual growth reading.
Meanwhile Polish consumer price inflation continued to ease in May, to 4.1% on the year, according to an early estimate, though it remained above the central bank's target of 2.5% plus or minus one percentage point.
"The outlook for headline inflation also hinges on the new electricity tariff to kick in from October, with the announcement due only in late summer/September," the HSBC analysts wrote. "This justifies a pause near term, in our view."
Glapinski has pointed to the lifting of the government's electricity price cap as an inflation risk.
Still, DM AFS brokerage economist Damian Rosinski saw space for back-to-back easings as soon as June.
"Data shows that despite the MPC cutting interest rates by 50 basis points in May, the real interest rate – calculated as the difference between the CPI rate and the NBP rate – remains clearly positive, at a level of over one percentage point," he said.
"In my opinion, the data opens the door to MPC rate cuts by 25 bp at each subsequent meeting until the end of the year...starting with June. Or other variants of aggressive cuts, including a cut of 50 basis points in June, for the next few quarters."
He added that Poland's presidential election result shouldn't change much and a rate cut on June 4 was highly likely.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
27 minutes ago
- Times
Jonathan Reynolds rules out ‘daft' wealth tax and says ‘get serious'
The business secretary has ruled out a 'daft' wealth tax as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) warned that other taxes will have to rise. Jonathan Reynolds told Labour backbenchers to 'get serious', dismissing the idea as a populist gesture that would not work. Lord Kinnock, Labour's former leader, has led calls for a 2 per cent annual levy on assets more than £10 million, which has been backed publicly by more than a dozen Labour MPs and privately many more. Rachel Reeves has been reluctant to rule out a wealth tax despite senior minsters privately concluding it would not work. • How could a UK wealth tax work? The impact examined Now Reynolds has made the government's most explicit public criticism by ridiculing the suggestion that a 'magic wealth tax' would dig the country out of a hole. He said an effective wealth tax 'doesn't exist anywhere in the world' and 'we're not going to do anything daft like that'. Reynolds told GB News: 'I say to people: 'Be serious about this.' The idea you can just levy everyone … What if your wealth was not in your bank account, what if it was in fine wine or art? How would we tax that? This is why this doesn't exist. 'There's a lot of populism out about this, and I'm frustrated. I see colleagues sometimes say this in parliament and I say: 'Come on, get serious.'' Reynolds said: 'This Labour government has increased taxes on wealth as opposed to income — the taxes on private jets, private schools, changes through inheritance tax, capital gains tax. But the idea there's a magic wealth tax, some sort of levy … that doesn't exist anywhere in the world. Switzerland has a levy, but they don't have capital gains or inheritance tax.' Experts, including the Institute for Fiscal Studies, have warned the government that no country has raised significant sums from a wealth tax, citing concerns over valuing assets and discouraging investment. Most countries that have introduced them have since abandoned them. However, Richard Burgon, the Labour MP for Leeds East, who delivered a petition on the tax to No 10 this week, said that 'the government has seriously damaged its own support by refusing to tax wealth — all while cutting support for disabled people, targeting the winter fuel allowance, and maintaining the cruel two-child benefit cap.' It came as the IMF said in its annual report on Britain that the chancellor would need to make 'tough fiscal choices' such as raising taxes on middle earners, scrapping the triple lock on pensions or introducing charges for the NHS. While it praised Reeves for 'growth-friendly' policies such as liberalisation of planning and said an 'economic recovery is underway', it warned that she would have to do more to raise cash or cut spending. The chancellor is already expected to raise taxes in the autumn after U-turns on winter fuel and welfare cuts combined with deteriorating forecasts left her facing a gap of £20 billion or more in public finances. With the government now facing months of speculation about how she will plug it, the IMF recommended raising even more cash in the budget to give herself more headroom against her fiscal rules and prevent a repeat next year. The IMF said the 'first best' option to reduce the need for constant tax and spending tweaks would be 'to maintain more headroom under the rules, so that small changes in the outlook do not compromise assessments of rule compliance'. It also suggested moving to one official assessment a year of whether Reeves is on target to hit her rules, instead of the two carried out by the Office for Budget Responsibility. However, in a warning to those hoping this would reduce the need for tax rises or spending cuts, the IMF warned that Britain's ageing population and high debt interest bill mean Reeves cannot avoid such painful choices in the long term. 'Unless the authorities revisit their commitment not to increase taxes on 'working people', further spending prioritisation will be required,' its report said. The IMF urged Reeves to press ahead with welfare reforms that have proved toxic with Labour MPs and replace the triple lock with a cheaper policy that would increase state pensions in line with the cost of living. 'Access to public services could also depend more on an individual's capacity to pay, with charges levied on higher-income users, such as co-payments for health services,' the IMF added. Mel Stride, the shadow chancellor, said the report showed that Reeves 'has already maxed out the credit card, her only options are to cut spending or raise taxes. The welfare debacle showed Labour are completely incapable of reining in spending. Businesses and families must brace for an even higher tax burden'. Reeves said the report 'confirms that the choices we've taken have ensured Britain's economic recovery is underway, and that our plans will tackle the deep-rooted economic challenges that we inherited'.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on standards in politics: a golden reform opportunity squandered
A year ago, following Labour's election win and the Conservative rout, the new government's standing could hardly have been higher or its opportunities greater. The political field lay open, in ways that it only does after an election, for serious political reform. One of the most trenchant sections of Sir Keir Starmer's election manifesto had pinpointed 'a crisis of confidence in our political system'. Labour had accordingly promised 'a reset in our public life'. Twelve months ago, the voters gave permission to Sir Keir to do just that. Fatally, he failed to seize the opportunity. Instead, the chance to make radical change to Britain's government and politics has largely been squandered. As a result, the work of rebuilding confidence has become harder than ever, as the continuing rise of Reform UK makes clear. The government's new ethics and integrity commission, a manifesto promise, should have been launched decisively last year on a tide of post-election reforming commitment and goodwill. Instead, momentum was lost by the freebie furore and wider policy failures. Long overdue, the commission was quietly announced on Monday in a written parliamentary statement to MPs, which few of them are likely to have read, on the eve of the summer recess. It is false to claim, as the Conservatives did this week, that this was a Labour attempt to bury bad news. The Tories are in no position to talk, having so often trashed the existing standards regimes in recent years. But Labour should be ashamed. It should not have left things unaddressed for so long, so that the impetus for post-Tory reform and for rebuilt trust were wasted. The statement, published by the Cabinet Office minister Pat McFadden, is fine as far as it goes. Uncertainty over whether the commission would be an oversight body for standards regulation, or would bundle up the work of established committees and regulators, has been resolved. It will mainly be the former, beefing up and replacing the committee on standards in public life (as advocated by Sir John Major) while leaving individual cases to a reduced number of regulatory bodies. The current advisory committee on business appointments will also be scrapped, with its ministerial and civil service arms enforced by separate bodies. As a tidying-up exercise, this all makes sense. The real problem is that a golden chance to reform the system in a watertight way has been passed up. The McFadden statement implies ministers want to avoid legislation to set up the commission. The result is that enforcement is not properly addressed or strengthened. The role of independent scrutiny, essential for public confidence, is left hanging. The statement leaves enforcement sanctions too vague. It is good that ex-ministers should 'be expected' to lose their severance pay if they take post-ministerial jobs that raise conflicts of interest. But what if that expectation is not fulfilled? Or if the rewards of such jobs are so high that the loss of severance pay is treated as a price worth paying? The system risks looking toothless. Cleaning up politics is not an optional priority. It is a compulsory one. These steps don't go far enough. Nor do they suggest a ruthless culture of ethical behaviour, led from the top, of the kind required. Mr McFadden's statement accepts that the changes will depend on the public's wider view of the work of politicians and government. That is indeed the problem. But there is not enough here to shift that dial.
Finextra
an hour ago
- Finextra
Crédit Agricole Italia and Nexi renew partnership
Crédit Agricole Italia can continue Nexi's acquiring and payment solutions with this strategic move. 0 This content is provided by an external author without editing by Finextra. It expresses the views and opinions of the author. This agreement further strengthens the long-standing relationship between the two players, who have been collaborating successfully for over 30 years. Today, the partnership includes more than 3 million cards and over 100,000 Nexi POS terminals used by Crédit Agricole's customers. The agreement will enable the bank to further enhance its offering on digital payments, allowing customers to benefit from highly innovative, cutting-edge and secure products and services provided by Nexi. 'The renewal of our partnership with Nexi confirms Crédit Agricole Italia's strategy of always placing customers at the core, by offering solutions tailored to their needs. The agreement represents a significant step forward in our growth strategy in the Italian market, through which we will ensure our clients continuity with the current model, along with high standards of quality, security and innovation,' commented Vittorio Ratto, Deputy General Manager, Retail and Digital at Crédit Agricole Italia. 'We believe that the payments market, already experiencing strong growth, holds further development potential, with positive impacts on the country's overall growth.' For Nexi, the agreement further reinforces its role as a key partner for banks in Italy: 'We are very proud of the renewal of our partnership with Crédit Agricole in Italy, confirming Nexi as the ideal partner for ambitious banking groups focused on the evolving customers' needs, thanks to its scale, expertise and best-in-class technology platform in Europe.' commented Marco Ferrero, Chief Regional Officer Italy at Nexi. 'Today's announcement is also a proof of the excellent work carried out together with Crédit Agricole over the years, and an incentive to continue supporting the evolution of the market while investing in top-quality products and services with the highest standards of security and innovation.' The renewal of the Crédit Agricole Nexi Partnership shows that both companies are still committed to innovation, helping customers, customer service, and growth in digital payments space.
