Man indicted on 12 hate crime charges in attack on Boulder demonstration for Israeli hostages
A man accused of hurling Molotov cocktails at a group of people demonstrating in Boulder, Colorado, in support of Israeli hostages has been indicted by a federal grand jury on 12 hate crime counts.
Soliman was initially charged with only one hate crime count in federal court in the June 1 attack on demonstrators. The federal grand jury indictment, which was filed in court Tuesday, had been expected for weeks as a formality in advancing the felony criminal case toward trial. It is routine for prosecutors to add charges beyond the crimes alleged in an initial criminal complaint.
The indictment accuses Soliman of trying to kill eight people who were hurt by the Molotov cocktails and targeting them because of their perceived or actual national origin, which prosecutors say was their perceived or actual connection and support for Israel. He was also indicted for another hate crime for trying to kill the others at the event or nearby who were not injured.
Soliman was also charged with two counts of using a fire and explosive to commit a felony and one count of possessing an explosive device while committing a felony, which are also considered to be hate crimes.
Investigators say Soliman told them he had intended to kill the roughly 20 participants at the weekly demonstration on Boulder's Pearl Street pedestrian mall, but threw just two of his over two dozen Molotov cocktails while yelling 'Free Palestine.' Soliman, who is also being prosecuted in state court for attempted murder and other charges, told investigators he tried to buy a gun but was not able to because he was not a 'legal citizen.'
He posed as a gardener, wearing a construction vest, to get close to the group before launching the attack, according to court documents.
Federal authorities say Soliman, an Egyptian national, has been living in the U.S. illegally with his family.
Soliman is being represented in state and federal court by public defenders who do not comment on their cases to the media.
At a hearing last week, Soliman's defense attorney, David Kraut, urged Magistrate Judge Kathryn Starnella not to allow the case to move forward because he said the alleged attack was not a hate crime. Instead, he said it was motivated by opposition to the political movement of Zionism. An attack motivated by someone's political views is not considered a hate crime under federal law.
Soliman is scheduled to appear in federal court on Friday for a hearing in which he may be asked to enter a plea to the charges.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sky News
16 minutes ago
- Sky News
Middle East live: Iran military chief has 'complete doubts' about Israel ceasefire; 23 killed in strikes on Gaza
Donald Trump posts: "MAKE THE DEAL IN GAZA! GET THE HOSTAGES BACK!!!" But it remains unclear how close a ceasefire is. It comes as Israeli strikes overnight killed at least 23 people, according to medics. Listen to Trump 100 as you scroll.


Daily Mail
19 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS Pistons star Malik Beasley under investigation for gambling on NBA games as off-court drama spirals out of control
The US District Attorney's office has launched a investigation into NBA star Malik Beasley amid allegations of gambling related to NBA games and prop bets. The stunning news, first reported by ESPN's Shams Charania on Sunday lunchtime, is just the latest off-field drama surrounding the Detroit Pistons star, who recently endured a very public split from his wife after five turbulent years of marriage. Beasley was in serious discussions with the Pistons over a new three-year, $42million contract as he headed into free agency, but it is now being reported that talks have been immediately paused while the investigation plays out. More to follow.


The Guardian
27 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on Donald Trump's China deal: rare earths pave the green road to militarisation
It's an irony that the minerals needed to save the planet may help destroy it. Rare earth elements, the mineral backbones of wind turbines and electric vehicles, are now the prize in a geopolitical arms race. The trade agreement between Washington and Beijing restores rare earth shipments from China to the US, which had been suspended in retaliation against Donald Trump's tariffs. Behind the bluster, there has been a realisation in Washington that these are critical inputs for the US. They are needed not just by American icons such as Ford and Boeing but for its fighter jets, missile guidance systems and satellite communications. This understanding suggests that Washington will scale back some of its countermeasures once Beijing resumes delivery of rare earths. The paradox is that to reduce its dependence on China, the US must depend on Beijing a little longer. This is not yet decoupling; it's deferment. That, however, may not last. Mr Trump has signed an executive order to boost production of critical minerals, which encourages the faster granting of permits for mining and processing projects. He eyes Ukraine and Greenland's subterranean riches to break dependence on China. The west became so reliant on a single geopolitical rival for such materials – materials it once extracted and refined domestically before shuttering operations – due to cost and environmental concerns. China, for its part, has come to dominate global rare earth processing. It has used that market power before – notably against Japan in 2010. It's hard not to think that it was strategic complacency that led to the west relying so heavily on China for key minerals. This month's Nato summit has seen the west push to reindustrialise via rearming itself. This is also reawakening long-dormant extractive ambitions in the global north. Canada, flush with critical mineral deposits, says its planned mining resurgence will be a new foundation for alliance solidarity. This month the EU called for strategic reserves of rare earths 'to prevent supply chain disruptions and economic blackmail from China' – highlighting their importance not just for electric vehicles but for defence and aerospace industries. 'Resilience' means digging deeper at home and controlling extraction abroad. The same minerals we need for net zero are being justified in terms of zero-sum rivalry. It is uncomfortable that 'green growth' and militarism have merged into a single policy frame, collapsing the distinction between ecological transition and arms buildup. A magnet for an electric car is also a magnet for a hypersonic missile. And meanwhile, the human and ecological toll continues to rise – largely out of sight and out of sync with the idea of environmental sustainability. A Guardian dispatch last week from Baotou, China's rare earth capital, found evidence of toxic ponds, poisoned soil and demolished 'cancer villages' – the hidden cost of our digital and electric age. Framing this as an inconvenient necessity risks repeating past mistakes. For mineral-rich nations, the surge in global demand brings opportunity. But as a UN report this year noted, without strong institutions and safeguards, it risks a familiar fate: corruption, conflict and environmental ruin. Today's scramble for critical minerals must not see the promises of responsible sourcing give way to a familiar logic – extract first, moralise later.