
Hearts of Darkness: A Film-Maker's Apocalypse review – Francis Ford Coppola and the mother of all meltdowns
With his personal and financial capital very high after The Conversation and the Godfather films, Coppola put up his own money and mortgaged property to make this stunningly audacious and toweringly mad version of Joseph Conrad's novella Heart of Darkness from a script by John Milius; it is transplanted from 19th-century Belgian Congo where a rogue ivory trader has gone native in the dark interior, to south-east Asia during the Vietnam war where a brilliant US army officer is now reportedly being worshipped as a god among the Indigenous peoples and must have his command terminated 'with extreme prejudice'. Marlon Brando had a whispery voiced cameo as the reclusive demi-deity, Martin Sheen was the troubled Captain Willard tasked with taking Kurtz down and Robert Duvall is the psychotically gung-ho Lt Col Kilgore, who leads a helicopter assault.
Haemorrhaging money and going insanely over-schedule, Coppola shot his film in the Philippines during burning heat, humidity and monsoons and borrowed army helicopters and pilots from President Ferdinand Marcos, only to find that on many occasions – especially during the legendary Ride of the Valkyries attack scene – filming had to halt as the Filipino military would ask for their helicopters back so they could suppress a communist insurgency. In fact, Coppola found himself reproducing reality on a 1:1 scale. As he said in his Cannes press conference, which opens the documentary: 'The film is not about Vietnam; it is Vietnam, it's what it was really like.' Well, bravura auteur rhetoric is an accepted Cannes press conference tradition. The film was arguably just what Vietnam was like for the Americans – though nobody actually died and perhaps it is time to re-state something about Vietnam that gets lost for later generations: a considerable proportion of US soldiers were drafted.
The agony was there from the beginning. Coppola originally cast Harvey Keitel as Willard but didn't like what he was doing and fired him on pretty much the first day – a traumatic and legally fraught event that can't be talked about too clearly in the documentary. Sheen, the replacement, was a heavy drinker and smoker whose 'breakdown' scene in his seedy Saigon hotel room was a dangerous, booze-fuelled improvisation. It was a personal primal scream, which contributed so much to his stress that he had a near-fatal heart attack, almost scuppering the entire production. The documentary's most gripping moment is Coppola yelling at someone on the phone not to talk about Sheen's heart attack in case the resulting gossip causes his financial backers to lose their nerve. Sam Bottoms, playing one of Willard's crew, talks cheerfully about doing speed and LSD during filming; he can't have been the only one.
And all the time Coppola was suppressing intense anxiety that he was making a mediocre, pretentious movie. Like Conrad, he wanted to satirise the hubris and grotesque vanity of the west's imperial ambitions – and there is something else as well. Willard comes to understand that in killing Kurtz, he is not interrupting or thwarting his occult ritual; he is in fact participating in it, and completing it. Perhaps Coppola came to believe something similar, that he was having his own epiphany-slash-nervous-breakdown in the jungle. It wasn't quite an apocalypse for him, although he arguably never made anything as good again. As it is, it might have been good to have had Coppola and Milius discuss that title: it sounds like a demand, coming from someone who won't wait for apocalypse a moment longer. It might be prescriptive and absurd, but as with the film itself, you wind up believing in it.
Hearts of Darkness: A Film-Maker's Apocalypse is in UK and Irish cinemas from 4 July, and on UHD and Blu-ray from 28 July.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
13 hours ago
- The Guardian
There are no new superhero movies for the next six months – is Hollywood up to something?
Fed up with all those superhero movies cluttering up the multiplexes and forcing your delicate black-and-white Lithuanian goat-herding tragedy on to a single screen at 10am on a Tuesday? Angry, like Martin Scorsese and Francis Ford Coppola, that a $300m CGI raccoon gets more screen time than the slow and haunting meditation on existential despair your favourite auteur spent a decade working on? For you, then, the darkest days of comic book movie hegemony may be over. A quick peek at the theatrical release calendar suggests that there is not a single new major-studio superhero flick due to hit multiplexes in the next six months. That's right, a full, blissful half a year – which hasn't happened since May 2011. For years, the anti-comic-book brigade have insisted superhero movies are sucking the oxygen out of cinema and killing originality. Now, the great superhero drought of 2025 makes it look as though their side has finally prevailed. And maybe, after the best part of two decades of interchangeable third-act rubble fights and billionaire orphans growling about destiny, that's as it should be. For those of us who are really rather fond of superheroes on the big screen, however, it feels like a worry. Six long months with no multiverse chaos or retconned origin stories?. What is going on? Is the comic book movie really dead? Did audiences finally get superhero fatigue? Or could it just be that the studios looked at their balance sheets, remembered Madame Web happened, and decided to give us all a six-month palate cleanse before trying again? The truth is that the gaping desert in the release schedule where quite a few superhero movies would usually be is the result of a perfect storm of misfires, budget panic and inter-studio meltdowns. DC fired its last cinematic universe into the sun (and hasn't given James Gunn much time to get its new one into shape), Sony quietly strangled its live-action Spider-Man spinoff plans after Kraven the Hunterflopped. And Marvel, once the unshakeable titan, has begun watching its pennies too. Reports in Hollywood suggest the studio's big plan for Phase 7 is to finally introduce the X-Men into the MCU, but with cheaper, younger unknowns rather than the expensive A-listers that permeated the 20th Century Fox films. This is partly because China no longer loves Hollywood cinema like it did in the halcyon, pre-Covid era, and partly because any studio that makes such eye-wateringly expensive duds as Eternals, Ant-Man: Quantumania and The Marvels is bound to have to consider cost-cutting issues sooner rather than later. Ironically, last month Gunn delivered Superman, the first well-reviewed film about a major DC titan since Patty Jenkins' Wonder Woman in 2017. Marvel looks to be getting back on track following early box-office success for Fantastic Four: First Steps, which has also been well-reviewed. But just as one swallow does not a summer make, two vaguely competent superhero movies don't magically erase a decade-long franchise hangover. The superhero slowdown isn't just about artistic self-reflection. It's a combination of bruised egos, battered spreadsheets, and the realisation that studios have relentlessly mined every character in the Marvel and DC back issues, including that one guy who appeared for two panels in a 1973 issue of Spider-Man whose power was talking to lightbulbs. The issue is basic box office maths. There was a time before Covid when you could slap a cape on an actor, throw in a Stan Lee cameo, and reliably hoover up a billion dollars before lunch. Now? Global audiences, particularly in China, have stopped treating every MCU release like a religious festival. And once your international market yawns, suddenly all those $250m CGI slugfests look less like guaranteed jackpots and more like prestige vanity projects in tights. The other elephant in the room is that streaming blew a hole in the business model. During the pandemic, Disney+ and HBO Max became superhero graveyards, funnelling B-tier projects to streaming audiences, and teaching them they could just wait a few weeks and then watch at home. The illusion of urgency – the idea that you had to see every film on opening weekend or risk missing the next puzzle piece – now seems ridiculous. Which brings us to the current vacuum, which may be less the heroic victory for cinema some may have hoped for, and more an emergency reset button. We may get six glorious months free from multiverse migraines and quippy alien invasions. But don't kid yourself: it's just Hollywood taking a breath and trying to figure out how to sell you more superhero movies next year.

The National
14 hours ago
- The National
Peter Kennard to open Gaza exhibition in Edinburgh's Palestine museum
The exhibition of new work aims to reveal the 'context and complexities' of the ongoing situation, rather than simply depicting the horrors of war, and will launch at the Palestine Museum in Scotland in conjunction with the Edinburgh Festival this month. Kennard, who is a pioneering artist and activist, is celebrated for his impactful photomontages that critique politics, war, and a range of social issues. Through his art, Kennard seeks to highlight the complicity of Western governments and their active support for Israel, encouraging viewers to think critically about the situation. READ MORE: Meet the 21-year-old asylum seeker who has earned a spot at top Scottish art school His exhibition features a series of prints made using a variety of mediums, including photomontage, double-exposed photographs, drawing, and paint, in response to the ongoing conflict. Kennard explained that as an artist, he felt 'impelled' to create images which would make people think about the massacre taking place in Gaza while the world's political leaders look on. 'A horrific genocide is now taking place on the civilian population in Gaza, the children, women, and men, who are being starved, bombed, and shot,' he said. 'As an artist, I feel impelled to try and make images that will allow the general public to think about the massacre taking place, while the world's political leaders look on or openly support the genocide by sending weapons to Israel.' The showcase will run daily from 9 August to the end of the month from 11am-6pm and is free to attend. With a career spanning over five decades, Kennard has produced notable images of resistance and dissent, as he aimed to address topics such as the Vietnam War, the Anti-Apartheid Movement, and environmental activism. His work has been exhibited globally, and he has been recognised as one of 'Britain's most important political artists'. The Palestine Museum in Scotland, located on Dundas Street, features work from a range of Palestinian artists showcasing paintings, sculptures and installations. The museum is the first of its kind in Europe and aims to counteract the 'dehumanisation' of the Palestinian people by illustrating their culture and narrative through art. It is the first branch of an existing museum in Woodbridge, Connecticut called the Palestine Museum US and showcases work from both international and local Palestinian artists.


The Guardian
14 hours ago
- The Guardian
There are no new superhero movies for the next six months – is Hollywood up to something?
Fed up with all those superhero movies cluttering up the multiplexes and forcing your delicate black-and-white Lithuanian goat-herding tragedy on to a single screen at 10am on a Tuesday? Angry, like Martin Scorsese and Francis Ford Coppola, that a $300m CGI raccoon gets more screen time than the slow and haunting meditation on existential despair your favourite auteur spent a decade working on? For you, then, the darkest days of comic book movie hegemony may be over. A quick peek at the theatrical release calendar suggests that there is not a single new major-studio superhero flick due to hit multiplexes in the next six months. That's right, a full, blissful half a year – which hasn't happened since May 2011. For years, the anti-comic-book brigade have insisted superhero movies are sucking the oxygen out of cinema and killing originality. Now, the great superhero drought of 2025 makes it look as though their side has finally prevailed. And maybe, after the best part of two decades of interchangeable third-act rubble fights and billionaire orphans growling about destiny, that's as it should be. For those of us who are really rather fond of superheroes on the big screen, however, it feels like a worry. Six long months with no multiverse chaos or retconned origin stories?. What is going on? Is the comic book movie really dead? Did audiences finally get superhero fatigue? Or could it just be that the studios looked at their balance sheets, remembered Madame Web happened, and decided to give us all a six-month palate cleanse before trying again? The truth is that the gaping desert in the release schedule where quite a few superhero movies would usually be is the result of a perfect storm of misfires, budget panic and inter-studio meltdowns. DC fired its last cinematic universe into the sun (and hasn't given James Gunn much time to get its new one into shape), Sony quietly strangled its live-action Spider-Man spinoff plans after Kraven the Hunterflopped. And Marvel, once the unshakeable titan, has begun watching its pennies too. Reports in Hollywood suggest the studio's big plan for Phase 7 is to finally introduce the X-Men into the MCU, but with cheaper, younger unknowns rather than the expensive A-listers that permeated the 20th Century Fox films. This is partly because China no longer loves Hollywood cinema like it did in the halcyon, pre-Covid era, and partly because any studio that makes such eye-wateringly expensive duds as Eternals, Ant-Man: Quantumania and The Marvels is bound to have to consider cost-cutting issues sooner rather than later. Ironically, last month Gunn delivered Superman, the first well-reviewed film about a major DC titan since Patty Jenkins' Wonder Woman in 2017. Marvel looks to be getting back on track following early box-office success for Fantastic Four: First Steps, which has also been well-reviewed. But just as one swallow does not a summer make, two vaguely competent superhero movies don't magically erase a decade-long franchise hangover. The superhero slowdown isn't just about artistic self-reflection. It's a combination of bruised egos, battered spreadsheets, and the realisation that studios have relentlessly mined every character in the Marvel and DC back issues, including that one guy who appeared for two panels in a 1973 issue of Spider-Man whose power was talking to lightbulbs. The issue is basic box office maths. There was a time before Covid when you could slap a cape on an actor, throw in a Stan Lee cameo, and reliably hoover up a billion dollars before lunch. Now? Global audiences, particularly in China, have stopped treating every MCU release like a religious festival. And once your international market yawns, suddenly all those $250m CGI slugfests look less like guaranteed jackpots and more like prestige vanity projects in tights. The other elephant in the room is that streaming blew a hole in the business model. During the pandemic, Disney+ and HBO Max became superhero graveyards, funnelling B-tier projects to streaming audiences, and teaching them they could just wait a few weeks and then watch at home. The illusion of urgency – the idea that you had to see every film on opening weekend or risk missing the next puzzle piece – now seems ridiculous. Which brings us to the current vacuum, which may be less the heroic victory for cinema some may have hoped for, and more an emergency reset button. We may get six glorious months free from multiverse migraines and quippy alien invasions. But don't kid yourself: it's just Hollywood taking a breath and trying to figure out how to sell you more superhero movies next year.