Oxfordshire child's 'harrowing' struggle to fit in at school
Lauren, not her real name, said her child's anxiety around school became so severe they once said they "didn't want to live any more".She said her child found it "very difficult to do anything normal... most of the time they spend half an hour in school each day".
Sometimes Lauren would wait with her child at school for up to two hours. "You can tell they can't cope with being there," she said."Am I imagining these things? Am I a bad parent? You question all those things when, deep down, you know your child and you know they're unhappy"."The frustration of them not having those opportunities to fit into a normal education system is really harrowing."There can be many reasons for school absence including long term physical illness, or mental health issues, such as stress or anxiety.The rise in the number of children with a diagnosis of special educational needs and disability (SEND) was also creating a problem for schools, which often do not have the resources to support them.
The Oxford-based charity Ark-T run therapeutic sessions at Orchard Meadow Primary in Blackbird Leys, where small groups of children work on art-based projects in a quiet, protected environment.Head teacher Heather Richards said missing school could become a "vicious circle" but that the sessions had led to "real improvement" in attendance figures. "They have a stronger connection with some of the children in their year group," she added. "They also build their confidence."Lauren's child attends an online version of the sessions and said they "literally leap" to go to attend.
'Need a national effort'
"Even if they're having a really bad week, they'll go to that session and they'll come out really buoyant and happy," she said. In a statement, the Department for Education said; "The government inherited a broken system, with children and families facing poor outcomes and barriers to opportunity. "The case for tackling the epidemic of school absence could not be clearer: improved grades, higher wages, better life chances."Tackling this issue is everyone's responsibility – government, schools, parents, and children – and we need a national effort to get our kids back in the classroom."As part of our plan for change, we are determined to turn the tide on poor attendance and break down barriers to opportunity - whether it's through attendance mentors, free breakfast clubs, improved mental health support, additional investment in family support, or more focus from Ofsted."
You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
15 minutes ago
- Times
The NHS model is on its last legs — time to replace it
At last, the unthinkable is being seriously thought about healthcare in Britain. The NHS is bust. More and more billions are periodically thrown at it, but its waiting lists are horrendous and relative to other comparable countries it does poorly in life expectancy and healthy life chances. Only the US does worse. As the largest employer in Europe, the NHS has some 1.38 million full-time equivalent staff who absorb almost half the budget for day-to-day spending. It's virtually impossible to run efficiently, and examples abound of rotten management and excessive bureaucracy. So says a report by Policy Exchange, which declares that this has to end. From 1955 to 2023, real health expenditure per capita rose by about 850 per cent. At 9 per cent of GDP, government health spending is almost the highest of all developed countries and by some estimates will rise to more than 20 per cent of GDP by 2070. Without radical reform, says the report, other public spending would have to be squeezed or taxation would need to be increased to eye-watering levels. This would damage the economy so badly that 'it simply cannot be allowed to happen'. In his foreword, the former health secretary Sir Sajid Javid says Britain is now at a crossroads. The NHS model can't cope with spiralling demand. It's run entirely by the state and its agencies. By contrast, says Javid, the very best performing healthcare systems combine high levels of state subsidy, mandatory insurance, co-payments, and individual choice. The report accordingly proposes replacing the tax-funded NHS by compulsory insurance, backed up by a publicly funded safety net to cover the poor, plus some element of co-payment to incentivise people to look after themselves. It recommends the model adopted by the Netherlands in 2006 under which people choose their insurance providers, with the state's role reduced to regulating insurers and providing the safety net for those who can't afford to insure themselves. Dutch healthcare costs are now proportionately lower than in the UK, waiting lists are smaller and health outcomes generally better. It has been clear for years that European-style social insurance systems fulfil the moral obligations of the NHS while providing better outcomes. Yet the NHS has been treated by Conservatives and Labour alike as the most sacred of political cows. This is even though it's not just failing to deliver adequate healthcare but the enormous sums it's swallowing are seriously distorting the economy, diverting essential investment from services ranging from education to defence. However, the whole public sector is on its knees for which the NHS is not the principal cause. The criminal justice system, for example, is collapsing through sustained and serious underfunding. The retired senior judge Sir Brian Leveson has now controversially proposed to limit trial by jury to tackle the immense backlog of cases, some of which take years to come to trial and may have to be abandoned because of the passage of time. Limiting jury trial, however, won't solve the problem because the lower courts are also under immense strain, as are the prisons and the police. The essence of the problem is that for decades Britain has been living a lie. It has indulged itself in a welfare state without taking the measures to pay for it. This goes back to the end of the Second World War, when the Attlee government decided that the spirit of the times demanded the building of a brave new world based on collective provision and equality. Far less attention was paid to creating the wealth to pay for this nirvana. It was assumed that redistributing wealth from rich to poor would pay for it all. Society thus moved from making to taking, producing less and less while telling itself that it had a right to welfare provision and that the rich should stump up. No government (other than Margaret Thatcher's) was brave enough to deliver some essential home truths about spending above the country's means. Instead, governments lied that things were getting better and that more was being spent. In fact, the public sector was being salami-sliced to shuffle funds from one service to another; and all were being fleeced to pour more billions into the black hole of the NHS. The ultimate symbol of this irresponsibility, and a principal force behind Britain's slide from making to taking, has been the benefits system. According to the Centre for Social Justice, people claiming universal credit and payments for ill health will soon earn £2,500 more than through the minimum wage. The Office for National Statistics says nearly one in four working-age people are classified as disabled. The NHS Confederation says that in 2021-22, 63,392 people went straight from university on to long-term sickness benefits, with an incredible increase among 25 to 34-year-olds of 69 per cent in five years. Last week, Kemi Badenoch rightly said the UK was 'sitting on a ticking time bomb' of spiralling welfare dependency, spending more on sickness benefits than on defence. The NHS model must be replaced to provide the equitable and efficient provision of healthcare to which politicians pay such dishonest lip service, and to protect the economy from such damaging distortions. But the underlying issue of an unaffordable welfare state can only be tackled by a government brave enough to recreate the work ethic, and an economy that delivers the jobs to inspire it.
The Guardian
33 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Is it true that … it's harder to build muscle mass and strength as you age?
'Your muscles become less responsive to exercise with age,' says Professor Leigh Breen, an expert in skeletal muscle physiology and metabolism at Birmingham University. 'It's not as easy to gain muscle and strength as when you were younger.' But that doesn't mean it's not worth the effort. 'The idea that exercise becomes pointless past a certain age is simply wrong,' he says. 'Everyone responds to structured exercise. You may not build as much visible muscle, but strength, cardiovascular health, brain function and protection against non-transmittable disease all improve.' Muscle mass and strength begin to decline from about the age of 40, compared with peak levels in your 20s. It's thought the body's responsiveness to training also starts to wane around then, but it is still possible to build muscle with the right strategy. 'With a few tweaks – more frequent sessions or increasing the number of sets in each workout – older adults can achieve results close to those of younger people,' Breen says. 'Nutrition is also key. Adequate protein, plus carbs and healthy fats, fuel your exercise, accelerate your recovery and support how your body adapts.' UK guidelines recommend at least 150 minutes of moderate or 75 minutes of vigorous aerobic activity a week for those aged 19 to 64, plus muscle-strengthening exercises, such as lifting weights, for all major muscle groups at least twice a week. This is vital not just for fitness, but for long-term health. 'Regular aerobic and resistance training cuts the risk of almost every noncommunicable disease – type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, Alzheimer's,' Breen says. Sign up to Inside Saturday The only way to get a look behind the scenes of the Saturday magazine. Sign up to get the inside story from our top writers as well as all the must-read articles and columns, delivered to your inbox every weekend. after newsletter promotion Can exercising still have a positive impact on your health, even if you've never picked up a weight? 'Definitely,' he says. 'People who've trained for years are better protected, but even late starters can dramatically reduce their disease risk in a short time.'
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
‘I thought cannabis should be legal, until I got psychosis and started eating out of bins'
For retired charity director Terry Hammond, 78, the distressing issue of cannabis-induced psychosis has come to dominate his life. Around 25 years ago, his bright, creative teenage son Steven, now 42, began smoking skunk – a highly potent synthetic form of the drug – at friends' houses, without his parents knowing. 'He was like so many young boys,' recalls Hammond from his home in Leicestershire. 'He was bingeing on it in secret and thought it would be fine.' But around six months later, in the autumn of 1999, Steven suddenly became paranoid. 'We were watching the BBC news, and he turned to me and accused me of ringing them. He was convinced the presenters were talking about him.' The psychosis didn't stop there. 'He began to think aliens had taken over everybody,' adds Hammond. 'Then he began mumbling in an incomprehensible language, shouting at the walls and locking himself in his room. He was a boy gripped by absolute fear and terror, and his beautiful mind had just been destroyed.' Not knowing how to cope with their now-delusional 6ft-tall son, Terry and his wife Christine, who also have a daughter, Victoria, kept him at home, but lived in fear he might commit violence or take his own life. 'At night, Steven would be screaming at the voices he heard,' Hammond says. 'I had to wash blood off the walls and carpet where he had been thumping his head against his bedroom wall. He had maniacal laughter, and at one point chased someone across the garden with a large piece of wood.' At just 21, and with no family history of mental health problems, Steven was diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia – essentially, psychosis that continues indefinitely. He spent three months in the department of psychiatry at the Royal South Hants Hospital in Southampton, where he was put on the antipsychotic drug Olanzapine and given talking therapy. But even now – two decades on – Steven, who lives in a studio flat in his parents' garden, is still affected by his early drug use. 'He cannot work and struggles socially,' says Hammond, who has Steven's permission to share his story and has also written a book, Gone to Pot, to help others in similar circumstances. 'He is still on antipsychotic drugs but continues to hear voices, although he now has the skills to rationalise them. 'It has completely ruined his life, and as parents we have had to suffer the bereavement of losing our son. Fundamentally, it has damaged his brain for good. Young people need to know smoking cannabis is playing Russian roulette with brain damage.' It is a harrowing and deeply personal story. But the issue of how to tackle the growing problem of ever-more potent cannabis on our streets is now causing division among those in power. Sir Sadiq Khan recently backed a report by the London Drugs Commission stating that possession of small amounts of cannabis should be decriminalised. The Mayor of London said there was a 'compelling, evidence-based case' for decriminalisation. But on July 7, Britain's leading police chiefs rebuked this and urged their officers to crack down on the drug. Sir Andy Marsh, the chief executive officer of the College of Policing, said smelling the drug in towns and cities had an 'impact' on how safe he felt and was a sign of crime and disorder. His calls for tougher policing were endorsed by both Sir Stephen Watson, chief constable of Greater Manchester, and Serena Kennedy, chief constable of Merseyside. Last month, David Sidwick, the Conservative police and crime commissioner for Dorset, wrote a letter to the police minister Diana Johnson – signed by 13 other police and crime commissioners – calling cannabis a 'chronically dangerous drug' that is just as harmful as cocaine and crack. Such calls for a fresh approach come alongside evidence showing that cannabis-induced psychosis – where someone experiences hallucinations, delusions, and a loss of touch with reality – has substantially increased in recent years. A 2019 study published in The Lancet by Prof Marta Di Forti shows that cannabis is now responsible for 30 per cent of first-time psychosis cases in south London (rising to 50 per cent in Amsterdam). Further research, not yet published, by Dr Diego Quattrone and Dr Robin Murray, both professors of psychiatric research at King's College London, reveals that cannabis-induced psychosis in the UK is now three times more common than in the 1960s. Their research suggests that 75 per cent of this increase is down to the use of skunk, which now accounts for 94 per cent of cannabis on the UK market. 'Across Europe, in the hubs with the highest cannabis consumption, namely London and Amsterdam, psychosis is up to five times more common than in other areas.' Dr Murray tells The Telegraph. 'Violence is also associated with psychosis, and of the psychotic people who go on to kill, 90 per cent are using either alcohol or cannabis. 'These are not typical domestic murders however. The people who become paranoid as a result of cannabis often have bizarre ideas, for example that God has told them to rid the world of evil, or that someone is persecuting them. And we know some of the multiple shooters in the US have been on high-potency cannabis.' You do not need to look far to find examples of such drug-induced atrocities. Most recently, Marcus Arduini Monzo, 37, was found guilty of murdering Daniel Anjorin, 14, with a samurai sword in Hainault, north-east London, while in a state of cannabis-induced psychosis. In July last year, James Kilroy, 51, of Westport, Ireland, stabbed and strangled his wife Valerie to death. He said he was 'on a mission from God' after smoking cannabis for years. Due to a lack of research, there is not yet unanimous consensus among experts that cannabis can be linked to violence, but a growing number believe this to be the case. Essentially, they attribute this to a key chemical component in the plant – tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) – which causes euphoria but also impairs attention, memory and learning, as well as triggering hallucinations and paranoid ideas in vulnerable individuals. Worryingly – especially for young brains developing up to the age of 25 – the THC can remain in the brain for days or weeks, potentially causing long-term damage to its communication systems. In another alarming trend, THC levels in cannabis have been rising over recent decades. In the 1960s, at the height of 'flower power,' THC levels in 'weed' (or weaker cannabis) were around 3 per cent. Today, most UK cannabis has THC levels of 16 to 20 per cent. In Holland, the figure is between 30 and 40 per cent, and in California, where cannabis is legal, levels can reach 80 per cent. To Murray, this race to ever-stronger strains of cannabis should be a wake-up call. 'We know almost everything bad in America comes over here. And we know that where cannabis is legal, both the potency and consumption rates shoot up. 'It is not easy to get psychosis. Typically, someone may smoke skunk for five years before it kicks in. But in America, the THC is so strong, you can go psychotic in one night. It will hit those who already have a history of mental health problems the worst. We are braced for an epidemic of psychosis.' This warning from both experts and police comes despite cannabis being supposedly illegal in the UK. Categorised as a Class B drug, someone caught in possession can face up to five years in prison and an unlimited fine. But in 2018, it became legal for NHS doctors to prescribe medical cannabis, and there has been a gradual relaxation of policing surrounding it – thought to be because underfunded forces are prioritising other issues. The plant's pungent aroma is now commonplace in most cities. Meanwhile, the think tank the Centre for Social Justice (CSJ) reports that two thirds of police officers believe cannabis is fully or partially decriminalised in practice. (In 2018, the illegal cannabis market in Britain was estimated at £2.6 billion.) Figures released under Freedom of Information show that in the year to September 2024, 68,513 people were found in possession of cannabis, but only 17,000 were charged. For Dr Niall Campbell, a consultant psychiatrist at the Roehampton Priory Clinic, this relaxation in regulation – combined with increased potency – has led to a greater number of patients suffering psychosis. 'I don't think this rise is that surprising given how easy skunk is to buy online, and how ubiquitous it has become,' he says. 'Psychosis often begins with young people smoking a few joints and feeling a bit paranoid. But if they don't stop, over time they can reach a psychotic state which won't go away, even if they stop smoking. Sadly, this psychosis may last a lifetime and once people are told that they can get very depressed or suicidal.' At the eight UK Addiction Treatment Group (UKAT) clinics across the country, it's a similar story. Patients typically stay for 28 days and, in more complex cases, up to six months, in residential facilities, with 35 per cent of patients each year funded by their local authorities. The cost for a 28-day inpatient stay at most UK clinics ranges from £8,000 to £16,000, while outpatient treatment costs between £2,000 and £4,000 per month. In 2024, the group admitted 1,032 people for cannabis addiction, a rise of 20 per cent since 2019. They are also reporting an increase in younger patients – as young as 18 – addicted to cannabis and needing rehab. Zaheen Ahmed, director of therapy at UKAT, says: 'I think people are trying to cope with life since Covid, and they are using cannabis to numb themselves. It is cheap, but the view that it is a harm-free drug is not true. The harmful effects can just be slow to appear, but we are now seeing a tsunami of patients with damage.' Linsey Rafferty, 42, from Paisley near Glasgow, is one of those to have experienced damage first-hand. 'I started taking hash resin at 12,' she tells The Telegraph. 'And then moved onto stronger grass and skunk, with higher THC levels. I never thought it was bad for me.' Rafferty had three short psychotic episodes over the decades she smoked, but in 2020, during the Covid lockdown, she suffered an extreme episode. 'I was hearing things and writing all over the walls of my home,' she says. 'I threw my phone away because I thought it had been tapped and was eating out of bins. It all made total sense to me at the time, and I can understand why people go violent.' After six months of psychosis, a friend alerted mental health services, and Rafferty was sectioned and put on antipsychotics. Five years on, she has stopped smoking with the aid of the local charity Street Connect, which helps those who are homeless or struggling with addiction. 'When I stopped smoking, the psychosis went away. But still, the episode was deep and long-lasting, and the scars haven't gone. I never realised it could make me so vulnerable. 'I used to think drugs should be legalised, but not anymore.' Despite stories like hers, however, Sir Sadiq is not alone in his calls to legalise cannabis. Steve Rolles, senior policy analyst for the Transform Drug Policy Foundation, says: 'Scientists are finding consensus that things are getting worse under the current legislation. Cannabis is more potent, and there are more cannabis-related mental health problems. We feel that if we had responsible regulation with a legalised market that could control potency and put health warnings on products, similar to tobacco, then this may reduce the risks.' But CSJ warns against this, cautioning of a drug-addiction crisis of 'unprecedented proportions.' 'The drug market is becoming increasingly dangerous – not just with more potent cannabis, but also opiates, and the emergence of xylazine, a deadly animal tranquilliser on the streets,' says Edward Davies, CSJ's research director. 'Funding for addiction services has been slashed by 60 per cent since 2012, leaving vast gaps in treatment availability. 'We are calling for urgent investment in treatment and recovery services, plus specialised clinics to address cannabis-induced psychosis. Law enforcement must also be empowered. Without decisive action, the crisis will continue to devastate communities across the UK.'
