Council of Yukon First Nations cancels some family support programs due to lack of Jordan's Principle funding
The situation has left at least one mother scrambling to figure out how she'll make ends meet.
More than 450 families received letters from the council (CYFN) last month stating that Indigenous Services Canada (ISC) had not confirmed if it would give the council Jordan's Principle funding for the 2025-2026 fiscal year.
"Due to this uncertainty, we cannot guarantee … supports beyond March 31, 2025," the letter states.
Jordan's Principle, established in 2016, is meant to ensure First Nations children have access to government-funded services when they need them, without jurisdictional disputes getting in the way. Funding is application-based.
CYFN executive director Shadelle Chambers said that ISC usually responds to the council's applications in December or January to confirm how much money it will get for the coming fiscal year. However, this year, the federal government only confirmed on March 22 that Jordan's Principle funding would continue into 2025-2026 but still isn't accepting applications.
With funding from last fiscal year used up, Chambers said CYFN doesn't have money to sustain services like its "necessities of life" program, which provided families with vouchers for things like groceries, children's clothing and baby products, as well as programs for short-term housing and respite care.
"Having to send letters to our families that we work with that we're no longer able to support them in certain areas has been extremely frustrating," Chambers said.
"[It's] just another one of the systemic issues that First Nations and Yukon First Nations families and children have to face in terms of, you know, the practices of the federal government."
'I still feel hopeless,' mother says of losing supports
Ashley Russell, a single mother of two and Trʼondëk Hwëchʼin citizen, was among the hundreds of people who used the "necessities of life program" and said she went into "sheer panic" when she learned it was ending.
"I still feel hopeless," she said.
Russell, who's studying to become a social worker, said she used the program for grocery vouchers — $125 every two weeks for each child — and also had a respite worker helping with her younger child, who's neurodivergent.
She said she hasn't figured out how to manage everything with those supports gone and is on the verge of quitting school.
"Unfortunately, my family is one of the families that suffers with a lot of trauma and I am the only sober person in my entire family, the only person with a driver's license, the only person with a proper education and job," she said.
"I'm also a full-time student and trying to work, trying to stay sober, trying to hold my family together… And then to find out that I'm not going to get help, not even paid help — it feels very alone."
Chambers said CYFN has been working to connect families with community food programs or other rent assistance options while advocating for clarity and action from ISC.
"The reality is this [situation] has caused a lot of stress for families and children, and it has also caused a lot of stress for our staff and our team," she said.
"And, you know, we're here to help support families and when one of our main access to supports is cut off for no realistic reason … it's frustrating, right?"
ISC changing how applications are processed
In response to a request for comment about the status of Jordan's Principle funding in the Yukon, ISC spokesperson Eric Head largely repeated portions of an "operational bulletin" the department issued in February outlining changes to how it was processing applications.
Changes include requiring more documentation for applications and narrowing the items and services that funding would be approved for.
"ISC is reviewing Jordan's Principle processes and policies at regional and national levels with long-term sustainability in mind," Head wrote, quoting the bulletin.
"There is continued funding for 2025-2026 for Jordan's Principle. In addition, ISC is working to communicate with requestors."
Chambers, however, accused the government of "deflecting" from the "real issues" — including the fact that it has a backlog of 135,000 Jordan's Principle applications to get through — and said the consequences "trickling down" to the families who were using CYFN's programs.
Russell, meanwhile, said she'd spoken to other families in the same situation as hers and that while people understand the problem on the federal level, it doesn't make things easier.
"That doesn't take away our pain, that doesn't take away our frustration and just feeling alienated on our own land. Like, it's just very exhausting," she said.
While Russell said she thought families needed to show grace to CYFN support workers dealing with the fallout, workers also needed to show "empathy and compassion" for families now suddenly struggling with what to do next.
"It's not the workers' fault, but also like, the clients can't be expected to behave properly — they're in survival mode or in panic survival mode, you know?" she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
2 hours ago
- CBC
B.C. sees thousands of wildfire evacuees every year. But are people moving permanently?
Social Sharing Michelle Feist never anticipated she would leave Lytton when she moved to the small Interior B.C. village in 2016. For her, it was a fresh start after her husband passed away. But after a wildfire tore through and destroyed most of the community in 2021, she couldn't bear to return. "The consequences are lasting. I will never be as I was before the fire," said Feist. Some residents of Lytton are rebuilding four years after the fire. Others, like Feist, have chosen to relocate. Feist initially moved to Williams Lake in the aftermath of the blaze. But she soon realized she was not free from the fire and smoke — and the anxiety— that were present every summer she lived there. "It changes you." Feist, a lover of the outdoors, started to dread the upcoming spring and summer seasons. In February of this year she made the difficult choice to move to a condo in Parksville, on Vancouver Island. "I just looked at the situation and thought, I don't know if I could do this indefinitely," she said. Although she misses living in a house, being surrounded by nature and having a garden, she does not regret her decision. "It's nice to be able to see and breathe, and I'm not dreading the season," Feist said. "Some disaster could hit it but it's probably not going to be a wildfire ... I feel safer." 'Difficult decisions' Feist isn't alone. She says many of her former Lytton neighbours have made the same decision, some even moving out of province. It's a dilemma that those in wildfire-prone communities are increasingly faced with, says Sarah Kamal, who researches disaster displacement at the University of British Columbia (UBC). "The vulnerability is very real and these communities are having to make some difficult decisions," she said. Kamal says the question for many communities that are often threatened by fire, is whether they have the resources to make infrastructure investments as well as respond to disasters. "Often these disasters cascade one after the other," said Kamal. "You really have to know you have ... those resources to respond in time." Firefighting in small and remote communities can be particularly challenging and expensive. WATCH | How B.C. First Nations use controlled burns to protect their communities: What Canada can learn from how B.C. First Nations prevent wildfire disasters 1 year ago First Nations in B.C. are in a race to protect themselves from wildfires, bringing back a tradition that had been banned for decades. CBC's Brady Strachan was invited to the front line of a prescribed or cultural burn to learn more about how it's done and why experts say other communities across Canada need to follow their example. Kamal says due to geography and limited resources, among other factors, it's not always possible to future-proof a community. She says that reality is difficult, especially for Indigenous communities that have deep connections to the land. "If you do leave, you're leaving many, many things, traditional ways of life, community, and so on. There's heartache in so many cases." Displacement unknown Over 7,000 residents were temporarily evacuated from their homes in the province during the 2024 wildfire season, according to the B.C. Wildfire Service. That number was in the tens of thousands during the 2023 fire season. And wildfires in the province are only expected to get worse. But the number of people who move away long term due to wildfire risk is difficult to track, says Barbara Roden, mayor of Ashcroft and chair of the Thompson-Nicola Regional District — an area that has seen numerous evacuation orders and alerts in the past decade. "People have lots of different reasons for moving into and out of an area." In recent years, though, she's had more people who are moving to Ashcroft ask her about the wildfire risk and what they need to know. "That is something that I definitely have seen over the last few years that was [previously] not a factor," said Roden. "It's something that has to be in the back of our minds." Evacuation alert vs. evacuation order: What you need to know 2 years ago Wildfire season has begun in B.C., and terms like 'evacuation alert' and 'evacuation order' are constantly in the news. CBC's Maurice Katz tells us the difference between the two, and more. In 2021, the B.C. Wildfire Service conducted a strategic threat analysis to map out areas of high wildfire risk in the province, and provide local governments, residents and other stakeholders with a tool to assess what steps need to be taken. The threat overview showed much of the province is either under extreme or high threat of wildfire. Roden says it is up to municipalities to proactively create evacuation plans, fire smart their communities, encourage people to fire smart their own properties, and keep residents informed. "They're there to be that steady voice of reassurance at a very scary time." Farrukh Chishtie, a scientist with the climate migration research group at UBC, says not enough research has been done to look at those who have relocated permanently due to wildfires. He says climate migration is happening in B.C., but the extent is unknown. "Where are they going to, and what type of struggles are they facing? We have no data," he said. The B.C. Wildfire Service confirmed to CBC News the province does not track wildfire migration. Feist says she feels lucky to have been able to move, as some do not have that option. And she recognizes many people choose to stay in their community. Although she is happy where she is, she says hardly a day goes by where she doesn't think about fire.
CBC
19 hours ago
- CBC
Controversial grizzly killed on small B.C. island, conservation officers confirm
British Columbia's Conservation Officer Service (COS) says a grizzly bear on a small island off the Sunshine Coast has been shot and killed. The bear will undergo a necropsy, the COS said in a Facebook post. Earlier in the day, the service said it was investigating an RCMP report that the bear was shot and possibly wounded by a member of the public in the Van Anda neighbourhood of Texada Island, near Powell River. The grizzly was first spotted on Texada on May 25. The bear has sparked debate among the residents of the 300-square-kilometre island, which is home to just under 1,200 people. Some residents wanted the bear moved or killed, while others wanted it to be left alone. Texada doesn't usually play host to large predators as it sits between the Sunshine Coast and Vancouver Island in British Columbia's Strait of Georgia. Wildlife management experts say it's likely the bear swam to the island from Powell River. Relocation options Three coastal First Nations had worked together to come up with a plan to move the grizzly bear, but the province had not signed off. The Conservation Officer Service previously told CBC News in a written statement that the adult male grizzly, estimated to be five years old, was not a good candidate for relocation because it had already been moved twice. The service said the bear had already been relocated after it was found wandering near schools and downtown areas of Gibsons and Sechelt, on the B.C. mainland last year. What should happen to the grizzly bear on Texada Island? It's been causing problems in the community of about 1,000 people and they are divided on whether it should be killed, removed, or left alone. Three coastal First Nations have an idea. After being moved to Vancouver Bay — partway up Jervis Inlet, about 50 kilometres north of Sechelt — the grizzly returned to the Sunshine Coast. It was then relocated even further north to the far end of Jervis Inlet. The statement also included a list of problematic behaviour the bear has engaged in this year, including: Stalking two residents while walking on a trail in Powell River on May 22. The residents escaped into the water while the bear paced on shore for half an hour, tearing up one of their jackets. Stalking a resident walking with her horse and dog for half a kilometre on Texada Island on May 28. Reportedly chasing livestock on June 10 and 11 on Texada Island. The statement also said there have been multiple sightings of the bear near a school, a store and farms on Texada.
CTV News
5 days ago
- CTV News
‘This burial site has been desecrated;' Ancestral remains found at future site of OPG parking lot
This aerial footage shows archaeological work that is ongoing at the site of a future OPG parking lot in Oshawa. Ancestral remains have been found at the site of a planned parking lot next to Ontario Power Generation's new Oshawa headquarters. In a statement provided to CTV News Toronto, OPG confirmed that the bone fragment was located on July 3 during 'archeological work' at the site and later determined to be ancestral following an investigation by Durham police. The OPG said in the statement that it 'recognizes the significance and sensitivity' of the finding and is 'committed to working closely with the local Indigenous communities and authorities to ensure a thorough and culturally respectful investigation.' 'Access to the site is strictly controlled, and we are treating the area with the utmost care, sensitivity, and reverence,' the statement notes. The remains were located underneath a site at 1910 Colonel Sam Dr. that is set to be excavated to allow for the construction of a new parking lot. In a joint statement released earlier this week, four Ontario First Nations communities said that the proposed parking lot will stand above a historic site known as the Scucog Carrying Place which 'has long been used' by its 'ancestors and community.' The First Nations communities said that the remains were located 'within large, excavated soil piles.' 'This burial site has been desecrated, and our communities are grieving,' the statement reads. 'We believe there is a high probability that additional ancestors' remains will be found at this site.' The OPG has said that construction at the site has been on hold since April 10 to allow for archaeological work, which involves the participation of Indigenous representatives. However, in their statement representatives from the Alderville First Nation, the Mississaugas of Scugog Island First Nation, Hiawatha First Nation and Curve Lake First Nation took issue with the precautions that had been taken at the site. 'It is with deep frustration and upset that we note contractors undertook these excavations and soil piling, seemingly without the information of an archeological assessment, or guidance from a cultural heritage policy, in an area publicly well-known as the Scugog Carrying Place,' they said. 'A full archaeological assessment would normally have been conducted before any ground disturbance took place.' The OPG says that following the discovery of the remains 'Indigenous representatives, who had been participating in the archeological work, ensured appropriate cultural protocols were observed.' It said that authorities were also notified 'immediately.' In their statement, the four First Nations communities said that they will be working with the Chief Coroner and government authorities to 'ensure a lawful and culturally respectful investigation into the circumstances of the excavation.'
