A bill banning cell phones in school for kids in K-8 is one step closer to becoming law
A bill that would ban cell phones in public schools in kindergarten through 8th grade moved one step closer to becoming law on Tuesday.
'I would definitely be for it. I think kids need to be focused on learning, not be distracted by social media,' parent Robert Stewart said.
While some people like the idea of a school cell phone ban, others see the benefits of letting students have some access to their phones.
'I like that we can know where he is,' Parent Barbara Myers said.
Myers said her 9-year-old grandson sometimes calls her during lunch to talk about plans after school.
'I think it should be limited. I think they should not be able to use them in class time,' Myers said.
RELATED STORIES:
Georgia student phone, tablet ban passes House vote, heads to state Senate
Ban on student phones in Georgia public schools back up for review in House Education Committee
Schools participating in cellphone lock-up pilot program says discipline issues are down
Tuesday afternoon, the Georgia Senate Children and Families Committee passed the Distraction-free Education Act" by a four-to one-vote.
'The data overwhelmingly shows us. And we know just really by instinct, that cell phones in classrooms are not conducive to education,' State Rep. Scott Hilton said.
The bill prohibits public school students in grades kindergarten through eight from accessing personal electronic devices during the school day. That includes smartphones, headphones, tablets and smartwatches.
School-issued electronic devices could still be used. The bill also includes exceptions for IEPs and medical plans.
'Of course there probably need to be some things in place for emergencies to make sure their parents can get in touch with them,' Stewart said.
The bill leaves that up to individual school systems.
School districts also would come up with policies on storing devices and consequences for violations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
3 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Senate votes to confirm Trump's defense lawyer Emil Bove to a U.S. appeals court
WASHINGTON — The Senate on a party-line vote on Tuesday confirmed Emil J. Bove, President Trump's defense lawyer and loyal ally atop the Justice Department, to a lifetime seat on the U.S. Court of Appeals in Philadelphia. The vote was 49 to 50. Bove, 44, was a highly controversial judicial nominee, not because of his legal views, but because he led a purge of prosecutors and FBI agents who had worked on cases growing out of the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. Before this year, the Justice Department held to a tradition of keeping politics out of law enforcement. But Bove and Atty. Gen. Pam Bondi saw their missions as carrying out the wishes of President Trump, including his plans for retribution against the prosecutors and investigators who brought charges against him or the 1,500 Trump allies who stormed the Capitol and fought with police. In the first weeks of Trump's second term, Bove served as the acting head of the Justice Department before Bondi was confirmed by the Senate. Bove also ordered federal prosecutors in New York to drop bribery and corruption charges against Mayor Eric Adams. The move prompted several of them to resign over what they saw as an unethical deal to win the mayor's cooperation in the administration's plan to round up immigrants who are in the country illegally. Bove also played a key role in the new administration's clash with a federal judge over deporting Venezuelans to a brutal prison in El Salvador. A former Justice Department attorney-turned-whistleblower said Bove told government lawyers they should ignore orders from the judge who sought to halt the deportations. When Bove appeared before a Senate committee as a judicial nominee, he said he had been misunderstood and unfairly criticized. 'I am not an enforcer' or 'anybody's henchman,' he said. Deputy Atty. Gen. Todd Blanche, who partnered with Bove in defending Trump last year, said he had been smeared by unfair criticism. 'Emil is the most capable and principled lawyer I have ever known,' he wrote in a Fox News opinion column. Democrats said Bove did not deserve a promotion to the federal courts. Sen. Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.) described Bove as a partisan loyalist who served Trump as 'the instrument of his vengeance.' 'When Trump wanted to purge the department of prosecutors who had proved to juries beyond a reasonable doubt that the violent offenders who attacked police officers that day did so to interfere with the peaceful transfer of power, Emil Bove was there to punish not the criminals, but the prosecutors,' Schiff said in opposing the nomination. On Tuesday, Bove was called a 'diligent, capable and fair jurist' by Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), according to the Associated Press. Bove is not likely to have much influence on the 3rd Circuit Court. Its 14 judges hear appeals from Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Delaware. Bove has no experience as a judge and has not written on legal or constitutional issues. However, if Justices Clarence Thomas or Samuel A. Alito were to retire in the next three years, Trump could nominate him to the Supreme Court. His nomination drew an unusually broad opposition from the legal community. In a July 15 letter to the Senate, 80 former and retired judges said confirming Bove to a life-term judgeship undercuts the rule of law and respect for the federal courts. They said his 'egregious record of mistreating law enforcement officers, abusing power and disregarding the law itself disqualifies him for this position.' More than 900 former Justice Department attorneys signed a letter to the Senate saying 'it is intolerable to us that anyone who disgraces the Justice Department would be promoted to one of the highest courts in the land.' Sen. Susan Collins, a Maine Republican, became the first Republican to declare her opposition to his nomination. 'We have to have judges who will adhere to the rule of law and the Constitution and do so regardless of what their personal views may be,' she said in a statement. 'Mr. Bove's political profile and some of the actions he has taken in his leadership roles at the Department of Justice cause me to conclude he would not serve as as impartial jurist. Collins and Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska were the only Republicans to vote against Bove.
UPI
4 minutes ago
- UPI
Emil Bove appointed to appellate court despite whistleblowers
1 of 3 | Emil Bove, attorney for former President Donald Trump, sits in the courtroom at Manhattan Criminal Court in New York on Thursday, May 2, 2024. Trump's trial is entering it's third week on charges he allegedly falsified business records to cover up a sex scandal during the 2016 presidential campaign. Pool photo by Jeenah Moon/UPI | License Photo July 30 (UPI) -- The U.S. Senate on Tuesday narrowly approved Emil Bove, who served as President Donald Trump's personal defense attorney, for a lifetime judicial appointment despite facing multiple whistleblower complaints. Bove was confirmed as a judge on the Philadelphia-based Third Circuit Court of Appeals on a 50-49 vote, with Republican Sens. Lisa Murkowski and Susan Collins voting with Democrats against him. Republican Sen. Bill Hagerty of Tennessee was absent. The vote follows one of the most heated sets of Senate hearings on any of Trump's judicial nominees. Three whistleblowers alleged that Bove, a high-ranking Justice Department official, misled lawyers and pressed career prosecutors to ignore court orders to advance Trump's political goals. Bove has denied the allegations, calling them "partisan attacks." Sen. Dick Durbin, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, said in an X post that Bove was "a terrible choice for the federal bench." "Mr. Bove's primary qualification appears to be his blind loyalty to this president," Durbin wrote. Sen. Chuck Grassley, the Republican chair of the committee, responded during a floor speech saying Democrats' attacks on Bove were unfair and he saw no evidence of misconduct. "Since the very beginning of this Congress, Democrats have engaged in a relentless obstruction campaign for nearly every one of President Trump's nominees," he said. The first whistleblower complaint was filed by Erez Reuveni, a now fired Department of Justice lawyer, who accused Bove of directing the Trump administration to disregard a court order to stop deporting migrants to a Salvadoran prison. A second complaint from an unnamed Department of Justice attorney backs up the first, claiming that Bove and other officials were "actively and deliberately undermining the rule of law." As the Senate neared its final vote on the nomination, a third whistleblower complaint accused Bove of misleading lawmakers when he denied pressing prosecutors to help broker the dismissal of the corruption case against New York Mayor Eric Adams, reports The Washington Post. Attorney General Pam Bondi celebrated Bove's confirmation in a post on X. "This is a GREAT day for out country," she said, while thanking him for "his tireless work and support" at the Justice Department. "He will be missed -- and he will be an outstanding judge," she said.
Epoch Times
2 hours ago
- Epoch Times
Senate Confirms Susan Monarez as CDC Director
The Senate on July 29 in a party-line vote confirmed Susan Monarez as director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Fifty-one Republicans voted to confirm Monarez, while 47 Democrats or nominal independents who caucus with the Democrats voted in opposition. Two GOP senators missed the vote.
