Pentagon says US strike set back Iranian nuclear program by up to 2 years
"We have degraded their program by one to two years, at least intel assessments inside the department assess that," Sean Parnell, a Pentagon spokesperson, said at a news briefing on Wednesday (local time), without providing further details.
"All of the intelligence that we've seen led us to believe that Iran's, those facilities especially, have been completely obliterated," Parnell added.
On June 22, US forces bombed the three Iranian nuclear facilities of Natanz, Fordow, and Esfahan, reports Xinhua news agency.
"No one exactly knows what has transpired in Fordow," Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi told CBS News in an interview Tuesday. "What we know so far is that the facilities have been seriously and heavily damaged."
Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation is assessing the damage, he added.
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian issued an order on Wednesday to enact a law suspending the country's cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
The law calls for a suspension of cooperation with the IAEA until Iran's sovereignty, territorial integrity, and the safety of its nuclear facilities and scientists are fully guaranteed, said Constitutional Council Spokesman Hadi Tahan Nazif.
The law requires that any future inspections of Iran's nuclear sites by the IAEA need approval from the Supreme National Security Council.
In response, the IAEA said in a statement, "We are aware of these reports. The IAEA is awaiting further official information from Iran."
Speaking at a daily press briefing on Wednesday, Stephane Dujarric, chief spokesman for UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, expressed concern over Iran's decision, calling it "obviously concerning."
"The Secretary-General has been very consistent in his call for Iran to cooperate with the IAEA, and frankly, for all countries to work closely with the IAEA on nuclear issues," he said.
US State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce said Wednesday that Iran's suspension of cooperation with the IAEA is "unacceptable."
"We'll use the word unacceptable, that Iran chose to suspend cooperation with the IAEA at a time when it has a window of opportunity to reverse course and choose a path of peace and prosperity," Bruce told a briefing.
Iran must cooperate fully with the UN agency without further delay, she said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
15 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
'Can't describe the pain': Bosnia marks 30 years since Srebrenica massacre
SARAJEVO: Three decades after the Srebrenica genocide, relatives are still looking for and burying the remains of more than 8,000 men and boys killed by Bosnian Serb forces, revealing the painful scars cut deep into the country. On July 11, 1995, Bosnian Serb forces stormed the Muslim enclave of more than 40,000 people in eastern Bosnia. At the time, it was a "UN protected zone" - an ultimately hollow phrase meant to shield the many displaced people who had fled the 1992-1995 war. General Ratko Mladic's forces executed thousands of men and boys before burying them in mass graves. After decades of painstaking work, about 7,000 victims have been identified and properly buried, but about 1,000 remain missing. Mass grave discoveries are now rare. The last was uncovered in 2021, when the remains of 10 victims were exhumed 180 kilometres (112 miles) southwest of Srebrenica. This year, the remains of seven victims will be buried during the July 11 commemorations at the Srebrenica-Potocari Memorial Centre, including two 19-year-old men and a 67-year-old woman. One bone found "This year, I'm having my father buried. But only one bone, his lower jaw," Mirzeta Karic told AFP. The 50-year-old said her mother was very ill, and so she decided to go ahead with the burial without waiting for more remains to be found. Her father, Sejdalija Alic, joined several thousand men and teenagers who tried to flee Mladic's troops through the dense forests. He failed. His 22-year-old son, Sejdin, was also killed, as were Alic's three brothers and their four sons. He will be Karic's 50th immediate family member laid to rest at Potocari cemetery. The ceremony for her brother, Sejdin, was in 2003. "I've been able to endure everything, but I think this funeral will be the worst. We're having a bone buried. I can't describe the pain." Still in 1995 An international criminal court sentenced Mladic, now 83, and former Bosnian Serb leader Radovan Karadzic, now 80, to life jail terms for war crimes and genocide during the conflict that left nearly 100,000 dead. Both are still incarcerated, but a proper reckoning inside the splintered Bosnian states remains overdue. Political leaders in the Bosnian Serb entity, Republika Srpska, reject the term genocide and regularly downplay the massacre. "This denial is trivialised," Neira Sabanovic, a researcher at the Universite Libre de Bruxelles, said. "It is very rare to find someone in Republika Srpska who acknowledges that there was genocide," she said. Republika Srpska President Milorad Dodik remains one of the most heard voices of genocide-denial in the statelet and Serbia. Of 305 instances of denial or downplaying in Serbian and the Bosnian Serb media during 2024, he leads the way, appearing 42 times, according to an annual study published by the Srebrenica Memorial Centre. Last year, an international day of remembrance was established by the United Nations to mark the Srebrenica genocide, despite protests from Belgrade and Republika Srpska. On Saturday, political leaders from the Bosnian Serb entity and Serbia, along with dignitaries from the Serbian Orthodox Church, will gather in Bratunac, near Srebrenica, for a commemoration of more than 3,200 eastern Bosnian Serb soldiers and civilians killed during the war. Portraits of some 600 of these dead were hung along the road this week near the Srebrenica Memorial Centre. "These people are not participating in the same debate. They are having a conversation with themselves, and they are still in 1995," the director of the Srebrenica Memorial Centre, Emir Suljagic, told local television on Thursday. "We have won a very important battle, the battle for international recognition," he added, referring to the UN resolution.
New Indian Express
26 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
BRICS Summit: Focus on India-Brazil strategic partnership for a multipolar world
With the arrival of Prime Minister Modi in Rio de Janeiro to take part in the 2025 BRICS Summit & Brasilia for a bilateral State visit, a first by an Indian PM in nearly six decades, the gaze is now on the India-Brazil Strategic Partnership. Far too long viewed essentially as South-South solidarity or symbolic multilateralism, this axis of rising power has in recent years achieved bolder geopolitical recognition. While India enhances its international footprint and Brazil restores its regional leadership, the convergences between the two democracies are no longer rhetorical; they increasingly become strategic driven by the shared vision of an equitable multipolar world order. In the midst of an expanded BRICS and rising challenges to the international system, Brazil has proved an invaluable interlocutor of India in the BRICS and the UN and in voicing the hopes and ambitions of the Global South. Brazil today matters to India not only as the largest economy of Latin America but also as a like-minded democratic country with whom India wishes to 'co-write' the rules of international governance. This convergence has been reflected also in the growing frequency and intensity of high-level interaction between the two countries. President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva and Prime Minister Modi have also been spotted several times since Lula's 2023 re-election as the two leaders have committed to upgrading the Strategic Partnership to the next level. But the current era of geopolitics gives special meaning to their convergence. The Rio BRICS Summit, its first since the grouping expanded in 2024, occurs against the backdrop of a fracturing international order where the return of multilateralism is increasingly questioned. Western institutions increasingly appear self-absorbed and the global South is speaking out more vocally than before. In this fluid world, India and Brazil offer the world a development-focused and democratic alternative. Their collaboration in BRICS seeks to turn the grouping into more than the symbol of rising power solidarity that it is today. India and Brazil aim to make it the forum for offering tangible deliverables for the Global South in the form of alternate sources of finance like the New Development Bank or new models of trade, digital connectivity, and climate finance. Indeed, the current Brazilian presidency of BRICS this year and the upcoming Indian chairmanship in 2026 is a rare diplomatic relay. Under Lula's administration, Brazil has emphasized a more politically integrated BRICS, one advocating for democratic values and challenging the imbalances of the current world order. Modi has echoed this priority, arguing that BRICS must induce international institutional change. The two leaders ratify the idea that the Global South should no longer only be the target of international decision, but the co-author of international rules. This convergence is not limited to BRICS. The two countries are equally committed to restructuring the UN Security Council and are the most vocal members of the G4 grouping (India, Brazil, Germany, Japan) pushing for permanent representation for emergent powers. Both find the present configuration of the UNSC as archaic and unrepresentative. In their latest bilateral, Modi and Lula renewed their backing for each other's candidacies and called for time-bound negotiations in the UN. Brazil has used its presidency of the G20 in 2024 to showcase global governance reform and India has been forthright in its support of this agenda. Together, they have been able to give new impulse to what has thus been an extremely stalled process of reform. Another area of great geopolitical convergence is in their approach towards the Global South. India and Brazil have been voices of Southern solidarity, with one difference: they offer pragmatic implementable solutions. India's 2023 and Brazil's 2024 G20 presidencies were built around development agendas, of inclusive finance and food security to digital public goods and climate justice. Lula openly acknowledged the reality of the fact several of Brazil's G20 agendas borrowed from India's G20 Presidency. Modi himself has praised Brazil for continuing the momentum and ensuring continuity in the upholding of voices of the developed world. As the baton comes up to South Africa to preside over the G20 presidency next year, the IBSA trio (India-Brazil-South Africa) would have achieved the rare distinction of back-to-back leadership of the world's most powerful economic forum and offer a unique moment of Southern convergence. The bilateral is also expanding with new content. Commerce between India and Brazil has exceeded $12 billion, and complementarities in energy, agro-products, and pharma are driving the push. Indian companies like UPL, Wipro, and Tata Motors have increasingly expanded operations in Brazil, and Brazilian enterprises in mining and airlines are considering Indian marketplaces. Modi's visit is expected to deliver new deals in green energy, food processing, and defence cooperation. These steps are the bigger picture: India no longer regards Latin America as the faraway theatre of power politics and Brazil increasingly regards India as the gateway to the Indo-Pacific and the hub of the economic rise of Asia. In the coming years, India and Brazil could really transcend being co-passengers of the multilateral system and turn out to be co-designers of a new equilibrium of power internationally. As bridge-builders between the Global South and the North, between the world of the democracies and the world of the developing nations, between development and growth, their bilateral ties are now a global good. For India, Brazil is as big of a partner of BRICS as it is a center-piece of a larger diplomatic offensive aimed at democratizing international institutions and transferring normative power. When PM Modi and President Lula get together side by side at the Rio Summit, the conversation must be bold: the India-Brazil relationship is no longer peripheral but at the very core of the way the two countries see the future of world order. The strength of the relationship will be less in terms of common desire and more in terms of collaborative action, from G4 to BRICS, from the UN to the G20. In a world as desperately in need of new coalitions for reform as for peace and inclusive growth, the coming together of Delhi and Brasilia gives the world a strong, democratic, and developmental vision of the multipolar world to come. (Manish Dabhade is an Associate Professor of Diplomacy in the School of International Studies, JNU& founded The Indian Futures, an independent think tank in New Delhi; X: @imanishdabhade)
Indian Express
40 minutes ago
- Indian Express
India says no to trade deal under deadline pressure; Trinidad & Tobago backs Delhi for UNSC; Gaza ceasefire soon
India abstains from signing trade deal with the US under 'deadline pressure', says open for a mutually beneficial deal; during PM Modi's visits to Trinidad and Tobago, the two sides reaffirm the need for reforms in the UN; US President Trump voices frustration over Russian President Vladimir Putin's failure to end the fighting; Hamas says it is ready to start talks 'immediately' on a US proposal for a 60-day ceasefire – here is weekly roundup of key global news. Notwithstanding the July 9 deadline for the reciprocal tariff pause, India abstains from signing a trade deal with the US under 'deadline pressure' reiterating that 'all possibilities are open' for a mutually beneficial deal. India has been negotiating with the US to eliminate the 26 per cent reciprocal tariff imposed on April 2. As Indian trade negotiators returned from the US on Friday, a government official described sustained access for labour-intensive goods (such as textiles and footwear), auto component exports, and steel as key interests in the India-US negotiations. In addition, agriculture and dairy sectors, where India has drawn 'very big red lines', emerged as sticking points, with the US demanding access to the Indian market for genetically modified (GM) products. What are the other points of difference that averted a trade deal, and what are the future prospects? Let's explore. India has drawn 'red lines' around politically sensitive agriculture and dairy sectors and has imposed both tariff and non-tariff restrictions on certain goods, including corn, ethanol, and soybeans. It has managed to shield its dairy sector because of at least two major reasons: one, the sector employs more than 80 million people, many of whom are smallholders; and two, there are concerns that foreign dairy products intended for food may be derived from animals fed with internal blood meal, a high-protein feed made from animal blood. As far as soyabean and corn are concerned, it is argued that imports are unlikely to suit India's soybean industry, which has a strong foundation in Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra. Similarly, millers are not too pleased about importing genetically modified corn as a feedstock for fuel ethanol. In addition, labour-intensive sectors such as textiles and footwear are among India's top demands in trade negotiations. It has sought lower tariffs in the textile trade in the US, similar to those offered to other FTA partners. India has also sought zero tariffs on electronic items exports, even as US President Donald Trump warned Apple of a 25 per cent tariff if it sold in the US iPhones built in India or anywhere else. Apple currently produces nearly 15 per cent of all iPhones in India, and plans to increase that to a quarter. India also aims to remove the US's additional duties on goods such as steel, aluminium, and auto components. In addition to the elimination of reciprocal tariffs, it has sought guarantees of no future tariffs. Moreover, New Delhi is seeking that the Trump Administration maintain a 'steady tariff differential' of 10-20 per cent between US tariffs on China and India, which is also a key reason to clinch the deal. This gives Indian traders an advantage over Chinese competitors and mitigates some of India's structural downsides, including infrastructural bottlenecks, logistics woes, and high interest costs. However, it may be noted here that this would hinge on how China leverages its dominance in rare earths to influence US tariff decisions. The growing concerns over Beijing's dominance in resources vital to new technologies were underscored at the recent Quad Foreign Ministers' meeting, where the grouping announced a Critical Minerals Initiative to 'collaborate on securing and diversifying' supply chains. The US has pushed hard for a broad-based opening of Indian sectors, from automobiles and whisky to agricultural items such as apples, corn and soya among others, as well as dairy. It has demanded the removal of a crucial regulation regarding dairy to sell its genetically modified (GM) products, resulting in tense discussions and even triggering protests from voices back home. The US eyes the Indian market amid a recent report by the US Department of Agriculture, which suggests that India's consumption of animal products (milk, eggs, fish, and meat) is likely to increase with population growth and rising per capita GDP. This could, in turn, boost demand for feed and create opportunities for US exports of these commodities (corn and soybeans) by the early 2030s, the report says. Moreover, the US sees India as a large market for its corn, soyabean and cotton amid the decline in exports of these products to China, which was its largest corn importer at $5.2 billion in 2022. Although India has said that the trade deal with the US will be signed when it is mutually beneficial, the two countries remain committed to more than double their bilateral trade to $500 billion by 2030. India is said to focus on areas where it has a competitive edge. Indian officials have indicated that diversifying oil and defence procurement is in the country's strategic interest, and that sourcing more from the US could significantly help bridge the goods trade gap. India's oil imports from the US have already jumped over 270 per cent year-on-year in the first four months of 2025. Moreover, in recent years, New Delhi and Washington have forged closer defence, technology, and diplomatic ties in a shared front against China. There is greater receptiveness now within India's policy circles to cut tariffs on some industrial goods, including automobiles, and some agricultural products of interest to Americans such as apples, almonds, walnuts, avocados and spirits. There is also more openness on the GM foods issue too. The NITI Aayog, in its Working Paper, has proposed that India import GM maize and soybeans, with the former as a feedstock for ethanol production, and the latter to extract oil for domestic consumption. In both cases, it calls for the export of their byproducts in their entirety – distiller's dried grains with solubles (maize) and de-oiled cakes and meals (soybean). It also called for concessions on agricultural products from the US such as edible oils and nuts where domestic supply gaps exist, and duty concessions to boost high-performing exports such as shrimp, fish, spices, rice, tea, coffee, and rubber. Additionally, the chances of India becoming the biggest market for the US are, perhaps, higher in cotton than in soyabean or corn. And it may be argued that duty-free imports of raw cotton can boost India's textile and apparel exports to the US itself, which stood at $10.8 billion in 2024. Notably, India-US trade negotiations have wrapped up for now, even as New Delhi strengthens its global diplomatic footprint. Support for India's permanent membership in the expanded United Nations Security Council (UNSC) and a shared commitment to fight terrorism are among the announcements made during Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to Trinidad and Tobago, the first by an Indian Prime Minister since 1999. The two countries inked six agreements to boost cooperation in several sectors, including infrastructure and pharmaceuticals, following talks between Prime Minister Modi and his counterpart from Trinidad and Tobago, Kamla Persad-Bissessar. The two leaders also delved into pressing global issues and reaffirmed the need for comprehensive reforms in the United Nations, including expansion of the UN Security Council, to better reflect current realities. The Caribbean nation also extended support to India's membership in the expanded UNSC. Modi and Bissessar called for dialogue and diplomacy as the way forward amid rising geopolitical tensions and global conflicts, and underlined the need for greater cooperation to deal with contemporary challenges such as climate change, disaster management, and cybersecurity. Prime Minister Modi also lauded the contribution of Indian-origin people to Trinidad and Tobago's development journey, and announced a decision to issue Overseas Citizenship of India (OCI) cards up to the sixth generation of the Indian diaspora in the country, where over 40 per cent of the population is of Indian origin. Earlier on Friday, the Prime Minister addressed the parliament of the Caribbean nation and spoke about the cricket connection between the two countries. He also reiterated his offer to train aspiring young women cricketers from Trinidad and Tobago in India. PM Modi expressed appreciation for Trinidad and Tobago's strong support and solidarity to the people of India in the wake of the Pahalgam terror attack, as the two leaders reaffirmed their commitment to fight terrorism in all its forms and manifestations. Modi is currently on a five-nation tour, which began with his visit to Ghana where he was honoured with Ghana's national award, 'The Officer of the Order of the Star of Ghana,' in recognition of his 'distinguished statesmanship and influential global leadership'. Four Memorandums of Understanding (MoUs) were signed, including in the areas of cultural exchange and traditional music. In his joint press statement following talks with John Mahama, the President of Ghana, Prime Minister Modi announced that they have decided to give India-Ghana ties the form of a Comprehensive Partnership. After Trinidad and Tobago, PM Modi has reached Argentina for the next leg of his tour. Later, he will attend the BRICS Summit in Brazil, and visit Namibia on his return. Russia launched the largest aerial assault on Ukraine in the over three-year long war amid reports that Moscow has been using banned chemical weapons in Kyiv, while US President Donald Trump voiced frustration over Russian President Vladimir Putin's failure to end the fighting. Russian forces have used increasing numbers of drones to target Ukrainian cities, with a record total of 539 drones and 11 missiles deployed against Kyiv on July 4, Reuters reported, citing the Ukrainian air force. Russia also downed dozens of Ukrainian drones in widely dispersed parts of the country, including two near the second-largest city of St Petersburg. Meanwhile, Dutch and German intelligence agencies said Russia's use of chemical weapons in this war is 'becoming more normalised, standardised, and widespread', with Dutch Defence Minister Ruben Brekelmans calling for tougher sanctions against Moscow, reported Reuters. The US first accused Russia of using chloropicrin, a chemical compound more toxic than riot control agents and first used by Germany during World War I, in May last year. Ukraine also alleges thousands of instances of Russian chemical weapons use. Hours after Thursday's attack by Russia, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy had a phone call with Trump, following which the US President said Ukraine would need Patriot missiles for its defence, Reuters reported. Commenting on the prospect of a ceasefire, Trump said, 'It's a very tough situation… I was very unhappy with my call with President Putin. He wants to go all the way, just keep killing people – it's no good.' Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, claiming it was needed to protect Russian-speaking civilians in eastern Ukraine and prevent the country from joining the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). Notably, Trump has ruled out the possibility of Ukraine joining NATO and even halted shipments of weapons and military aid to it. Since 2022, every NATO summit has committed to aiding Ukraine in its war against Russia. Most NATO countries view Russia as a direct and immediate threat. All the while, Israel continues to kill starving Palestinians as Hamas said it is ready to start talks 'immediately' on a US proposal for a 60-day ceasefire, prompting US President Trump to say there could be a deal by next week. At least 50 Palestinians were killed in Gaza as Israeli forces again target people waiting for food, Al Jazeera reported, while the UN said on July 5 that it had recorded at least 613 killings both at aid points run by the US- and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) and near humanitarian convoys run by other relief groups, including the UN. The United Nations has criticised the GHF, which began distributing aid at the end of May following a three-month Israeli blockade on Gaza, for bypassing the UN-led system and violating humanitarian impartiality rules. Meanwhile, Hamas responded in 'a positive spirit' to the Gaza ceasefire proposal, brokered by the US and mediated by Egypt and Qatar. Trump had earlier said that Israel had agreed 'to the necessary conditions to finalise' the ceasefire, which envisages a release of hostages and negotiations on ending the conflict. According to Gaza's Health Ministry, at least 57,268 people have been killed and 135,625 wounded in Israel's devastating war on Gaza since October 2023, when Hamas attacked Israel, killing over 1,100 people and taking 251 hostage. In the meantime, the West Bank, occupied by Israel since the Six-Day War in 1967, has become a 'big prison' as Israel fences it in, Reuters reported. Walls and checkpoints erected by Israeli forces have long been a part of day-to-day life for the nearly 3 million Palestinian residents of the West Bank. But many now say that a dramatic increase in such barriers since the start of the war in Gaza has put towns and villages in a state of permanent siege. Experts like Talmiz Ahmad, a former ambassador to Oman, the UAE and Saudi Arabia, had underlined a number of provocations in the run up to the October 7 attack by Hamas, which included the surge in attacks on Palestinians in the West Bank. Send your feedback and ideas to
