logo
Opinion: Can Learning Cursive Help Kids Read Better? Some Policymakers Think It's Worth a Try

Opinion: Can Learning Cursive Help Kids Read Better? Some Policymakers Think It's Worth a Try

Yahoo25-05-2025
This article was originally published in The Conversation.
Recently, my 8-year-old son received a birthday card from his grandmother. He opened the card, looked at it and said, 'I can't read cursive yet.'
Then he handed it to me to read.
If you have a child in the Philadelphia School District, chances are they have not been taught how to read or write cursive either.
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter
But cursive handwriting is making a comeback of sorts for K-8 students in the United States. Several states in recent years passed legislation mandating instruction in cursive handwriting, including California, Iowa and Oklahoma.
Pennsylvania and New Jersey are considering similar legislation, as are other states.
I'm an associate professor of special education and the director of the Iowa Reading Research Center. At the center, we're conducting a systematic review of prior research to improve cursive handwriting instruction.
We also want to know how learning cursive affects the development of reading and writing skills.
In cursive handwriting, the individual letters of a word are joined with connecting strokes, such as in a person's signature.
Cursive fell out of favor in U.S. schools over a decade ago. In 2010, most states adopted Common Core academic standards which omitted cursive handwriting from expected academic skills to be learned by K-8 students. In fact, the standards only briefly mention print handwriting, a writing style in which the individual letters of a word are unconnected, as a skill to be taught in early elementary grades.
Educators often have trouble finding enough time in the school day to teach all the expected writing skills, let alone something that's not mandated such as cursive handwriting.
In several national surveys, teachers have reported limited amounts of time for writing instruction and that they have found it difficult to address both the basic skills of writing, such as handwriting, and more advanced skills, such as essay composition.
The increased interest in cursive handwriting likely stems from effort by policymakers to improve the literacy performance of K-12 students across the country.
On the National Assessment of Educational Progress reading assessment, a measure of nationwide reading progress, only 31% of fourth grade students scored proficient or above. Philadelphia's numbers were worse, with just 19% of fourth grade students scoring proficient or above.
Research suggests it may be possible to improve overall writing and reading through handwriting instruction.
The benefits have been more closely studied with print handwriting, but preliminary evidence suggests cursive handwriting instruction may also be beneficial. Some studies have found cursive handwriting instruction can improve handwriting legibility, writing length and select reading skills. In a 2020 study, researchers found cursive handwriting instruction can also improve spelling accuracy and storytelling ability.
Why might cursive make a difference? On the surface, it seems like a simple motor skill. But under the surface, cursive handwriting draws upon deep reading knowledge and requires the coordination of multiple cognitive and physical processes.
To handwrite letters or spell words in print or cursive, students need to commit multiple aspects of each letter to memory. For example, if students handwrite the word 'cat,' they need to know the overall shape of each letter, as well as its name and sound.
After drawing upon this reading knowledge from memory, students use a combination of motor and vision systems to write each letter and the entire word. Gross motor movements are used to adjust the body and arm to the writing surface. Fine motor movements are used to manipulate the pencil with one's fingers. And visual-motor coordination is used to write each letter and adjust movements as needed.
Besides potential benefits to overall writing and reading development, cursive handwriting continues to have social importance.
It is often used to sign formal documents via a cursive signature, or to communicate with close friends or loved ones. Furthermore, understanding cursive is needed to read important historical documents, such as the Declaration of Independence.
Even in the digital age, touch-screen tablets and other devices often come with the ability to handwrite text with an electronic pencil. I teach courses at the University of Iowa, and many of my students handwrite their notes on electronic tablets.
For schools, low-tech options such as paper and pencils remain more cost-efficient than high-tech options. For example, it can be time-consuming and expensive to replace a broken laptop but relatively cheap to sharpen a broken pencil or get a new piece of paper.
Although it may be difficult for educators to find sufficient time for writing instruction, students will likely benefit from developing the capacity to express their ideas in a variety of ways, including cursive handwriting.
For anyone interested in learning about cursive handwriting and teaching it to their children or students, the Iowa Reading Research Center will release a free online course and curricula called CLIFTER on June 2, 2025.
Read more of our stories about Philadelphia.
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gen Z's Love for School Increasing
Gen Z's Love for School Increasing

Newsweek

time19-06-2025

  • Newsweek

Gen Z's Love for School Increasing

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Gen Z students have reported their most positive evaluations of schools in years, 71 percent awarding an A or B for this year in a Gallup and Walton Family Foundation report. Newsweek has contacted the Department of Education for comment via email. Why It Matters The report, published on Wednesday, June 18, comes amid a litany of concerns about American education. A report released in January, 2025, from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) found that the reading and math skills of fourth and eighth-grade students have declined in multiple states to below the national average. After this report was released, Peggy Carr, the commissioner of the National Center for Education Statistics, said: "These 2024 results clearly show that students are not where they need to be or where we want them to be." Educators were hit hard by the COVID-19 pandemic and the ensuing disruption, the effects of which have been hard to recover from. In 2024, a report released by the Center on Reinventing Public Education (CRPE), a research group at Arizona State University stated that the average American student is "less than halfway to full academic recovery," from the impact of the pandemic. The Report's Key Findings Average school grades rose to a B on a 0-to-4 GPA scale, up from B- in 2023 and 2024. The percentage of students assigning their schools an A grade also jumped to 31 percent, up from 22 percent in 2023. Parents' grades for schools also improved, with 40 percent rating their child's school an A, marking a notable rise from 33 percent in the previous year. High school freshmen and sophomore students at Concordia High School using Apple iPads in the world geography classroom at the private religious school outside Austin, Texas. High school freshmen and sophomore students at Concordia High School using Apple iPads in the world geography classroom at the private religious school outside Austin, Texas. Robert Daemmrich Photography Inc/Corbis via Getty Images Students' average reported GPA for their schools reached 2.92, while parent-assigned averages also increased to 3.13, further reflecting the uptick in satisfaction. Gallup's findings also showed Black and Hispanic students posting the greatest year-over-year gains. The 2025 Gallup and Walton Family Foundation Student Report Card was based on a survey of 1,551 students and their parents, taken between May 16 and May 27. "We saw improvements across the student body, including many of the groups that have historically given their school lower marks, such as students who qualify for free or reduced-price lunch, Black and Hispanic students, and students with disabilities," Gallup's senior education researcher Zach Hrynowski told Newsweek in an email. The report cautioned that heightened positivity among students and parents had not yet translated into improved academic outcomes. Kevin G. Welner, a research professor at the School of Education & School of Law at the University of Colorado Boulder told Newsweek the report is unquestionably "good news." "If parents and students are happy with their schools, we should be happy as well." What Is Driving Gen Z's Increased Satisfaction? Hrynowski said: "While the improvements were broad, it's hard to pin down a single cause." The biggest improvements occurred in areas related to career-connected earning, and the next largest improvements came in students' excitement about what they are learning, he said. Welner said we can "only speculate" about why numbers are up, but pointed to post-COVID recovery as a potential reason. Christopher Lubienski, a Professor of Education Policy at Indiana University pointed to a number of reasons there could be an increase in satisfaction, noting that people with potentially high levels of discontent, such as homeschooled students, weren't sampled. He also added that "schools represent stability in an increasingly unstable world for a lot of students." "Considering the sample size, it could be just a statistical blip," Lubienski told Newsweek. "The bigger story here is the continued and maybe growing satisfaction across the board, but particularly for students from disadvantaged backgrounds." Frederick M. Hess, a senior fellow and the director of education policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute told Newsweek: "If you ask a student who doesn't do any homework, do you such as school, there's an excellent chance to tell you they such as school more than a kid who whose parents make them do homework." This is "not an ironclad rule by any means," he said, adding that there is reason to be concerned that student satisfaction isn't related to education or academic engagement. It could be they like school because "they can hang out and do social media together," Hess said. "I would never say positive results are a bad thing ... I think it's really important to be cautious." How Meaningful Are These Perception Shifts? So, what do these perception shifts mean in practice? Hrynowski noted "several indicators that would suggest this could be the first step toward improvements in long-term academic success." "From our three years of data, we clearly and consistently see that students who are more engaged in the classroom and give their schools higher marks also report better academic achievement and lower absenteeism," Hrynowski said. Matt Eicheldinger a New York Times bestselling author and Instagram and TikTok creator with a background in teaching, told Newsweek via email: "It can be easy to view these perception shifts as a valuable insight of the U.S. education system, but they should not be mistaken for definite indicators of the overall health of the system. "Satisfaction may reflect school climate, stronger relationships, and more inclusive environment, but true educational health is multifaceted." Eicheldinger added that we need to consider academic outcomes, access equality and teacher retention, as well as funding and long-term student success. "Without addressing these other systemic factors, increased satisfaction alone gives a misleading picture of progress," he said. Lubienski said the results show people still have faith in their schools, despite the challenges education has faced in recent years. "There is a constant barrage of criticism of our schools from some politicians, but people still like their schools," said Lubienski. Hrynowski also flagged some potential issues with achievement scores and said that they are "probably a bit of a lagging indicator." "Even if the school experience has improved meaningfully over the last year, it may still take a year or two for those gains to start showing up in test scores." Hrynowski added that stagnant test scores are down to things such as COVID learning loss. "A better experience over the past year doesn't guarantee that the damage of that learning loss has been fully mitigated—we may just be limiting the damage at this point," Hrynowski said. What Happens Next The report comes at a time of major change for America's education system. President Donald Trump has signed an executive order to dismantle the Department of Education that former President Jimmy Carter founded 45 years ago, which could change the face of education in America. AI also poses significant challenges. Lubienski said that though this is a relatively minor shift, it is a "hopeful sign," before adding that we need to attend to having well resourced schools, good teachers and world-class curriculums. Eicheldinger said this report could signal a turning point. "When students enjoy school and feel connected, engagement and learning often rise," he said. "But for lasting impact, that positive experience must be backed by meaningful changes, such as relevant curriculum and supportive environments. "Joy is a great start, but it needs structure to lead to long-term success," Eicheldinger added.

Jerald McNair: While schools are out, our youths need to continue to read
Jerald McNair: While schools are out, our youths need to continue to read

Chicago Tribune

time16-06-2025

  • Chicago Tribune

Jerald McNair: While schools are out, our youths need to continue to read

As the summer approaches and the school year ends, schools across the country are concerned about the upcoming year and the federal cuts that may come with the dismantling of the U.S. Department of Education. The concern is even more pressing considering a report released in January by the National Assessment of Educational Progress that shows that the reading proficiency for fourth and eighth graders in the United States continues to decline. Last year, their proficiency declined by 2 points compared with 2022. In fact, 19 states had a fourth grade reading score below the national average of 214. For eighth graders, 11 states had scores much lower than the national average of 257. What we do know about educational data is there is often a decline in reading scores in the summer, which is referred to as 'summer slope' or 'summer slide.' Data from the Northwest Evaluation Association shows that third to fifth graders lose 20% of their school-year gains in reading. This kind of data hits educators, including administrators, quite hard. What more can we do? Does this one biennial test represent all of what schools are doing to improve the reading skills of students throughout the year? As we seek answers, what gets lost in the discussion is the myriad of variables that influence reading results and why they can be so volatile, particularly for young readers, whose foundational skills have yet to develop. When youths don't read enough, their reading score results will often stagnate or decline. Average instructional time for a student in the United States is 5.7 hours per day. Reading represents only a portion of that time. If the only time young people read books is when they are at school, reading scores across our nation will not improve. Now more than ever, it's important that our youths continue to read throughout the summer. For those students not attending summer school, it's essential that parents and caregivers designate times for their children to read, even on vacation. That means putting some limits on use of devices. If the family is traveling, requiring reading can prove to be beneficial. Neuropsychology and Education Services for Children and Adolescents, a practice in New England, recommends that children read at least 20 minutes per day after being in school all day. It will expose them to 1.8 million words in one school year. During summer break, continuing that practice can have a profound impact on reading efficiency for students, preventing some of the reading loss that happens during summer break. Having youths not only visit the library but also obtain a library card is recommended. The American Library Association maintains that library cards fuel academic achievement. Through the summer, many libraries host events and activities to engage youths and can encourage them to become lifelong readers. Unfortunately for education in our country, the budget proposed by President Donald Trump, known as the 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' may result in 40 federal K-12 programs being cut. The president's budget proposal keeps top-line funding intact for the Education Department's two biggest sources for schools, Title I and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, an analysis by Education Week says. However, the bill asks Congress to eliminate nearly four dozen other grant programs that provide services for specific K-12 student populations. It comes down to a proposed cut of $12 billion to the U.S. Department of Education budget at the beginning of the new fiscal year on Oct. 1. School districts may have to do more with less. With reading data continuing to show a decline, it's more than concerning. It makes this summer, and summers in the foreseeable future, particularly important. President John F. Kennedy once said: 'Children are the world's most valuable resource. And its best hope for the future.' How we meet the challenges of the future, compete in this global economy and stay on the cutting edge of technological improvements and advancements depends on how educated our youths are. It's important to understand that the learning loss that COVID-19 caused is still being felt. Data from the Harvard Graduate School of Education states that when a student experiences learning loss due to an interruption, students generally recover 20% to 30% of the lost ground the first year but typically make no more recovery in the next three to four years. So much work has to be done. We can start by making certain our youths continue to pick up a book and read over the summer. Perhaps our iconic and talented entertainers Beyonce, Taylor Swift, Shaboozey and others can lead the way and positively influence our youths by saying, 'Summer reading is summer fun.'

201 ways to say ‘f**k': what 1.7 billion words of online text shows about how the world swears
201 ways to say ‘f**k': what 1.7 billion words of online text shows about how the world swears

CNN

time15-06-2025

  • CNN

201 ways to say ‘f**k': what 1.7 billion words of online text shows about how the world swears

EDITOR'S NOTE: CNN is showcasing the work of The Conversation, a collaboration between journalists and academics to provide news analysis and commentary. The content is produced solely by The Conversation. This story contains graphic language that some readers may find offensive. Our brains swear for good reasons: to vent, cope, boost our grit and feel closer to those around us. Swear words can act as social glue and play meaningful roles in how people communicate, connect and express themselves – both in person, and online. In our new research published in Lingua, we analysed more than 1.7 billion words of online language across 20 English-speaking regions. We identified 597 different swear word forms – from standard words, to creative spellings like '4rseholes', to acronyms like 'wtf'. The findings challenge a familiar stereotype. Australians – often thought of as prolific swearers – are actually outdone by Americans and Brits, both in how often they swear, and in how many users swear online. Our study focused on publicly available web data (such as news articles, organisational websites, government or institutional publications, and blogs – but excluding social media and private messaging). We found vulgar words made up 0.036% of all words in the dataset from the United States, followed by 0.025% in the British data and 0.022% in the Australian data. Although vulgar language is relatively rare in terms of overall word frequency, it was used by a significant number of individuals. Between 12% and 13.3% of Americans, around 10% of Brits, and 9.4% of Australians used at least one vulgar word in their data. Overall, the most frequent vulgar word was 'fuck' – with all its variants, it amounted to a stunning 201 different forms. We focused on online language that didn't include social media, because large-scale comparisons need robust, purpose-built datasets. In our case, we used the Global Web-Based English (GloWbE) corpus, which was specifically designed to compare how English is used across different regions online. So how much were our findings influenced by the online data we used? Telling results come from research happening at the same time as ours. One study analysed the use of 'fuck' in social networks on X, examining how network size and strength influence swearing in the UK, US and Australia. It used data from 5,660 networks with more than 435,000 users and 7.8 billion words and found what we did. Americans use 'fuck' most frequently, while Australians use it the least, but with the most creative spelling variations (some comfort for anyone feeling let down by our online swearing stats). Americans hold relatively conservative attitudes toward public morality, and their high swearing rates are surprising. The cultural contradiction may reflect the country's strong individualistic culture. Americans often value personal expression – especially in private or anonymous settings like the internet. Meanwhile, public displays of swearing are often frowned upon in the US. This is partly due to the lingering influence of religious norms, which frame swearing – particularly religious-based profanity – as a violation of moral decency. Significantly, the only religious-based swear word in our dataset, 'damn', was used most frequently by Americans. Research suggests swearing is more acceptable in Australian public discourse. Certainly, Australia's public airing of swear words often takes visitors by surprise. The long-running road safety slogan 'If you drink, then drive, you're a bloody idiot' is striking – such language is rare in official messaging elsewhere. Australians may be comfortable swearing in person, but our findings indicate they dial it back online – surprising for a nation so fond of its vernacular. In terms of preferences for specific forms of vulgarity, Americans showed a strong preference for variations of 'ass(hole)', the Irish favored 'feck', the British preferred 'cunt', and Pakistanis leaned toward 'butt(hole)'. The only statistically significant aversion we found was among Americans, who tended to avoid the word 'bloody' (folk wisdom claims the word is blasphemous). People from countries where English is the dominant language – such as the US, Britain, Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Ireland – tend to swear more frequently and with more lexical variety than people in regions where English is less dominant like India, Pakistan, Hong Kong, Ghana or the Philippines. This pattern holds for both frequency and creativity in swearing. But Singapore ranked fourth in terms of frequency of swearing in our study, just behind Australia and ahead of New Zealand, Ireland and Canada. English in Singapore is increasingly seen not as a second language, but as a native language, and as a tool for identity, belonging and creativity. Young Singaporeans use social swearing to push back against authority, especially given the government's strict rules on public language. One possible reason we saw less swearing among non-native English speakers is that it is rarely taught. Despite its frequency and social utility, swearing – alongside humour and informal speech – is often left out of language education. Cultural, social and technological shifts are reshaping linguistic norms, blurring the already blurry lines between informal and formal, private and public language. Just consider the Aussie contributions to the July Oxford English Dictionary updates: expressions like 'to strain the potatoes' (to urinate), 'no wuckers' and 'no wucking furries' (from 'no fucking worries'). Swearing and vulgarity aren't just crass or abusive. While they can be used harmfully, research consistently shows they serve important communicative functions – colourful language builds rapport, expresses humour and emotion, signals solidarity and eases tension. It's clear that swearing isn't just a bad habit that can be easily kicked, like nail-biting or smoking indoors. Besides, history shows that telling people not to swear is one of the best ways to keep swearing alive and well. Martin Schweinberger is a lecturer in applied linguistics at The University of Queensland. Kate Burridge is professor of linguistics at Monash University. Republished under a Creative Commons license from The Conversation.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store