New online safety rules are here but as tech races ahead, expect changes
Technological advances
"If it does what it says it does, it should be really big," said one Whitehall source, with high hopes of the change on the way.Ofcom will be responsible for enforcing new child safety rules which will require platforms to check users' ages. These take effect on 25 July - and Ofcom's chief executive, Dame Melanie Dawes, will join me live in the studio tomorrow morning to explain more.The regulator won't tell platforms exactly how to verify users' ages. But it could be sharing a selfie in real time, or checking bank details. Without proving they are 18, a child or teenager should theoretically not be able to see content that might do them harm.Ofcom's measures to make tech firms remove illegal content have already come into force. A senior Whitehall source said: "We have had 20 years with no attention being paid to safety." You can't say that now.But some observers take a very dim view of how much the new rules are going to change.One campaigner said: "If we believed the breathless PR, we could all take to our deckchairs and just enjoy the sun."Rightly or wrongly, the new rules don't cover what kids share with each other on messaging apps, and they don't block risky stunts or challenges or in-app purchases like loot boxes that end up costing some families a fortune.And as technology races ahead, the rules don't fully cover AI chatbots which are increasingly grabbing kids' attention.The Online Safety Act, which was passed in 2023, didn't tackle material that is harmful but legal for adults - not least because of an almighty row in the Conservative Party when they were in charge.Nor was it set up to tackle misinformation or hate, which MPs warned on Friday left serious holes in the new system designed to protect everyone.What the Online Safety Act is - and how to keep children safe online
The Science, Innovation and Technology Committee, which investigated the law in the wake of the Southport riots, said internet users were being exposed to large volumes of harmful and misleading content "which can deceive, damage mental health, normalise extremist views, undermine democracy, and fuel violence".MPs in the committee concluded that the Act failed to keep UK citizens "safe from a core and pervasive online harm".Many safety campaigners think the rules simply don't go far enough and that Ofcom has been far too cautious. A former cabinet minister tells me: "I just don't understand their lack of pace or urgency."It took years to get the Online Safety Act passed as law in the first place. Parliament spent a long time grappling with real dilemmas - especially how to protect fundamental rights of free speech and privacy.Then Ofcom took many months to write the codes of practice that have come into force over time. They wanted to create rules that were practical for the tech platforms themselves.One industry source says Ofcom had been "sensible and grown-up", and while the rules weren't "revolutionary" they were important, positioning the UK between tighter regulations in the EU and a more lax regime in the US.However you look at it, these new laws have been a very, very long time coming. And while Whitehall has been grinding along, technology, and the kinds of experiences we all have online, has been racing ahead.Who had really heard of AI five years ago? Many sources I've spoken to question now if the way the whole system has been designed is the right one.The former minister I spoke to said it was a "category error" to regulate the internet in this way, questioning whether Ofcom was the right body to do the job.But ultimately, Ofcom can only work within the laws MPs set.
While we'll be focusing in the studio tomorrow on the effect the new rules will have, there is already an obvious demand among politicians to go further.Labour's education secretary branded the Tories' suggestion to ban phones in schools a "gimmick". The PM said it was "unnecessary". But the House of Lords might back the idea in votes in mid-autumn, pushing the question back to MPs.Might some newly emboldened Labour backbenchers be tempted to support it too? One of them told me if there were a reshuffle, and a new education secretary, "I'd be straight in there to say, ditch the battle, get on the right side of the public and parents, and agree to the Tories' proposal."But I understand there are new measures developed in government that might emerge even before then, shortly after the summer.With the age verification measures about to come into force, the cabinet minister in charge, Peter Kyle, wants to shift the conversation towards healthy habits. The Online Safety Act focuses on what we can see on the internet. But Kyle's next focus is on how we use it, considering how some apps could be addictive.A source said: "kids shouldn't have to be grateful they can't see violent porn on their devices… the next debate is about what is healthy online."
Ministers are considering how they could protect children from algorithms that "can make kids feel out of control", or drive compulsive behaviour. Proposals on the table include an "app cap", screen time limits, extra rules on live streams, and making more of a distinction between what 13 and 16-year-olds can do online.More legislation is likely to bring in the next round of changes, but right now, as one MP said: "it is stuck somewhere in the system."You can expect the next round of conversations about how governments can protect the public from the worst excesses of the internet while enjoying its incredible opportunities to be part of the political soundtrack of the autumn.Technology has changed so many aspects of our lives so fast for the better in recent years. But for too many families, their experiences online have brought terrible pain. Just as our heads might spin trying to understand all the changes, politicians have perhaps struggled to balance the dangers as well as the opportunities, and how they might be called on to protect the public.What happens online is not the usual turf of politics like making ends meet, running schools or hospitals. But just as our virtual lives are an increasing part of our world, they are becoming a bigger part of our political life too.
A list of organisations in the UK offering support and information with some of the issues in this story is available at BBC Action Line
Sign up for the Off Air with Laura K newsletter to get Laura Kuenssberg's expert insight and insider stories every week, emailed directly to you.
BBC InDepth is the home on the website and app for the best analysis, with fresh perspectives that challenge assumptions and deep reporting on the biggest issues of the day. And we showcase thought-provoking content from across BBC Sounds and iPlayer too. You can send us your feedback on the InDepth section by clicking on the button below.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
O2 phone shops in high risk areas locking their doors after spate of armed robberies by crime gangs
Customers at certain shops now have to knock on the door and be let in by a security guard PHONES LOCKED O2 phone shops in high risk areas locking their doors after spate of armed robberies by crime gangs PHONE shops in high risk areas have been forced to lock their doors to customers after a spate of armed robberies by organised crime gangs. O2 has confirmed a 'locked door' policy is now in place at a number of high street stores across the country in response to the terrifying raids - including Richmond in south-west London, The Strand in central London and St Albans, Herts. Advertisement 3 O2 has confirmed a 'locked door' policy is now in place at a number of high street stores across the country Credit: Andrew Styczynski 3 The move is in response to the terrifying raids - including Richmond in south-west London, The Strand in central London and St Albans, Herts Credit: Andrew Styczynski 3 Instead of just walking into the shops, customers now have to knock on the door and be let in by a security guard Credit: Andrew Styczynski Instead of just walking into the shops, customers now have to knock on the door and be let in by a security guard. The Sun found staff at the shop in St Albans on Friday were operating a one in one out system, only allowing up to three members of the public in at a time. According to a source, they were forced to bring in these measures after two terrifying robberies which left staff members fearing for their lives. They said: 'At the end of February we had an attempted robbery. Three guys came in and tried to force their way into the store room. Advertisement 'I saw them, all with their faces covered, out of the corner of my eye and I thought I was done for. 'We suspected they had a weapon and they were trying to force staff back there to open the door - the police came that time and they didn't manage to take anything. 'A few months before in October the shop was actually robbed, they took thousands of pounds worth of phones. 'There were two customers in the shop at the time, and because of the threats and the suspected weapon it was decided that the door would be locked. Advertisement 'No one should come into work and be scared they're going to be stabbed over a phone - no one wants to lose their life over just a phone. 'It has affected trade a little, but you know now all the people coming in have the intention to buy and it makes staff feel safer while helping them so I think it's worth it.' Moment phone snatcher receives instant karma as he's knocked off his bike by furious Londoners In May, the O2 shop in Richmond was targeted by two armed men, with one swiftly arrested by police. Just a few months before in February, the same shop was raided by armed thieves who forced staff into the store room and made off with a number of mobiles. Advertisement An O2 spokesperson said: 'In response to a growing number of thefts at stores in certain areas, we have introduced a 'locked door' policy at a small proportion of our stores, including in St Albans. 'These stores remain fully open for our customers, and the only difference they will experience is that instead of opening the door themselves, it will be opened for them by a security guard. 'This decision has been taken to prioritise the safety of both our employees and our customers, as well as the security of our stock. 'We are working closely with law enforcement, and with other providers who are facing similar issues, to tackle this problem.'
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Police set to get £15m anti-drone tech kit to fight airborne crime including devices that look like rifles
POLICE are to get anti-drone tech to combat airborne crime — including devices that look like rifles. The £15million kit will be deployed against terrorists and organised gangsters. It will also be used to stop drugs being flown into jails. Home Office chiefs have approved three separate £5million deals to buy gun-like radio jammers which disable drones and also help identify their criminal controllers. The devices can be either hand-held, like a pistol or rifle, mounted on a vehicle or used in a fixed position. Details are revealed in contracts which show the Home Office wants 'the next generation of hand-held radio frequency effector technology' for police to counter drones. The firms awarded contracts — each lasting until June 2027 — are Steelrock Technologies, CPM Ellettronica and Kirintec. Steelrock said 'every hostile drone incursion puts people and critical assets at risk' while Kirintec said it supplies 'counter uncrewed aerial systems for air defence and denial'. Images from the companies show the technology being used in urban centres and dense woodland. The devices will be run by the National Police Chiefs' Council, which co-ordinates action of counter-terrorism, fighting organised crime, public order and frontline policing. Experts are increasingly concerned about the threat of drones from terrorists and spies. 1
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
The people wrongly accused of cutting the Sycamore Gap tree down
Within hours of the world-famous Sycamore Gap tree being illegally felled, Walter Renwick found himself in a maelstrom of accusations and amateur sleuths, who had taken it upon themselves to investigate, thought that in the former lumberjack they had found their had the skills, a chainsaw and an apparent motive, but there was one flaw in the was not him. Photographs quickly appeared in a national newspaper showing police searching Mr Renwick's Northumberland home and a chainsaw being removed. "It was heartbreaking," Mr Renwick said."There were police everywhere, drones flying around the valley, divers in the lake, they were 100% certain I'd done it. "Every time I went shopping in Haltwhistle or Hexham, people were nudging each other and saying 'that's him that cut the tree down', stuff like that."Mr Renwick even wore a disguise to hide his identity."I know it was daft but I put a Rod Stewart wig on so people didn't spot me." Months earlier he had been evicted from Plankey Mill Farm near Bardon Mill, just a few miles from Hadrian's Wall, by landowners Jesuits in Britain. His family had been there for decades, but the tenancy held by his grandfather and father had not passed to him."I'd just lost everything I had, my cows, my sheep, my parents' stuff. I'd lost my home and then this," Mr Renwick said of the Sycamore Gap in Britain said they made the "difficult decision" to evict Mr Renwick in 2021 after "many attempts to engage with him".They cited "serious breaches of his tenancy, including unauthorised camping on the land, damage to the farmhouse and repeated refusal to allow inspections".Mr Renwick admits he had been running a campsite and there had been concerns about anti-social behaviour there and elsewhere on his land. One of the complaints, he alleges, was from the National Trust which owns a neighbouring property and the land at Sycamore National Trust said it would be "inappropriate to discuss our complaints procedure in relation to any individual". Freelance journalist Kevin Donald was one of those deployed to try and find out who had been arrested in the days immediately following the felling. "It's a bit tenuous, but there was a sort of motive there," he said. "Suddenly everything was pointing to Walter Renwick who then became a massive target for online trolling." Walter Renwick was arrested on 29 September 2023, the day after the felling, but hours earlier another person had also been taken into custody. Journalist Mr Donald said neighbours in Haltwhistle described seeing "a large police presence" and a teenager being put into a car "with blue lights flashing"."At first local people seemed reluctant to name him. They seemed to want to protect him," Mr Donald Police then announced they had arrested a 16-year-old boy, who we are not naming at his while being questioned, his name and photograph were posted on social media."The picture showed him with a chainsaw and he was in what you'd call lumberjack gear," Mr Donald said. "It suddenly went from 'a kid couldn't do this' to 'maybe that kid could'." Those in the boy's home town remember a time of febrile speculation. Bed and breakfast owner Ed Corble called it "absolute chaos". "His family had no idea why it was happening and for a 16-year-old to have the eyes of the world on him like that was so dangerous."Scott Donaldson, owner of the nearby Milecastle Inn, said many people had concerns about the arrest. "We had family members in the tree surgery business and they just thought there was no way a 16-year-old could have done it," he said. "There was a lot of discussion in the pub and we quickly came to the conclusion that there was no way that young lad was involved." That, however, did not stop trolls sending the teenager disturbing abuse online about the recent death of a relative."You've immediately got this trial by social media going on," Mr Donald said."It was all over the place that they'd arrested Walter and his grandson, but it turned out they didn't even know each other."In November, the police said the teenager would face no further action. A month later the same announcement was made about Mr Renwick. By that time Daniel Graham, 39, and Adam Carruthers, 32, both from Cumbria, had been arrested. We asked Northumbria Police what prompted the arrests of Mr Renwick and the teenager and why it had taken the force several weeks to conclude no further action would be taken against a statement the force said it recognised the "strength of feeling that the felling has caused" and that it had carried out a "a meticulous and proportionate investigation".It added "the unwavering commitment" of those involved in the case had led to a successful prosecution. On 9 May, a jury at Newcastle Crown Court unanimously convicted Graham and Carruthers of two counts of criminal damage."I just keep asking myself why they did it," Mr Renwick said."Was it just attention seeking? I don't know what it was but, for me at least, it's over. "Actually, you know, the tree, that was one thing. But losing my farm. That was the thing that hurt most of all."Jesuits in Britain said Mr Renwick's father "gave up" the tenancy in 2008 and Mr Renwick did not meet the legal criteria to succeed his dad, but he was offered a 10-year lease which was extended twice, "well beyond any legal obligation on our part".A spokeswoman said Mr Renwick was "fully aware" of the process and options available and he was given "multiple opportunities to discuss alternative arrangements"."Throughout we have sought to act with kindness and integrity," the charity said, adding: "We sincerely wish him well as he moves forward." Follow BBC North East on X and Facebook and BBC Cumbria on X and Facebook and both on Nextdoor and Instagram.
