Starmer faces pushback for opening door to Palestinian statehood
The UK will only refrain from doing so if Israel allows more aid into Gaza, stops annexing land in the West Bank, agrees to a ceasefire and signs up to a long-term, peace process over the next two months.
Hamas, the Palestinian militant group, must immediately release all remaining Israeli hostages, sign up to a ceasefire, disarm and 'accept that they will play no part in the government of Gaza', Sir Keir also said.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu:
"Starmer rewards Hamas's monstrous terrorism & punishes its victims.
A jihadist state on Israel's border TODAY will threaten Britain TOMORROW.
Appeasement towards jihadist terrorists always fails. It will fail you too. It will not happen."
— Prime Minister of Israel (@IsraeliPM) July 29, 2025
But the PM's announcement rewards 'Hamas's monstrous terrorism', his Israeli counterpart, Benjamin Netanyahu, claimed.
In a statement on social media site X, Israel's prime minister added: 'Appeasement towards jihadist terrorists always fails.'
Donald Trump, who met Sir Keir on Monday and discussed measures to end the starvation faced by Gazans, suggested the pair had not talked about recognising Palestinian statehood.
But Mr Trump said he did not mind the PM 'taking a position' on the issue.
This was a contrast with his reaction to Emmanuel Macron's announcement that France will recognise Palestine at the UN General Assembly in September, which the US president said would make no difference.
Other figures within the US administration have taken a harder line on recognising Palestine.
US state department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce suggested a UN conference called to discuss recognising a Palestinian state as part of a two-state solution was a 'publicity stunt' and called it a 'slap in the face' to the victims of the October 7 attacks.
She also suggested that the UK announcement could risk 'rewarding Hamas'.
Sir Keir said the Government's 'primary aim' was getting aid into Gaza and getting hostages released when asked why UK recognition of the state of Palestine was conditional.
He added he was 'particularly concerned that the very idea of a two-state solution is reducing and feels further away today than it has for many, many years'.
While Sir Keir signalled the UK could back away from recognising a Palestinian state if his conditions are met, No 10 is understood to believe that such a two-state solution would also proceed from negotiations towards a sustained peace.
The UK and its allies need to see 'at least 500 trucks entering Gaza every day' to deliver aid, the Prime Minister added, and are together 'mounting a major effort to get humanitarian supplies back in' by air and by land.
Sir Keir spoke with a series of world leaders throughout Tuesday, including Mr Netanyahu, and King Abdullah II of Jordan, whose nation is leading efforts to airdrop aid into Gaza.
About 20 tonnes of aid have been dropped by the UK and Jordan in recent days, according to Foreign Secretary David Lammy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
24 minutes ago
- ITV News
British-Israeli ex hostage 'deeply saddened' by UK plan to recognise Palestinian state
British-Israeli hostages and their families are concerned by the UK's decision to recognise the state of Palestine, as ITV News Political Correspondent Carl Dinnen reports. The British-Israeli former hostage Emily Damari has said she feels "deeply saddened" by the UK's announcement on Tuesday that it will recognise the state of Palestine by September, if Israel does not take steps to end the conflict. Posting on X, Damari wrote: "As a Dual British-Israeli citizen who survived 471 days in Hamas captivity, I am deeply saddened by your decision Keir Starmer to recognise Palestinian statehood. "This move does not advance peace—it risks rewarding terror. It sends a dangerous message: that violence earns legitimacy." She continued: "Recognition under these conditions emboldens extremists and undermines any hope for genuine peace. "Shame on you." Adam Rose, a Partner at the law firm Mishcon de Reya, represented seven families of the ten people taken hostage by Hamas with ties to the UK. Writing today, he said: "British hostage families are deeply concerned that hostages have been made a bargaining chip by the UK. "We are concerned that the UK's proposal risks delaying the release of the hostages. This is because the UK has said that it will recognise a Palestinian state unless Israel agrees a ceasefire. "But the risk is that Hamas will continue to refuse to a ceasefire because if it agrees to one this would make UK recognition less likely." Speaking to ITV News, Rose clarified: "If Hamas don't release the hostages, Israel is less likely to agree a ceasefire. If Israel doesn't agree a ceasefire, the UK position appears to be they will recognise the state of Palestine." Announcing the UK's intention on Tuesday, Starmer set certain conditions Israel would need to meet to prevent the UK recognising the state of Palestine. Speaking to press, he said: "The UK will recognise the state of Palestine by the United Nations general assembly in September, unless the Israeli government takes substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza, agree to a ceasefire, and commit to a long term sustainable peace - reviving the prospect of a two-state solution. "This includes allowing the UN to restart the supply of aid and making clear that there will be no annexations in the West Bank." He then went on to reiterate the demands on Hamas, saying: "They must immediately release all of the hostages, sign up to a ceasefire, disarm, and accept that they will play no part in the government of Gaza." He concluded: "We'll make an assessment in September on how far the parties have met these steps." The lawyers representing British hostages' families have asked for clarity from number ten on whether recognition of Palestinian statehood is contingent on the release of all remaining hostages by Hamas. Whilst Downing Street have not given that assurance, they have restated their demands on Hamas remain unchanged. In recent days, the PM had faced intense pressure from political opponents, as well as those in his own party, after 255 MPs from nine seperate parties wrote a letter calling on the UK to act faster in recognising Palestine's statehood. Chair of the Foreign Affair Committee Dame Emily Thornberry described the announcement as "fantastic" and said it showed Starmer was listening to people's concerns. Calls for the UK to join France in taking this step have been growing as the humaniatrian crisis in Gaza deteriorates, with scenes Starmer himself described as "revolting." The Labour party's position has long been to recognise the state of Palestine aspart of a two-state solution, with ministers recently saying it was a question of "when not if." Although the situation in the Middle-East was high on the agenda in a meeting between Starmer and Donald Trump, the US president distanced himself from the PM's position whilst flying home from his trip to Scotland. "You could make the case that you're rewarding people, that you're rewarding Hamas if you do that and I don't think they should be rewarded," Trump said, repeating the Israeli position. He added: "I'm not in that camp to be honest." The announcement of the UK's intention to recognise Palestine came the same day as Gaza's Health Authority brought the death toll up to over 60,000 over the 21-month conflict. Last week, experts warned the remaining population of Gaza is dangerously close to starvation, something Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu denied before being rebuffed by both Starmer and Trump. Israel's actions in Gaza come after an attack by Hamas terrorists on October 7, 2023, in which around 1,200 people were killed, nearly 800 of them civilians, and around 250 taken hostage. 50 hostages are thought to still be in captivity, of whom Israel believes 27 are dead. Netanyahu has previously said there are 'doubts' about the fate of several more. Responding to the UK's commitment to recognise the state of Palestine, Netanyahu posted on X: "Starmer rewards Hamas's monstrous terrorism and punishes its victims."A jihadist state on Israel's border TODAY will threaten Britain TOMORROW."Appeasement towards jihadist terrorists always fails. It will fail you too. It will not happen."
South Wales Argus
43 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Palestine Action High Court challenge can go ahead, judge rules
Huda Ammori is challenging Home Secretary Yvette Cooper's decision to proscribe the group under anti-terror laws, announced after the group claimed responsibility for action in which two Voyager planes were damaged at RAF Brize Norton on June 20. The ban means that membership of, or support for, the direct action group is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Earlier this month, lawyers for Ms Ammori asked a judge to allow her to bring the High Court challenge over the ban, describing it as an 'unlawful interference' with freedom of expression. And in a decision on Wednesday, judge Mr Justice Chamberlain said that two parts of the arguments on Ms Ammori's behalf were 'reasonably arguable'. In his ruling, he said it was arguable that the proscription 'amounts to a disproportionate interference' of Ms Ammori's rights to freedom of expression and freedom of assembly. He said: 'That being so, the point will have to be determined at a substantive hearing and it would not be appropriate for me to say more now.' The judge continued that a second argument, that Ms Cooper failed to consult Palestine Action 'in breach of natural justice', could also go to a full hearing. He said: 'As a matter of principle, I consider that it is reasonably arguable that a duty to consult arose.' He continued: 'Having considered the evidence, I also consider it reasonably arguable that there was no compelling reason why consultation could not have been undertaken here.' Mr Justice Chamberlain refused to allow Ms Ammori to challenge the Government's decision on several other grounds, including a claim that the Home Secretary failed to gather sufficient information on Palestine Action's activities or the impact of the proscription on people associated with it. He also refused to allow Ms Ammori to argue that Ms Cooper breached her duty under the Equality Act, and took into account 'irrelevant considerations', such as whether Palestine Action's methods were 'morally or politically justifiable'. Following the ruling, Ms Ammori said: 'This landmark decision to grant a judicial review which could see the Home Secretary's unlawful decision to ban Palestine Action quashed, demonstrates the significance of this case for freedoms of speech, expression and assembly and rights to natural justice in our country and the rule of law itself.' She continued: 'We will not stop defending fundamental rights to free speech and expression in our country and supporting Palestinian people against a genocide being livestreamed before our eyes.' Raza Husain KC, for Ms Ammori, previously told the court at the hearing on July 21 that the ban had made the UK 'an international outlier' and was 'repugnant'. Mr Husain added: 'The decision to proscribe Palestine Action had the hallmarks of an authoritarian and blatant abuse of power.' The Home Office is defending the legal action. Sir James Eadie KC, for the department, said in written submissions that by causing serious damage to property, Palestine Action was 'squarely' within part of the terrorism laws used in proscription. He said: 'There is no credible basis on which it can be asserted that the purpose of this activity is not designed to influence the Government, or to intimidate the public or a section of the public, and for the purpose of advancing a political, religious, racial or ideological cause.' Previously, Ben Watson KC, for the Home Office, said Palestine Action could challenge the Home Secretary's decision at the Proscribed Organisations Appeal Commission (POAC), a specialist tribunal, rather than at the High Court. Sir James said that an 'exceptional case' would be needed for it to go to the High Court, rather than the POAC. Mr Justice Chamberlain said on Wednesday that a High Court challenge could take place in the autumn of this year, whereas an appeal to the specialist tribunal would take much longer. He said: 'If it were necessary to appeal for deproscription, it is very unlikely that an application before POAC would be listed before the middle of 2026.' In his judgment, he said: 'If the legality of the proscription order can properly be raised by way of defence to criminal proceedings, that would open up the spectre of different and possibly conflicting decisions on that issue in magistrates' courts across England and Wales or before different judges or juries in the Crown Court. 'That would be a recipe for chaos. 'To avoid it, there is a strong public interest in allowing the legality of the order to be determined authoritatively as soon as possible. The obvious way to do that is in judicial review proceedings.' The judge also said that people protesting in support of Palestine and Gaza, but not expressing support for Palestine Action, had 'attracted various kinds of police attention, from questioning to arrest'. He continued that it was 'important not to draw too much from the fact that police and others appear to have misunderstood the law on some occasions'. But he added: 'Nonetheless, reports of the kind of police conduct referred to… are liable to have a chilling effect on those wishing to express legitimate political views. 'This effect can properly be regarded as an indirect consequence of the proscription order.' Ms Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action on June 23, saying that the vandalism of the two planes, which police said caused an estimated £7 million of damage, was 'disgraceful'.
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Small increase in university students from poorest areas
The Scottish Government hopes to have 20 percent of students coming from the most deprived 20 percent of the population by 2030, with an interim target of 18 percent by 2026. In order to achieve the final target, a total increase of 3.3 percentage points will be required over the next six years; however, over the past six years, the recorded increase has been just 1.1 percentage points, and the total increase since 2014 stands at just 3 percentage points. The latest Report on Widening Access also reveals that the number of full-time, first-degree university entrants with experience of the care system continues to increase: it now stands at 1.9 percent, which is higher than the overall percentage of under-18s thought to be looked after by local authorities. Scottish Liberal Democrat education spokesperson Willie Rennie MSP says that the figures show the Scottish Government is guilty of 'breaking yet another promise to close the attainment gap between students from the most and least deprived areas.' He said: 'When it comes to the attainment gap, the SNP can only offer broken promises and missed targets. 'Universities have done a lot of work in trying to widen access, but they can only do so much. Ultimately, the SNP's failure to close the attainment gap at a school level undermines that good work because it is leaving lots of young people from deprived backgrounds without the support they need to get into university. 'In schools, there are lots of issues that need addressed, from behaviour challenges to teachers stuck on supply lists and fundamental problems with the curriculum. But all of these have gotten worsen on the SNP's watch.' Graeme Dey MSP, the [[Scottish Government]] Minister for Higher and Further Education Graeme Dey, welcomed publication of the latest data: 'These figures show that the number of people from deprived areas in Scotland studying full time for their first degree in 2023-24 was the second highest on record. 'The number of Scots, from the most deprived areas, entering university on full-time first degree courses is up 37% since this government established the Commission on Widening Access, while we have also seen record numbers of Scots from deprived areas accepted to study in 2024, increasing by 11% since 2023. 'The findings today are a testament to the great work being done by both our universities and colleges to improve access, with an increase to 20.8% of all full-time entrants to undergraduate HE courses, including colleges, coming from the most deprived areas. 'However, there is more to do to meet the goal of 20% of all entrants being from the 20% most deprived communities by 2030. I will continue to work constructively with the sector to create more opportunities for people from the poorest backgrounds to go to university and gain qualifications which will help in our mission to eradicate child poverty. 'Our continued pledge to keep tuition fees free is also ensuring that access to higher education is based on the ability to learn and not the ability to pay.'
