logo
FlySafair under fire for offshore payouts amid staff wage freezes

FlySafair under fire for offshore payouts amid staff wage freezes

The Citizen3 days ago
Audited records reveal FlySafair transferred millions abroad while denying workers cost-of-living increases.
Amid a pilot strike due to protracted wage negotiations and along with domestic and international licensing compliance deadlines, it is now alleged FlySafair, South Africa's only budget air carrier, transferred substantial cash to its shareholders in Ireland.
A source said more than R1.31 billion was transferred abroad at the tail-end of the Covid pandemic, during a time when FlySafair reportedly told employees it could not afford basic cost-of-living salary increases.
The allegations are supported by the audited financial statements of Safair Aviation (Ireland) DAC, a holding company with no employees and minimal expenses, which reports to parent company ASL Aviation Holdings.
FlySafair reportedly transferred over R1.3bn offshore
According to the statements, Safair Aviation (Ireland) DAC received $54.5 million (about R956 million) in 2022, and a further $20.3 million in early 2023, from its South African subsidiary, Safair Holdings (Pty) Limited – the parent company of FlySafair.
In total, over $74.8 million was transferred abroad in just over a year.
FlySafair did not respond to requests for financial data covering earlier or later periods.
ALSO READ: FlySafair cancels more than 20 flights, offers refunds as pilots' strike continues [VIDEO]
'This is not just executive hypocrisy; it is a textbook case of pandemic profiteering,' the source said.
'Employees were told to sacrifice because the company was apparently struggling, yet foreign shareholders were enriched with sums that dwarf what would have been needed to treat staff fairly.'
At the time the funds were expatriated, pilots and other staff faced wage freezes and reduced benefits.
Pilots, staff faced wage freezes
Relating the cash exit, another source said that a 10% salary increase for pilots would, in contrast, have cost about R45 million a year.
'That is less than 4% of what was sent offshore in one financial period. There was no real inability to pay, just a decision to prioritise foreign shareholders over the people who keep the airline running,' said the source.
Earlier this year, FlySafair came under fire after questions about its ownership structure and control led to a sanction by the Domestic and International Air Licensing Councils.
ALSO READ: Here's how much FlySafair pilots are earning as increase offer rejected
It was found the airline was controlled by its Irish parent and thus in violation of the law.
Requirements in South Africa demand that 75% control of an airline remains in local hands, while the balance may be held internationally.
Aviation attorney and private pilot Emile Myburgh said, despite allegations from the source, this is not directly a profit issue, but it raises other questions.
Not directly a profit issue
'It certainly raises questions when significant profits go offshore. The fact that such significant sums go abroad is at least a red flag,' Myburgh said.
FlySafair has long argued that its ownership meets the legal thresholds, but Myburgh said regulators look beyond the paperwork.
'The law looks at the de facto, real situation,' he said.
ALSO READ: FlySafair pilots down tools, travellers warned of delays and cancellations
'It doesn't matter how you structure the 75% South African shareholding. If the tests laid down by the Air Services Licensing Act and Companies Act show that control lies with a non-South African resident, then it doesn't matter what the de jure situation is.'
Myburgh said South African aviation law does not tolerate simulation.
'Even if the airline shows 75% local shareholding on paper, if the 25% foreign shareholder effectively controls the airline through voting rights or board appointments, then the airline is in breach of the Act,' he said.
Near all of FlySafair controlled outside SA's borders
The Citizen previously reported that near all of FlySafair is controlled outside South Africa's borders.
The department of transport confirmed the carrier has appealed the domestic ruling but not the international sanction. FlySafair has about six months left to correct its control structures.
Businessman Robert Gumede was purportedly approached to invest in the company but, according to sources, the deal fell flat. Gumede's office did not respond to questions from The Citizen at the time of publication.
ALSO READ: Pilots at this airline may strike starting next week
A department of transport spokesperson responded to questions about the dividend export, FlySafair's licensing status and progress of same.
'These matters are part of the agenda to be discussed in the upcoming meetings of both councils. The outcomes of the meetings will be made available in the next coming two to three weeks.'
Myburgh said current wage negotiations between FlySafair's pilot body and the company could be impacted by the offshore dividend evidence.
Wage negotiation could be impacted by offshore dividend evidence
'Huge dividends being paid to shareholders while employees are told to take the financial brunt of the risk has often been used, successfully, against employers who plead poverty while living the good life during wage negotiations,' he said.
FlySafair did not acknowledge or respond to questions from The Citizen.
The carrier failed to respond to questions over the large dividends paid to its parent via a third party, how it justified these in the light of imposing wage austerity, or provided any additional annual financial statements that showed or didn't show similar activity in other years.
ALSO READ: Planning to Fly? Acsa warns of flight delays at OR Tambo International Airport
The airline also avoided responding to questions about local investment, shareholding, the status of acquiring a B-BBEE partner and licensing council sanctions.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Count Me in Movement calls for reform of spaza shop regulations to support local businesses
Count Me in Movement calls for reform of spaza shop regulations to support local businesses

IOL News

time2 hours ago

  • IOL News

Count Me in Movement calls for reform of spaza shop regulations to support local businesses

The Count Me In Movement has decried the systemic exclusion of South African citizens and township business owners from accessing crucial government support as the nation grapples with a burgeoning informal retail sector. . Image: Independent Newspapers Archives The Count Me in Movement has taken a firm stand against the "systematic exclusion" of South Africans within the current Spaza Shop regulatory framework, calling in the process for a significant overhaul of South Africa's spaza shop regulatory system. The movement said the current system excludes township business owners from accessing crucial government support while the nation continues to grapple with a burgeoning informal retail sector. This comes after the recent government announcement of the R500 million Spaza Shop Support Fund (SSSF), which seeks to empower eligible South African spaza shop owners in both townships and rural areas, offering them a lifeline to improve, expand, and sustain their businesses. However, the Count Me in Movement argues that many local entrepreneurs remain locked out of this initiative, primarily due to excessive compliance burdens, fragmented registration processes, and pervasive barriers within the licensing system. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ In a statement released on Friday, the movement appealed directly to Small Business Minister Stella Ndabeni-Abrahams, urging her to address these pressing challenges. They disclosed that while spaza shops play a pivotal role in township economies, a lack of streamlined and accessible compliance requirements often deters local operators from benefiting from government initiatives. "Despite playing a critical role in township economies, many of these businesses remain locked out of the Spaza Shop Support fund due to excessive compliance. burdens, fragmented registration requirements, and systematic barriers in the licensing process," it said. The movement said unregistered spaza shop owners, most of whom are undocumented foreigners have made the process very difficult for local spaza shop operators. "Adding to the challenge is the rapid proliferation of unregistered spaza shops, operated by undocumented foreign nationals, who are not subjected to the same inspections or regulatory scrutiny--creating an uneven and unfair playing field for local entrepreneurs. "Our local entrepreneurs are being set up to fail by a system that expects full compliance with scattered, expensive and inaccessible requirements. The current model disproportionately impacts South African spaza shop owners who lack the digital access, financial resources, or administrative support required to navigate complex state systems," the movement added.

Solidarity CEO urges FlySafair to prioritise pilots' wellbeing in strike standoff
Solidarity CEO urges FlySafair to prioritise pilots' wellbeing in strike standoff

IOL News

time3 hours ago

  • IOL News

Solidarity CEO urges FlySafair to prioritise pilots' wellbeing in strike standoff

Solidarity's CEO Dr Dirk Hermann urges FlySafair to prioritise people over profits, warning that pilot frustration, driven by poor work-life balance and mistrust, could ground the airline's future in a globally competitive market. Image: Supplied Solidarity union Chief Executive Officer Dr Dirk Hermann has called on FlySafair CEO Elmar Conradie to intervene directly in the airline's ongoing pilot strike, warning that the dispute has exposed a deep crisis of trust between the airline and its highly skilled workforce. In an open letter released on Sunday, July, 27, 2025, Hermann addressed Conradie directly, noting that while neither of them is personally involved in the negotiations, the matter has reached a critical point that requires leadership. 'This open letter deliberately does not form part of the negotiations but is a note between the two of us,' he wrote. Hermann highlighted that more than 90% of Solidarity's pilot members voted to continue the strike even after a new offer from FlySafair, an unprecedented move for a professional group that rarely resorts to industrial action. 'Solidarity members only go on strike as a matter of the highest exception... This case is, however, such a highly exceptional one,' he said. He pointed to a 'complete breakdown of trust' between the airline and its pilots and describes their levels of disillusionment as 'toxic.' Drawing on his academic expertise, Hermann added: 'I did my PhD in Labour Relations, and my topic was alienation. I can tell you that the alienation levels of your pilots are toxic.' A core concern is not just remuneration, but the implementation of a new roster system that significantly impacts work-life balance. Pilots, according to Hermann, are not primarily striking over money but over the loss of meaningful, balanced working conditions. ' They are asking for one weekend off a month,' he explains. 'They are looking for balanced jobs and FlySafair has taken that away from them.' Hermann criticised FlySafair's handling of the strike, especially the decision to respond to a one-day action with a full week-long lockout, now extended. 'They wanted to show what is going on in their hearts, but then they got hit in the pocket. They have been threatened and bullied,' he said. He warned that the airline risks an exodus of pilots to international carriers. While FlySafair achieved record profits in 2024 and reportedly paid out R90 million in shares to executives and R1.31 billion to overseas shareholders, many pilots' salaries remain below pre-COVID levels. Hermann argues that the airline's offer has not kept pace with local and global industry standards, especially given the global shortage of pilots. ' There is a pilot shortage, and it is going to get even worse. This shortage is going to rise above inflation, and so too will their salaries. It is a market reality,' he writes. 'My call to you is to intervene in the negotiations. Don't look at the sums, but at the people. Be internationally competitive with a total remuneration package that surpasses salary. If you don't, it will translate into sums, sums you will not like.' 'You must now land this plane that is on strike. Give the pilots what they are asking for and what is good for them, the company and the country,'' he said. Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel. IOL News

Trump's Tariffs Must Sow the Seeds for a National Reawakening
Trump's Tariffs Must Sow the Seeds for a National Reawakening

The Star

time5 hours ago

  • The Star

Trump's Tariffs Must Sow the Seeds for a National Reawakening

Zamikhaya Maseti | Published 9 hours ago Zamikhaya Maseti On August 1, 2025 , South Africa will enter a zone of strategic economic pain, engineered not by global market fluctuations, but by the vengeful hands of conservative economic nationalism. The United States, under the reins of Donald J. Trump, will impose a 30 per cent tariff on all goods and products exported from South Africa to the American markets. This is not a policy of trade readjustment; it is a geoeconomic act of hostility. The justification, wrapped in the language of " reciprocity, " is in reality a strategic blow aimed at disciplining South Africa's geopolitical posture and diplomatic boldness. Trump's economic nationalism, which sits at the ideological centre of Conservative Republicanism, is not merely inward-looking. It is punitive, retaliatory, and profoundly regressive. It has shaken the global trade architecture, not to recalibrate it, but to bend it in favour of America's new mercantilist order. This doctrine does not merely target trade imbalances; it punishes defiance. South Africa is now paying the price for standing on principle, particularly for its posture on Palestine and its landmark case against Israel at the International Court of Justice. It is clear, painfully so, that South Africa is being economically strangled not for what it trades, but for what it believes. Some Western analysts, ever keen to defend the status quo, will dispute this. They will search for economic rationality in an act that is blatantly political. Let them continue their intellectual gymnastics. This moment calls for clarity, not politeness. The truth is that Trump's worldview is transactional and tribal, and in that logic, South Africa has become collateral. That South Africa is seen as an irritant in Washington's new world order is not coincidental; it is structural. And let it be said without fear, Trump's policy on South Africa is influenced not only by economic calculations but by the mythologies peddled by actors like AfriForum and Elon Musk, who have exported the lie of white genocide into America's political bloodstream. But this is not the time for victimhood, nor is it the moment for diplomatic lamentation. It is time for South Africa to do some difficult thinking and embrace a new, muscular pragmatism . Diplomatic efforts, however noble, are unlikely to change Trump's position. Minister Parks Tau and his diplomatic team may work tirelessly, but they are facing a political machine that does not respond to nuance. Trump's narrative is fixed , and in that narrative, South Africa is an unfriendly trading partner whose tariffs harm American interests. He argues, correctly or not, that South African import duties and market access protocols are unfavourable to US goods. That argument, however flawed, resonates with his domestic base, and therefore it will stand. The United States will not blink , and it will not backtrack . Thus, it is not sufficient for South Africa to hope against hope; it must respond. Minister Parks Tau, trade envoys, and industrial leaders must now do the hard intellectual and strategic labour of repositioning the country's economic posture. Nowhere is this urgency more pressing than in the automotive sector, a critical node of South Africa's manufacturing ecosystem. This sector is not only a source of direct jobs; it sustains a complex web of downstream industries, from component manufacturing and logistics to retail and after-market services. It is here that the 30 per cent tariff will hit hardest, and it is here that innovation, not inertia, must be summoned . The sector must accept that the American market , for the foreseeable future, has lost ground. The time has come for South Africa to pivot decisively toward other markets, especially those aligned with its economic diplomacy ambitions. The first option lies in the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), the single largest integrated market on the continent , and the largest globally by number of countries. With over 1.3 billion people and a combined GDP exceeding $3.4 trillion, the AfCFTA offers South Africa a natural and politically friendly trading space. Sub-Saharan Africa, in particular, presents high-value demand for affordable, durable automotive products, especially among its emerging middle classes and youthful populations. Research shows that more than 60 per cent of the region's population is under the age of 25, representing a long-term demand curve that is not speculative, but empirically grounded. Yet, South African companies have been slow to leverage this opportunity. There remains an unhealthy fog of Afro-pessimism and the lingering delusion of South African exceptionalism. These intellectual blindfolds must be cast aside . Africa is not a dumping ground; it is a destination for growt h. The automotive industry must shift from waiting for trade to come to it and instead begin creating strategic partnerships in East, West, and Central Africa. This includes setting up joint ventures, service hubs, and low-cost satellite assembly plants across regional economic communities. The second and equally strategic option lies in a new industrial partnership with China. The presence and popularity of Chinese-made vehicles in the South African domestic market has reached a saturation point. They are competitively priced, technologically competent, and now represent a serious challenge to traditional brands. But if left unmanaged, this trend could lead to the hollowing out of South Africa's manufacturing base. South Africa must use its BRICS membership as a strategic lever. China must be persuaded to localise the manufacturing of its automotive brands in South Africa. This is not a charity request; it is a strategic proposal. Chinese companies should be invited to co-invest in high-tech manufacturing and assembly infrastructure in Eastern Cape, Gauteng, and KwaZulu-Natal. This could take the form of co-assembled production alongside legacy OEMs like Mercedes-Benz SA, which now face looming layoffs. The South African government must incentivise this localisation through targeted industrial policy, special economic zones, and technology-sharing frameworks. In this regard, the principle of ' South Africa Inc ' must be revived with urgency. Under President Cyril Ramaphosa, South Africa Inc refers to the coordinated use of economic diplomacy, government strategy, and business networks to advance national economic interests abroad. Its objectives are to integrate South African companies into key markets, attract strategic investment, and drive regional industrialisation. In Southern Africa, this approach has already delivered notable success, such as increased South African corporate presence in Zambia, Namibia, and Mozambique, particularly in retail, finance, and energy sectors. Now is the time to bring the automotive sector under this umbrella. South African diplomatic missions across Africa and Asia must be tasked explicitly with facilitating market entry, assembling policy frameworks, and brokering industrial partnerships for local manufacturers. This is not merely export promotion; it is the safeguarding of South Africa's industrial sovereignty. In conclusion, the Trump tariffs should not be seen as the end of a trade relationship, but as the beginning of a deeper national reawakening. The South African government must retool its economic diplomacy, its industrial incentives, and its regional vision. The automotive sector, in particular, must abandon old comfort zones and rise to this moment with the courage of imagination and the rigour of strategy. What is at stake is more than exports; it is the future of South Africa's industrial identity. * Zamikhaya Maseti is a Political Economy Analyst with a Magister Philosophiae (M. PHIL) in South African Politics and Political Economy from the University of Port Elizabeth (UPE), now known as the Nelson Mandela University (NMU). ** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL, Independent Media or The African.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store