Flippant ‘Alligator Alcatraz' name obscures the unjust, dehumanizing truth
An open letter to the editors and producers of our nation's newsrooms:
I am writing today out of deep concern over the language being used by many media outlets to describe the immigrant detention center in Florida currently known as 'Alligator Alcatraz.' As an English teacher of nearly 20 years, I understand that language matters. While it may seem like a harmless nickname or a clever turn of phrase, referring to this facility by such a flippant term has dangerous consequences for public understanding and moral clarity.
Let's call this place what it is: a government-run detention camp, where human beings — including children — are being held in conditions that have been widely criticized by humanitarian organizations. Hundreds held there are facing no criminal charges. A catchy nickname, especially one coined by the administration responsible for its operation, serves to sanitize and trivialize the very real suffering taking place there. It diminishes public outrage and makes it easier for these facilities to continue existing in the shadows of normalized cruelty.
The words we choose shape public perception and, ultimately, public policy. Both history and current events offer chilling reminders of how euphemisms can be weaponized to obscure injustice.
During World War II, The United States referred to the unconstitutional incarceration of Japanese Americans as 'relocation,' and the German Nazi government used the term 'Sonderbehandlung' (which translates to 'special treatment') in the context of the Holocaust.
More recently the first Trump administration's Zero Tolerance Policy on immigration, led to the creation of detention centers for migrant children who were taken from their parents. They were branded 'tender-age shelters.'
Right now, as our government publicly condemns China for rounding up Uyghur people and sending them to 'reeducation camps,' it is sending people snatched from their jobs and immigration hearings to a camp that sounds like a Disney attraction.
The mass media has no control over what an administration that has no shame will do. However, it does have a responsibility, not to repeat the government's talking points, but to speak truth to power. Going along with that name minimizes the gravity of a human rights crisis. The fact that this nickname has been circulated by officials, or gained social media traction, does not mean it should be perpetuated by responsible journalists.
I urge you, as people with power to shape public conversation, to reconsider how your organization refers to this facility. Call it what it is: a detention center, an immigrant holding facility, or — if you have the courage to name the moral reality — a modern-day concentration camp. The stakes are too high for us to play along with euphemisms. People's lives and dignity hang in the balance.
Sincerely,
Nikki Kincaid
Nikki Kincaid is a proud lifelong Missourian, a veteran teacher and a believer in plainspoken truth.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Republican Congressman who voted against Trump's bill now trying to fundraise off Epstein files
Republican lawmaker Thomas Massie is fundraising off his efforts to compel the Justice Department to release files on the disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. In a recent email to supporters, first reported by MeidasTouch News, the Republican wrote that 'the most powerful people on earth have been working overtime to keep the Epstein files hidden for many years.' 'When I force Congress to go on record on the Epstein files, I have no doubt that they'll bring the world down on my head,' Massie added. Massie and Democratic Representative Ro Khanna are leading a bipartisan effort to force Congress to vote on a measure compelling the Justice Department to release the remaining Epstein files. The petition comes after the Justice Department and FBI released a joint memo indicating there will be 'no further disclosure' on the investigation into Epstein, who was facing federal sex trafficking charges when he died. In the same memo, the agencies confirmed Epstein died by suicide in a New York City jail cell in August 2019 following years of conspiracy theories around his death. The memo also claimed Epstein did not keep a 'client list,' even after Attorney General Pam Bondi suggested the list was on her desk earlier this year. The administration is facing mounting backlash from both sides of the aisle over the memo. Trump has defended Bondi and directed her to seek the release of grand jury testimony related to Epstein last week. The Justice Department has since filed a request with a federal judge to unseal that testimony. It's unclear when it will actually be unsealed, however. Speaker of the House Mike Johnson announced the House's annual summer break will start on Wednesday as Massie and Khanna continued their efforts. Johnson says he doesn't 'understand' Massie's motivation for bringing the petition. 'Thomas Massie could have brought his discharge petition anytime over the last four years of the Biden administration,' Johnson said. 'He could have done that at any time, and now he's clamoring as if there's some sort of timeline on it.' 'I try to follow Ronald Reagan's 11th Commandment: never speak evil of another Republican," he added. "My gosh, it's hard to do sometimes around here.' The House could be forced into a vote after the summer break ends in September. Massie and Khanna need 218 signatures to force the vote in the fall. Massie is optimistic they'll get them, NBC News reports. "Over the August recess, I think momentum will build for transparency. I don't think this is going to go away," Massie said. "And I think, when we return in September, we'll get Phase 2 of the Epstein files because we'll get…every Democrat and at least a dozen Republicans who want transparency and justice." Massie has made an apparent enemy of Trump in recent months. Trump called Massie a 'Third Rate Congressman' and a 'LOSER' after he voted against the president's sweeping tax and spending bill, also known as the 'Big, Beautiful Bill.' Massie was one of only two Republicans to vote against the legislation, which passed the House along party lines and passed the Senate with a tie-breaking vote from Vice President JD Vance. Trump also raged against Massie when he criticized his decision to bomb nuclear sites in Iran last month. 'Congressman Thomas Massie of Kentucky is not MAGA, even though he likes to say he is,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. 'The good news is that we will have a wonderful American Patriot running against him in the Republican Primary, and I'll be out in Kentucky campaigning really hard. MAGA is not about lazy, grandstanding, nonproductive politicians, of which Thomas Massie is definitely one,' he added. The Independent has contacted Massie for comment.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Appeals court won't reinstate AP access to presidential events
The U.S. Court of Appeals on Tuesday denied an appeal by The Associated Press for a hearing on its efforts to restore full access to cover presidential events, not ending its case but allowing the White House to continue its control over access to President Donald Trump. The news outlet wanted the court to overturn a three-judge panel's June 6 ruling not to let AP back into the events until merits of the news organization's lawsuit against Trump was decided. But the court on Tuesday declined to hear that appeal. It all stems from Trump's decision in February to keep AP journalists out of the Oval Office, Air Force One and other events too small for a full press corps, in retaliation for the news outlet's decision not to follow his lead in changing the Gulf of Mexico's name. The AP sued in response. In April, a district court ruled that the administration could not exclude journalists based on their opinions. The Trump administration immediately turned to the U.S. Court of Appeals to successfully delay implementation of the ruling before the court could consider the full merits of the case. Next up: This fall, the appeals court considers those full merits. 'We are disappointed by today's procedural decision but remain focused on the strong district court opinion in support of free speech as we have our case heard,' said Patrick Maks, an AP spokesman. 'As we've said throughout, the press and the public have a fundamental right to speak freely without government retaliation.' The White House did not immediately return a request for comment. Since the start of the case, the White House has instituted new rules for access to the limited-space events. AP photographers have been regularly permitted back, but its reporters only occasionally. On Monday, the White House said it would not allow a reporter from The Wall Street Journal onto Air Force One to cover Trump's weekend trip to Scotland because of the outlet's 'fake and defamatory conduct' in a story about the president and late financier Jeffrey Epstein. ___ David Bauder writes about media for the AP. Follow him at and David Bauder, The Associated Press
Bloomberg
26 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Chicago CFO Says Property Tax Hike Likely in 2026 Budget Package
Chicago Chief Financial Officer Jill Jaworski said the city will likely seek to raise property taxes to address next year's budget deficit. 'It is likely that that will be part of the package,' Jaworski said in an interview at Bloomberg's New Voices event in Chicago on Tuesday. 'We haven't rolled out the full package yet, but the package is going to include cuts, and it is going to include proposals for increasing our revenues.'
