&w=3840&q=100)
Baby Grok: Elon Musk's xAI plans to launch child-friendly AI app soon
"We're going to make Baby Grok @xAI, an app dedicated to kid-friendly content," Musk said in an X post on Sunday (IST). The move signals Musk's intention to expand AI usage into the domain of child education and entertainment, while addressing growing concerns about children's exposure to AI.
Moving away from controversies
Musk's announcement of a new app could help the company pivot away from the recent controversies, especially when it comes to protecting young users.
Ahead of the curve
A child-friendly version could also give the chatbot a competitive edge, as most rivals are yet to launch dedicated apps for youngsters. Grok competes with the likes of OpenAI's ChatGPT and Google's Gemini. Recently, the chatbot has been more deeply integrated into Musk's social network platform X, where it publicly engages with users.
Expanding domains
Earlier this month, xAI also unveiled 'Grok for Government', an initiative aimed at developing AI solutions tailored for US government agencies. The project focuses on creating intelligent, agentic workflows to support various administrative and security functions. According to media reports, xAI stated that the program will bring its advanced AI capabilities to federal, local, state, and national security customers, signalling the firm's growing interest in public sector partnerships.
New updates
On July 9, xAI released its latest version of the AI chatbot -- Grok 4. According to xAI, Grok 4 is the most intelligent AI model in the world. Grok 4 includes native tool use and real-time search integration, the company said. We utilised Colossus, our 200,000 GPU cluster, to run reinforcement learning training that refines Grok's reasoning abilities at pretraining scale, the firm added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
Meta, X and LinkedIn appeal unprecedented VAT claim by Italy
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills US tech giants Meta, X and LinkedIn have lodged an appeal against an unprecedented VAT claim by Italy that could influence tax policy across the 27-nation European Union, four sources with direct knowledge of the matter said on is the first time that Italy has failed to reach a settlement agreement after bringing tax cases against tech companies, resulting in a fully-fledged judicial tax trial being to the sources, this came about because the case went beyond agreeing on a settlement figure and sought to establish a broader approach focused on how social networks provide access to their tax authorities argue that free user registrations with X, LinkedIn and Meta platforms should be seen as taxable transactions as they imply the exchange of a membership account in return for a user's personal issue is especially sensitive given wider trade tensions between the EU and the administration of US President Donald is claiming 887.6 million euros ($1.03 billion) from Meta, 12.5 million euros from X and around 140 million euros from the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, Elon Musk's social network X and Microsoft's LinkedIn filed their appeals with a first instance tax court after mid-July, when the deadline for responding to a tax assessment notice issued by Italy's Revenue Agency in March to several experts consulted by Reuters, the Italian approach could affect almost all companies, from airlines to supermarkets to publishers, who link access to free services on their sites to users' acceptance of profiling could also eventually be extended across the EU where VAT is a harmonised a statement to Reuters, Meta said that it had cooperated "fully with the authorities on our obligations under EU and local law".It added that the company "strongly disagrees with the idea that providing access to online platforms to users should be subject to VAT".LinkedIn said it had "nothing to share at this time".X did not respond to a request for comment from is uncertain whether a full trial of the matter, which involves three levels of judgement and takes an average of 10 years, will go discussions with the three companies, Italy is preparing as a next step to seek an advisory opinion from the European Commission, the sources Italian Revenue Agency will have to prepare specific questions, which the Economy Ministry will then send to the EU Commission's VAT Committee, which meets twice a aims to submit its questions for the meeting scheduled to be held by early November, in order to receive the EU's comments in time for the following meeting in spring Economy Ministry and Revenue Agency declined to EU Commission's VAT Committee is an independent advisory group. While its assessment will be non-binding, a "No" could prompt Italy to halt the case and ultimately drop the criminal investigation by Italian prosecutors, according to the dispute is one of several between Europeans and US Big July 11 Reuters exclusively reported that Meta would not be tweaking its pay-or-consent model further despite the risk of EU to a Financial Times report on July 17, the European Commission has stalled one of its investigations into Musk's platform X for breaching its digital transparency rules while it seeks to conclude trade talks with the US.
NDTV
34 minutes ago
- NDTV
After No-Show Today, Google, Meta Summoned Again By Probe Agency In Betting App Case
New Delhi: Tech giants Google and Meta have been summoned by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) yet again, directing their representatives to appear before it on July 28. This comes after both companies failed to show up today, saying they needed time to collect relevant information and required documents in connection with a probe into illegal online betting and money laundering. The ED is investigating allegations that several betting apps - already under scrutiny - were promoted through digital advertisements on platforms operated by Google and Meta. The agency suspects that the tech firms may have inadvertently played a role in enabling these apps by allowing them to run promotional content and by not adequately vetting advertisers. According to officials, representatives from both companies were expected to submit documentation related to ad revenues, business dealings, and algorithmic placements involving the betting platforms. However, citing the need for more time to compile necessary materials, they failed to appear on the designated date. Consequently, the ED has now made it mandatory for them to present themselves with all relevant documents by July 28. The probe is being conducted under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), and spans across multiple stakeholders, including app developers, media outlets, hawala operators, and celebrity endorsers. The agency is reportedly tracing financial trails and potential ad monetisation linked to these betting entities. This is part of a broader crackdown by the ED, which began after evidence emerged of foreign-linked betting operations using Indian platforms for illegal transactions. The Ministry of Information and Broadcasting had earlier issued advisories warning digital platforms against airing betting-related ads, but violations reportedly continued, prompting further scrutiny. So far, neither Google nor Meta has publicly commented on the summons or the investigation. The July 28 appearance is likely to be critical as the ED examines whether the tech platforms had any awareness or control over the nature of the content they were monetising - and if any compliance gaps contributed to unlawful gains. Meanwhile, the probe agency has also summoned actors Rana Daggubati, Prakash Raj, Vijay Deverakonda and Lakshmi Manchu in connection with the case. Mr Daggubati has been asked to appear before its zonal office in Hyderabad on July 23, Mr Raj has been summoned on July 30, Mr Deverakonda on August 6, and Ms Manchu on August 13. These actors were accused of promoting illegal betting apps on social media platforms.
Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
Betting on Bots: Why Replacing People With AI Is a Strategic Time Bomb
Chasing Efficiency, Losing Humanity Live Events AI Without Humans is a Half-Built Machine Short-Term Wins, Long-Term Repercussions The Future Belongs to Hybrid Organizations AI has reached a pivotal inflection point. With generative AI tools capable of automating everything from customer service to content creation, many enterprises are viewing headcount reduction as an obvious—and profitable—next step. From big tech to media, the layoffs are already face value, it makes sense. AI costs less, doesn't take sick days, and can scale operations overnight. But that's a dangerously narrow lens. These companies are mistaking productivity for progress and treating human capital as a liability instead of a renewable resource. The consequence? They're optimizing themselves out of future are not just a cost—they're the culture, the connective tissue, and the strategic memory of an organization. When you lose people, you lose intuition, insight, and creativity that no algorithm can replicate. Klarna , the Swedish fintech giant, made headlines earlier this year when it announced that its AI assistant—powered by OpenAI's tech—was now handling the workload of 700 full-time customer service agents. CEO Sebastian Siemiatkowski proudly touted the shift as a breakthrough in efficiency, claiming that the AI assistant performed the equivalent work of hundreds of employees with a higher satisfaction rate and dramatically lower the market, this looked like genius: more output, less overhead. Klarna's stock surged. Executives were praised. Media dubbed it 'the future of fintech.' But beneath the surface, a more complex story is emerging—one that questions whether this brand of AI enthusiasm is sustainable, humane, or even strategically began facing a surge in customer complaints, a dip in user satisfaction, and growing frustration with the AI system that had replaced its human tone has changed as well. In his recent remarks to multiple media outlets, he admitted,' We went too far'. He stressed the importance of striking the right balance between human workers and artificial intelligence, a lesson that could influence the broader fintech and tech is an optimizer, not an originator. It can execute flawlessly within known parameters, but it cannot challenge assumptions, break paradigms, or understand contextual emotion. When companies replace humans outright, they're not just saving on salary—they're amputating the very instincts that guide long-term business service, marketing, product design—these aren't just workflows. They're empathy engines. They're how a brand speaks, listens, and evolves. Automating these entirely means you'll start sounding like everyone else—and eventually lose your market automating roles with AI improves profit margins. But what does it cost in morale, IP continuity, and innovation capacity? Layoffs send a chilling signal internally: people are replaceable. This breeds fear, not ambition. Talented employees—especially those in mid-level or creative roles—start looking elsewhere. As institutional knowledge walks out the door, the organization begins to hollow from firms aren't just dumping talent and plugging in AI. They're retraining, reskilling, and reimagining what AI-human synergy can look like. IBM is transitioning over 30% of its workforce to AI-augmented roles, but is heavily investing in upskilling instead of laying off. Accenture has pledged over $3 billion in AI investments with human training at the centre. These are companies preparing for a future where humans lead and machines empower, not understand the hard truth: people may cost more in the short term, but they create far more value in the long five years, we'll be able to draw a clear line between companies that used AI to enhance their workforce and those that used it to erase people with AI is an easy move on paper. But leadership isn't about short-term optics—it's about building durable, adaptive, human-first here's the inconvenient truth: AI will change the world, but it won't change your culture. People will.
