logo
‘It is killing people': UN chief slams US-backed Gaza aid operation

‘It is killing people': UN chief slams US-backed Gaza aid operation

Irish Times11 hours ago

United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres said a US-backed aid operation in
Gaza
is 'inherently unsafe', giving the blunt assessment that 'it is killing people'.
Israel
and the
United States
want the United Nations to work through the controversial new Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), but the
UN
has refused, questioning its neutrality and accusing the distribution model of militarising aid and forcing displacement.
'Any operation that channels desperate civilians into militarised zones is inherently unsafe. It is killing people,' Mr Guterres told reporters.
Mr Guterres said UN-led humanitarian efforts are being 'strangled', aid workers themselves are starving and Israel, as the occupying power, is required to agree to and facilitate aid deliveries into and throughout the Palestinian enclave.
READ MORE
'People are being killed simply trying to feed themselves and their families. The search for food must never be a death sentence,' Mr Guterres told reporters.
'It is time to find the political courage for a ceasefire in Gaza.'
Since Israel lifted an 11-week aid blockade on Gaza on May 19th, allowing limited UN deliveries to resume, the UN says more than 400 Palestinians have been killed seeking aid from the UN and GHF operations. A senior UN official said on Sunday that the majority of those people were trying to reach GHF sites.
Responding to Mr Guterres on Friday, Israel's foreign ministry said Israel's military never targets civilians. It accused the UN of 'doing everything it can' to oppose the GHF aid operation.
'In doing so, the UN is aligning itself with Hamas, which is also trying to sabotage the GHF's humanitarian operations,' it posted on X.
A GHF spokesperson said there have been no deaths at or near any of the GHF aid distribution sites.
'It is unfortunate the UN continue to push false information regarding our operations,' the GHF spokesperson said. 'Bottom line, our aid is getting securely delivered. Instead of bickering and throwing insults from the sidelines, we would welcome the UN and other humanitarian groups to join us and feed the people in Gaza.'
GHF uses private US security and logistics firms to operate. It began operations in Gaza on May 26th and said on Friday it has given out more than 48 million meals so far. The US state department said on Thursday it had approved $30 million in funding for the GHF and called on other countries to also support the group.
Israel and the United States have accused Hamas of stealing aid from the UN-led operations, which the militants deny. —Reuters

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US is again betting that installing ‘our sonuvabitch' will neutralise an adversary. It never does
US is again betting that installing ‘our sonuvabitch' will neutralise an adversary. It never does

Irish Times

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Times

US is again betting that installing ‘our sonuvabitch' will neutralise an adversary. It never does

In the surreal world of Donald Trump and Binyamin Netanyahu , war starts and ends on social media, with the flick of a post on Truth Social. Midnight Hammer, the name chosen by Washington for its June 22nd bombing raids on Iran , might have been better suited to a porn film. Everything in Sheriff Trump's wild west is oversized – the world's most expensive warplanes delivered the world's heaviest ordnance on the world's longest bombing raid constituting 'ONE OF THE MOST SUCCESSFUL MILITARY STRIKES IN HISTORY'. Except it wasn't. In his inaugural address last January, Trump gave the impression he had learned from past errors, promising to 'measure our success not only by the battles we win but also by the wars that we end – and perhaps most importantly, the wars we never get into'. If Trump were capable of contemplation, he might ask himself why, roughly every 20 years, Israel and the US attempt to remake the Middle East, with catastrophic consequences. A brief reminder of past misadventures: READ MORE June 1982 Israel invades Lebanon with the goal of stopping attacks by the Palestine Liberation Organisation. Hundreds of Israeli soldiers and tens of thousands of Lebanese and Palestinians are killed. Israeli occupation forces remain in much of the country for 18 years, until they are driven out in humiliation by Hizbullah, an Iranian-backed Shia Muslim militia. March 2003 The US invades Iraq with the goal of destroying Saddam Hussein's nonexistent weapons of mass destruction. Hundreds of thousands of Iraqis and more than 4,000 US troops are killed during the invasion, ensuing civil war and eight-year occupation, which costs more than $3 trillion. Iran becomes the main power in Iraq. June 13th, 2025 Binyamin Netanyahu begins bombing Iran, on the dubious pretext that Iran is about to make a nuclear weapon. Israel has never owned up to owning hundreds of nuclear warheads that it has never submitted for inspection. Trump, who doesn't follow through on his own ultimatums to Vladimir Putin , waits only three days of a two-week grace period before dropping 14 30,000-pound GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator bombs, or MOPs, on Iranian nuclear sites. Trump calls Iran 'the world's No 1 state sponsor of terror'. But these days, it is Trump's buddies, Putin and Netanyahu, who practise state terror against Ukraine and Gaza. If there really were no other way to spare the world from a hypothetical Iranian bomb, one might have concluded – as German chancellor Friedrich Merz did in an obscene remark – that Israel was 'doing our dirty work for us', or 'Drecksarbeit', as he put it. Nato secretary general Mark Rutte also praised the illegal attacks . Under Trump, the West has lost its moral compass. Painstaking negotiations, not brute force, are the only way to defuse a nuclear threat. Diplomacy achieved the 2015 accord known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action treaty (JCPOA) , which Iran abided by until Trump discarded the agreement at Netanyahu's urging. It was Netanyahu who commissioned the 1996 Clean Break report advocating the overthrow of Saddam Hussein, upon which US neocons based the 2003 invasion of Iraq. This month's war on Iran was reportedly inspired by Restoring Deterrence: Destabilising the Iranian Regime, a study by the British academic researcher Barak Seener, published by a rightwing think tank in London. The belief that we can neutralise an adversary by installing 'our sonuvabitch' is a dangerous, recurring delusion. In 1982 Israel and the US attempted to impose the soon-to-be slain Maronite militia leader Bachir Gemayel to lead Lebanon. In 2003 the US groomed Ahmad Chalabi , a corrupt banker who propagated the myth of Saddam's WMDs, for Baghdad. Now Israel dreams of restoring the Pahlavi dynasty, 46 years after the late Shah and his family were driven out by Islamic revolution. The Shah's son, Reza Pahlavi, now aged 64, visited Jerusalem with his mother Farah Diba at the invitation of the Israeli Likud cabinet minister Gila Gamliel in 2023. 'The Iranian people love Israel, and they want the Ayatollah regime to be replaced,' Gamaliel told the Jerusalem Post in March. Trump harbours the same fantasy: 'It's not politically correct to use the term 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime Change??? MIGA!!!' he posted on Truth Social. On June 23rd Reza Pahlavi predicted at a press conference in Paris that the Tehran regime would fall this year. Israel's heritage minister, Amihai Eliyahu of the far-right Otzma Yehudit party, said , 'The fact that we are co-operating with the opposition in Iran today is a blessing.' After an estimated 800 Iranians and 30 Israelis were killed, Trump blithely congratulated his Israeli allies and the country he had just bombed for their 'Stamina, Courage, and Intelligence'. Hours later he lashed out at both for apparent ceasefire violations, saying they 'don't know what the f*** they are doing.' Trump flew to The Hague, where he was feted by royalty and fawned over by Nato's secretary general. Thirty-one of Nato's 32 member states – only Spain's socialist prime minister, Pedro Sánchez, objected – caved in to Trump's long-time demand that they devote 5 per cent of GDP to defence. And those extra hundreds of billions had better be spent on US hardware. There was not a squeak of criticism for Russia's assault on Ukraine, because Trump hates it when you insult his buddies. He denounced corruption charges against Netanyahu as 'a witch hunt'. Trump directed his venom at 'FAKE NEWS CNN, TOGETHER WITH THE FAILING NEW YORK TIMES' for reporting preliminary findings by the US Defence Intelligence Agency that 12 days of sound and fury had delayed Iran's nuclear programme by at best a few months. CIA director John Ratcliffe flew to Trump's rescue, insisting that Operation Midnight Hammer set back Iran's nuclear programme by years. We segued from the verge of a third world war into farce, with Trump, Netanyahu and Iran's supreme leader all claiming victory. Trump and Netanyahu must learn there is no such thing as a quick fix in the Middle East. We've come full circle to the original dilemma: negotiations or a new forever war.

Quiet man of Government emerges from the shadows
Quiet man of Government emerges from the shadows

RTÉ News​

time2 hours ago

  • RTÉ News​

Quiet man of Government emerges from the shadows

As the fledgling Iran and Israel ceasefire unexpectedly took root last Tuesday morning, a less dramatic act of consolidation was playing out in front of the cameras in Government Buildings. The coalition's leaders hurriedly arranged themselves on the podium in the press centre on Merrion Street to tell the world about a plan to breathe new life into Dublin's O'Connell Street. The event was late getting under way as the Taoiseach explained that the ferociously busy Cabinet meeting had worked through no less than 50 items. Was Micheál Martin suggesting that the "do-nothing Dáil" label which smudged the planned glossy opening act of this Government was now consigned to history? That was the clear inference and amid the spirit of fast-moving newness there emerged from the wings, the politician who effectively leads the Independent ministers in Government. Seán Canney stood with the Taoiseach and Tánaiste in a manner akin to Eamon Ryan's ever-present role in the last administration. The Galway-East TD's prominent public positioning last week was the result of mounting frustration among some Independent ministers and TDs. They felt that the presentation of the Government, particularly by the media, as primarily a two-party entity, was unfair and inaccurate. "There were conversations among a few ministers, and it was decided that we need people to know that there are three and maybe four parts to this Government," said one minister. Others point to what they perceive as an even deeper disregard for some Independent TDs who signed up to the Programme for Government. "They cut us out of the consultative process when making decisions and that led to Barry Heneghan and Gillian Toole voting against them, but it is now sorted, they know we're serious," said one Independent TD. The group has also had its own Deputy Government Press Secretary, Tom Blade, appointed this week. All the while there is an absolute rule across Government that these ministers and TDs must receive information simultaneously with those in Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael. He is a great manager of people and is very structured in his approach, I think he could qualify for a UN role at this stage. If everyone understands their roles better now, there is nonetheless a complicated structure to the Independent's place in the Government. What is beyond dispute is that Mr Canney is the de facto leader of the Independent ministers. Privately he is acutely aware that it is a job which requires the most well-honed of diplomatic skills, given the differing aims of his colleagues and the absence of a political party machine. "He is a great manager of people and is very structured in his approach, I think he could qualify for a UN role at this stage" is how one Cabinet minister sums up the man who first entered politics in the 2004 local elections. Previously, in the 2016-2020 minority government, he exuded restraint when the rotation of the Office of Public Works ministry with Kevin 'Boxer' Moran stalled. Back then the man reared on a farm in Belclare, Tuam, Co Galway spoke about the value he placed on deals reached through a handshake, just like farmers did at fair days. It is a principle that served him well, and he was later appointed to another junior ministry by the then-taoiseach Leo Varadkar. Canney 'knows what he wants' These days Mr Canney attends the agenda-setting pre-Cabinet meeting with the Taoiseach and Tánaiste every Monday night. The 65-year-old, first elected to the Dáil in 2016, is described as approaching those meetings in a calm and good-humoured manner. He is said to "know what he wants" and is "effective". Some even play on his surname and believe he is by nature "quite canny". The former quantity-surveyor, who also lectured in that subject for almost a decade at GMIT, is said to have surprised some in Government with his focus on national issues. He has also impressed those in the Department of Transport where he has set a lofty ambition to reduce driving test waiting times to ten weeks by September. "He really grabbed that one by the scruff of the neck and he is receiving fortnightly reports to ensure that the RSA makes it happen," is the view of someone familiar with Mr Canney's work in the department. Notably, he is understood to have opposed the idea of appointing NAMA boss Brendan McDonagh as the housing czar, during what was a bruising Government controversy earlier this year. "He is very much big picture," said one senior figure in Government Buildings. On Tuesdays, Mr Canney along with Noel Grealish attend Cabinet meetings and also that day, Mr Canney chairs a meeting of the five Independent ministers. Perhaps illustrating his elevated status, he has what no other junior minister possesses, a big office in the main corridor of Government Buildings. "He tells us what's coming up and how things went at the Monday night meeting. It can be a bit challenging for the Independent ministers in government sometimes, but we like challenges," one minister said. Then there is the weekly meeting of the Independent ministers and TDs on Wednesday evenings, a gathering that is chaired by Michael Lowry. Some ministers say they do not always attend and prefer to do "their own thing". Most do participate however, even if there are mixed views on whether or not Mr Lowry is becoming a more peripheral figure. "The 'Lowry Lackeys' jibe hurt a lot, and it is better just to focus on your own work," one of those who worked closely with Mr Lowry in the Government formation talks said. Another Independent TD was more philosophical, saying "he still has access to Government and still gets things done. You can't dismiss a man with that experience". Indeed, it was Mr Lowry who chaired a meeting of Independent TDs and ministers when they met with Minister for Housing James Browne on Wednesday afternoon last. There, the minister explained in broad terms what will be unveiled in the coming weeks to make the building of homes more viable. He also rejected a push from Independent TDs to publish all the new measures in one big plan and insisted that it is more beneficial to keep making changes on an almost weekly basis. There are ongoing battles between Independents and the Department of Public Expenditure over the upcoming review of the National Development Plan (NDP). "It is proving very difficult, but senior ministers from all parties are experiencing the same thing," one Independent minister said. Officially though, there is a vow of silence around these discussions. Again, this week the Taoiseach insisted, in a reply to Labour's Alan Kelly, that "no agreements or lists" have been made with Independent TDs to include projects in their constituencies in the updated NDP. However, no one can deny that Independents now want a more high-profile role in Government, with Seán Canney chosen as the man to lead this charge.

‘Everybody can feel the pain': Middle Eastern views on the present and future
‘Everybody can feel the pain': Middle Eastern views on the present and future

Irish Times

time3 hours ago

  • Irish Times

‘Everybody can feel the pain': Middle Eastern views on the present and future

Syrian Amr Alhamad (42), lawyer and researcher, based in Damascus: 'My hopes for Syria have remained the same since the very first day of the revolution in March 2011. I believe everything changed with the liberation of Syria and the fall of [Bashar al-] Assad 's control. Despite the many internal challenges – sectarian tensions, economic hardship, lack of transparency and competence within the interim government, and ongoing regional interference – my hopes remain strong. 'Honestly, we don't have the luxury to stop fighting for a free Syria. I've lost many friends in this struggle, and I remain fully committed. I've adapted my efforts to meet the evolving needs on the ground. I won't hesitate to give it my all. 'Since the liberation in December 2024, I returned and launched a consultancy company, Nexus Consulting , to support media and NGOs, and to provide reliable data on the needs and perspectives of Syrians. Despite all the difficulties, I believe in a better future for Syria – and I'm not alone. According to a recent survey we conducted with more than 10,000 Syrians, the majority still believe in a better Syria, despite the continuing lack of services and economic crisis. READ MORE 'I also hope this spirit of resilience and hope spreads to Lebanon, Gaza, Iraq, and Iran. I truly hope they can join us in this journey toward freedom and dignity.' (In conversation with Sally Hayden.) Palestinian Rawan Yousef , a researcher and academic in Jerusalem (photo and age withheld for safety reasons): 'I think that with the situation now, one of the most humane and visible solutions [is a] one-state solution for the entire people of Palestine and Israel . So one state on the mandatory or historical lines of Palestine, where everyone has equal rights and where obviously no group of people is supposedly superior to the other, including dismantling the apartheid system of Israel. 'The issue with the Middle East is that there's hostile states, such as Israel, that are still in a colonial settler mindset, and they want to expand, and they want to submit other countries to their will. So my hopes for the region is that people can work towards just peace, and also there would be a sort of balance between different countries. 'I think it is important to think about justice and about people being held accountable for what they've done. An example of this is [Israeli prime minister Binyamin] , and he's a war criminal, so people like him must be brought to justice, and there should be accountability for what he and the Israeli army have done. 'I think people tend to see Palestine/Israel as a complex issue, but in reality it's not that complex. It is an active settler colonial endeavour on the Palestinian lands. And it is as simple as that. One group of people are settlers that have all the international backing, weaponry, everything, and the other population is native, and it's being genocided, it's being ethnically cleansed for the last seven decades. And ethnic cleansing goes into different speeds. So in the West Bank , there's also ethnic cleansing, there's also displacement of people. And to achieve peace, there need to be changes in the Israeli mindset and that needs to stop it being a settler colonial state.' (SH) Iranian Shima Vezvaei (37), Tehran-based journalist: Shima Vezvaei 'Everybody wants to know what Iranians want, and what do they think and what do they feel? And I have to say, it's very difficult to argue that and to talk about that as a homogenous thing ... People belong to different associations. They have been exposed to different media, different narratives, different groups. So it's very natural that we have different moods and we have different opinions. 'What I can say is that no matter what ... everybody, I think, can feel the pain, can feel the fear of a sound of the explosion of a missile, and everybody wants an end to that. '[As for the future], it's so out of our hands, and it's difficult to predict what's going to happen, and that's the part that sucks, because it depends on a lot of political groups and politicians that don't know anything about how the world should work. And they're breaking any law and any regulations, any system that was supposed to keep the world safe and to stop wars from happening and to de-escalate. I think political change must be connected to real material lives of our people. Not just powerful men who are running the world — Shima Vezvaei 'So I feel like there is nothing to hold on to. There is no law to hold on to, nobody to hope that acts, especially in the US, in Europe. And progressive groups in the Middle East are getting oppressed one after another, and their voices are not being heard. 'I think we have realised, more than before, the liberation of our people can't happen in a vacuum. That our fate is connected to each other. So I'm hoping that this 'ceasefire', or whatever that is (it's crazy even this news is breaking in Truth Social and X, instead of real meaningful negotiations), lasts long. But also an end to the genocide in Gaza, self-determination for people of Syria and Lebanon and Iran. 'I hope the power gets in the hands of people. And we can think about what justice and democracy looks for us, and how to achieve it. How to recognise the diversity of our people and celebrate it. And how to stop this accumulation of power and despotism in our own local governments. 'There is so much at stake now. Especially the achievements of our social movements, our women's movements ... laws, regulations, social and political freedom and equality ... 'I think political change must be connected to real material lives of our people. Not just powerful men who are running the world.' (SH) Israeli Sid Knopp (62) lives in Bat Yam, south of Tel Aviv and works in military computing: Sid Knopp 'A ceasefire with a fanatical terrorist regime is always going to be tenuous. The only way I see real progress is if the ayatollah is removed and a 'moderate' leadership comes in. 'My hope for the future is to live in peace without the constant threat of destruction. One would hope that the Islamic extremists in the neighbourhood will finally realise that we are not going anywhere. However, the 'cold peace' we've had with Egypt for decades is probably the best we can hope for with Lebanon and Syria. Most of my family and friends do not agree with my political views. They tend to be more optimistic and way less realistic. 'Gaza is disastrous for everyone involved. Another fanatical regime which pretends that their goal is to 'get their country back'. Hamas abuses their civilians, steals billions and is way more interested in terror than actually making progress. We see that following the October 7th massacres, almost two years ago, Hamas and their partners have been well battered, yet Hamas holds on to hostages because they dream of getting back to their previous role of total control and rebuilding their terror network. Sadly, I don't think it will end well for the few living hostages and when the time comes, Hamas will have to be obliterated.' (In conversation with Mark Weiss)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store