logo
The SALT income tax deduction cap was increased to $40,000 in Trump's bill. Should you take it?

The SALT income tax deduction cap was increased to $40,000 in Trump's bill. Should you take it?

Boston Globe2 days ago
For the last seven years, the tax code has limited the amount taxpayers may write off for state and local taxes to $10,000. Prior to that, the cap was a much more generous $40,000.
Advertisement
The $10,000 cap was imposed by Congress as part of the first Trump administration's mammoth tax cut plan. It was quite costly to taxpayers in places like Boston's western suburbs, where local property tax bills range in excess of $25,000 (and where the state income tax is 5 percent and the sales tax 6.25 percent).
Indeed, for some of the state's wealthiest residents, local property taxes plus state taxes exceeds $40,000. (Taxpayers must choose to include state income taxes or state sales taxes in their calculations, but not both.)
This year's tax and spending bill, pushed by the current Trump administration, reversed what the previous Trump administration did by quadrupling the cap back to $40,000. It was done mostly to keep Republican Congress members who represent wealthy suburban districts on board for a bill that, overall, favors the well-off over those struggling to get by.
Advertisement
Here's what you should know about the SALT income tax deduction.
Who qualifies for the SALT deduction?
All taxpayers who pay state and local taxes may take the deduction, but it only makes sense for those who are relatively well-off. A threshold question for all federal income taxpayers is whether to take the
How does the standard deduction work?
The amount of income tax a taxpayer owes is based, logically enough, on how much income the taxpayer has. The more income, the more taxes . But the tax code allows for gross income to be reduced by a multitude of deductions, producing a taxable 'adjusted gross income.' Wealthier taxpayers who can afford CPAs and tax lawyers scour the tax code for deductions, while the vast majority of taxpayers simply accept a lump sum 'default' deduction, known as the standard deduction, which is set by Congress.
What are the most common deductions for those who itemize?
Besides state and local taxes, common deductions are for mortgage interest on a primary residence or second home; charitable contributions; and out-of-pocket medical and dental expenses. All are subject to certain limitations.
Why take the standard deduction instead of itemizing?
If all your itemized deductions come out to a sum that is less than the standard deduction, then the obvious choice is to take the standard deduction. Taking the standard deduction is also less time-consuming.
Advertisement
How much is the standard deduction?
The standard deduction was greatly increased — almost doubled — under the first Trump administration tax cut. For individual filers it went from $6,500 to $12,000; for joint returns, $13,000 to $24,000. The tax bill enacted this month bumps up the standard deduction for single filers to $15,750 and for joint filers $31,500. It's a huge increase, one that benefits the vast majority of taxpayers, including those with lower and moderate incomes and do not itemize.
What percentage of taxpayers take the standard deduction?
Taxpayers have overwhelmingly — and increasingly — opted for the standard deduction. Since the 2017 tax cut, the percentage of Americans who take the standard deduction has skyrocketed to more than 90 percent, compared to less than 70 percent as recently as 2020.
How long has the SALT tax reduction been around?
It dates back to the advent of the federal income tax more than a century ago. Initially, the SALT deduction was unlimited, meaning you could deduct from your taxable income every dollar you paid in state and local taxes, without a cap.
How has SALT changed recently?
The biggest change came when, at Trump's behest, a Republican-controlled Congress in 2017 capped it at $10,000 over the objections of many blue state lawmakers.
What was the rationale for reducing the SALT deduction in 2017?
Trump in his first administration successfully lobbied for one of the largest tax cuts in history, including much lower personal and corporate income tax rates, higher standard deductions, and a doubling of the child tax credit. (A tax credit is a dollar-for-dollar reduction in taxes owed, as opposed to a tax deduction, which is a reduction in taxable income.) The 2017 tax cuts, however, were not offset by spending reductions. One relatively minor way the 2017 law sought to pay for the tax cuts was by slashing the SALT deduction by 75 percent.
Advertisement
What were the politics behind the 2017 SALT reduction?
The SALT deduction favors mostly blue states that vote reliably Democratic in presidential elections. The Trump administration apparently felt politically safe imposing a heavier tax burden on taxpayers in states Republicans consider unwinnable.
So why did the Republican-controlled Congress this year increase the SALT cap to $40,000?
This year's tax bill passed the House by the slimmest of margins, 215-214, with all Democrats opposed and two Republicans voting against it on the grounds it explodes the national debt. Before the vote, a few moderate Republicans from blue states lobbied for increasing the SALT deduction cap. Doing so was apparently the price bill proponents were willing to pay to keep those few crucial Republican votes in line.
When does the higher SALT deduction go into effect?
Immediately. Taxpayers can take advantage of it before next year's midterm elections, which affords a modest political advance to Republicans. (Some of the most serious — and unpopular — cuts to the social safety net won't go into effect until after the midterms, another possible political advantage for Republicans.)
How long will the higher SALT deduction continue?
It will increase by $1,000 each year through 2029, but then revert back to $10,000 in 2030, unless Congress says otherwise.
Got a problem? Send your consumer issue to
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump fires Biden-appointed Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner after bad jobs report: ‘Numbers were RIGGED'
Trump fires Biden-appointed Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner after bad jobs report: ‘Numbers were RIGGED'

New York Post

time22 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Trump fires Biden-appointed Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner after bad jobs report: ‘Numbers were RIGGED'

President Trump ordered the dismissal Friday of the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), hours after the economic data collection agency released a report showing unemployment ticked up last month. Now-former BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer, an appointee of former President Joe Biden, triggered Trump's fury after her agency announced lower than expected employment gains in July and revised the numbers for May and June downward by a total of 258,000 jobs. The president accused McEntarfer of manipulating the data and charged that she had done so in the past. McEntarfer was nominated by Biden to head BLS in 2023. She was confirmed by the Senate for the post last year after previously serving in the Biden White House. Bureau of Labor 'I believe the numbers were phony, just like they were before the election,' Trump told reporters as he left the White House to spend the weekend at his Bedminster, NJ club. 'So you know what I did? I fired her.' A BLS spokesperson confirmed McEntarfer 'was terminated today' and Deputy Commissioner William Wiatrowski will take over on an acting basis. McEntarfer, a career federal employee, was confirmed by the Senate to lead BLS in January 2024 after previously serving as a senior economist at the White House Council of Economic Advisors under Biden. Trump explained in a Truth Social post that he was 'just informed' that the nation's employment reports were 'being produced by a Biden Appointee' and charged that McEntarfer 'faked the Jobs Numbers before the Election to try and boost Kamala's chances of Victory.' 'This is the same Bureau of Labor Statistics that overstated the Jobs Growth in March 2024 by approximately 818,000 and, then again, right before the 2024 Presidential Election, in August and September, by 112,000,' the president wrote. 'These were Records — No one can be that wrong?' Last August's revision of job growth for the 12 months ending in March 2024 – the largest downward revision to US payroll figures since 2009 – drew outrage from some Republican lawmakers, who suggested the numbers were intentionally fudged to boost the Harris-Biden administration. 'We need accurate Jobs Numbers,' Trump wrote, noting that McEntarfer would be 'replaced with someone much more competent and qualified.' 'Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes,' he continued. 'McEntarfer said there were only 73,000 Jobs added (a shock!) but, more importantly, that a major mistake was made by them, 258,000 Jobs downward, in the prior two months.' 'Similar things happened in the first part of the year, always to the negative.' Trump argued the numbers were 'rigged' to make him and Republicans 'look bad.' AP Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.), who demanded testimony from McEntarfer last year over the Biden-era job stats revisions, praised Trump for removing her from the top BLS post. 'I have been raising concerns for the past year about inaccurate job numbers put out by Dr. Erika McEntarfer,' Marshall wrote on X. 'Her cooked-up numbers have misled the American people for too long.' 'Glad President [Trump] is going to clean this up.' Trump doubled-down in a separate social media post, arguing that the July BLS report was 'RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad.' Trump told reporters Friday he has 'about three' people in mind to replace McEntarfer. 'I have a lot of good candidates. I will say, everybody wants it,' he said. 'We're gonna put someone in who can be honest.'

Trump rages over bad jobs report
Trump rages over bad jobs report

The Hill

time22 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump rages over bad jobs report

Trump claimed without evidence on Truth Social that the commissioner, Erika McEntarfer, had 'faked the Jobs Numbers' before the 2024 election in order to boost former Vice President Kamala Harris's White House bid. Trump cited labor statistics revisions during the Biden administration that boosted job numbers ahead of the election. The jobs report released Friday showed a significant downturn during Trump's administration in May and June, indicating the U.S. added 258,000 fewer jobs over those months than had initially been reported. The move was met with outrage from Democrats. 'That's some weird Soviet s‑‑‑,' Sen. Martin Heinric h (D-N.M.) said. 'Blaming the messenger? Nothing's ever his fault.' Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) posted on social media that, 'Instead of helping people get good jobs, Donald Trump just fired the statistician who reported bad jobs data that the wanna-be king doesn't like.' McEntarfer was nominated by Biden in 2023 and confirmed by the Senate in 2024 as the 16th commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, which is part of the Department of Labor. She was confirmed in the Senate in a bipartisan 86-8 vote. Notably, Vice President J.D Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who were both senators at the time, voted in favor of her nomination. The Hill's Alex Gangitano has more here.

Trump to appoint new Fed board member after governor Kugler announces resignation
Trump to appoint new Fed board member after governor Kugler announces resignation

USA Today

time22 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Trump to appoint new Fed board member after governor Kugler announces resignation

Federal Reserve governor Adriana Kugler is stepping down, giving President Donald Trump an opening to fill. Federal Reserve governor Adriana Kugler is stepping down from the central bank's board, giving President Donald Trump the chance to appoint an early replacement amid his monthslong campaign to badger Fed officials into lowering interest rates. The announcement comes just two days after the Fed said it would hold its key interest rate steady, despite mounting pressure from Trump to trim rates. Two Trump-appointed board members in favor of lower rates, Michelle Bowman and Christopher Waller, dissented from the decision. Kugler was absent from the vote. Kugler's resignation gives Trump an opportunity to at least partially shape the Fed's makeup to his liking ahead of her original departure date. Kugler, a Biden-appointed governor, joined the seven-member board in 2023 and was set to serve through January 2026. Kugler didn't offer a reason for her Aug. 8 departure. A statement from the Fed said she would return to Georgetown University as a professor this fall. In a letter to President Donald Trump, Kugler said it has been the 'honor of a lifetime' to serve on the Fed's board of governors. 'I am especially honored to have served during a critical time in achieving our dual mandate of bringing down prices and keeping a strong and resilient labor market,' Kugler said. 'The Federal Reserve does important work to help foster a healthy economy and it has been a privilege to work towards that goal on behalf of all Americans for nearly two years.' In a July 30 note, Bill Adams, chief economist for Comerica Bank, noted that Trump may use Kugler's opening to appoint his pick for Fed Chair Jerome Powell's replacement. Powell, who was appointed by Trump in 2017, will have his term as Fed chair end in May 2026. The president, who has recently backed away from threats to fire Powell, has made clear that he's unhappy with the Fed's decision to hold off on rate cuts. In June, Trump said he's hunting for a new Fed chair and has narrowed his search to 'three or four people.' Adams said Trump's next pick for chair could be a current Federal Open Market Committee member or an external hire. "Perhaps the next Chair will have a different approach to monetary policy than Powell, but it's hard to say—recall that Powell himself is a Trump appointee," Adams wrote on July 30, before Kugler announced her resignation. "In any case, the Fed seems likely to cut interest rates between now and when Powell's term ends, which would make the transition feel less fraught."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store