
This Is the Commodore Comeback Fans Have Waited for—but the Odds Are Still Against It
In 1994, Commodore crashed and burned. Once a home computing giant across the US and Europe, the company was undone by mismanagement and misfires. The carcass was picked clean and the pieces resold so many times that it was hard to keep track, but with each new owner came the inevitable—an attempt to make a fast buck by slapping the famous C= logo on any old junk.
Fans watched in horror as the brand appeared on the mediocre Web.it all-in-one PC, the bizarrely named Gravel in Pocket media player, and the Commodore smartphone. There was even a Commodore-branded shredder. So when retro gaming YouTuber Christian 'Perifractic' Simpson announced he wanted to buy what remained of Commodore and give it a new life, questions were asked. Chief among them: does the world still even need Commodore? When I'm 64
Commodore as a brand initially focused on typewriters and calculators, but its glory days arrived with the rise of home micros, causing a swift rebirth as Commodore International Computing.
Its biggest success was the Commodore 64, which hit the sweet spot between affordability and potential. While the CPU was sluggish, powerful graphics and a surprisingly capable sound chip (which remains revered today) spurred creativity on both sides of the Atlantic. Over 5,000 commercial games were released during the machine's heyday, and more than 15 million units were sold, making the C64 still one of the highest-selling single computer models ever.
It's this legacy Simpson aims to revive. Initially, he sought a licensing deal with the Commodore brand owners, imagining 'official' boards and replacement components as part of an inclusive, community-friendly conglomerate. These plans snowballed during discussions, and Simpson found himself securing an agreement to buy Commodore outright for a 'low seven-figure' sum. He now serves as Commodore CEO and promises to revive the company in a sustainable way—one that won't repeat the failures of the past.
But here's where things get tricky. Simpson doesn't actually own the original company because that company no longer exists. Commodore's 1990s dismemberment means the current iteration owns a number of trademarks, but essential parts of the ecosystem remain scattered. C64 ROMs and Amiga (Commodore's 16-bit micro) rights belong to Cloanto and Amiga Corporation. AmigaOS is controlled by Hyperion Entertainment. And aside from the odd mass-market flirtation from clone machines, like the C64DTV all-in-one joystick and the plug-and-play THEC64 Mini, major developments that mattered for the past 30 years have all come from the community, not the brand. Computers for the Masses
It's for these reasons Simpson finds himself walking multiple tightropes. He must avoid alienating enthusiasts that kept the Commodore flame alive, and not imply that only his new Commodore confers legitimacy. He must collaborate closely with owners of other key puzzle pieces and license the Commodore brand fairly to interested third parties. And to recoup that seven-figure sum, the new Commodore must sell enough new hardware, which means moving beyond a dwindling core fanbase.
For now, Simpson's initial play banks heavily on nostalgia—not solely for the C64, but for an entire era. The new Commodore website pitches the company as a 'digital detox brand [that's] grounded in digital minimalism.' It rails against social media, glorifies the good old days of 'techno optimism'—apparently, the 1980s through to the mid-1990s—and hints that Commodore can help users reclaim their childhoods. But the company also wants to be seen as an innovator with an eye on the future, and this results in a kind of branding whiplash. The new Commodore wants to be both reboot and original; past and future.
Fittingly, this iteration's debut product, the Commodore 64 Ultimate, embodies such tensions. The $500 gold-bling Founders Edition and $350 LED-laden disco case Starlight Edition don't exactly scream digital minimalism. But the $300 BASIC Beige is the spitting image of the original hardware. All models bridge authenticity and modernity by supporting original C64 peripherals and current connectivity, including 1080p HDMI output so you needn't hunt down a CRT TV. Inside, it's all FPGAS—field programmable gate arrays—which ultimately mean simulation rather than the less-accurate emulation found in Chinese retro handhelds and cheap plug-and-play TV devices.
Some critics nonetheless grumble that even this 'new' machine is past and present in another way, effectively being an amalgamation of existing products, from the keycaps to the having the Ultimate64 board at its core. However, Ultimate64 creator Gideon Zweijtzer has publicly disagreed that Simpson is merely assembling other people's hard work and slapping on a logo. He believes the Commodore 64 Ultimate was a 'joint effort between parties to create a cohesive package' and credits Simpson as someone with reach who can 'bring people together.' The $64,000 Question
That reach will be essential because noble efforts, sentiment, and saying the right thing won't bring sustainability. Even pent-up demand for a new Commodore 64—at the time of writing, over 4000 units have been sold, amounting to $1.5 million in revenue—is a one-off trick that can't be repeated. History shows retro appeal can be short-lived. Outside the hardcore enthusiasts, fans tend to rapidly move beyond rose-tinted, wide-eyed nostalgia; the retro devices they've bought then gather dust. Few remain on sale for long because the market is finite and fickle.
And then, there's the question of games. A large slice of the annual retro gaming market—estimated to be around $2.5 billion, though no one has a great handle on the numbers—comes from software rather than hardware. The issue for Commodore here is that it never released any notable games of its own, so it can't mimic Atari's ability to remake the Atari 2600 with modern connectivity while also reimagining 1980s classics like Pong and Missile Command . And even if Commodore were to license games, nothing in the entire C64 catalog has the cultural clout of Pac-Man , Space Invaders , Sonic the Hedgehog , or Super Mario Bros .
The Commodore 64 Ultimate menu.
The alternate mainstream option would be an attempt to reestablish Commodore's reputation as a brand that offers computing for the masses, not the classes, ringing in Simpson's desire for a 'simpler, distraction-free computing experience.' But what would that mean in practice? Unplugging? Educational and creative tools? Commodore 64 BASIC is notoriously bad, and it's unclear whether enough newcomers will see value in a relatively expensive beige retro box when a Raspberry Pi costs a fraction of the price and can tap into a massive existing ecosystem. But an entirely new platform would be a colossally risky endeavor. The Last Byte of a Legend
What is the endgame, then? Without hit games and obvious mainstream appeal, how does Commodore survive, let alone thrive? Is it even possible for this 1980s cultural icon to move beyond people who were there at the time and break out of its bubble? It's hard to say.
Perhaps it doesn't have to. Simpson envisions a 'single, joined-up family of Commodore machines,' and that could be enough. Commodore would become a community-focused brand, presiding over a modest ecosystem, acting as a benevolent curator that elevates quality projects, brings just enough polish and legitimacy to help the scene flourish, and simply refuses to let the legacy fade. Although investors who've pumped in cash might see things differently.
A much worse scenario would be a repeat of the past: panic over income, leading to the brand again being stamped on unremarkable products, or the mismanagement and misfires that alienate partners and fans. There's also the very real possibility that Commodore might just discover the harsh reality of being a very niche, small player in an industry of giants. Any one of those could deal a final, fatal blow to the brand from which it would never recover, taking down swathes of the community with it.
Still, this time feels different. This revival doesn't come from cynicism but from genuine passion and love for the brand. Even so, the odds of success feel slim, whether that means sparking a new wave of computing optimism or returning the brand to cultural relevance. But for a while at least, fans can remain optimistic this might finally be the play that truly brings Commodore back to life.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Melinda French Gates says she refuses to give her 22-year-old daughter any money for her shopping business — here's why
With an estimated net worth of $30.7 billion, Melinda French Gates can easily bankroll her daughter's business without breaking a sweat. But at a recent summit, the billionaire philanthropist confirmed she is not funding the new venture. Gates didn't say which of her two daughters she was referring to, but 22-year-old Phoebe Gates recently launched Phia, an AI-powered shopping app, according to The Verge. Don't miss Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) You don't have to be a millionaire to gain access to this $1B private real estate fund. In fact, you can get started with as little as $10 — here's how 'I wouldn't put money into it,' Gates told host Amanda Davies at the *Power of Women's Sports Summit presented by e.l.f. Beauty in London. By holding back her financial support, Gates says her daughter gets the chance to test and validate the business idea with real investors and customers. If it's a 'real business,' Gates says, the venture will eventually find people willing to back it. Phia has already attracted outside capital. According to GeekWire, the startup has raised $850,000, including $100,000 from Soma Capital, a $250,000 Stanford social entrepreneurship grant and $500,000 from angel investors such as Kris Jenner and Desiree Gruber. Phoebe Gates and her co-founder, Sophia Kianni, have also secured a podcast deal to promote the venture. Her journey offers some valuable lessons for anyone looking to start a business. Look for real-world traction Despite the flashy headlines, most startups fail. Roughly 90% eventually collapse, according to the Founders Forum Group, with 42% failing because they couldn't meet market demand. In other words, the odds are stacked against you, and the most common pitfall is building something nobody wants to pay for. To avoid this trap, try to find relatively cheap and quick ways to validate your business idea. Pitch the idea to angel investors or industry experts to see if they would bet real money on the venture's success. Better yet, look for paying customers to validate your business idea before you sink too much of your own money into it. Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says — and that 'anyone' can do it Customers are the best source of funding According to the Small Business Administration, about 14% of small business owners relied on friends and family for funding in 2023. More often, though, entrepreneurs turned to self-funding methods like credit cards or formal channels like banks or government agencies. One of the most popular sources of funding was the business itself. Nearly 31% of small business owners relied on the corporation's earned and retained earnings to fund and grow their ventures. In other words, paying customers can be your best source of startup capital. If you're launching something new, think about how to attract real customers first. For example, you could build a waitlist of clients who have already signalled interest in your product or service. You might also collect early deposits or presale revenue to help fund development. Getting those early customers will take time and effort, especially in marketing, but it brings two major benefits: proving there's real demand and creating early cash flow to support your growth. What to read next Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Accredited investors can now buy into this $22 trillion asset class once reserved for elites – and become the landlord of Walmart, Whole Foods or Kroger without lifting a finger. Here's how Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind. Sign in to access your portfolio


Gizmodo
32 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
The Greek Small Town Doctor Who Knows AI's Secrets
On vacation in Greece since July 17, I figured it was a good opportunity to see how artificial intelligence was perceived in this small European Union country, which sits at the crossroads of Africa, the Middle East, and Europe. My curiosity was amplified by the fact that I was far from the famous islands like Santorini or Mykonos, which are typically overrun by tourists. The first four days of my trip took me to Ioannina, a town in the country's northwest, a region of mountaineers and shepherds. Here, unlike the sunbaked islands to the south, the landscape is dominated by lush green forests and imposing mountains. The heat wave sweeping through Greece this mid July has kept many tourists from tackling the area's hiking trails. Locals also told me that the ongoing war between Israel and Hamas has emptied the region of the thousands of Israeli tourists who usually visit each summer. In Ioannina, if you ask for fish, the waiters give you a look that says, 'What are you talking about?' It is a stark reminder that this is not the Greece of mythical beaches, but a world unto itself. This sense of remoteness made me even more curious. Was the technology that dominates every conversation in New York, in major American companies, and on Wall Street, even a topic of discussion here? On Monday, July 21, after admiring the sunset over the lake where Ioannina's residents gather, I found myself at a restaurant with friends of friends. There were four of us, including two locals: a doctor named Thomas Tzimas, a seasoned physician at the local public hospital, and an engineer named Aristotelis Yfantis. After holding back for the first part of the nearly four hour meal, I turned to Dr. Tzimas and asked if he used AI. He smiled. I immediately felt I had asked the wrong question, that I was projecting my tech saturated reality onto his. Just because my work revolves around AI does not mean everyone else does. But I was wrong. I had just stumbled upon one of the most AI savvy doctors I had ever met. Here, in a small town nestled among the Greek mountains, AI had already infiltrated the public hospital. He was not only using it daily but was also keenly aware of its flaws and had developed his own methods to counter them. His secret, he would tell me, was controlling the AI's 'temperature' to prevent it from inventing facts. Dr. Tzimas, 56, is an Internal medicine specialist. He is the director of the Internal Medicine Department at General Hospital of Ioannina 'G. Hatzikosta.' I might as well tell you right away: do not get Dr. Tzimas started on AI. With his calm and measured voice, he offers an endless stream of analysis on the subject. He walks you through his daily hospital routine, providing a fascinating glimpse into how large language models have been adopted here, and on the ground perspective I often feel is missing from my reporting back in America. First, Dr. Tzimas dismisses the most common fear. 'No, not at all,' the 56 year old says when I ask if he worries about being replaced. 'My job involves experience that AI cannot yet replicate. I need to listen to lung, heart, and bowel sounds, palpate patients, and examine them.' He continues, 'While AI might analyze a digital photograph of a skin lesion, it cannot palpate a patient and feel the intensity of pain or guarding. These are qualities that rely on a doctor's senses, like smelling a patient's breath to detect diabetic ketoacidosis.' The key, he told me, is human interaction. Observing a patient's demeanor and hygiene provides crucial information that an algorithm cannot easily process. 'AI helps save time,' he concedes, 'but it needs an experienced physician to input those essential details.' He is also a pragmatist. Any medical profession that does not require a human touch, he insists, is already on the path to being replaced. First on his list is radiology. He says specialists who interpret X-rays and MRIs are becoming obsolete because AI has grown extraordinarily good at spotting lung nodules, fractures, and subtle neurological conditions. Studies published in journals like The Lancet have shown AI models matching or even outperforming human radiologists in identifying cancers on mammograms. 'For an X-ray, there will be only one [specialist] to check to replace ten of them and just confirm what the system has diagnosed,' Dr. Tzimas said. 'And it's easily done on CT scans and MRI scans. Those specialties will soon be replaced by AI.' Next, he says, are psychotherapists. The explosion of mental health apps and chatbots like Woebot and Wysa are already offering AI driven therapy services. believes these tools are poised to compete directly with human therapists for basic counseling, especially for patients who cannot afford or easily access face to face care. 'In psychoanalysis, you don't prescribe medications,' he explained. 'A psychiatrist that has a severely schizophrenic patient or depressed patient has to prescribe drugs. With therapy, you go talk to them. AI will replace therapists.' Before I could process that, Dr. Tzimas revealed that some surgeons are also on the chopping block. He is referring to the human operators of surgical robots like Intuitive's da Vinci system, a multi armed machine that allows surgeons to perform minimally invasive procedures with greater precision. He believes it is only a matter of time before AI directly controls these robots, enabling operations to be performed autonomously. 'Do you know that there are robots who perform surgery nowadays? But they're controlled by humans,' he said, seeing my surprised look. 'Yeah! They can be controlled by AI systems. That's coming.' For now, AI has become his invaluable assistant. 'My previous boss would write his thoughts on paper, and his secretary would type them out,' he says. 'Now, I dictate notes into my iPhone, copy and paste them into an AI system, and it generates a professional email. It also transcribes typed documents from referrals into digital archives, saving me tons of time.' One of the most complex parts of his job, he tells me, is navigating the politics between medical staff, which requires diplomacy and a delicate balancing act. This is where AI shines. 'I use a 'negotiator GPT' prompt that makes answers very diplomatic,' he says. 'When there's a conflict among junior doctors, I have to be strict but also prevent further conflict. This AI acts like an accomplished diplomat, helping me craft replies in our communication platform that smooth over issues.' He also uses it to tailor patient care after a hospital visit. 'I believe certain aspects of a dietician's role, specifically the creation of detailed dietary plans for patients, could be largely automated,' Dr. Tzimas said. 'Imagine a patient with cystitis who shouldn't eat fatty foods, but they don't know what 'fatty food' means. With a nutritional prompting AI, it can issue a detailed diet, explaining that even seemingly lean foods like lamb can be fatty if broiled.' However, the biggest impact that AI has in his job is in the diagnosis of patient symptoms. Dr. Tzimas uses a recent example of a patient who came to the hospital with a fever, after inhaling dust in a sheep and goat stable. After inputting the symptoms and the results of basic tests, AI identified Q fever as a potential diagnosis. A blood sample was sent to Athens for a specialized test. 'Although it came back negative and the final diagnosis was unrelated, the AI system identified Q fever as a potential possibility, which opened our horizons. Without AI, Q fever might not have been on our list,' he said. His biggest concern is the AI's configuration. He quickly realized that AI hallucinates, or makes things up, far too often. But the tool is too important to discard. So, to limit these fabrications, he focuses on a specific setting called 'temperature.' 'If the temperature of AI is 1, they hallucinate,' he explained. 'For the medical field, it has to be 0.3. That makes them so strict, they cannot fantasize things. They stick to the facts.' Temperature is a parameter in AI language models that controls randomness. A high temperature, near 1.0, encourages AI to be more creative and unpredictable, which is great for writing a poem but potentially dangerous for diagnosing a disease. Lowering the temperature, closer to 0.3, makes AI more focused, deterministic, and fact based, reducing the risk of these hallucinations. 'If you prompt AI with very strict protocols, they do not hallucinate,' Dr. Tzimas said, as I pushed him on the reliability of his tools. In Ioannina, for Dr. Tzimas, the debate about whether AI will change medicine is irrelevant. It already has. He uses it for diagnosis, staff communication, and even teaching junior doctors. His perspective reveals both the promise and the peril of our AI future. On one hand, therapy, radiology, and surgery may never look the same. On the other, a simple software setting, the difference between a temperature of 1.0 and 0.3, could be the difference between a correct diagnosis and a catastrophic error. I left the dinner stunned. Seeing a small-town doctor adopting AI so aggressively, I wondered whether the gap between the technology haves and have-nots might grow at a slower pace than I feared. At least in Ioannina, the gap seemed a little less immense.


Android Authority
32 minutes ago
- Android Authority
5G promised a revolution, but here's what we actually got
Robert Triggs / Android Authority Depending on where you live, you've likely had 5G in your pocket for at least a couple of years — or possibly close to half a decade. In any case, the wireless tech has certainly been around long enough to have had time to accomplish the numerous lofty promises that CEOs piped up to upsell us, which included everything from rejuvenating retail to traffic lights pushing updates to your car. While some of those promises might have come to pass, quite a lot of them have obviously not. I don't know about you, but my city's traffic lights aren't any more in sync than they were a decade ago. But let's answer the big question: Now that we're several years into 5G's global rollout, has it come close to living up to the hype? Has 5G lived up to the hype? 0 votes Yes NaN % No NaN % I'm not sure NaN % Fast data for some but not for everyone David Imel / Android Authority For you and me, 5G promised three major improvements: gigabit speeds boasting 10x or greater enhancements over 4G, latency as low as 1ms, and more reliable coverage. Let's start with that first point, which was always overly reliant on the promise of expensive, short-range mmWave spectrum. This technology has mostly seen deployment in dense urban hotspots — stadiums, airports, and downtowns — in a few countries like China and the US, but the rest of the world has largely ignored it due to its cost and poor signal range. Even in the US, only Verizon remains highly committed to the technology, with AT&T and T-Mobile preferring localized deployments. Instead, much of the world's 5G network coverage is based on repurposed 4G spectrum and select 6-GHz bands. So how does the data compare to the hype? Ookla's US speed test report between July and December 2024 shows a huge discrepancy in data rates across the country. In many states, the median download speed seen by consumers remains around the 50Mbps data range, and even in the best case, consumers typically experience sub-200Mbps speeds. That's serviceable for light work on the go, but falls well shy of the gigabit potential we were promised (although consumer speeds were never going to sustain that level for any length of time). Equally, latency remains comparatively high for our gadgets, averaging 63ms nationwide, fine for browsing but too high for real-time applications like cloud gaming or AR/VR. The situation is equally varied when we look at the global picture. Western consumers are sitting somewhere between 100Mbps and 300Mbps for typical 5G download speeds, but that's a very broad range. Once again, typical speeds vary quite widely, with the worst markets scoring hardly much faster than a reasonable 4G at under 100Mbps and the fastest well over 300Mbps, which challenges a decent fibre package. South Korea's operators score over 400Mbps for 5G downloads, for example. According to the GSA's June 2025 report, upload speeds are substantially slower, between 20Mbps and 50Mbps. However, that's still a step up from the 5Mbps to 15Mbps range common on 4G LTE networks. Taking a step back, the report reveals that 5G speeds are around 3x faster than 4G LTE on the same networks. That's obviously a solid benefit, but again, it's nowhere near the 10x speed boosts marketing at the start of 5G's deployment, partly because mmWave reaches so few customers. In addition, looking at 5G in isolation is rather generous — you certainly won't be connected to 5G all of the time, so typical speeds will be slower. Given that some 4G LTE-A networks were already capable of hitting 100Mbps or more, a lot of 5G's benefits could also be quite heavily exaggerated by this data. Carrier coverage remains spotty Edgar Cervantes / Android Authority Considering the positives, carriers have some seemingly decent coverage numbers to boast about these days, which you'd hope, given that we are years into the rollout. In the US, at least 75% of customers are now covered with 5G, with similar figures of around 80% in many European countries as well. Other regions range from 60-90%, depending on how early they started their deployment. As you've probably experienced, urban areas have the best 5G coverage, while rural areas often remain more limited. However, coverage doesn't always mean connected. You might dip in and out of cell areas on your commute, or might not actually receive a 5G signal when sitting in your home. While geographic coverage appears robust, users are spending less than half their time connected to 5G. Rather than measuring geographical reach, Opensignal's 5G Availability metric records time spent with an active 5G connection, and that number is obviously much lower than area, and varies greatly depending on your country and network. Puerto Rico leads the charts with 57.4% typical 5G connectivity time, followed by India (54.3%), Kuwait (45.6%), Singapore (40%), and the US (37.5%) in fifth, based on data collected between January and March 2025. This is likely due to the fact that many suburban and rural areas still lack strong mid-band 5G to boost signal coverage. Even if we give 5G the benefit of the doubt in terms of speed, latency, and geographical area, US consumers typically spend just over 1/3 of their time connected to a 5G network — hardly a convincing case that the technology is a major game changer for our daily lives. EU countries fare even worse. So while everyday mobile performance is a mixed bag, what about the futuristic use cases 5G was supposed to unlock?' Where are all the smart cities? Damien Wilde / Android Authority If consumer coverage and speeds are a little disappointing, the overhyped futuristic applications promised by 5G remain aspirational, to put it politely. Outside of flashy demos, things like remote robotic surgery and fully autonomous smart cities were always more pipe dream than near-term reality. This is partly because many networks are still Non-Standalone 5G (NSA). NSA relies on 4G infrastructure for core functions, while Standalone (SA) is built from the ground up to enable features like network slicing and ultra-low latency. According to Téral Research, just 74 out of 354 global public 5G networks have migrated to SA — a rather disappointing 21%. Additionally, Omdia and Ookla note that European carriers are notably behind the US, scoring just 2% against 24% in 5G SA availability. As of mid-2025, 163 further operators are investing in SA, but until full Standalone 5G is widely deployed, many advanced features — like ultra-low latency and true network slicing — will remain on the sidelines. Many of the initial 5G promises are also being batted around again with 5G Advanced — only time will tell. Softbank Instead, a few private enterprises have deployed their own private 5G networks for specific use cases, such as security systems and warehouse robotics. Other sectors like ports, airports, and manufacturing plants have adopted private 5G networks for logistics, asset tracking, and low-latency automation. While still limited in scope, these deployments hint at future potential — particularly if costs fall and software ecosystems mature. Notably, nearly 90% of tightly controlled private 5G deployments are based on Standalone. A slow transition to Standalone 5G has kept many of the biggest benefits off the table. Skepticism aside, some new 5G-powered capabilities have made their way into the consumer space. Fixed Wireless Access for home use is well established for some consumers in the US and abroad, giving access to reasonably quick data speeds in lieu of often more costly cable setups. However, data speeds and reliability are just as variable as mobile packages. Satellite connectivity in the Pixel, iPhone, and such is only possible because of 5G-NTN, though that will cost consumers extra to use in the long term. However, these 5G benefits have come at a considerable cost to carriers. In addition to the raw equipment costs, carriers have spent a fortune on new spectrum. AT&T spent some $27 billion in the US C-band action, and Verizon a staggering $55 billion. Yet in October 2024, OpenSignal noted that '5G hasn't yet had a substantial impact on operators' profitability.' Partly because plan prices haven't risen in line with the costs, which is good for consumers, but equally because business use cases haven't really manifested. Carriers are now prioritizing network efficiency to keep investment costs under control. Has 5G been worth it? Kris Carlon / Android Authority Overall, the rollout of 5G has had some benefits, but those perks are certainly limited when compared to the initial promises and costs. Mobile broadband is undeniably faster than the 4G era, and even though around 3x the speed is far from what was often marketed, this has helped push data speeds from dubious to far more usable. Latency is better too, ensuring activities like streaming and browsing feel noticeably smoother, but it's nowhere near low enough compared to fibre for consumers to contemplate real-time applications. 5G is faster and more reliable, but perhaps not by the margins promised. All of this has to be carefully weighed against the costs, in terms of carrier investments, data plan costs, and hardware prices. Data plans certainly haven't become much cheaper, and, if anything, premium 5G tariffs remain expensive. Likewise, 5G modem, radio (particularly for mmWave), and chipset prices continue to rise, in part due to the costs of implementing the complex array for 5G networking brands and technologies. It's one of the reasons why modern flagship phones are just so pricey. Of course, the promised future of mass IoT and automation certainly hasn't appeared. We'll have to see if those promises ever materialize before 6G networks roll around. But when it comes to 5G, I imagine I'm not alone in feeling that the next-gen network is fine but has hardly been worth the hype, and the data proves it.