Anas Sarwar backs Labour welfare cuts but insists they wouldn't do same Scotland
Sarwar added that Labour are now in a 'much better place on welfare reform than a week ago', before they scaled back proposals to avoid a defeat in the House of Commons on Tuesday evening.
Last week, more than 120 Labour MPs signed a 'reasoned amendment' to the Universal Credit and Personal Independent Payment Bill after it was revealed it would cut around £5 billion per year from disability benefits.
READ MORE: Scots back independence as Keir Starmer's popularity at record low, new poll finds
Ministers hope a partial U-turn by Starmer on the plans, which will protect existing claimants of personal independence payments (Pip) and the health element of Universal Credit, will be enough to win over Labour rebels.
However, not all of the changes will directly impact people in Scotland as Pip is being replaced by the Adult Disability Payment.
The Scottish Government has promised not to make similar cuts in Scotland, with the Social Justice Secretary warning that even the Prime Minister's concessions do not go far enough.
Shirley-Anne Somerville called on Labour to scrap all of their proposals, pointing to the UK Government's own analysis which shows they could plunge 150,000 people into poverty.
Sarwar has argued that the figure did not take into account other Labour measures to help people get back into work, or economic policies.
Asked if he would cut benefits for disabled people in Scotland if he wins next year's Holyrood election, he told the PA news agency: 'No, absolutely not'.
The Scottish Labour leader insisted his party is 'on the same wavelength' and agrees that reforms to the welfare system are needed.
But he said claims that benefits are being cut are not true, as the welfare bill is still set to grow.
'We all accept the principle of reform,' Sarwar said.
He added: 'We all accept that we have to prioritise work, and that work is the best route of poverty.
'We all accept that. Those that can work should work.
'We also all accept that those who can't work should get the support they need, and also accept those that need support to get into work should get that support too.'
Responding to Sarwar's claims SNP MSP Colette Stevenson said the Scottish Labour leader wouldn't stand up for Scotland and would "rubber stamp anything his Westminster bosses tell him to".
She said: "When Keir Starmer proposes cutting support for disabled people, it's Anas Sarwar who stands by him every step of the way.
"From the Winter Fuel debacle, to failing the WASPI women, to supporting the two-child cap, to backing cuts to disability payments, Labour's record in one short year says it all.
"SNP-run Scotland is the only part of the UK where child poverty is going down rather than up, we're scrapping the two-child cap, and we're protecting disabled people by maintaining the Adult Disability Payment here in Scotland, rather than passing on Labour's proposed cuts in England.
"Anas Sarwar has proven he won't stand up to Starmer - he'll rubber stamp anything his Westminster bosses tell him to."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
12 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
What - or who - caused the tears that sparked turmoil in the markets? Chancellor's future hangs in the balance after series of humiliating U-turns
sent markets tumbling today after a tearful breakdown in the Commons fuelled speculation she is on her way out. As stunned MPs looked on, the Chancellor wept in the Commons chamber just moments after admitting she was feeling the pressure following a series of humiliating U-turns. TV cameras captured brutal footage of the self-styled 'Iron Chancellor' wiping away tears as Sir Keir Starmer ducked questions about whether she is safe in her job. The pound fell sharply and the government's borrowing costs jumped as rumours swirled that she could be headed for the exit, taking Labour 's remaining fiscal credibility with her. Downing Street insisted that the Chancellor is not set for the chop, despite Labour MPs blaming her for disastrous cuts to disability benefits and winter fuel payments, which have been the subject of costly and shambolic U-turns. No 10 flatly denied claims that the PM and Chancellor had an angry showdown following the latest humiliating retreat over welfare reform on Monday night. Reports of a bust-up with Deputy prime Minister Angela Rayner were also denied. The Treasury insisted that the Chancellor's distress was the result of a 'personal matter'. But a Whitehall source said the Chancellor revealed she is feeling the heat following a disastrous period for the Labour government. Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle briefly chastised her as she entered the Commons chamber for taking too long over her answers the previous day. A source said she tried to explain away her conduct by replying: 'I'm just under so much pressure.' Experts warned that a series of expensive U-turns, couple with faltering economic growth could blow a £20 billion hole in the public finances, forcing the Chancellor to break her own promise not to raise taxes this autumn. She is said to have resisted this week's climbdown over welfare cuts until the final moment, arguing it would wreck the government's economic credibility. Ms Reeves appeared upset as she took her seat next to the PM on the government front bench. Sir Keir's parliamentary aide Chris Ward tapped her on the shoulder to see if she was all right. But she was unable to control her emotions when Kemi Badenoch accused Sir Keir of using her as a 'human shield' – and the PM failed to back her. During angry exchanges in the Commons, the Tory leader pointed out that the Chancellor 'looks absolutely miserable', asking the PM: 'Labour MPs are going on the record saying that the Chancellor is toast, and the reality is that she is a human shield for his incompetence. In January, he said that she would be in post until the next election. Will she really?' Sir Keir – who had previously guaranteed Ms Reeves her job until the next election – ducked the question. Instead, he joked that Mrs Badenoch would be gone before the election and accused the Conservatives of leaving behind a toxic economic legacy. Mrs Badenoch replied: 'How awful for the Chancellor that he couldn't confirm that she would stay in place.' TV cameras captured brutal footage of the self-styled 'Iron Chancellor' wiping away tears as Sir Keir Starmer ducked questions about whether she is safe in her job Despite her obvious distress, the PM did not appear to speak to Ms Reeves as he marched out of the chamber for two hours of crisis meetings with MPs. It was left to the Chancellor's sister Ellie Reeves to offer comfort to her – the two sisters leaving the chamber hand in hand. Doubts about the Chancellor's future triggered market panic as analysts feared a new Chancellor could tear up Ms Reeves's fiscal rules and embark on an even higher spending programme. Downing Street later told reporters that the PM had full confidence in Ms Reeves. Asked why he had not defended her in the Commons, a spokesman said: 'He has done so repeatedly. 'The Chancellor is going nowhere. She has the Prime Minister's full backing. 'He has said it plenty of times, he doesn't need to repeat it every time the Leader of the Opposition speculates about Labour politicians.' Former Labour Cabinet minister Alan Johnson insisted Ms Reeves was a 'tough cookie' who 'ain't going to quit'. But financial analyst Kathleen Brooks, of investment firm XTB, said the 'prospect of political turmoil' was 'spooking the bond market' and causing government borrowing costs to rise. She added: 'The PM might be keeping his options open at this stage, but the Chancellor is a strange choice to axe from a market perspective. She was unable to control her emotions when Kemi Badenoch accused Sir Keir of using her as a 'human shield' – and the PM failed to back her 'The market is pricing in the possibility of a replacement chancellor with a more left-leaning agenda, which is spooking the bond market.' Cabinet Office minister Pat McFadden and justice secretary Shabana Mahmood are tipped as potential replacements for Ms Reeves if she resigns or is sacked in the coming weeks. The extraordinary episode came amid growing questions about Sir Keir's leadership following a chaotic U-turn over welfare reform has raised fresh doubts about his judgment as he approaches his first anniversary in power this weekend. The PM was forced to abandon £5 billion of cuts to disability benefits on Monday night after Labour whips warned he was heading for defeat despite offering huge concessions to rebel backbenchers last week. One minister described the events of the last week as a 'total s*** show'. But Downing Street said Sir Keir planned to continue with his approach to government despite the recent reverses. Asked if he would be making any changes to avoid repeating recent mistakes, a No 10 spokesman said he would 'plough on' with delivering the government's agenda. Rebel ringleader Rachael Maskell said there had been a 'change in power' away from the PM in the wake of the U-turn, and called on the Government to impose wealth taxes. Fellow rebel Cat Eccles said Sir Keir's explanation that he had been too distracted by foreign affairs to focus on the welfare row was 'not a great excuse'. Allies of Angela Rayner boasted that she had been 'instrumental' in persuading Sir Keir he would have to ditch the disability cuts to avert a catastrophic Commons defeat by his own MPs. Ms Rayner insisted she was not gunning for the PM's job, despite fears in No 10 that she is on manoeuvres. She told ITV's Lorraine show that 'to be fair' to Sir Keir 'there's a lot going on and the PM's been here there and everywhere doing the job for Britain'. Asked about her own ambitions she said there was 'no chance' she would ever want to be PM, joking it would 'age me by 10 years in six months'.
Scottish Sun
37 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
The Range is selling an iconic Cadbury chocolate bar almost 20 years after it was axed from the UK
The creamy white chocolate bars, wrapped in iconic light blue packaging, were a fan favourite CHOCO LOT The Range is selling an iconic Cadbury chocolate bar almost 20 years after it was axed from the UK Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) THE Range is bringing back a Cadbury favourite that vanished in 2002. A savvy shopper spotted Cadbury Dream bars on the shelves at the discount store. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 Cadbury Dream bars have made a return Dream bars, made from white chocolate and cocoa butter, were launched in the UK in 2001 but discontinued just a year later. A shopper shared their discovery on the Facebook group Food Finds UK, posting a photo of the sweets for sale at a discount store. One commenter tagged a friend, saying: "You used to love Dream chocolate when we were younger." The iconic Dream white chocolate bars made a comeback in 2020, appearing in select UK stores including B&M. Before the B&M relaunch, UK shoppers could only buy Dream online from GB Gifts, who imported the bars from Australia for £5.99. Chocolate fans have also spotted other classic treats returning to shelves this month. The Wham Bar is back - but as an ice lolly - now available at Iceland stores. First launched in the 1980s by Scottish confectioners McCowan's, Wham Bars once sold 30 million bars a year. After McCowan's went into administration in 2011, Tangerine Confectionery took over the brand. One shopper posted on the NewfoodsUK Facebook group: 'Wham Ice Cream Lollies are back at Iceland Foods.' Cadbury's New UK Bar, Nationwide's 5% Deposit Boost, and River Island's 33 Store Closures – Money News Today The Wham ice lollies are exclusive to Iceland, with a four-pack priced at just £2.50. Meanwhile, Cadbury Dairy Milk Balls - said to be similar to the discontinued Cadbury Tasters from the mid-2000s - have been spotted at Iceland for £3.50, or two packs for £6. Marmite Peanut Butter has also made a comeback, just nine months after being axed. Originally launched in 2019, then discontinued five years later, Unilever has now confirmed the spread is back for good. It's available at Tesco, Sainsbury's and Ocado. How to save money on chocolate We all love a bit of chocolate from now and then, but you don't have to break the bank buying your favourite bar. Consumer reporter Sam Walker reveals how to cut costs... Go own brand - if you're not too fussed about flavour and just want to supplant your chocolate cravings, you'll save by going for the supermarket's own brand bars. Shop around - if you've spotted your favourite variety at the supermarket, make sure you check if it's cheaper elsewhere. Websites like let you compare prices on products across all the major chains to see if you're getting the best deal. Look out for yellow stickers - supermarket staff put yellow, and sometimes orange and red, stickers on to products to show they've been reduced. They usually do this if the product is coming to the end of its best-before date or the packaging is slightly damaged. Buy bigger bars - most of the time, but not always, chocolate is cheaper per 100g the larger the bar. So if you've got the appetite, and you were going to buy a hefty amount of chocolate anyway, you might as well go bigger.
The Independent
38 minutes ago
- The Independent
MPs back proscribing direct action group Palestine Action as terror organisation
MPs have backed the Government's move to ban direct action group Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation, despite warnings it will have a 'chilling effect' on protest. Legislation passed in the Commons on Wednesday, as MPs voted 385 to 26, majority 359 in favour of proscribing the group under the Terrorism Act 2000. The motion is expected to be debated and voted on by the House of Lords on Thursday before it becomes law. If approved, it would become a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison to be a member of the direct action group or to support it. Security minister Dan Jarvis told MPs that protesters expressing support for Palestine 'have always been able to, and can continue to do so' as he urged support to ban Palestine Action. He said: 'Palestine Action is not a legitimate protest group. ' People engaged in lawful protest don't need weapons. People engaged in lawful protest do not throw smoke bombs and fire pyrotechnics around innocent members of the public. 'And people engaged in lawful protest do not cause millions of pounds of damage to national security infrastructure, including submarines and defence equipment for Nato.' Palestine Action is seeking a legal challenge against the Government's bid to proscribe it, with a hearing expected on Friday to decide whether the ban can be temporarily blocked, pending further proceedings to decide whether a legal challenge can be brought. The Government's move comes after two planes were vandalised at RAF Brize Norton on June 20 in an action claimed by Palestine Action. Five people have since been arrested on suspicion of a terror offence in relation to the incident. Mr Jarvis said the attack at RAF Brize Norton 'was just the latest episode in Palestine Action's long history of harmful activity', adding: 'Palestine Action has orchestrated a nation-wide campaign of property damage featuring attacks that have resulted in serious damage to property and crossed the threshold from direct criminal action into terrorism.' But the minister faced backlash from some MPs who described the move as a 'draconian overreach' and likened the group to the Suffragettes. The United Nations also warned ahead of the vote for the UK not to proscribe Palestine Action, as experts are concerned at the 'unjustified labelling of a political protest movement as 'terrorist'.' Independent MP for Coventry South Zarah Sultana also told the Commons: 'To equate a spray can of paint with a suicide bomb isn't just absurd, it is grotesque. 'It is a deliberate distortion of the law to chill dissent, criminalise solidarity and suppress the truth.' Former soldier Clive Lewis, now the Labour MP for Norwich South, said: 'I understand what terrorism is. I was in London on July 7 in 2007 and I watched my community, this city, attacked by real terrorists. 'And at that point, rightly or wrongly, I decided I was going to Afghanistan to fight the terrorists. 'And I went because I love this country, and I love our democracy, and I want to see it protected. I think today's proscription order against Palestine Action undermines that and I wish my Government wouldn't do it.' A spokesperson for Palestine Action said: 'We are confident that this unlawful order will be overturned. 'As United Nations experts have made clear, spraying red paint and disrupting the British-based operations of Israel's largest weapons firm, Elbit Systems, is not terrorism.' Outside of Parliament, four protesters were arrested by the Metropolitan Police following a demonstration to oppose the move to ban Palestine Action. The police had imposed Public Order Act conditions aimed at limiting the protest to Richmond Terrace, off Whitehall. One woman, who identified herself as Emma Kamio to the PA news agency, appeared to use the protest technique known as 'locking on' to cause an obstruction outside of Carriage Gates, one of the entrances to the parliamentary estate. Her daughter Leona Kamio was among a group of pro-Palestine protesters who have appeared in court to deny breaking into the UK site of an Israel-based defence firm with sledgehammers, causing £1 million of damage. Police were seen speaking to Ms Kamio as she sat on the pavement outside Parliament with her arm inside what appeared to be a suitcase. Listing the four arrests, a Met spokesperson said a woman 'who locked herself onto a suitcase outside the gates of Parliament' was among them for 'breaching the conditions and for being in possession of articles intended for locking on'. Among those arrested was also a 'man who blocked the gates of Downing Street with his mobility scooter and refused to move to the conditioned area'. A larger than usual number of officers could be seen in the area around Parliament. The Met said the 'significant policing presence in the vicinity of Parliament' was because of its 'responsibility to take action to prevent serious disruption to the life of the community', including by ensuring MPs 'can go about their business free from intimidation or unreasonable interference'. The legislation approved by MPs also bans two white supremacist groups, Maniacs Murder Cult and Russian Imperial Movement, including its paramilitary arm Russian Imperial Legion. The Home Office describes the Maniacs Murder Cult as a neo-Nazi transnational and online organisation which has claimed a number of violent attacks around the world. Russian Imperial Movement is a ethno-nationalist group which aims to create a new Russian Imperial State. Its paramilitary unit fought alongside Russian forces in the invasion of Ukraine to advance its ideological cause. It also runs a paramilitary training programme to support attendees to carry out terror attacks, the Home Office added.
