logo
Trump freed to pursue even more of his agenda after Supreme Court win on injunctions

Trump freed to pursue even more of his agenda after Supreme Court win on injunctions

CNNa day ago

If President Donald Trump has wielded his executive power like a Mack Truck over the last months, plowing ahead with a velocity unseen in his recent predecessors, his win at the Supreme Court on Friday could act as high-octane fuel in his tank.
By setting new limits on federal judges using nationwide injunctions, the court freed Trump's hand to pursue his already sweeping view of presidential power in ever more expansive ways. The morning decision punctuated what has been an extraordinary week for the president, both at home and abroad, as he approaches the six-month mark of his second administration.
For a president who continually rails against unelected judges exceeding their mandate by blocking his policies, Friday's Supreme Court ruling amounted to a form of vindication.
And after a string of presidents chafed against judges who blocked their policies from taking effect, Trump now finds himself freed from some of the burdens his predecessors faced.
'In practice, he has now become a more powerful executive than he was before this decision came down,' said Shira Scheindlin, a former US District Court judge. 'But I will say that many presidents have been very unhappy with these national injunctions. It started under George W. Bush, then Obama, then Biden, and of course, Trump,' she said. 'It depends whose ox is being gored.'
White House officials were quick to cite a line in Justice Amy Coney Barrett's majority opinion as bolstering Trump's criticism of judges he thinks rule beyond their remit.
'When a court concludes the executive branch has acted unlawfully, the answer is not for the court to exceed its power too,' wrote Barrett, whom Trump appointed during his first term but had recently been the subject of his frustration — at least before Friday's ruling.
The ostensible issue at hand in the ruling was birthright citizenship, and there could be immediate repercussions on who is eligible to become a citizen in at least some states. Some Democrats and immigrant rights groups warned of pending bureaucratic chaos, where a baby's birth state would determine whether they qualified for US citizenship.
But the citizenship issue itself won't be decided by the court until later. And when Trump emerged in the White House Briefing Room on Friday morning, the matter appeared almost secondary to the larger win that erases one of the checks on his executive authority.
'Thanks to this decision, we can now promptly file to proceed with these numerous policies and those that have been wrongly enjoined on a nationwide basis,' an ebullient Trump said from the White House podium.
Aside from the birthright citizenship issue, he listed ending funding for 'sanctuary cities,' suspending refugee resettlement, freezing federal funding and blocking taxpayer funds for transgender medical care as examples of areas where the administration now plans to use the ruling to unblock Trump's orders.
'We have so many of them,' Trump said. 'I have a whole list. I'm not going to bore you.'
There are other avenues plaintiffs could pursue to block Trump, including class action lawsuits. And while Friday's ruling could slow his orders from being blocked, many may still ultimately end up before the Supreme Court.
But at least for Friday, Trump was in a celebratory mood.
The president not only took great delight in the court's ruling, but in the court itself. He walked into the briefing room wearing a smile of satisfaction, the capstone of one of the most remarkable weeks since returning to power.
His hourlong news conference played out as a victory lap not only for his birthright citizenship executive order but also for his decision to launch military strikes on Iran, despite not knowing the ultimate outcome of either.
The court has yet to rule on the merits of the immigration question and the long-term fate of the Iranian nuclear program is still in question.
'Well,' Trump said Friday as he stepped to the lectern, 'this was a big one, wasn't it?'
He was referring to the Supreme Court opinion handed down less than two hours earlier, but the words also served as a metaphor for the past weeks of his presidency, one that is forever shaped by his first term in office.
Not only does Trump enjoy the luxury of an obedient Republican Party, he also has the enviable benefit of a high court majority shaped by his hand.
Trump is only the latest occupant of the Oval Office to test the powers of the executive branch of government. The court's ruling on Friday will almost certainly be applauded by future presidents of either party.
'These injunctions have allowed district court judges to be emperors,' Trump's Attorney General Pam Bondi, standing alongside the president, said Friday. 'They vetoed all of President Trump's power, and they cannot do that. This has been a bipartisan problem that has lasted five presidential terms. Five different presidents and it has ended today.'
But the fact that he had the good fortune of nominating three Supreme Court justices in his first term and is back to see the fruits of their conservative labors makes him somewhat distinct from nearly all presidents who have come before him.
'I'm grateful to the Supreme Court for stepping in and solving this very, very big and complex problem, and they've made it very simple,' Trump said. 'I want to thank Justice Barrett, who wrote the opinion brilliantly, as well as Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Thomas. Great people.'
That is not how he was describing Barrett in private over the last several months. Behind the scenes, the president had griped about some of the Supreme Court justices he appointed during his first term, believing they were not sufficiently standing behind his agenda.
In private, some of Trump's allies have told him that Barrett is 'weak' and that her rulings have not been in line with how she presented herself in an interview before Trump nominated her to the bench in 2020, according to sources. Many conservatives were apoplectic in March when Barrett voted to reject Trump's plan to freeze nearly $2 billion in foreign aid.
'It's not just one ruling. It's been a few different events he's complained about privately,' a senior administration official told CNN in June.
Now, however, Barrett — along with the court's other five conservatives — handed Trump a win in the most prominent case of the term.
As another Supreme Court term comes to an end, questions will inevitably rise about potential retirements on the bench. The prospect of Trump gaining another appointment is far from certain, but hardly out of the question. White House lawyers have developed an early roster of contenders should a vacancy occur, a standard practice for all administrations.
The president decided to forego a trip Friday to his golf course in Bedminster, New Jersey, opting to spend a rare weekend at the White House as Senate Republicans work through an impasse over a monumental tax-and-spending bill that contains virtually all of Trump's domestic agenda. He once again called out those who are raising concerns about the measure, describing them as 'grandstanders,' and although he initially suggested his July 4 deadline was not 'the end-all,' he later upped the pressure on Truth Social.
'The House of Representatives must be ready to send it to my desk before July 4th — We can get it done,' he posted.
As Trump turns toward the second half of his first year in office, myriad challenges await him and his party as the early stages of the midterm election campaign begin taking shape.
Republican pollsters have privately warned party leaders of the potential political fallout from the megabill, particularly the proposed deep cuts to Medicaid and other social safety-net programs to help pay for the extension of Trump's tax cuts. The president has repeatedly pledged to not touch Medicaid, a promise that may well be litigated in the 2026 campaign.
But Trump offered no signs of anxiety that many of his fellow Republicans in Congress have expressed – particularly about funding for rural hospitals – arguing again Friday that his bill would be beneficial to all Americans.
'It's a great bill. It's a popular bill,' Trump said. 'But we'll get no Democrats, only because they don't want to vote for Trump.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Readers sound off on a lack of lifeguards, Mamdani's promise and Planned Parenthood
Readers sound off on a lack of lifeguards, Mamdani's promise and Planned Parenthood

Yahoo

time38 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Readers sound off on a lack of lifeguards, Mamdani's promise and Planned Parenthood

Brooklyn: As another summer season is upon us, the NYC Parks Department is once again taking advantage of the people of Coney Island and South Brooklyn by not supplying any lifeguards on the beach for a mile stretch between the Coney Island Pier and W. 37th St., the end of the Boardwalk. For the past few years, they have placed lifeguards on one bay on the amusement-area side of the pier where all non-local residents come off the trains and head to the beach, while Brooklyn residents are told that if they want to go into the water and cool off, they can all cram into the one bay, which isn't realistic. They should at least put some lifeguards toward the end of the Boardwalk at W. 33rd St., which seems to be a crowded area for the locals. There is a bathroom and some parking at that spot. Instead, the Parks Department has employees walking up and down the shore blowing whistles, telling people to get out of the water, which is mostly ignored because people have come down to the beach to cool off and relax. Take the money given to the ignored whistleblowers and hire a few lifeguards. Local politicians have been informed, with no response received. Do we have to wait for some drownings to occur before someone acts on this problem? William Blitzer Bayside: As a recent NYC retiree, I am very frightened of the prospect of having to change my current Medicare benefits to Medicare Advantage. Why can't the city just put new hires on the Advantage plan and leave the rest of us alone? $600 million is a drop in the bucket for NYC. What will they use it for, another needless bike lane? Mary Santora Yonkers: With their proclivity to never learn from past disasters, the radical Democrats have again demonstrated the definition of insanity by nominating Zohran Mamdani. The term 'democratic socialist' is perhaps the most glaring oxymoron in political history, and this purportedly educated mob continuously displays its baneful nescience, obviously having missed the history classes showing that socialism has been a failure — a deadly failure — wherever it has been employed. A death knell has been sounded, and New York City (and state) has one more chance to save itself from perdition. James McCaffrey Manhattan: Ranked-choice voting worked. Mamdani didn't win because of a trick. He won because enough New Yorkers ranked him first (and second and third) that he'll easily prevail when they run the tabulation. That's democracy, not a glitch. Suzy Sandor Astoria: A letter to NYC real estate: Do you think that many New Yorkers are struggling to afford a decent place to live? And that real estate has a role in building a brighter future for the city? Do you think it's worth listening to young people and their hopes? Do you think NYC has always been defined by its cultural and economic diversity? If yes to any of these, then please stop the tired, simplified critiques of Mamdani's Democratic primary victory. However you voted — and however you will vote in November — talk to the guy. Some in the real estate world are freaked out by this result, painting it in apocalyptic terms. But buildings need people who can afford to inhabit, frequent and maintain them. I invite you to imagine that the future Mamdani envisions might not be so bad. It may even be worth building together. Annabel Short Brooklyn: Voicer Art Gunther is correct. Pay is too low and now, no benefits. I married in 1970 and got my first apartment. I also started a job with New York Telephone Company, a union job. My one week's pay covered my rent. My total bills for rent and utilities were under $125 a month. My pay included free health care and a pension plan. When my daughter was born, the total bill was $12.50 for the phone and a bracelet while in the hospital. My wife was a stay-at-home mom and I purchased a second car for my wife to use. Those kinds of jobs are now hard to find. Minimum wage is a joke. Profits pay CEOs millions and investors get the rest. I blame politicians for allowing unbridled corporate greed. The lower and middle classes are losing out. Until they reform how campaigns are financed, money will always rule this country. Greg Ahl Manhattan: The 'One Big Beautiful Bill' seems to be one big beautiful bomb — and the bomb has only put us in a position where those in charge might have taken a better look at outcomes or, for that matter, things that happened before the bomb dropped. Those pesky photos of lines of trucks at the Iran nuclear facility days before the airstrikes come to mind. What were they loading? Where were they taking their loads? Did anyone look at those photos before the big drop was executed, and did anyone know what they were looking at? If they did, they certainly didn't do anything about it. Talk about closing the barn door after the cows are gone. More mind-boggling incompetence. Don Cerrone Nyack, N.Y.: Why would the ayatollah keep his enriched uranium in the mountain where CBS News said it was for the past decade? We know that Americans are highly uneducated, but you would have to wear a bib because you could not keep the spit in your mouth to not figure this one out. Stephen Boyle Dumont, N.J.: Is White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt a graduate of the Baghdad Bob School of Propaganda? Walter Wolfgang Papenfass San Francisco: The beating and arrest of an immigrant father of three U.S. Marines, who has lived here for decades peacefully and lawfully, is only one example of the cruelty and insanity of President Trump and arch-villain Stephen Miller. There have been many other stories of active servicemembers whose spouses and/or parents have been swept up to meet deportation quotas. The master of disaster (President Dunce) had promised to go after murderers, rapists, etc. and also promised to go easy on farm and hotel workers and other service workers. He has broken both of those promises in spectacular fashion, as only he can. The F-bomber-in-chief is an embarrassment to the United States of America. Jimmy Layton Rego Park: Is there a point at which New York or any large city anywhere in the world might say, 'That's it, we can't accommodate any more people'? Jeff Rosenblatt Glendale: Voicer Laurie Aron believes that demonstrations on June 14, which attracted estimated crowds of 8 to 11 million people nationwide, prove that Republicans are on the wrong side of history. Laurie, I have news for you: Election Day 2024, with about 75.5 million voters, demonstrates that you are on the wrong side of history since they voted for Trump. Most Trump supporters act like adults when things don't go their way, while many liberals throw public temper tantrums. Since there are only two Trump rallies I recall that had violence associated with them, most people can name them (Charlottesville and the so-called insurrection). Meanwhile, liberals have so many violent rallies that no one can keep track of them. For example, in 2017 on Inauguration Day, Washington, D.C. had a violent rally with cars burned as a result of an election, since no action was yet taken by the president. Thomas Murawski Kew Gardens: Once again, the American public is being duped into thinking that Planned Parenthood is an abortion clinic ('Supremes say states can deny funds from Medicaid to Planned Parenthood,' June 27). Planned Parenthood provides all types of health care for women and men, including cancer screenings, contraception, prenatal care, menopause treatment, health education and even smoking cessation programs. Only 3-4% of their services account for abortion care. So why are people so willing to give up other health care services they offer? Sometimes, these clinics are the only ones available. Planned Parenthood also provides services to individuals regardless of insurance. No one is turned away if they can't pay, and they offer sliding-scale fees. Do you know any doctors who do that? L. Duzant

Iran could start enriching uranium for bomb within months, UN nuclear chief says
Iran could start enriching uranium for bomb within months, UN nuclear chief says

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Iran could start enriching uranium for bomb within months, UN nuclear chief says

Iran has the capacity to start enriching uranium again - for a possible bomb - in "a matter of months", the head of the UN's nuclear watchdog has said. Rafael Grossi, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), said the US strikes on three Iranian sites last weekend had caused severe but "not total" damage, contradicting Donald Trump's claim that Iran's nuclear facilities were "totally obliterated". "Frankly speaking, one cannot claim that everything has disappeared and there is nothing there," Grossi said on Saturday. Israel attacked nuclear and military sites in Iran on 13 June, claiming Iran was close to building a nuclear weapon. The US later joined the strikes, dropping bombs on Iran's three nuclear facilities: Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan. Since then, the true extent of the damage has been unclear. On Saturday, Grossi told CBS News, the BBC's US media partner, that Tehran could have "in a matter of months... a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium". He added that Iran still possessed the "industrial and technological capacities... so if they so wish, they will be able to start doing this again." The IAEA is not the first body to suggest that Iran's nuclear abilities could still continue - earlier this week, a Pentagon intelligence assessment found the US strikes only set the programme back by months. Trump retorted furiously by declaring that Iran's nuclear sites were "completely destroyed" and accused the media of "an attempt to demean one of the most successful military strikes in history". For now, Iran and Israel have agreed to a ceasefire. But Trump has said he would "absolutely" consider bombing Iran again if intelligence found that it could enrich uranium to concerning levels. Tehran is coming back to life, but its residents are deeply shaken How a volatile 24 hours edged Iran and Israel to a ceasefire US gained nothing from strikes, Iran's supreme leader says Iran, on the other hand, has sent conflicting messages on how much damage was caused. In a speech on Thursday, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said the strikes had achieved nothing significant. Its foreign minister Abbas Araghchi, however, said "excessive and serious" damage was done. Iran's already-strained relationship with the IAEA was further challenged on Wednesday, when its parliament moved to suspend cooperation with the atomic watchdog, accusing the IAEA of siding with Israel and the US. The two countries attacked Iran after the UN body last month found Tehran to be in breach of its non-proliferation obligations for the first time in 20 years. Iran insists that its nuclear programme is peaceful, and for civilian use only. Despite the Iranian refusal to work with his organisation, Grossi said that he hoped he could still negotiate with Tehran. "I have to sit down with Iran and look into this, because at the end of the day, this whole thing, after the military strikes, will have to have a long-lasting solution, which cannot be but a diplomatic one," he said. Under a 2015 nuclear deal with world powers, Iran was not permitted to enrich uranium above 3.67% purity - the level required for fuel for commercial nuclear power plants - and was not allowed to carry out any enrichment at its Fordo plant for 15 years. However, Trump abandoned the agreement during his first term in 2018, saying it did too little to stop a pathway to a bomb, and reinstated US sanctions. Iran retaliated by increasingly breaching the restrictions - particularly those relating to enrichment. It resumed enrichment at Fordo in 2021 and had amassed enough 60%-enriched uranium to potentially make nine nuclear bombs, according to the IAEA.

Trump Urges Israel-Gaza Ceasefire: 'Make the Deal'
Trump Urges Israel-Gaza Ceasefire: 'Make the Deal'

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

Trump Urges Israel-Gaza Ceasefire: 'Make the Deal'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump has pressed for Israel and Hamas to clinch a ceasefire and secure the release of the remaining captives held in Gaza. Trump fired off an all-caps demand fire in a Truth Social post at 1:19 a.m. ET Sunday: "MAKE THE DEAL IN GAZA. GET THE HOSTAGES BACK!!! DJT" It follows comments the president made on Friday in the Oval Office, when he told reporters that he believed a ceasefire could come "within the next week." "I think it's close. I just spoke with some of the people involved. It's a terrible situation," Trump said. This is a breaking news situation and will be updated

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store