Singapore stocks rise on June 26 amid mixed regional trading, STI up 0.3%
SINGAPORE – Shares here and elsewhere enjoyed sessions of relative calm on June 26 after a tumultuous period that has roiled global bourses.
The outcome for the Straits Times Index (STI) was modest rise of 0.3 per cent or 12.48 points to 3,938.46 with gainers outpacing losers 294 to 185 on trade of 1.2 billion securities worth $1.3 billion.
The muted theme was set overnight on Wall Street where investors were growing increasingly confident about the Israel-Iran cease-fire.
The key indexes were mixed but are still hovering at near record levels. The S&P 500 was unchanged, the Dow industrials fell 0.2 per cent while the Nasdaq inched up 0.3 per cent.
There was more movement in the region. The Hang Seng in Hong Kong fell 0.6 per cent and the Kospi in Seoul declined 0.9 per cent but the Nikkei 225 in Tokyo surged 1.7 per cent while Malaysian shares rose 0.6 per cent.
Australia's ASX 200 closed flat as investors dumped technology and property stocks.
Mr Barnabas Gan, group chief economist and head of market research at RHB, noted that market sentiment has rebounded as global economic conditions modestly improved amid tariff de-escalation.
If this trend holds, it would be reasonable to expect fewer interest rate cuts, a more sustained appetite for risk and upward revisions to regional economic growth, Mr Gan added.
But he warned that it is only a short period before reciprocal tariff suspensions expire.
'In this context, we maintain a tactical overweight in equities and market weight in fixed income ... but remain ready to pivot back into safe havens should trade risks re-emerge,' he said.
Meanwhile, DFI Retail Group was STI's the top gainer, rising 2.6 per cent to US$2.75, while ST Engineering led the losers, down 1 per cent to $7.87.
Local banks were mixed: OCBC gained 0.2 per cent to $16.23; UOB rose 0.4 per cent to $35.85; but DBS lost 0.4 per cent to $44.42. THE BUSINESS TIMES
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
9 hours ago
- CNA
Splurging is not the enemy. Splurging on impulse is
In over 10 years of blogging and talking publicly about money, I've found that people often equate financial savvy to being a miser. After all, conventional money wisdom is simple: 'Save more, spend less.' But being financially savvy doesn't mean saying no to all luxuries or spending only on cheaper items. Instead, it means knowing when to say yes or no, and how to do so with intention. Over the years, I've developed a mental checklist to help me make up my mind with any big splurges – whether it's tickets to Taylor Swift's Eras Tour, a S$300 dress, or a holiday trip overseas for my entire family. A key concept I use to guide my spending decisions is that of utility cost. VALUE IS MORE THAN THE NUMBER ON THE PRICE TAG I first learnt about utility cost during economics classes back in junior college, and it has stuck with me ever since. With any big-ticket purchase, instead of looking only at the price tag, I think about its utility. How many times do I expect to be able to use it? Can it offer me prolonged enjoyment, repeated uses or other long-term benefits? What are some unexpected costs I could incur in the future if I were to choose a cheaper alternative today? A cheap mattress, for instance, might hurt my back and lead to visits to chiropractors and masseuses. A S$20 running shoe with minimal cushioning or support could cause me injuries. A cheaper smartphone may come with lower camera specifications that would require me to either compromise on my work as a content creator or purchase additional equipment to make up for it. That was why I bought my wedding gown from Taobao, an online marketplace known for low-quality, super-cheap buys. I was expecting to wear it only once – and true enough, the dress has been gathering dust in my wardrobe since then. In contrast, I recently paid S$350 for a semi-designer dress from Bangkok because I expect to wear it more than 10 times for several upcoming occasions. For me, this higher utility justified the higher cost. This often gets missed in the oversimplified 'save more, spend less' narrative. It's not just about the money we're parting with; it is about how much value we're getting in return. Buying an expensive shirt or bag isn't necessarily a bad money decision in itself; only using it once or twice is. THINK LONG-TERM One easy way to help you gauge if something is worth the splurge: Divide the cost of the item by the number of times you (realistically) expect to use it. Otherwise, you can also define this simply as the value or satisfaction you expect to gain from the purchase. I hardly own any branded goods myself, but I recall how a good friend of mine previously bought a S$3,000 branded handbag which she used daily for her first three years of work. In her case, dividing the cost of her bag by the amount of time she used it extensively (S$3,000 divided by 3 years or 1,095 days) means her rough cost-per-use hovered under S$3. The bag also gave her plenty of other intangible benefits – for three years, she didn't have to switch bags or rotate her items between different bags, and she refrained from buying new fast-fashion bags. The bag even served as a conversation starter for her at networking events. To her, all this made her handbag more than 'worth' the S$3,000 she paid for it. When working out the cost-per-use value of a designer item, it helps to think about what it'll do for you, how versatile the piece is, whether you'll tire of it quickly, and if you're paying more for the logo than the craftsmanship. THE TRUE VALUE OF EXPERIENCES That's all well and good for consumer goods, but what about intangible experiences? Let's take travel for an example. I've had trips where I came back exhausted, overspent and underwhelmed; I've also taken holidays that helped me reconnect with myself, bond with loved ones, and return home recharged. The difference was almost never in how much money I spent, but rather in how well the trip was planned in accordance with what I truly enjoy. For instance, I've realised that I don't particularly enjoy or value visiting crowded tourist hot spots just to see, do or eat things popularised by social media. So, I no longer chase bucket-list destinations or viral TikTok itineraries. Instead, I focus my spending on trips that offer real value to my well-being. KNOWING WHEN TO SAY NO Still, we all have our weak spots, things that make it easy for us to get caught up in our own excitement. My system seems to have worked well for me over the last few years, with one exception: e-commerce livestreams. From beauty products to, home gadgets, there always seems to be a constant countdown, limited-quantity offers, and hosts who know exactly what to say to make my self-control disappear. I've often caught myself hovering over the 'buy now' button during a livestream, feeling like if I didn't act in that moment, I'd miss out on the best deal forever. On these occasions, my trusty utility cost framework often ends up taking a backseat to impulse. I start spending emotionally rather than intentionally. Once I realised this, I stopped tuning in for the sake of my wallet. That's not to say livestream shopping is bad. In fact, I've found some great deals this way. But if continually exposing yourself to your weakness leads you to busting your budget more often than you'd like, it's time to re-evaluate that self-exposure. After a while, I started tuning back in to livestream shopping again – but only when I was sure I could remind myself that not every 'good deal' is good for me. Now, whenever I find myself gripped by the urge to grab yet another 'exclusive', 'limited time' offer, I ask myself: Was I already planning to buy that item before entering the livestream? If the answer is no, then chances are I don't actually need it. FINANCIAL PRUDENCE IS NOT DEPRIVATION Spending mindfully doesn't mean saying no to all big purchases. It means learning to say yes strategically to only what we really want or need. This is especially important today, when we are constantly bombarded by online content and messaging telling us what to buy, wear or experience. This can spell financial stress for us when it leads us to shell out for big-ticket items with little consideration . That's where a simple mental framework – like utility cost – can help. Being financially responsible isn't about being miserly. It's about making sure we feel good about the things we choose to splurge on, instead of wallowing in the guilt or regret of post-purchase remorse. At the end of the day, the goal shouldn't be just saving more and spending less. Instead, we should ask ourselves: What matters most to us?
International Business Times
14 hours ago
- International Business Times
Wall Street Hits New Highs as Rate Cut Bets Rise Despite Trade Tensions
US stock markets showed positive movement on Friday. The S&P 500 added 32.05 points, or 0.52%, to end the session at 6,173.07, and the Nasdaq rose 105.55 points, also 0.52%, and settled at 20,273.46, both all-time closing highs. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 432.43 points, or 1.00%, to 43,819.27. All three major indexes closed the week in positive territory, lifted by investors' attention to signals of economic health and signs of trade tensions easing. Wall Street rose on increasing hopes for interest rate cuts. Consumer spending and income fell in May, according to the Commerce Department. Inflation remained above the Fed's 2% target. Consumer sentiment improved slightly but was still lower than it was late last year. These factors helped raise the chances of a Fed rate cut, with markets pricing in a 76% likelihood for September and a 19% chance in July, according to CME's FedWatch. Trade News Boosts Optimism, Then Dampens It The markets initially rallied on the news that the U.S. and China agreed to expedite shipments of rare earth minerals days before the July 9 deadline associated with Trump's "reciprocal" tariffs. Treasury officials also suggested that deals with 18 other big U.S. trading partners could be completed by Labor Day. But investor enthusiasm was dampened when President Trump abruptly canceled trade discussions with Canada due to its digital tax on American tech companies. Analysts said investor sentiment was still positive despite the setback. "People are chasing momentum," said Chuck Carlson of Horizon Investment Services. "They don't want to miss this rally." Stocks, Sectors, and Market Action Consumer discretionary stocks were top performers, while energy shares lagged. Micron's upbeat earnings outlook boosted AI-related stocks. Nvidia gained 1.8 percent as it moved towards a $4 trillion market value. Nike shares jumped 15.2% after projecting a smaller revenue drop than expected. On the NYSE, advancing issues outnumbered decliners by a 1.29-to-1 ratio. There were 347 new highs and 55 new lows. The situation on the Nasdaq was different, however, as there were more stocks declining than advancing, resulting in a 1.11-to-1 ratio of down stocks to up ones. The S&P 500 had 35 new 52-week highs and no new lows, while the Nasdaq recorded 101 new highs and 15 new lows. The total trading volume on U.S. exchanges was 22.07 billion shares, compared with the 20-day average of 18.27 billion.
AsiaOne
17 hours ago
- AsiaOne
Trump dismisses reports US is weighing up to $38 billion civilian nuclear deal for Iran, World News
WASHINGTON - US President Donald Trump on Friday (June 27) dismissed media reports that said his administration had discussed possibly helping Iran access as much as $30 billion (S$38 billion) to build a civilian-energy-producing nuclear programme. CNN reported on Thursday and NBC News reported on Friday that the Trump administration in recent days had explored possible economic incentives for Iran in return for its government halting uranium enrichment. The reports cited sources. CNN cited officials as saying that several proposals were floated and were preliminary. "Who in the Fake News Media is the SleazeBag saying that 'President Trump wants to give Iran $30 Billion to build non-military Nuclear facilities.' Never heard of this ridiculous idea," Trump wrote on Truth Social late on Friday, calling the reports a "Hoax." Since April, Iran and the US have held indirect talks aimed at finding a new diplomatic solution regarding Iran's nuclear programme. Tehran says its programme is peaceful and Washington says it wants to ensure Iran cannot build a nuclear weapon. Trump, earlier this week, announced a ceasefire between US ally Israel and its regional rival Iran to halt a war that began on June 13 when Israel attacked Iran. The Israel-Iran conflict had raised alarms in a region already on edge since the start of Israel's war in Gaza in October 2023. The US struck Iran's nuclear sites over the last weekend and Iran targeted a US base in Qatar on Monday in retaliation, before Trump announced the ceasefire. [[nid:719354]] Israel is the only Middle Eastern country widely believed to have nuclear weapons and said its war against Iran aimed to prevent Tehran from developing its own nuclear weapons. Iran is a party to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, while Israel is not. The UN nuclear watchdog, which carries out inspections in Iran, has said it has "no credible indication" of an active, coordinated weapons programme in Iran.
