Israel military raids West Bank camps
RAMALLAH: Israeli troops raided two Palestinian refugee camps in the occupied West Bank's north overnight, the military told AFP, as Israel presses offensives on multiple fronts.
The military told AFP that at "around 4:00 am Israeli forces entered Balata camp", near the northern city of Nablus, for "a routine counter-terrorism operation".
It added that the troops had been deployed to the nearby Askar camp prior to the operation in Balata camp.
Imad Zaki, head of the popular services committee of Balata camp, also told AFP that the military began its raid at 4:00 am (0100 GMT) on Wednesday.
"They closed all entrances to the camp, seized several homes after evicting their residents, and ordered the homeowners not to return for 72 hours.
These homes were turned into military outposts and interrogation centres," Zaki said.
"The soldiers are conducting house-to-house and neighbourhood-to-neighbourhood searches, destroying the contents of homes and physically assaulting the residents," Zaki told AFP.
He added that life had been "largely paralysed" for the camp's residents but that no injuries were reported.
In a separate statement, the military said that its forces had "neutralised" one Palestinian overnight in the West Bank village of Al-Walaja near Jerusalem.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
2025 Top Trending local enterprise accounting software [Click Here]
Esseps
Learn More
Undo
They said that as the troops were deployed in the area, a Palestinian armed with a knife "attempted to stab (Israeli) soldiers who were operating in the area and steal their weapons".
"The soldiers responded with fire and neutralised the terrorist," the army said, using a term it normally uses when someone has been killed.
The Israeli military said Tuesday that its forces had been active in various parts of the Jenin area, in the northern West Bank.
It said in a statement that its forces had arrested five Palestinian militants suspected of planning attacks on Israel.
Throughout the Gaza war, violence in the West Bank -- a separate Palestinian territory -- has soared, as have calls to annex it, most notably from Israel's far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich.
Since the start of the war in October 2023, Israeli troops or settlers have killed at least 939 Palestinians, including many militants, according to the Palestinian health ministry.
Over the same period, at least 35 Israelis including civilians and soldiers have been killed in Palestinian attacks or during Israeli military raids, according to official Israeli figures.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
21 minutes ago
- Mint
Appeals court says California law requiring background checks for ammunition is unconstitutional
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — A voter-backed California law requiring background checks for people who buy bullets is unconstitutional, a federal appeals court ruled Thursday in a blow to the state's efforts to combat gun violence. In upholding a 2024 ruling by a lower court, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals found that the state law violates the Second Amendment. Voters passed the law in 2016 and it took effect in 2019. Many states, including California, make people pass a background check before they can buy a gun. California went a step further by requiring a background check, which costs either $1 or $19 depending on eligibility, every time someone buys buy bullets. Last year, U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez decided that the law was unconstitutional because if people can't buy bullets, they can't use their guns for self-defense. The 9th Circuit agreed. Writing for two of the three judges on the appellate panel, Judge Sandra Segal Ikuta said the state law 'meaningfully constrains" the constitutional right to keep arms by forcing gun owners to get rechecked before each purchase of bullets. 'The right to keep and bear arms incorporates the right to operate them, which requires ammunition,' the judge wrote. Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, who supported the background checks, decried the court's decision. 'Strong gun laws save lives — and today's decision is a slap in the face to the progress California has made in recent years to keep its communities safer from gun violence," Newsom said in a statement. "Californians voted to require background checks on ammunition and their voices should matter.' Chuck Michel, president and general counsel of the California Rifle & Pistol Association, called the law 'absurdly restrictive.' 'This case has been a long hard fight against overreaching government gun control, but a firearm cannot be effective without the ammunition to make it operable. The state of California continues to try to strip our rights, and we continue to prove their actions are unconstitutional.' Benitez had criticized the state's automated background check system, which he said rejected about 11% of applicants, or 58,087 requests, in the first half of 2023. California's law was meant to help police find people who have guns illegally, such as convicted felons, people with certain mental illnesses and people with some domestic violence convictions.
Mint
21 minutes ago
- Mint
UK Cabinet Pushes Starmer to Hasten Backing of Palestinian State
(Bloomberg) -- UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer is facing pressure from senior members of his government and French President Emmanuel Macron to imminently recognize Palestine as a sovereign state due to the worsening humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Some cabinet ministers have grown frustrated with Starmer's resistance to fulfilling his promise to back Palestinian statehood, according to people familiar with the matter. Health Secretary Wes Streeting, Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood, Northern Ireland Secretary Hilary Benn and Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy have recently urged Starmer and his Foreign Secretary David Lammy to move more quickly on the issue, the people said. Macron, who had been seeking to persuade Starmer to jointly recognize Palestine over recent months, announced late Thursday that France will do so at the United Nations General Assembly in September, intensifying pressure on Starmer further. The British premier said Thursday that 'statehood is the inalienable right of the Palestinian people' and that a ceasefire would put the UK 'on a path' to recognition, but stopped short of committing to a timeframe. Talks for a ceasefire in Gaza broke down on Thursday, with the US and Israel withdrawing their negotiating teams. It's a development that deals a new blow to the talks, just weeks after President Donald Trump said a deal was close. The tension within the UK government on the issue has been stoked by reports of widespread hunger in Gaza just two weeks after the European Union struck an agreement with Israel that was intended to increase the flow of food to the occupied territory. There have been increasing reports of emaciated babies, starvation and children crammed into soup queues. While the Israeli government has sought to blame Hamas, Médecins Sans Frontières and many other humanitarian groups accused Israel of failing to make good on the arrangement. Since Hamas' attack on Israel in October 2023, which triggered the war in Gaza, the Israeli government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has also hardened its stance against the creation of a Palestinian state, arguing it poses a risk to Israel's security. But the devastating impact of Israel's incursion into Gaza — which has resulted in more than 59,000 estimated deaths and reduced vast areas to rubble — has driven some of Israel's traditional supporters in Europe to speak out and consider trade sanctions aimed at hastening an end to the conflict. The UK has suspended some arms exports to Israel and sanctioned senior members of Netanyahu's administration. Some senior Labour figures have both publicly and privately warned that even if the UK chooses to recognize Palestine at the UN in September, it may come too late given the scale of the destruction. In an unusual public intervention on an issue that's not part of his brief, Streeting told the House of Commons on Tuesday said he hoped recognition will happen 'while there is still a state of Palestine left to recognize.' London Mayor Sadiq Khan joined the calls for the UK to immediately recognize Palestinian statehood the next day, urging the government to 'do far more to pressure the Israeli government.' The Guardian was first to report the Cabinet unrest. The UK will be represented at a United Nations conference being convened by France and Saudi Arabia in New York next week but hasn't yet decided whether to send Lammy or a more junior minister, according to people familiar with the matter. France will use the summit to discuss efforts to achieve a ceasefire and a two-state solution but won't formally recognize Palestine until a gathering of leaders at UNGA in September. The UK is yet to decide whether it will follow France in doing so, the people said. Lammy has argued in recent weeks that despite other countries having already recognized Palestine, his immediate focus is on 'trying to alleviate the suffering' in the region. 'I recognize the debate on recognition, and we must move to recognition at the appropriate point,' Lammy told the House of Commons earlier this week after several Labour lawmakers urged him to move faster. But, he added, 'I do not believe in all honesty that recognition would change the situation on the ground.' More stories like this are available on
Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
Rahul Gandhi's 'vote theft' claim an afterthought, says EC
NEW DELHI: Election Commission of India on Thursday said leader of opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi 's allegations of "vote theft" during the 2024 Lok Sabha elections in Karnataka appear to be an afterthought, given that Congress neither filed a single appeal with election officials after publication of the state's final electoral roll in Jan 2024 nor did it challenge the results in state high court through an election petition. Talking to reporters in Parliament complex, Rahul claimed that Congress has "concrete 100% proof" of "cheating in an LS seat" in Karnataka and warned that "if you (EC) think you are going to get away with this... you are mistaken... we are going to come for you". The Congress MP said opposition would ensure that EC is held accountable. Dismissing his charges as "baseless" in a statement, EC said: "It is highly unfortunate that rather than filing an election petition as per section 80 of Representation of the People (RP)Act, 1951, or if filed, awaiting verdict of HC, he has not only made baseless allegations but also chosen to threaten EC, which is a constitutional body." With his allegations coming more than a year after the LS polls result, EC said it was wondering why "such baseless and threatening claims were being made against it and the CEC, and that too now." It added that the losing Congress candidates did not file a single election petition to challenge the result, despite Representation of the People Act, 1951 allowing this within 45 days of declaration of result. Others, however, did file 10 election petitions in HC. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villas For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Dubai villas | search ads Get Deals Undo Countering Rahul's "unwarranted threatening statements", the Karnataka chief electoral officer (CEO) on X said copies of the draft and final electoral roll for the state's 224 assembly seats were provided to recognised parties, including Congress, on Oct 27, 2023, and Jan 22, 2024, respectively. Between publication of the draft and final roll, around 9.2 lakh claims and objections were received and settled across 34 districts. Neither Congress nor any other entity avail the two-stage appeal option available under Representation of the People Act, 1951, the post said. Meanwhile, backing RJD functionary Tejashwi Yadav suggested possibility of boycotting Bihar elections over the special revision of electoral rolls issue, Congress' K C Venugopal said a political party's biggest weapon in a democracy is the voters' list and if that is compromised, with names being deleted and lists not being clean, then you are challenging democracy. "Let there not be an election and there be one party. Let Election Commission rule that. That is what Yadav meant by his comment about boycotting," Venugopal said.
