
Struggle for the Freedom Charter goes on
The Freedom Charter was adopted in Kliptown 70 years ago, on 26 June 1955. Thousands of delegates travelled across South Africa — by train, by bus, on foot — to take part in the Congress of the People. They met under an open sky, gathered on a dusty field where a wooden stage had been erected. Armed police watched from the perimeter but the atmosphere was determined and jubilant.
One by one, the clauses of the Charter — on land, work, education, housing, democracy, peace — were read aloud, and each was met with unanimous approval. The charter distilled months of discussion and collective vision.
Discussions of the charter seldom place it in its full historical context. Yet to understand its true significance, we must see it as part of a wider global moment — an era in which oppressed peoples across the world were rising against colonialism.
After the defeat of fascism in 1945, there was a deep sense of possibility. The victory fuelled a new international moral order, embodied in the founding of the United Nations and its charter, with its emphasis on human rights, self-determination and peace. In the colonised world, this sparked a wave of anti-colonial struggle and growing demands for independence. India gained independence in 1947, China, through force of arms, in 1949 and Ghana in 1957.
In April 1955, two months before the Freedom Charter was adopted, 29 newly independent and colonised nations met in Bandung, Indonesia. The Bandung Conference gave voice to the aspirations of the Global South — to end colonialism and racial domination, assert autonomy in world affairs and build cooperation among formerly colonised peoples. Bandung thrilled anti-colonial forces globally. The Freedom Charter emerged amid this excitement.
This hopeful period was shadowed by a fierce imperial backlash. In Iran, prime minister Mohammad Mossadegh's nationalisation of oil in 1951 was met with a CIA- and MI6-backed coup in 1953. In Guatemala, president Jacobo Árbenz's land reforms provoked a similar response, and in 1954 the CIA orchestrated his removal.
Around the world, popular sovereignty was crushed to preserve imperial power. The Korean War (1950–53) marked the aggressive militarisation of the Cold War. In January 1961, Congo's first elected leader, Patrice Lumumba, was assassinated with the support of the CIA. In April that year the CIA organised the failed Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba. In 1965, the US began a full-scale invasion of Vietnam. In 1966, Ghana's Kwame Nkrumah was overthrown in a Western-backed coup.
In South Africa, the vision set out in the Freedom Charter was swiftly met with state repression. Months after its adoption, 156 leaders of the Congress Alliance were arrested and charged with treason. Then came the Sharpeville Massacre in March 1960. The apartheid regime banned the liberation movements underground and, in response, the ANC took the decision to turn to armed struggle.
The Freedom Charter cannot be separated from the process that gave it life — a process that was profoundly democratic and rooted in the daily lives of people. In 1953, the ANC and its partners in the Congress Alliance issued a call for a national dialogue: to ask, plainly and urgently, 'What kind of South Africa do we want to live in?'
The response was remarkable. Across the country, in townships, villages, workplaces, churches and at all kinds of gatherings, people came together to develop their demands. Submissions arrived handwritten, typed or dictated to organisers.
The charter expressed a vision of South Africa grounded in equality, justice and shared prosperity. 'The people shall govern' affirmed not only the right to vote, but the principle that power must reside with the people. 'The land shall be shared among those who work it' challenged the dispossession at the heart of colonial and apartheid rule. Crucially, the charter called for an economy based on public benefit rather than private profit: 'The national wealth of our country, the heritage of South Africans, shall be restored to the people.'
Education, housing and healthcare were to be universal and equal. The charter envisioned a South Africa without racism or sexism, where all would be 'equal before the law', with 'peace and friendship' pursued abroad.
After the banning of the liberation movements in the 1960s and the brutal repression that followed, the Freedom Charter did not disappear — but it receded from popular memory.
In the 1980s, it surged back into public life with renewed force. The formation of the United Democratic Front in 1983 in Cape Town, and the emergence of the Congress of South African Trade Unions (Cosatu) in 1985 in Durban, gave new organisational life to the charter. Grassroots formations drew on unions, civics and faith groups to take the charter out of the archives and the underground and into the streets. For the powerful mass movement organised in workplaces and communities the charter promised a future grounded in radical democracy and a fundamental redistribution of land and wealth.
The charter became a vital reference point for the negotiations that began after the unbanning of the liberation movements. Its language and principles profoundly shaped elements of the new Constitution.
The charter's insistence that 'South Africa belongs to all who live in it' and that 'the people shall govern' was carried through into the constitutional affirmation of non-racialism and universal suffrage. Guarantees of equal rights, human dignity and socio-economic rights such as housing, education and healthcare echo the charter's vision.
But the transition involved compromise. In the 1980s, the charter had been a call for deep structural transformation. At the settlement, key clauses — particularly those calling for the redistribution of land and the sharing of national wealth — were softened or deferred. The final settlement preserved existing patterns of private property and accepted a macroeconomic framework shaped in part by global neoliberal pressures. While the vote was won, the deeper transformations envisioned in the charter were postponed.
The result is that today, 31 years after the end of apartheid, structural inequalities and mass impoverishment remain. The charter's economic promises have not been fulfilled.
The 2024 general election marked a historic turning point. Taken together, the two dominant parties garnered support from less than a quarter of the eligible population. Nearly 60% of eligible voters did not participate.
The charter's promise that 'the people shall govern' demands more than a vote — it requires sustained participation. This requires rebuilding mass democratic participation from below. It means rekindling the culture of popular meetings, community mandates and worker-led initiatives that grounded the charter in lived experience. It means going beyond elections and restoring a sense of everyday democratic agency — in schools, workplaces and communities. It means making good on the promise to redistribute land and wealth.
It also means rebuilding solidarity across the Global South. South Africa played a leading role in the formation of the Hague Group in January this year to build an alliance in support of Palestine. This was a major breakthrough that echoed the spirit of Bandung. The meeting that the group will hold in Bogota in July promises to significantly expand its reach and power.
We must recognise the scale of resistance to transformation, both internationally and at home. The criminal attack on Iran by Israel and the United States exposes the brutality of imperial power — and the urgent need for a global counterweight.
In South Africa economic elites and NGOs, think tanks and media projects funded by Western donors often work to frame redistributive politics as illegitimate or reckless. These networks have grown bolder as ANC support has declined.
In June 2023, the Brenthurst Foundation — funded by the Oppenheimer family — convened a conference in Gdansk, Poland. Branded as a summit to 'promote democracy', the conference issued a 'Gdansk Declaration' widely read as an attempt to legitimise Western-backed opposition to redistributive politics in the Global South. The Democratic Alliance and the Inkatha Freedom Party were present, along with former Daily Maverick editor Branko Brkic and representatives of Renamo (Mozambique) and Unita (Angola), both reactionary movements that were backed by the West to violently oppose national liberation movements.
The event marked the open emergence of a transnational alliance aimed at neutralising any attempt to challenge elite power in the name of justice or equality.
It is a reminder that the struggle to realise the Freedom Charter's vision will not be won on moral terms alone. It will require effective political organisation, ideological clarity and courage. The charter was born of struggle. It must now be defended and renewed through struggle.
Ronnie Kasrils is a veteran of the anti-apartheid struggle, and South Africa's former minister for intelligence services, activist and author.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

TimesLIVE
an hour ago
- TimesLIVE
Women's rights face 'full-on assault' due to UN and aid funding cuts
Four major international reports on women's rights, including recommendations on how to prevent domestic violence and discrimination, will not be published this year, a UN document shows — part of what rights groups describe as a broader backlash against gender equality. Voluntary funding for the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) is down $60m (R1.07bn) this year due to unpaid contributions and major US foreign aid cuts under President Donald Trump, about 14% of its total income last year. An OHCHR document circulated to member states and reviewed by Reuters shows 13 human rights reports have been delayed, four of them specifically concerning women, putting off investigations and discussions on how policies can be improved. 'We're silencing policy dialogue,' Pooja Patel, programme director at the International Service for Human Rights in Geneva, told Reuters. One in four countries reported a backlash on women's rights last year, a UN report in March said, something rights groups said made monitoring and recommendations more important. 'It affects the everyday lives of women and girls when these reports and mechanisms are not functioning,' said Claire Somerville, a lecturer and executive director of the Gender Centre at the Geneva Graduate Institute.


Mail & Guardian
4 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
R700 million for a conversation? Rather spend it on small business grants, classrooms, bursaries or clinics
South Africans know how to 'dialogue' but fall short on implementation. Photo: File Imagine getting up in a shack with no electricity and trekking five kilometres to a clinic, only to be told there's no doctor on duty, and then trekking back home to boil water on a paraffin stove while hoping teachers at your child's school might just make an appearance. Then envision this: your government says it's going to spend R700 million asking how you feel about South Africa. That is what the proposed National Dialogue feels like. A R700 million conversation around the country. It is presented to us as Codesa 2.0, a second chance to relaunch South Africa's broken social contract. But that is the uncomfortable reality. The state is ruling through consultation. Instead of mending what is broken, they are asking us to talk about it. Again. The government maintains it does want to know what people have to say. It is staging two national conventions and dozens of sectoral and provincial consultations. The process will be overseen by an Eminent Persons Group of judges, sports heroes and business people. All very grand-sounding. To many South Africans, though, it has a sense of déjà vu. We've done this before. From izimbizo to developmental plans, white papers to commissions, South Africans have been sharing their stories, their grievances and their aspirations in forums year in and year out. We reported to the Zondo state capture commission about graft. We reported to the National Planning Commission about poverty. We reported to municipal public forums about poor housing and dysfunctional toilets. So what did we do differently? An astounding 32.1% of South Africans are unemployed. The figure for young jobless people is 45%. Load-shedding lost us R1.2 trillion from 2007 and 2023. More than three million learners used pit latrines at schools. These are not new revelations. These are old sores that have been reopened in each forum that this state has held. It is not that South Africans are not saying anything. The issue is that nobody is listening, or doing anything. Dialogue is not a bad thing. Societies do need spaces to think, recover trust and construct common visions. But context matters. Dialogue is not neutral. If it is the state's fallback response to a crisis, that is a warning sign. There is a risk that the state is replacing action with performance. To have a conversation regarding youth unemployment doesn't create jobs. It creates catering, venue, facilitation and transport contracts. That is where R700 million is being spent in a nation where protests about service delivery erupt almost every single week. Imagine what would be accomplished if this R700 million was redistributed. It would fund 28,000 youth small business grants of R25,000 each. It would build hundreds of classrooms, bursaries or rural clinics to give them a stable electricity supply. We're about to spend it debating something that already is. The damage has already been done. Trust is not regained through a microphone. South Africans do not require another process. They require consequences. They require a government that not only hears them but acts in a timely fashion and with regularity. The Codesa 2.0 idea has to be unpacked too. The original Codesa was a negotiation among political parties coming out of a violent, polarised apartheid past. We are not building a democracy. We are seeing it slowly disintegrate. We are not engaging in a reconciliation dialogue. We are engaging in service delivery, accountability and popular displeasure. Framing it as a time of renewal risks sentimentalising a credibility crisis. It is no longer good enough to say that the people should be consulted. Consultation is useless if it does not lead to something. We have sat in too many rooms, completed too many surveys, and read too many commitments in reports. What people require now is action. If there is a dialogue, then it must be measured in terms of its end product; not the number of voices but the number of changes on the ground. The government must stop acting as if it is a facilitator and start acting like it is a leader. If this National Dialogue is to produce the same outcomes that we have seen previously — reports to accumulate in heaps of dust, recommendations that go unheard and citizens who have been used and neglected — then it will be next on the list of expensive experiments in acts of political theatre. People in this country don't look for perfection. They look for honesty, for effort, for growth. If we can't offer them that, then all this commotion is not going to do us any good. Speeches don't run things. The time has arrived to stop outsourcing leadership to words and to lead as if lives depended upon it. Because they do. Vhahangwele Tsotetsi is a political analyst, consultant, social entrepreneur and Project YouthSA chairperson.


Mail & Guardian
4 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
Prof Bismark Tyobeka appointed chairperson of Ministerial Expert Panel on Nuclear
Prof Bismark Tyobeka. In a landmark development for South Africa's energy transition, Prof Bismark Tyobeka, principal and vice-chancellor of the North-West University (NWU) and former CEO of the National Nuclear Regulator, has been appointed both a member and chairperson of the Ministerial Expert Panel on Nuclear. The appointment, announced by the Minister of Electricity and Energy, Dr Kgosientsho Ramokgopa, places Prof Tyobeka at the helm of a body tasked with advising government on the pace, scale and procurement approach for new nuclear capacity. Prof Tyobeka's selection reflects not only his nuclear qualifications, skills and deep regulatory expertise, but also his stature as one of Africa's foremost authorities on nuclear safety and governance. This non-remunerative appointment is for a 12-month term. Minister Ramokgopa noted that in recent months, his ministry has been shaping its strategic objectives in support of the government's Medium-Term Development Plan, with nuclear energy playing a key role in that vision. 'The Ministry will aggressively expand research and development, innovation and partnerships to reassert South Africa's capability and global positioning as a leader in nuclear technology, and use this nuclear expertise to drive industrial development and growth,' he said. The panel will advise the Minister on strategic issues across the entire value chain of nuclear technology development. Of Professor Tyobeka, the Minister remarked: 'I am aware that Professor Tyobeka fulfils a vital role as Principal and Vice-Chancellor of the North-West University, and I am confident that the two roles will complement each other significantly, given the NWU's strong focus on nuclear technology and its contribution to energy security, as well as the broader goals of job creation and localisation within the nuclear sector.' Prof Tyobeka expressed his appreciation for the trust the Minister has placed in him and reaffirmed his commitment to helping steer South Africa's just energy transition. 'According to the Minister, the role of this expert panel extends beyond nuclear energy alone. It is intended to provide comprehensive advice on all nuclear-related matters, including nuclear science, technology and power. This is an exciting opportunity for us to support the Minister in enhancing the country's nuclear capabilities, particularly in advancing the production of medical isotopes at NECSA. Our goal is to reaffirm South Africa's leadership in radiopharmaceuticals, a position we have proudly held for many years. 'Moreover, the panel comprises esteemed experts, both local and international, within the nuclear field. I believe this will bring renewed momentum to restoring South Africa's position as Africa's leading nuclear power. As many are aware, Egypt has recently made substantial progress with its nuclear build programme and is currently constructing four nuclear power stations, each with a capacity of 1 200 megawatts. Once completed, Egypt will become the continent's largest producer of nuclear electricity, a position South Africa has held for more than four decades. 'This appointment – mine and that of my distinguished colleagues – augurs well for the revitalisation of South Africa's nuclear power programme. More than just revival, however, it must also inject urgency and direction into our efforts, while being mindful of the appropriate pace and scale. 'We look forward to working closely with the department's policy developers and implementers. We acknowledge the commendable work already achieved. Our task is to build on that foundation and help take the country's nuclear ambitions to the next level through expert, strategic guidance to Minister Ramokgopa.' • Find attached a voice recording from Prof Tyobeka on his appointment. • Follow the link to the article here: