logo
Struggle for the Freedom Charter goes on

Struggle for the Freedom Charter goes on

Mail & Guardian2 days ago
Hope: The Freedom Charter was adopted on 26 June 1955 at Kliptown in Soweto. Its contents were drawn from submission from people all over South Africa.
The Freedom Charter was adopted in Kliptown 70 years ago, on 26 June 1955. Thousands of delegates travelled across South Africa — by train, by bus, on foot — to take part in the Congress of the People. They met under an open sky, gathered on a dusty field where a wooden stage had been erected. Armed police watched from the perimeter but the atmosphere was determined and jubilant.
One by one, the clauses of the Charter — on land, work, education, housing, democracy, peace — were read aloud, and each was met with unanimous approval. The charter distilled months of discussion and collective vision.
Discussions of the charter seldom place it in its full historical context. Yet to understand its true significance, we must see it as part of a wider global moment — an era in which oppressed peoples across the world were rising against colonialism.
After the defeat of fascism in 1945, there was a deep sense of possibility. The victory fuelled a new international moral order, embodied in the founding of the United Nations and its charter, with its emphasis on human rights, self-determination and peace. In the colonised world, this sparked a wave of anti-colonial struggle and growing demands for independence. India gained independence in 1947, China, through force of arms, in 1949 and Ghana in 1957.
In April 1955, two months before the Freedom Charter was adopted, 29 newly independent and colonised nations met in Bandung, Indonesia. The Bandung Conference gave voice to the aspirations of the Global South — to end colonialism and racial domination, assert autonomy in world affairs and build cooperation among formerly colonised peoples. Bandung thrilled anti-colonial forces globally. The Freedom Charter emerged amid this excitement.
This hopeful period was shadowed by a fierce imperial backlash. In Iran, prime minister Mohammad Mossadegh's nationalisation of oil in 1951 was met with a CIA- and MI6-backed coup in 1953. In Guatemala, president Jacobo Árbenz's land reforms provoked a similar response, and in 1954 the CIA orchestrated his removal.
Around the world, popular sovereignty was crushed to preserve imperial power. The Korean War (1950–53) marked the aggressive militarisation of the Cold War. In January 1961, Congo's first elected leader, Patrice Lumumba, was assassinated with the support of the CIA. In April that year the CIA organised the failed Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba. In 1965, the US began a full-scale invasion of Vietnam. In 1966, Ghana's Kwame Nkrumah was overthrown in a Western-backed coup.
In South Africa, the vision set out in the Freedom Charter was swiftly met with state repression. Months after its adoption, 156 leaders of the Congress Alliance were arrested and charged with treason. Then came the Sharpeville Massacre in March 1960. The apartheid regime banned the liberation movements underground and, in response, the ANC took the decision to turn to armed struggle.
The Freedom Charter cannot be separated from the process that gave it life — a process that was profoundly democratic and rooted in the daily lives of people. In 1953, the ANC and its partners in the Congress Alliance issued a call for a national dialogue: to ask, plainly and urgently, 'What kind of South Africa do we want to live in?'
The response was remarkable. Across the country, in townships, villages, workplaces, churches and at all kinds of gatherings, people came together to develop their demands. Submissions arrived handwritten, typed or dictated to organisers.
The charter expressed a vision of South Africa grounded in equality, justice and shared prosperity. 'The people shall govern' affirmed not only the right to vote, but the principle that power must reside with the people. 'The land shall be shared among those who work it' challenged the dispossession at the heart of colonial and apartheid rule. Crucially, the charter called for an economy based on public benefit rather than private profit: 'The national wealth of our country, the heritage of South Africans, shall be restored to the people.'
Education, housing and healthcare were to be universal and equal. The charter envisioned a South Africa without racism or sexism, where all would be 'equal before the law', with 'peace and friendship' pursued abroad.
After the banning of the liberation movements in the 1960s and the brutal repression that followed, the Freedom Charter did not disappear — but it receded from popular memory.
In the 1980s, it surged back into public life with renewed force. The formation of the United Democratic Front in 1983 in Cape Town, and the emergence of the Congress of South African Trade Unions (Cosatu) in 1985 in Durban, gave new organisational life to the charter. Grassroots formations drew on unions, civics and faith groups to take the charter out of the archives and the underground and into the streets. For the powerful mass movement organised in workplaces and communities the charter promised a future grounded in radical democracy and a fundamental redistribution of land and wealth.
The charter became a vital reference point for the negotiations that began after the unbanning of the liberation movements. Its language and principles profoundly shaped elements of the new Constitution.
The charter's insistence that 'South Africa belongs to all who live in it' and that 'the people shall govern' was carried through into the constitutional affirmation of non-racialism and universal suffrage. Guarantees of equal rights, human dignity and socio-economic rights such as housing, education and healthcare echo the charter's vision.
But the transition involved compromise. In the 1980s, the charter had been a call for deep structural transformation. At the settlement, key clauses — particularly those calling for the redistribution of land and the sharing of national wealth — were softened or deferred. The final settlement preserved existing patterns of private property and accepted a macroeconomic framework shaped in part by global neoliberal pressures. While the vote was won, the deeper transformations envisioned in the charter were postponed.
The result is that today, 31 years after the end of apartheid, structural inequalities and mass impoverishment remain. The charter's economic promises have not been fulfilled.
The 2024 general election marked a historic turning point. Taken together, the two dominant parties garnered support from less than a quarter of the eligible population. Nearly 60% of eligible voters did not participate.
The charter's promise that 'the people shall govern' demands more than a vote — it requires sustained participation. This requires rebuilding mass democratic participation from below. It means rekindling the culture of popular meetings, community mandates and worker-led initiatives that grounded the charter in lived experience. It means going beyond elections and restoring a sense of everyday democratic agency — in schools, workplaces and communities. It means making good on the promise to redistribute land and wealth.
It also means rebuilding solidarity across the Global South. South Africa played a leading role in the formation of the Hague Group in January this year to build an alliance in support of Palestine. This was a major breakthrough that echoed the spirit of Bandung. The meeting that the group will hold in Bogota in July promises to significantly expand its reach and power.
We must recognise the scale of resistance to transformation, both internationally and at home. The criminal attack on Iran by Israel and the United States exposes the brutality of imperial power — and the urgent need for a global counterweight.
In South Africa economic elites and NGOs, think tanks and media projects funded by Western donors often work to frame redistributive politics as illegitimate or reckless. These networks have grown bolder as ANC support has declined.
In June 2023, the Brenthurst Foundation — funded by the Oppenheimer family — convened a conference in Gdansk, Poland. Branded as a summit to 'promote democracy', the conference issued a 'Gdansk Declaration' widely read as an attempt to legitimise Western-backed opposition to redistributive politics in the Global South. The Democratic Alliance and the Inkatha Freedom Party were present, along with former Daily Maverick editor Branko Brkic and representatives of Renamo (Mozambique) and Unita (Angola), both reactionary movements that were backed by the West to violently oppose national liberation movements.
The event marked the open emergence of a transnational alliance aimed at neutralising any attempt to challenge elite power in the name of justice or equality.
It is a reminder that the struggle to realise the Freedom Charter's vision will not be won on moral terms alone. It will require effective political organisation, ideological clarity and courage. The charter was born of struggle. It must now be defended and renewed through struggle.
Ronnie Kasrils is a veteran of the anti-apartheid struggle, and South Africa's former minister for intelligence services, activist and author.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Brics leaders must take steps on policy to facilitate between member countries
Brics leaders must take steps on policy to facilitate between member countries

Mail & Guardian

time12 minutes ago

  • Mail & Guardian

Brics leaders must take steps on policy to facilitate between member countries

These countries need to rethink the prohibitive tariffs they place on each other Many themes are on the minds of the political leaders attending the Brics Summit in Brazil, but one aspect that is certainly important for all is easing trade friction in this group. For the long-term sustainability of Brics, there must be a stronger economic ambition that ties the grouping together beyond its political and geopolitical alignments. Across all Brics countries, researchers, policymakers and business people have been attempting to adapt and address the restrictions caused by the United States Liberation Day tariff. There remains profound uncertainty about the path ahead, as the 90-day pause comes to an end this coming week. What the Brics countries have not reflected on is the prohibitive tariffs they place against each other, which limit intra-Brics trade. The blame, while correct, cannot be placed solely on the US for its higher tariffs; the Brics countries should also consider taking a serious look inward and assess how they could deepen intra-trade and increase investments. The ideas of this path have long been documented in the business arm of this grouping, the Brics Business Council Forum, in its various annual reports. Still, few of these ideas have made their way into the political groupings' resolutions in a manner that changes the economic engagement landscape among these countries. The current environment necessitates such a strong approach. Consider the South African agricultural sector, which, because of the lack of a trade agreement, faces higher tariffs in Brics member countries. Take China as an example; South Africa's macadamias face a 12% import tariff and the wine industry tariffs of 14% to 20%. In addition to higher tariffs, exporters also face phytosanitary barriers. I am singling out China here, but the same can be said about India, another major agricultural importer in Brics. For South Africa, agriculture is one of the key strategic industries for driving economic growth and revitalising rural communities. Notably, the sector cannot grow robustly without an expansion into new export markets. Already, the South African agricultural industry exports roughly half of its produce in value terms, amounting to about $13.7 billion in 2024. But the Brics countries account for a small share of these exports. Roughly two-thirds of South Africa's agricultural exports go to the African continent and the European Union. While China has signalled optimism and an intention to lower import tariffs for various goods from Africa, there is no demonstrable evidence of the actual path of implementing this, along with the timelines. Currently, it primarily serves as a political statement. The Brics grouping should build on these political statements, and argue for a proper framework that technocrats and business can start refining, which can be launched at the next summit in India as the Brics trade agreement. This would encompass the agricultural sector, as this grouping is a big market, accounting for roughly half of global agricultural imports, but filled mainly by non-Brics members. The US authorities' tough trade stance necessitates this approach to trade policy, which will allow Brics countries to expand the avenues for trade for their domestic businesses and alleviate the friction in this grouping. This economic ambition of deepening trade is vital for the long-term sustainability of Brics. Wandile Sihlobo is the chief economist of the Agricultural Business Chamber of South Africa (Agbiz).

Did Mkhwanazi cross the line by going public with SAPS concerns?
Did Mkhwanazi cross the line by going public with SAPS concerns?

The Herald

timean hour ago

  • The Herald

Did Mkhwanazi cross the line by going public with SAPS concerns?

KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner Lt-Gen Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi has sparked a national debate after publicly raising concern about political interference in the SAPS. During a media briefing on Sunday, Mkhwanazi suggested senior political figures were influencing police decisions, a claim that drew sharp responses and praise in equal measure. President Cyril Ramaphosa, attending the Brics summit in Brazil, called the matter a 'grave national security concern' and urged police leaders to show 'discipline and restraint' amid the fallout. He warned 'the trading of accusations and counteraccusations threatens to undermine public confidence' in the SAPS. Some see Mkhwanazi as a whistle-blower exposing rot in the system. Others say he stepped out of line and should have handled the matter internally.

Police top brass in public fallout: Who are the key figures?
Police top brass in public fallout: Who are the key figures?

The Herald

timean hour ago

  • The Herald

Police top brass in public fallout: Who are the key figures?

Divisions between police in KwaZulu-Natal and Gauteng and allegations of political interference in investigations have placed the spotlight on three of the most powerful positions in law enforcement in South Africa. KwaZulu-Natal police commissioner Lt-Gen Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi on Sunday blamed police minister Senzo Mchunu for the dissolution of the political killings task team after the team had uncovered a drug cartel in Gauteng allegedly involving senior police officers, politicians, prosecutors and members of the judiciary. He also accused national deputy police commissioner responsible for detectives Lt-Gen Shadrack Sibiya of withdrawing all case dockets from the team and transferring them to his office, where he claimed they have gathered dust. Mchunu, when he announced the disbandment of the political task team in January, said it was no longer needed. In 2023, then police minister Bheki Cele said the task team had since its inception in July 2018, investigated 321 dockets including 155 cases of murder and 51 of attempted murder. There had been 348 arrests which had led to 62 suspects being convicted, and 155 still going through the court processes. Snapshot of the key figures: Senzo Mchunu Mchunu is seen as a key ally of President Cyril Ramaphosa after the former staunch supporter of Jacob Zuma spoke out against state capture and endorsed the CR17 election campaign. He became minister of police in July 2024. He previously served in the cabinet as minister of water and sanitation and of public service and administration. He worked as a high school teacher in Nquthu and in Eshowe before going into politics full-time in 1991. He served in various provincial ANC structures in the province and was KwaZulu-Natal premier between 2013 and 2016. An alumnus of the University of Zululand and Unisa, he has a BA degree in education and international relations. On July 4, Mchunu told parliament during his budget debate speech that he intended to ensure a clean-run police service. 'We are addressing internal matters that directly affect the functioning and credibility of the SAPS. We take this opportunity to confirm the recent arrests of senior officials in crime intelligence after the investigations by the inspector-general for intelligence and the Investigating Directorate Against Corruption. As the ministry, we have taken a defined stance against corruption within the SAPS and we unequivocally state that there is no tolerance for corruption within the SAPS,' he pronounced. This followed the arrest of seven senior officials, including the divisional commissioner for crime intelligence, Lt-Gen Dumisani Khumalo, on charges relating to alleged corruption. On Sunday, Mchunu said the allegations made against him by Mkhwanazi were baseless. His team would review the statements and consider appropriate action. Nhlanhla Sibusiso Mkhwanazi He became a student constable in 1993 and rose through the ranks to become a lieutenant-general in 2011. He holds a BTech degree in policing and a national diploma in police administration. Before being appointed to his role as the top cop in KwaZulu-Natal, he was head of the special task force, and a divisional commissioner of both human resource development and of operational response services. His team has come under criticism for the number of shootings between officers and suspects. Mkhwanazi initially got the job as acting provincial commissioner in 2018 from then national SAPS boss Khehla Sitole, who was booted out by Ramaphosa after a public spat with Cele. In April, Mchunu denied he was aware of an Independent Police Investigative Directorate probe into Mkhwanazi in relation to allegations of interference in the 2023 arrest of a correctional services official. Ipid cleared Mkhwanazi of any wrongdoing. Mkhwanazi hinted in March that there was tension between him and Mchunu. He also told MPs he had been told there was an internal campaign against him, but he had no intention of competing for the job as head of the Hawks when his contract ended in 2026. There was, however, speculation that Mkhwanazi was interested in the position of national commissioner as Gen Fannie Masemola is due to retire soon. Shadrack Sibiya National police commissioner Masemola announced in mid-2023 that he had appointed then major-general Shadrack Sibiya to the position of deputy national commissioner of crime detection, promoting him to the rank of lieutenant-general. This was intended to strengthen investigative capacity within the police, the commissioner said. He had rejoined the police as head of operations the previous year. Sibiya started his career as a student constable in 1989 at the Hammanskraal SAPS Academy and in the Knysna detectives unit. He rose in the ranks to become a former head of the Hawks in Gauteng. Sibiya controversially lost this job over allegations of being involved in the unlawful rendition in 2010 of Zimbabweans wanted in that country for the murder of a police officer. He was cleared of this, with the move against him deemed a political conspiracy. At his disciplinary inquiry, he testified he had been the victim of a conspiracy to remove him from office, because of his attempts to prosecute the head of crime intelligence at the time, Lt-Gen Richard Mdluli, on fraud and corruption-related charges. Mdluli's case is still being heard in the courts. Sibiya also served as head of group forensics and investigation services for the City of Johannesburg and won a court case ordering his reinstatement after a disproved assertion that his unit was spying on councillors. He has stated publicly that he is interested in becoming the national head of the Hawks, since last month's retirement of Lt-Gen Godfrey Lebeya. Sibiya told the SABC the allegations against him are false and criticised Mkhwenazi's conduct. 'There are processes to follow where there is such a situation or when you feel you are not being heard. 'I need to consult with my legal team. I will respond and I will prove to you that what Gen Mkhwanazi is saying is absolutely not true. 'If he has any proof, I give him permission to show the evidence that he is talking about to the media or to any other person he can trust.' TimesLIVE

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store