Cheaper Australian childcare failing to help lower-income mothers return to work
The independent economic research body e61 Institute analysed childcare reforms in 2018 and found that higher subsidies for lower- and middle-income families had no measurable impact on mothers' participation in the jobs market.
Women's earnings plunge by 55% on average in the first five years of parenthood, and this 'motherhood penalty' mostly persists for a decade after giving birth, previous Treasury analysis has found.
Australian women with dependent children are less likely to be employed full-time than in comparable countries such as New Zealand, the US, the UK and Canada.
But Silvia Griselda, a research manager at e61 and co-author of the report, said the findings were a warning for policymakers that 'increasing childcare subsidies can be costly and ineffective if not carefully designed'.
Get our breaking news email, free app or daily news podcast
Griselda said cheaper childcare did lead to more children attending centres – an important goal in itself – but that for some low-income families, an increase in childcare subsidies was not enough to offset the loss of benefits and higher taxes from moving, for example, from two to three days of work a week.
Cheaper childcare did, however, have more of an impact on labor force participation of parents in middle- to high-income families.
'If we are to truly unlock the economic benefits of childcare investment we need a comprehensive approach that considers not only the cost of childcare, but the entire tax and transfer system,' Griselda said.
Lower-income families are eligible for benefits and tax offsets such as the parenting payment, family tax benefits A and B and the low-income tax offset.
The Treasury secretary, Steven Kennedy, has also highlighted the need to tackle these high so-called 'workforce disincentive rates', which measure the share of an additional day's pay lost to taxes, reductions in benefits and childcare costs.
Anthony Albanese has committed to delivering universal childcare, although in what form remains an open question.
Since coming to power Labor has committed $3.6bn over two years to deliver a 15% boost to childcare workers' pay, and lifted the subsidy rate to 90% for families earning less than $80,000.
The government also legislated to remove the activity test – which determines parents' level of subsidies based on the number of hours they work in a fortnight – for three days of care from 2026, and has promised to establish a $1bn fund to build and expand childcare centres in areas where parents struggle to find places.
Despite the additional billions spent, parents still complain of high and rising costs of putting children in early education and care, particularly as centres increase prices by more than the additional subsidies.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
Out-of-pocket childcare expenses have climbed by nearly 10% in the past year, even as inflation more broadly has slowed to under 3%. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) early last year found that higher subsidies were only having a 'limited' effect on parents' costs.
Over the longer term, the picture is better: childcare costs are 3.4% lower than two years ago, and 5.3% down since December 2021, according to the latest Australian Bureau of Statistics figures.
There is growing support for expanding the number of not-for-profit childcare centres, as the spotlight on the expanding for-profit sector intensifies amid recent reports of abuse and ongoing concerns about wider safety.
The government has reportedly flirted with the idea of a $10-a-day price cap on fees – a model strongly backed by advocacy groups such as the Parenthood.
But the new findings from e61 back up Productivity Commission modelling last year that showed even substantially more generous childcare subsidy rates (at an additional $5bn cost to the budget) would have a 'negligible' effect on parents' labour force participation.
Nonetheless, the PC recommended an approach that would deliver access to at least three days a week of quality early childhood education and care, and that this would require a major multi-year effort to expand the supply of centres, particularly in regional and remote areas.
Under its preferred option, care would be 'effectively free' for families earning under $80,000 – which includes around a third of families with small children.
The PC and early childhood experts said that beyond the narrow focus on workforce participation, boosting attendance in formal early childhood education was particularly beneficial for children in poorer households who were least likely to attend.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Dollar heads for biggest weekly drop in a month as focus shifts to Fed, BOJ meets
SINGAPORE, July 25 (Reuters) - The dollar steadied near two-week lows on Friday, on track for its biggest weekly drop in a month, as investors contended with U.S. tariff negotiations ahead of a deadline while looking ahead to central bank meetings next week for clues on policy. Both the U.S. Federal Reserve and the Bank of Japan are expected to hold rates at next week's policy meetings, but traders are focusing on the subsequent comments to gauge the timing of the next move. "Next week's BOJ policy meeting will be closely watched for hints on the timing of the next rate hike," said Carol Kong, currency strategist at Commonwealth Bank of Australia. The prospect of rate hikes by the BOJ had improved, she added, after a trade deal struck with the United States this week lowered tariffs to 15% on auto imports from Japan. The yen stood at 147.10 to the dollar, on course for a weekly gain of 1%, its strongest such performance since mid-May. A majority of economists in a Reuters poll this week expect Japan's central bank to raise interest rates by 25 basis points this year. The dollar index , which measures the U.S. currency against six other units, was at 97.448, set for a drop of 1% this week, its weakest performance in a month. On Thursday, the European Central Bank left its policy rate at 2%, as expected, in a break from a year of policy easing, to await clarity over future U.S. trade ties after the European Commission said a negotiated solution was in reach ahead of the August 1 deadline. The euro was little changed at $1.1754 in early trade, but not far from $1.183, the near four-year high it touched at the start of the month. The euro is up 13.5% this year as tariff policies take the shine off the dollar. Progress on trade deals has also raised market hopes for talks with China, after U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said officials of both countries would meet in Stockholm next week to discuss an extension of the deal negotiation deadline. The Australian dollar has been boosted by the rise in risk appetite after the trade deals and was last at $0.6593, hovering near an eight-month high touched on Thursday. Donald Trump locked horns on Thursday with Fed Chair Jerome Powell during a rare presidential visit to the central bank, criticising the cost of renovating two historical buildings at its headquarters and pressing the case for lower interest rates. Markets mostly shrugged off the visit, however, having become accustomed to Trump's repeated tirades against Powell and the Fed. "Trump's Fed visit was spectacle over substance," said Prashant Newnaha, senior Asia-Pacific rates strategist at TD Securities. "The market's focus is firmly on next week's Fed meeting. We expect Powell to repeat a patient, data-dependent policy outlook with flexibility but (he) is unlikely to commit to cuts." At their two-day rate-setting meet, the central bank's 19 policymakers are widely expected to leave their benchmark interest rate in the range of 4.25% to 4.50%. Traders are pricing in 43 basis points of rate cuts by the end of 2025. ANZ strategists expect the Fed to cut rates by 25 basis points in September and again in December. "Were it not for tariff uncertainty, we judge that rate cuts would already have resumed," they said in a note. "The labour market is weakening, service price disinflation is well established, demand growth has slowed and there is no discernible evidence that higher tariffs are spilling into a broader inflation problem." In cryptocurrencies, bitcoin eased 0.79% to $117,840, while Ethereum was 2% lower at $3,655.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Rat in the ranks! The Welcome to Country problem that just won't go away
Michaelia Cash doesn't do subtle. By backing a push to scrap Welcome to Country ceremonies and Aboriginal flags from official events, she's reignited a culture war that puts her squarely at odds with her party leader, making life much harder for Sussan Ley. There's no denying Cash is tapping into a sentiment that exists in the Australian community. Welcome to Country acknowledgements have become so routine they often feel more ridiculous than respectful these days. For many, they've gone from meaningful to mechanical virtue signalling. That doesn't mean most people oppose reconciliation. It means some of us have grown tired of too many empty gestures, particularly when they appear disconnected from real outcomes for Indigenous Australians. So while Labor has been quick to paint Cash's position as out of step with mainstream values, they'd be wise not to overplay that hand. If the Voice referendum taught us anything, it's that public opinion on Indigenous recognition is more complex than elite consensus suggests. In fact, it's entirely plausible that more voters agree with Cash than with Labor (and Ley) on this one, especially if the issue is framed around overuse. But politics is about timing and discipline, and that's where this spat becomes a problem for the Coalition. Ley has been trying to present a more moderate image in the post- Peter Dutton era: supporting acknowledgements and engaging respectfully with Indigenous voices. Now her own Senate leader, no less, has taken a sledgehammer to that, backing a WA Liberal Party motion to strip Welcome to Country of its official status and fly only state and national flags. It's a contradiction that will be hard for Ley to smooth over. She congratulated Indigenous participants during the opening of parliament this week. Cash now seemingly wants the whole thing rolled back. That kind of disunity reinforces Labor's preferred narrative that the Coalition is riven by factional divisions and dominated by culture warriors. Ley looks like a leader being undercut by her own Senate leader, right at a time when two former Nationals leaders still in parliament (Barnaby Joyce and Michael McCormack) are doing the same on the net zero emissions target. At least they aren't in shadow cabinet or part of the Opposition's leadership team. These sorts of fights quite obviously threaten unity, even if having them immediately after a big election defeat is the right timing. However, that doesn't make life any easier for Ley, and Cash must know that but not care. To be sure, I suspect most Australians want practical progress on Indigenous disadvantage, not more ceremony. When every school assembly, conference and council meeting begins with the same words, fatigue can set in. Especially when multiple speakers all do the same, which isn't how the acknowledgment is supposed to work. The irony of that ignorance is never lost on me when I have to sit through it. So yes, Cash has made Ley's job harder: A Senate leader contradicting their opposition leader is always a bad look, reinforcing the impression of a party divided on both message and tone. But Labor would be foolish to assume this is a free kick. Cash's position, while politically provocative and destabilising, is not fringe, which is what makes her dissent so much harder for Ley to navigate. Labor shouldn't dismiss Cash outright either, which is exactly what they have done. That's just hubris.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Trump says Australia has agreed to accept American beef
WASHINGTON, July 24 (Reuters) - Australia has agreed to open its market to U.S. beef, President Donald Trump said on Thursday, after the U.S. ally eased restrictions on imports that had angered the American leader. The Trump administration hailed the deal, announced by Australia earlier on Thursday, as a win even as analysts said the step was unlikely to significantly boost U.S. shipments because beef prices are much lower in Australia. "The other Countries that refuse our magnificent Beef are ON NOTICE," Trump said in a post on Truth Social on Thursday. Since returning to the White House in January, Trump has attempted to renegotiate trade deals with multiple countries who he asserts have taken advantage of the United States over the years. Many economists have disputed Trump's characterization. Australia Agriculture Minister Julie Collins said earlier on Thursday that a "rigorous science and risk-based assessment" had concluded that U.S. measures to monitor and control the movement of cattle meant biosecurity risks that Australia was previously concerned about were being effectively managed. Meat from animals born, raised and slaughtered in the U.S. has been allowed into Australia since 2019. But few suppliers were able to prove their animals had been only in the U.S., because cattle frequently moved between the U.S., Canada and Mexico without being adequately tracked. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said in a statement welcoming the move that Australia had imposed "unjustified barriers" on U.S. beef that were now being lifted. "American farmers and ranchers produce the safest, healthiest beef in the world. It's absurd that non-scientific trade barriers prevented our beef from being sold to consumers in Australia for the last 20 years," Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins said in the same statement. The U.S. has been improving its ability to monitor animals' movements to limit the spread of avian influenza and the New World screwworm, a parasite that eats cattle alive. Recognizing those improvements, Australia will now also accept beef sourced from cattle born in Canada or Mexico and legally imported and slaughtered in the U.S., the Australian agriculture ministry said. Australian firms will be able to apply for import permits from July 28, it added.
