John Green connects deadly disease to Stetson hats, svelte figures and weighted vests
John Green; that's who.
And the author was on 'The Daily Show' on May 7 spreading the knowledge in his campaign to end the world's most deadly infectious disease.
The curable disease, caused by the bacteria Mycobacterium tuberculosis, resulted in 1.25 million deaths in 2023, according to the Word Health Organization.
'I'm super opposed to tuberculosis,' he told host Desi Lydic. 'I'm a little confused why everyone else isn't. It feels like it should be kind of a universally-held opinion.'
The young adult genre ('The Fault in Our Stars,' 'Turtles All the Way Down') and social media (Vlogbrothers YouTube channel) star was promoting his New York Times bestseller 'Everything Is Tuberculosis: The History and Persistence of Our Deadliest Infection,' published in March.
Green shared how tuberculosis tied into the development of the modern-day American cowboy hat. The maker of the Stetson had moved from New Jersey to the West to recover from tuberculosis, he said.
The host challenged him to connect the disease to other trends and events.
Was there a connection to Navy fighter jets falling into the water, she asked, referencing the second time in just over a week that a U.S. Navy fighter jet from the USS Harry S. Truman aircraft carrier was lost in the Red Sea.
President Harry S. Truman had requested the federal government budget $200,000 to fund the development of Isoniazid, one of the most critical tuberculosis drugs, Green responded.
'If it weren't for Harry Truman sending federal money, federal government taxpayer money, to fund the treatment of tuberculosis, we wouldn't have that amazing drug,' he said.
How about the popularity of weighted vests?
'Not even a challenge,' he answered. 'It's trying to shrink your body. It's trying to make you smaller. And that is a result, partly of this tubercular beauty standard. When we romanticized tuberculosis, in the 18th and 19th centuries, we began to associate beauty with very frail, small bodies. So attempts to shrink the female body are at least in part a response to this tuberculosis beauty standard that goes back to the 19th century.'
John Green: Best-selling author writes a love letter to the Indianapolis 500
Green, an Indianapolis resident, talked about a 2019 trip to Sierra Leone, where he got to know a youth who was trying to recover from drug-resistant tuberculosis and learned how widespread the disease was.
Over the next five years, he 'fell in hate' with the disease, and the book came about from wanting to tell 'his ultimate story of survival, and also wanting to tell the story of the fact that this disease is not history; it's present,' the writer told Lydic.
'It's the deadliest infectious disease in the world, and unfortunately, as a direct result of decisions made by our government, that number is going to go up instead of going down,' Green said. 'It's been going down for the last 20 years, which is something we can be really proud of.
"The U.S. has long been the most generous funder of TB response, but that's changing with the dismantling of USAID; and as a direct result, I think the estimates are that within two years, we might see two million people dying instead of over a million.'
That doesn't have to be, he said.
'We can achieve cure rates of over 95%. We do that in the United States, and we should be doing it globally. And the fact that we aren't really is kind of a mark of shame on humanity.'
'Turtles All the Way Down': John Green's novel is now a movie, and the ebook is on sale. How to get it
'We know how to live in a world without TB. You search for cases, you treat every case you find, and you offer preventative therapy to folks who are near those cases. And that's how we eliminated TB in the U.S.; or nearly eliminated it. That's how we've nearly eliminated TB in many countries around the world. But that takes funding. And right now, if you think of the history of tuberculosis as a long staircase where we learn more and learn better tools and have better tools to fight the disease, right now we have the tools; we just don't have the political will. So right now, unfortunately, we've fallen down the staircase.'
Green sounded hopeful, though.
'But it's easy to feel like this is the end of history. I feel that way all the time, to be honest with you. But it's not the end of history. This is the middle of the story, not the end of the story, and it falls to us to write a better end. And I really believe we can do that together. I really believe that I will live to see a world without tuberculosis.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
America's New Anti-Vaccine Foreign Policy
The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. This week, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. used his address to a global vaccine summit to disparage global vaccination. The conference was organized by Gavi, the world's leading immunization program, and in a recorded speech, Kennedy accused the organization of collaborating with social-media companies to stifle dissenting views on immunization during the coronavirus pandemic and said it had 'ignored the science' in its work. He criticized Gavi for recommending COVID-19 shots to pregnant women, and went deep on a discredited study that purported to find safety issues with a tetanus vaccine commonly used in the developing world. 'In its zeal to promote universal vaccination,' Kennedy claimed, Gavi 'has neglected the key issue of vaccine safety.' Kennedy's remarks confirmed what The New York Times first reported in March: that the United States, Gavi's third-largest donor, would stop pledging money to the organization. (Congress, which has always had final say over Gavi funding, has not yet weighed in.) They are also the first indication that the U.S.'s rejection of global vaccine campaigns stems from the Trump administration's opposition not only to foreign aid, but to vaccination itself. For the first time, Kennedy has managed to use the anti-vaccine agenda to guide American foreign policy. Gavi, at its most basic level, is Costco for immunizations, wielding its massive purchasing power to buy vaccines in bulk for cheap. National governments and private philanthropies pledge funding to it every five years. The United Kingdom and the Gates Foundation are its largest donors; the United Nations distributes the shots. The poorest countries pay 20 cents per vaccine, and prices rise along with national income. Since the partnership was launched, in January 2000, 19 countries—including Ukraine, Congo, and Guyana—have gone from relying on Gavi to paying for vaccinations entirely on their own. Indonesia, which accepted donations from Gavi as recently as 2017, pledged $30 million to the organization this funding cycle. Gavi, by its own estimate, has saved about 19 million lives and vaccinated 1 billion children. At the conference this week, the director of the World Health Organization noted that since 2000, the number of children who die each year before they reach the age of 5 has fallen by more than half, largely due to the power of vaccines. By Gavi's estimates, the U.S. canceling its Biden-era pledge to provide $1.2 billion this donation cycle could lead to the deaths of more than 1 million children who otherwise would have lived. (The Department of Health and Human Services did not respond to a request for comment.) In his recorded remarks, Kennedy said America would not send the money until Gavi can 're-earn the public trust' by 'taking vaccine safety seriously.' Cutting off millions of children's only access to routine vaccines is 'the most emphatic globalization of the anti-vaxxer agenda,' Lawrence Gostin, the faculty director of Georgetown's O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, told me. Tom Frieden, the former director of the CDC, told me that after he heard Kennedy's remarks, 'I was literally sick to my stomach,' because 'unscientific, irresponsible statements like this will result in the deaths of children.' (The U.S. has run an international anti-vaccine campaign before: According to an investigation by Reuters, in 2020, the Pentagon unleashed bot accounts on multiple social-media platforms that impersonated Filipinos and discouraged uptake of China's Sinovac vaccine—the first COVID vaccine available in the Philippines—using a hashtag that read, in Tagalog, 'China is the virus.' The goal was not to combat vaccines, but to undermine China's influence.) [Read: RFK Jr. is barely even pretending anymore] Kennedy's prerecorded address held back his harshest critiques of Gavi. In his 2021 book, The Real Anthony Fauci, Kennedy paints 'Bill Gates's surrogate group Gavi' (the Gates Foundation co-founded Gavi) as nothing more than a profiteering 'cabal' and a facilitator of 'African Genocide.' To hear Kennedy tell it, 'virtually all of Gates's blockbuster African and Asian vaccines—polio, DTP, hepatitis B, malaria, meningitis, HPV, and Hib—cause far more injuries and deaths than they avert.' Decades' worth of safety and efficacy studies have proved him wrong. In his remarks to Gavi this week, Kennedy focused on the DTP (diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis) shot, describing at length a 'landmark' 2017 study that found the vaccine increased all-cause mortality among girls in Guinea-Bissau. But as Frieden pointed out, this was in fact a relatively small observational study. In 2022, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of more than 50,000 newborns found that the DTP vaccine significantly decreased infant mortality. Frieden compared the evidence: 'Hundreds of kids versus 50,000 kids. Poorly done; well done.' Kennedy made efforts to take his anti-vaccine advocacy global before he became America's health secretary. In 2021, he delivered a webinar on the importance of expanding an 'international movement' for Children's Health Defense, the anti-vaccine organization he founded. In 2019, when Samoa was experiencing a major dip in measles immunization after an improperly prepared vaccine killed two children, Kennedy visited the prime minister and, on behalf of Children's Health Defense, reportedly offered to build an information system the country could use to track the health effects of vaccines and other medical interventions. When a deadly measles outbreak took hold later that year, Kennedy sent a letter to the prime minister suggesting that widespread vaccination might make unvaccinated Samoan children more likely to die of measles. (In an interview for a 2023 documentary, Kennedy said that 'I had nothing to do with people not vaccinating in Samoa' and that his conversations about vaccines with the prime minister had been 'limited.') [Read: The U.S. is going backwards on vaccines, very fast] Now, it seems, Kennedy has gained the power to realize his ambitions both domestically and abroad. Earlier this month, Kennedy dismissed all 17 members of the CDC's vaccine advisory committee, then replaced them with a group that includes several allies who have spread misinformation about the harms of vaccines. This week, as other countries pledged their support for Gavi, Kennedy's brand-new, handpicked panel convened for a discussion of the dangers of thimerosal, a vaccine ingredient that is a frequent target of anti-vaxxers despite having been found safe. The committee has formed a working group to review the 'cumulative effect' of childhood vaccination in the United States. As Kennedy said in his address to Gavi, 'Business as usual is over.' Article originally published at The Atlantic
Axios
4 days ago
- Axios
Traditional Medicare to add prior authorizations
Medicare is requiring more pre-treatment approvals in its fee-for-service program in a bid to root out unnecessary care, federal regulators announced Friday. The big picture: Traditional Medicare historically hasn't required prior authorizations to access most drugs or services, a major perk for enrollees. Prior authorization in privately-run Medicare Advantage plans has become a hot-button issue, with Congress and federal regulators working to rein in the practice. Federal inspectors found in 2022 that prior authorization in MA prevented some seniors from getting medically necessary care. Major health insurers this week made a voluntary pledge to streamline and improve the prior authorization process across all health insurance markets. State of play: Medicare's innovation center announced that it will solicit applications from companies to run the prior authorization program. Medicare is looking for companies with experience using AI and other tools to manage pre-approvals for other payers, and with clinicians who can conduct medical reviews to check coverage determinations. The program will start Jan. 1, 2026 and run through the end of 2031. It will only apply to providers and patients in New Jersey, Ohio, Oklahoma, Texas, Arizona and Washington. The change will apply to 17 items and services, including skin substitutes, deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's Disease, impotence treatment and arthroscopy for knee osteoarthritis. CMS selected the services based on previous reports and evidence of fraud, waste and abuse, as well as what's already subject to prior authorization in Medicare Advantage. Overuse of skin substitutes to help heal wounds has especially come under fire in recent years. Medicare spent more than $10 billion on the products in 2024 — more than double what was spent the year before, according to the New York Times. CMS noted that it may make other services subject to the prior authorization program in future years. Providers in the geographic areas can choose whether or not they want to submit an authorization request before delivering a service. But if they decide not to, they'll be subject to post-claim review and risk not getting paid for a service that was already delivered. "In general, this model will require the same information and clinical documentation that is already required to support Medicare FFS payment but earlier in the process, namely, prior to the service being furnished," the notice reads. Zoom in: The companies hired to manage the program will be paid based on how much they saved the government by stopping payments for unnecessary services. "Under the model, we will work to avoid any adverse impact on beneficiaries or providers/suppliers," CMS wrote in the notice.
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
‘This is not a luxury': Families in Trump states agonize over GOP's proposed Medicaid cuts
Courtney Leader has been closely following the contentious tax-and-spending debate in Washington – not that she cares much for politics, but because she believes the proposed Medicaid cuts are a matter of life or death for her daughter. 'This is not a luxury. I do not have my daughter enrolled on Medicaid so we can have fancy things,' Leader said. 'I have my daughter enrolled in Medicaid so we can keep her alive and keep her at home, which I think is the best option for her.' As the Senate grinds closer to a vote on a Republican bill containing President Donald Trump's domestic agenda, the real-world implications are playing out across the country at kitchen tables of parents like Leader, whose 9-year-old daughter with brain damage and cerebral palsy relies on Medicaid benefits for daily care and weekly therapy. She wrote to Sen. Josh Hawley, a Missouri Republican, hoping to put a face on the Medicaid debate. She explained that her husband works as a carpenter, whose private insurance provides health coverage for the couple and their four other children. She said costly medical bills for their daughter, Cyrina, were too much for any household to bear. 'Without Medicaid,' Leader told her senator, 'we would lose everything – our home, our vehicles and, eventually, our daughter.' Hawley did not identify Leader by name, but he shared her family's story in a New York Times essay last month as he first emerged as a rare Republican warning his party against cutting Medicaid for some of the 70 million low-income and disabled Americans who rely on the program. He called such a move 'morally wrong and politically suicidal,' and has pushed for proposed changes to the bill to avoid what he believes would be a devastating blow to rural hospitals. It's a pivotal moment in the tug-of-war over Trump's priorities, the centerpiece of which is a sweeping package to extend tax cuts to some of the wealthiest Americans, while reducing social safety-net programs for health care, food assistance and rural hospitals. The president has pledged not to cut Medicaid, even though the current version of the measure would do just that, according to the Congressional Budget Office, and add more than $2 trillion to the deficit over the next decade. A visit to Missouri, where at least one in five residents depend on Medicaid for health coverage, offered a snapshot of the potential fallout from the sprawling legislation the president and Republicans have branded as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. 'I know that they're saying they're not planning to cut Medicaid, right?' said Leader, 36. 'But I reached out, concerned that if any changes are made, there will be this trickle-down effect that will impact families like mine.' As she stood in her kitchen, getting ready to drive Cyrina to a morning therapy session about 30 minutes away, Leader ticked through the costs to sustain her daughter, who was shaken by a caregiver when she was four months old, leading to her condition. She has a complex web of medical and developmental challenges, but can stay in their home because of a nurse and weekly therapy appointments, the co-pays of which are paid by Medicaid, along with a feeding tube, formula and a litany of other supplies. 'The formula that is delivered through a tube in her stomach costs more than my mortgage,' Leader said. 'It costs more than my entire food budget for our family and in that alone, there is no way that we could come up with that $1,500 to be able to feed her.' While the legislation does not directly call for cutting benefits for medically complex cases, Leader believes that some existing services are still at risk, particularly in-home care that keeps her daughter out of a nursing home. She must recertify for coverage every year – on Cyrina's birthday in May – and believes any significant changes to programs administered by the state will add another layer of bureaucracy that she and other parents routinely endure. 'Who's going to protect us when they can't get paperwork done in time and we lose coverage for a month or two?' Leader said, her voice rising with emotion as she raised concerns about state-level backlogs. 'I'm worried that the red tape is going to affect our Medicaid because of just the oversight burdens and that as a result, I'm going to lose my daughter because she's lost coverage before.' The Senate version of the bill had been poised to make even deeper cuts to Medicaid than the measure the House narrowly passed last month. Hawley and other senators have threatened to withhold support for the legislation unless Republican leaders make significant changes, particularly to funding rural hospitals, which has complicated Trump's plea to sign the bill into law before July 4. Republicans were dealt a major setback on Thursday when a key Medicaid change they were counting on to pay for the legislation was ruled in violation of Senate rules. But party leaders have vowed to push forward with new workarounds, with Trump rallying support for the megabill during an afternoon White House event. 'Senate leadership needs to fix this,' Hawley told reporters this week. 'It's going to close rural hospitals.' More than 1,000 miles away from Washington, inside the bright hallways of Golden Valley Memorial Healthcare in Clinton, Missouri, a sense of anxiety over the Medicaid debate was evident on a recent afternoon. The 50-bed hospital is not only a critical piece of the economy as the largest employer in Henry County, but also the only maternity ward and emergency room for about an hour's drive in each direction across this stretch of western Missouri. 'We are paying very close attention because we want to make sure that those Medicaid benefits are preserved so our patients can continue to access care that they need,' said Craig Thompson, CEO of Golden Valley Memorial. 'For rural hospitals like ours, it's ranchers, it's farmers, it's small business owners and it's a whole lot of kids.' About four out of five patients admitted to the hospital, he said, depend on Medicaid, the health care program for lower-income Americans, or Medicare, the program for seniors. Severe cuts to Medicaid, he said, would unnecessarily send more people to the emergency room and have devastating effects on his and other rural hospitals across the state. Last fall, Trump carried this rural county with 76% of the vote, which was 17 points higher than his Missouri victory. Yet the politics of health care is complicated, even here in Trump country, where voters also approved a statewide Medicaid expansion measure four years earlier. Before that vote, Medicaid in the state was largely restricted to the elderly, disabled or pregnant. The expansion vote allowed about 340,000 Missourians to enroll in the program, according to the Missouri Foundation for Health, the funding of which is now uncertain, amid new work requirements and a long list of provisions. 'I think there's a perception that Medicaid beneficiaries are respondent or even lazy, for lack of a better term,' Thompson said. 'That's simply not what we see on a daily basis.' Dr. Jennifer Blair, who grew up about 45 miles away in the small Missouri town of Peculiar, said she fears maternity wards at hospitals like Golden Valley are at risk if some of the deep Medicaid cuts are realized. 'We are surrounded by several maternity care deserts, which is defined as a county that has no or very limited access to obstetric services for their patients,' Blair said. 'If we were to lose that access to the birthing center here at Golden Valley, our patients would have to travel more than 60 miles.' Long before the House passed nearly $300 billion in cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, once known as food stamps, signs of increasing need have been clear at Ozarks Food Harvest, a 100,000-square-foot warehouse on the edge of Springfield. It serves about 30 million meals every year across one-third of Missouri. 'The demand for food is quite a bit higher than it was even at the height of the Covid crisis,' said Bart Brown, president and CEO of the non-profit food program. 'We are seeing lots of new families that we've never seen before.' The SNAP program has always been solely funded by the federal government. The House measure called for passing along considerable costs to state governments, which are already facing difficult choices and balanced-budget requirements. The move would have saved the federal government more than $128 billion over the next decade, according to the Congressional Budget Office, which House Republicans hoped to use to help cover the costs of extending the tax cuts. The Senate parliamentarian removed the provision on procedural grounds, making it one of the key differences the Senate and House must reconcile before passing the legislation. June Owens isn't closely following the back-and-forth of the debate in Washington. She arrived in a strip mall parking lot in nearby Marshfield shortly after 6 a.m. on a recent rainy morning, so she could get a spot near the front of a long and winding line of cars and trucks. She rolled down the window of her green Mercury to talk for a moment, waiting for the outdoor pantry to open at 9 a.m. 'Life wasn't always this way with us. My husband got hurt a few years ago and it changed our whole life,' said Owens, 77, a retired bookkeeper. 'We were in the process of getting all of our ducks in a row for retirement and it just upside-downed everything, so food pantries have helped us through the situation.' At Ozarks Food Harvest, seniors are the fastest growing segment of people who ask for food assistance, Brown said, citing their 'fixed incomes and inflation.' He is carefully watching the tax-and-spending debate in Congress, mindful that whatever the president ultimately signs into law will impact the lives of people in Springfield and across the southern Missouri region his organization serves with a mission statement of 'transforming hunger into hope.' 'Anytime that there's a change in federal benefits that results in a net loss, people have to meet that gap somewhere,' Brown said, walking through his cavernous warehouse. 'They're going to turn to food pantries and we're stretched thin anyway.' CNN's Jeff Simon and Leonel Mendez contributed to this report.
