Broward school meals: Families' next steps as universal free lunches will come to an end
For the 2025-26 school year, lunch prices will rise by $1 for paying students: $3.50 for lunch in high school, $3.35 in middle school and $3 in elementary school.
But those costs wouldn't pertain to certain eligible students. In a news release Friday, the district provided additional steps that families can take.
Broward schools on July 14 will begin 'accepting Meal Benefits Applications' at www.myschoolapps.com to determine families' eligibility for free or reduced-price school lunches. The application is available throughout the school year at myschoolapps.com. For those eligible, each reduced-price lunch is 40 cents, the district said.
Broward school district to end universal free lunches, raise lunch prices
The application process marks a transition back to the steps in place before the district began offering free lunches to all students during the past two years, bolstered by program funding. For the past two years, Broward Schools' Food and Nutrition Services Department assisted families with the cost of meals through two U.S. Department of Agriculture programs, as well as Food and Nutrition Services funds, the district said in a news release.
For the upcoming school year, 'free and reduced-price lunches will be offered based on eligibility, requiring families to complete an application,' it said.
The district said automatically certified to receive free lunches are students who either:
— Receive Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits. — Have Temporary Assistance for Needy Families benefits. — Are 'enrolled in Head Start, Foster, Homeless, or Migrant.'
Families should create an account for each student through My School Bucks at www.myschoolbucks.com, starting July 28, to buy meals and a la carte items, the district said.
All students will keep receiving free breakfasts through the U.S. Department of Agriculture Universal Free Breakfast Program, the district said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
16 hours ago
- Newsweek
Kansas Officials Defy Trump Admin Over SNAP Benefit Order
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Officials in Kansas have declined to comply with a SNAP benefit data-sharing request from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) over concerns it could breach recipient privacy. Newsweek has contacted the USDA and the Kansas Department for Children and Families for comment via email outside regular working hours. Why It Matters The USDA, which oversees the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), first announced a plan to make states share benefit recipient data—including names, dates of birth, personal addresses and Social Security numbers—in May as part of President Donald Trump's executive order to increase data sharing across federal and state programs. The agency renewed its push last week when it again ordered states to comply with the order. However, the latest directive has been met with a united legal challenge from 19 states and Washington, D.C., that contend the order violates federal privacy laws and the U.S. Constitution. Kansas, while not part of the multistate legal action, has refused to hand over the requested data. SNAP benefit sign at the entrance to a Big Lots store in Portland, Oregon, in October 2020. SNAP benefit sign at the entrance to a Big Lots store in Portland, Oregon, in October 2020. GETTY What To Know In a letter to the USDA, the Kansas Department for Children and Families (KDCF) said the state could not comply with the request as it could "place KDCF in a position of potential liability in the event a court finds that the USDA's demand violates federal law." The letter, sent to Gina Brand, the USDA's senior policy adviser for integrity, from KDCF Secretary Laura Howard, said the request was also difficult to comply with in a "practical matter." "Producing the amount of data being requested will require significant time, manpower, and expense," the letter said. "Requiring the production to occur no later than July 30, 2025, presents an unreasonable burden that simply cannot be met." According to the USDA, the goal of the data collection is to help root out fraud in the program, which serves some 42 million people nationwide. While the agency's directive does not mention immigration enforcement as a reason for data collection, critics of the order have raised concerns that it could be used to facilitate deportations. Regarding the multistate lawsuit, the USDA previously told Newsweek that it would "not comment on pending litigation." What People Are Saying Kansas Department for Children and Families Secretary Laura Howard said: "DCF is committed to the security of Kansans' personal information and maintaining confidentiality consistent with state and federal law. This demand for personal information goes beyond the scope of administering the program and puts in jeopardy the privacy of hundreds of thousands of Kansans who depend on SNAP to put food on their tables." Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins said in a May 6 news release announcing the data-sharing plans: "President Trump is rightfully requiring the federal government to have access to all programs it funds, and SNAP is no exception. For years, this program has been on autopilot, with no USDA insight into real-time data. The Department is focused on appropriate and lawful participation in SNAP, and today's request is one of many steps to ensure SNAP is preserved for only those eligible." What Happens Next The USDA has not publicly responded to the letter from Kansas.
Newsweek
a day ago
- Newsweek
SNAP Lawsuit Against Trump Admin Gets Clinton Judge
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A federal judge appointed by President Bill Clinton has been assigned to preside over a high-profile lawsuit brought by a coalition of states challenging the Trump administration's efforts to collect personal data from participants in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). On July 29, 2025, U.S. District Judge Maxine M. Chesney, who has served in the Northern District of California since 1995 and currently holds senior status there, has been assigned to the case. Newsweek has sent email requests for comment to attorneys representing each of the twenty states, the federal agency, and attorneys for the administration. Why It Matters The lawsuit at the center of the case challenges a federal directive requiring states to turn over detailed personal information about SNAP recipients to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). Filed by attorneys general from 20 states, the District of Columbia, and Kentucky, the suit argues that the USDA's demand for data—including names, Social Security numbers, addresses, birth dates, and immigration status—oversteps legal boundaries and risks unauthorized sharing with other federal agencies. The plaintiffs contend the mandate violates federal privacy laws and the Administrative Procedure Act. Stock image/file photo: A woman looking a receipt while grocery shopping. Stock image/file photo: A woman looking a receipt while grocery shopping. GETTY What To Know State of California et al v. United States Department of Agriculture et al, challenges the federal mandate requiring states to provide the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) with sensitive personal information about all SNAP recipients dating back to January 2020. The legal challenge comes in response to a March 2025 executive order signed by President Donald Trump that directed federal agencies to expand interagency data sharing. Following that order, the USDA began requesting extensive SNAP data from state agencies, warning that noncompliance could jeopardize federal funding for state-run SNAP programs. The attorneys general claim that the USDA's actions force states into a legal and financial dilemma: either comply with what they consider an illegal federal directive or risk losing millions in SNAP funding. The lawsuit seeks to block enforcement of the USDA's demand and to prohibit the transfer of SNAP recipient data to agencies not directly involved in the program's administration, including the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Government Efficiency. The USDA has not yet publicly detailed its rationale for the data request or how the collected information would be used. How many People Use SNAP? Nationally, SNAP peaked at over 43 million in September 2020 and served an average of 41.7 million people per month in FY 2024. In New York, about 2.9 million people received SNAP benefits in May 2025, roughly 14.7% of the state's population. Of those, nearly 1 million were children. Nationally, more than 55 percent of SNAP recipients are in families with children. Although non-citizens are generally not eligible to receive SNAP for themselves, federal law allows them to apply on behalf of U.S. citizen children. The plaintiffs contend that the administration's policy change could disproportionately impact mixed-status families by exposing them to increased scrutiny or enforcement and that the USDA's demand for data that includes names, Social Security numbers, addresses, birth dates, and immigration status is unlawful and exceeds the agency's authority. They argue that the data could be improperly shared with other federal agencies, particularly those involved in immigration enforcement. According to the lawsuit, such a requirement violates both the Administrative Procedure Act and federal laws that restrict the use and disclosure of SNAP data. What People Are Saying New York Attorney General Letitia James said in a press release dated July 28, 2025: "Families should be able to get the food assistance they need without fearing that they will be targeted by this administration," adding: "I will not allow the SNAP benefits that millions of New Yorkers count on to be put at risk. We are suing today to stop this illegal policy and protect New Yorkers' privacy and access to food assistance." The same day, Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell pointed out in a press release: "In fact, the USDA itself has described SNAP as having "one of the most rigorous quality control systems in the federal government." Adding: "Those systems do not require, and have never required, that states turn over sensitive, personally identifying information about millions of Americans without any meaningful restrictions on how that information is used or shared with other agencies." California Attorney General Rob Bonta said: "President Trump continues to weaponize private and sensitive personal information—not to root out fraud, but to create a culture of fear where people are unwilling to apply for essential services," adding: "This unprecedented demand for SNAP data violates state and federal privacy laws. California will not comply. We'll see the President in court." What Happens Next No hearings have been scheduled, and the case remains in its early stages. Judge Chesney's assignment adds a notable element to the proceedings, as the court prepares to consider arguments over federal authority, data privacy, and administrative law. The case could have significant implications for the privacy rights of SNAP recipients, particularly in the states and jurisdictions involved in the lawsuit. If the court rules in favor of the plaintiffs, it could limit the federal government's ability to collect or use personal information from individuals enrolled in federally funded food assistance programs.
CBS News
2 days ago
- CBS News
Michigan joins over 20 states in suing USDA over access to SNAP food stamp recipient records
Michigan is among nearly two dozen states that are suing the federal government over a pending rule that seeks extensive access to the personal records of food stamp recipients. A total of 22 states have signed onto the suit, which was filed Monday in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against the U.S. Department of Agriculture. "USDA's actions are unprecedented, threaten the privacy of millions of families, and ignore long-standing restrictions on the use and redisclosure of SNAP data," said the statement from Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel's office. The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, known as SNAP, is the modern version of what was once called food stamps. The program is meant for lower-income people who complete an application and meet a series of eligibility requirements. While the SNAP program is federally funded, it has long been administered by the states, and the records of recipients are generally handled at that level. Michigan currently directs about $254 million in SNAP benefits a month through the Michigan Bridge Card network. Eligible recipients can use their individual or household allocations via the electronic benefits card toward purchasing food at most supermarkets and other participating retailers. Fruits, vegetables, meat and dairy products can be purchased with SNAP benefits. Paper products and cleaning supplies are among the ineligible grocery items. In May, the USDA issued a notice that it will require states and territories to share records of SNAP benefits and allotments with the federal government. While those instructions are on hold, according to the USDA, they do ask for personally identifiable information such as names, addresses, Social Security numbers and other records about applicants and recipients. The USA is also seeking information "sufficient to calculate the total dollar value" of SNAP benefits that participants received on and after Jan. 1, 2020. "For years, this program has been on autopilot, with no USDA insight into real-time data. The Department is focused on appropriate and lawful participation in SNAP, and today's request is one of many steps to ensure SNAP is preserved for only those eligible," USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins said in her announcement. The lawsuit said the federal government has never previously asked for such detailed records on SNAP recipients. Quality control checks normally ask for sample data, and both inspections and audits would seek a limited range of information specifically allowed by law. "SNAP applicants provide their private information on the understanding, backed by long-standing state and federal laws, that their information will not be used for unrelated purposes," Nessel's office said. "USDA's actions are unprecedented, threaten the privacy of millions of families, and ignore long-standing restrictions on the use and redisclosure of SNAP data."
