
De-extinction or pre-extinction? Biotech company's resurrected 'dire wolves' raise questions
So far, three snow white pups have been born — two males and a female — and they're being kept in an undisclosed location in the northern U.S., a region where ancient dire wolves likely roamed before going extinct 13,000 years ago.
This is controversial for a number of reasons. First, the new animals are not real dire wolves, they are hybrids that resemble the extinct animals. The company made 20 edits on 14 grey wolf genes to create traits specific to dire wolves, like white coats, bigger heads and longer fur. But grey wolves have more than 20,000 genes, so the newcomers are still mostly grey wolves.
It is not known whether these animals will be able to breed with each other.
The company also has plans to bring back the woolly mammoth using modern elephants as a template. They have already created a woolly mouse by editing mouse genes with known woolly mammoth mutations. The company has also said it's exploring reviving the dodo, using a chicken as a template.
If successful, these so-called de-extinct animals will be unique in the world. However, while it would be an amazing experience to see a living woolly mammoth — or an elephant that resembles one — that animal could end up as an oddity in a zoo, captive and alone for the rest of its life.
Colossal Biosciences chief scientist Beth Shapiro told Quirks & Quarks via email that is not their intention.
"While there's something poignant about a lone mammoth facing an altered planet, Colossal's vision is decidedly not that. Our approach focuses on establishing viable populations over time, not just individual animals," she wrote.
"For these social groups to thrive, they need a place to live to which they are adapted. Ultimately, we need not only to recreate lost species, but also actively restore aspects of their original ecosystems — bridging conservation and restoration."
One problem is that the ice age environment these animals lived in no longer exists. The Arctic and the rest of the planet has warmed a great deal since they inhabited it, and the trend continues today. That means the animals will have to adapt to a new environment, or special habitats created to care for them.
While the production of genetically modified animals that resemble extinct species is a novel demonstration of the power of modern gene-editing techniques, it would require a tremendous effort, including significant technological breakthroughs and millions — if not billions — of dollars to bring back thundering herds of woolly mammoths or sky-darkening flocks of passenger pigeons.
There are also ethical considerations, considering cloned animals have a low survival rate and there are serious risks to the surrogate mothers.
It invites the question of whether those resources would be better used to halt the extinction of current species, which humans are driving at an alarming rate. A 2017 study found that, given limited conservation resources, the cost of just protecting animals that had been brought back from extinction would mean the decline and potential loss of more species that might currently be on the brink, leading to net biodiversity loss.
These considerations are something we've talked about on Quirks & Quarks many times, including with Beth Shapiro herself.
Many scientists have suggested that we are now in what is known as the sixth great extinction in the history of our planet — the previous one being the catastrophe that ended the reign of the dinosaurs. Species are being driven out of existence by human activity, including the loss of their natural habitat, and climate change. Some estimate that the current rate of extinction is somewhere between 1,000 and 10,000 times above the natural extinction rate.
Colossal says that their work will help with conservation efforts by bringing back creatures whose ecosystem functions are now missing on the planet. But bringing the current extinction event to a halt will have more far reaching effects than a few wildlife refuges for rare beasts.
Working at the pre-extinction side of the process could solve many other environmental problems that are affecting the human species as well.
After all, if we can just stop destroying the environment and driving these animals to extinction, we won't have to worry about the ethics or controversies surrounding bringing them back from the dead.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Toronto Sun
13 hours ago
- Toronto Sun
Robot coyotes eyed by U.S. army to protect fighter jets from wildlife
U.S. Army researchers have developed an unmanned ground vehicle featuring plastic coyotes mounted on top that can help deter problematic wildlife such as birds. Photo by U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center / LinkedIn American researchers have come up with a novel idea to keep birds and other wildlife away from fighter jets stationed at airfields across the U.S. Robot coyotes. Researchers at the U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) released an image of three unmanned ground vehicles with life-size plastic figures mounted on top in a grassy field near the U.S. navy's elite Blue Angels fighter jet demonstration team. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Not 'Coyote Ugly' but rather 'Robot Coyotes'. The US Army's newest trick for protecting aircraftThe US Army has found an unlikely ally in its fight to protect military aircraft. Its Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) has developed 'coyote rovers,' four-wheeled… — Mike Alderson FRSA (@OpenEyeComms) July 12, 2025 In other words, they repurposed the scarecrow and replaced it with fake predators. The centre said in a social media post they are aiming to help 'biologists and managers at military airfields deter wildlife, particularly problematic birds, from posing a risk to flight crews, aircraft and operations.' Last year, the centre began collaborating with the U.S. Department of Agriculture's National Wildlife Research Center in Ohio to test the effectiveness of Coyote Rovers at scaring off wildlife through several trials. Shea Hammond, a research biologist for ERDC, said he and Jacob Jung, an ERDC research wildlife biologist, have worked on the developing the Coyote Rovers over the last five years. RECOMMENDED VIDEO This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Hammond believes that the technology could also be used by civil infrastructure authorities as well as the military. 'They basically have the same functionality as any other drone,' Hammond told the Army Times . 'We can program areas we want to exclude it from going, such as the airfield itself. We had worked on docking stations and recharging stations so it can operate on a programmed timer, so it can have utility for multiple days.' Hammond said scientists could employ artificial intelligence and machine-learning skills in future versions of the Coyote Rovers. In the past, dogs were sometimes used to deter wildlife from getting near expensive military aircraft, equipment and buildings, Hammond noted. But that job could be done better by these coyote robots, he added. Read More Golf Toronto & GTA Toronto & GTA Toronto Raptors Toronto & GTA


CBC
a day ago
- CBC
Research project at Churchill facility raises alarm about potential impact of oil spill in Arctic waters
A natural remedy that has previously helped counter oil spills will be too slow to "do any useful work" if there's a spill in the Canadian Arctic, increasing chances of "catastrophic" harm, researchers say. Preliminary findings from the GenIce II research team, led by Eric Collins from the University of Manitoba in Winnipeg, suggest oil-degrading microbes respond very slowly to oil-contaminated Arctic waters. "We do see that it takes at least a few weeks or a month for the microbes to respond and actually start to break down the oil, and that's just too long in the case of a real oil spill," said Collins, who has a doctorate in biological oceanography and is a Canada Research Chair in Arctic Marine Microbial Ecosystem Services. In November, the GenIce II research team (GenIce is short for genomics and ice) began work at the $45-million observatory in Churchill, Man., to better understand and observe the potential impact of an oil spill in the Arctic marine environment. Collins said the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill served as a "wake-up call" for researchers to study the impact of "natural microbial communities" in oil-contaminated water. It is believed that during the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, microbes cleaned up nearly 10 times more than humans did. The spill released more than half a billion litres of oil into the Gulf of Mexico over an 87-day period, killing thousands of marine species and contaminating the natural habitat. Collins's research team is focused on how microbes respond to oil in Arctic waters, as opposed to water in warmer regions like the Gulf of Mexico, where the Deepwater Horizon spill happened. With the shipping season in the Hudson Bay extending due to melting Arctic ice and an expected increase in shipping and marine traffic through the bay, experts say the chance of an oil spill is increasing. An oil spill near the coastline is particularly concerning to Collins because the current circulation in Hudson Bay could spread the contamination all along the coastline, endangering the ecosystem and, in turn, surrounding communities, many of which depend on the natural environment for sustenance. Collins' team is conducting research at the new Churchill Marine Observatory — without which Collins says the GenIce II project "wouldn't be possible." "There's no way we would get permission to put oil directly into the water in order to test the effects of an oil spill on the Arctic community, so the fact that we have these large tanks that we can pump water from Hudson Bay into and do the experiments in a controlled setting is really important," Collins said. The facility runs seawater through a pumphouse into two pools where the experiments occur. One pool remains uncontaminated, while oil is placed in the other pool; after the experiment is complete, the oil is removed and the water is cleaned using an on-site wastewater treatment facility, and then released back into the ocean after a third party tests its cleanliness. Feiyue Wang, who heads the Churchill Marine Observatory, says the facility's ability to perform controlled experiments in natural Arctic waters is unique. Since plans for the facility were announced in 2015, it has captured the attention of international researchers, particularly from Arctic countries, Wang said — interest he expects will lead to more collaborative research with international partners. "We're [other Arctic countries] facing similar types of challenges and opportunities," said Wang, who has a doctorate in environmental geochemistry and is a Canada Research Chair in Arctic Environmental Chemistry. "What's happening in Hudson Bay is really just a forecast of what's happening elsewhere in the Arctic." According to a government study in 2022, over the past 30 to 40 years, it has taken three to four days longer each decade for ice to cover Hudson Bay fully. Over the course of each decade, the ice cover has started to break about five days earlier in spring. The ice cover in that inland sea has required more time to develop into a fully established ice cover (an increase of three to four days per decade). Ice break-up initiation has begun earlier in the Spring/Summer, i.e. that shift is estimated at about five days per decade. Wang says Hudson Bay is on track to be "essentially ice-free" by the end of the century. "As a country, as scientists, we want to get ahead of the potential issues," Wang said. "The observatory is really geared toward studying opportunities and challenges associated with socioeconomic development in a changing environment as the Bay becomes more open." The observatory became operational nearly 10 years after plans were announced and roughly six years after it was expected to be completed. Complications with ownership of the Port of Churchill, a major flood in 2017 that impacted the railway to Churchill, COVID-19 and the passing of David Barber, a key figure in the establishment of the facility, all led to delays in construction. The original location of the observatory changed after the Port of Churchill changed ownership. With help from the federal and provincial governments, the facility was built at a new location, which did garner some criticism from the community, because it was built on traditionally significant land. "We tried everything we could, including the input from the community, to try and minimize the disturbance to the landscape," Wang said. "So that is an ongoing dialogue, an ongoing collaboration that we'll be dealing with and working with the community to make sure that their concerns are addressed." Efforts are also being made to incorporate traditional Indigenous knowledge into the research being done at the marine observatory, Wang said. "They're an integral part of what we do," Wang said. "They know the lands, they know the ice, they know the marine ecosystem, and so we always work together." The GenIce II team also worked closely with the community in Chesterfield Inlet, Nunavut, to help monitor the environment, watch for oil spills and research the responsiveness of Arctic microbes to oil. "Inuit people in Chesterfield Inlet are particularly worried about oil spills coming from ships that are going there to the mines in Baker Lake, where they're extracting gold," Collins said. "There's a lot of ship traffic up there, and if there was an accident, then that could release a lot of oil, and they depend on the animals that live in the water for their subsistence."


Canada News.Net
a day ago
- Canada News.Net
Filmmaker partners with Colossal Biosciences to recreate lost species
WASHINGTON, D.C.: Filmmaker Peter Jackson's lifelong fascination with the extinct giant New Zealand flightless bird called the moa has led to a surprising new partnership with U.S.-based biotech company Colossal Biosciences, which aims to bring back extinct species through genetic engineering Jackson, best known for directing The Lord of the Rings, owns one of the world's largest private collections of bones from the moa. This week, Colossal announced a new project to re-create a bird resembling the South Island giant moa, a towering creature that once stood up to 12 feet (3.6 meters) tall. The project has received US$15 million in funding from Jackson and his partner Fran Walsh and includes collaboration with New Zealand's Ngāi Tahu Research Centre. "The movies are my day job; the moa are my fun thing," Jackson said. "Every New Zealand schoolchild grows up fascinated by the moa." While scientists doubt extinct animals can be truly brought back, some believe it's possible to alter existing species to resemble them genetically. Still, there are concerns that efforts like this may take attention and resources away from conserving living endangered species. Moa lived in New Zealand for thousands of years before being hunted to extinction about 600 years ago. International interest in the bird spiked in the 19th century when a complete skeleton was sent to England, now housed in the Yorkshire Museum. Jackson became involved with Colossal after learning of its efforts to "de-extinct" species like the woolly mammoth and dire wolf. He connected the company with scientists he had met through his collection of 300 to 400 moa bones. In New Zealand, moa bones can be traded if found on private land, but cannot be exported or taken from public conservation areas. The project's first step is to identify well-preserved moa bones that may contain extractable DNA, said Colossal's chief scientist, Beth Shapiro. The DNA will be compared with that of living ground-dwelling birds like the emu and tinamou to determine what made the moa unique. Shapiro said re-creating a bird is harder than re-creating a mammal because birds develop inside eggs. Applying techniques like CRISPR to avian embryos faces scientific hurdles. Even if a moa-like bird is created, Duke University ecologist Stuart Pimm questioned its viability. "Where would you put it?" he asked, noting the challenges of reintroducing extinct species. "This would be a very dangerous animal." Ngāi Tahu researchers are helping guide the project, linking it to Māori traditions and heritage. Moa bones and ancient Māori rock art at sites like Pyramid Valley add cultural depth to the work. "He doesn't just collect moa bones," said Canterbury Museum curator Paul Scofield. "He has a comprehensive collection."