Lessons from golf for the astute investor
The recent conclusion of the 153rd Open Championship, the oldest golf tournament in the world, on Jul 20 saw the final grouping consisting of world No 1 Scottie Scheffler against Li Haotong.
It is a rare occurrence to see a Chinese golfer at a major tournament. Scheffler won by an impressive healthy margin, but what was more intriguing was that he went 32 holes bogey-free, demonstrating consistency and dominance under pressure. (For non-golfers, bogey-free means finishing all of those holes at par or better.)
This got me looking into the compounded reward money for the last century. In 1926, the famous Bobby Jones – lawyer by trade, golfer by passion – won for the first time. As a career amateur, he wasn't entitled to any prize money, so the whopping £75 (US$364) was awarded to the runner-up.
Fast forward to 2025, Scheffler took home US$3.1 million of the total US$17 million prize money, an increase of 8,500 times from a century prior (taking the US dollar exchange rate in 1926 of £1 to US$4.85). This growth seems mind-blowing and equates to a compounding growth rate of just 9.5 per cent, approximately the return of global stocks in the same period.
Returning to golf with fresh eyes
While I played competitively as a junior, I have had the good fortune of returning to the green with my kids reaching the age to start swinging.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Playing as an adult has brought a whole new appreciation for the mental side of the game – the risk-reward trade-offs, the need to make decisions and live with them, the pressure, the choice of equipment and so many other nuances draw parallels to evidence-based investing.
Staying on course by taking appropriate amounts of risk for return
In golf, you are constantly faced with choices. From tee to green, you need to pick the line, shot and trajectory, while taking into account bunkers, water, rough, wind, rain, emotions, your competitor's actions and the world around you. You could carry that water to try to get on the green in two, or lay up with a higher chance of making par.
Investing presents similar choices. You could take on lots of risk for the chance of making a big short-term return, but you could also catch a bad swing and end up in a ditch.
Astute investors begin by picking the right 'shot' for each of their goals. This isn't about chasing the latest market fad; it's about crafting a well-thought-out investment strategy and asset allocation that aligns with your unique goals, time horizon and risk tolerance.
Do you need a conservative iron shot to lay up, or can you confidently unleash the driver for a long-term gain and take on the volatility?
Understanding your personal 'course conditions' and making strategic choices before you swing is paramount to improving your probability for success, and knowing when to go for it or protect capital.
Working backwards from the goal
Visualisation is important in golf – and not just for the next shot. A good golfer visualises from the green and the hole, and works backwards to the optimal shot they want to play off the tee to put themselves in the best position.
If I want to hit 120 yards into the green on a 350-yard hole, I should try to hit 230 yards off the tee. I don't have to take out the driver and put myself a more awkward 60 yards from the hole even if I strike it in the middle of the fairway. Scheffler's performance at the Open clearly showed he consistently made choices off the tee that set himself up for success.
Investing is the same. We start with the life goal, and work backwards to how we allocate our assets today. Liabilities-driven asset allocation has long been the way institutions invest, and now with the power of access, advice, lower costs and technology to implement this method, individuals can do the same.
Like golf gear, every investor needs a set of personalised strategies
Golf is one of the few sports where your gear can become outdated every few months. Golfers have to comb through all the noise, find what suits them and select fourteen golf clubs, each with a distinct purpose.
Similarly, to consciously build investment portfolios, we must assemble an efficient collection of strategies that complement each other. When combined, they must be suitable for our goals, and our ability to tolerate volatility and complexity. Ideally, you can do this in a cost-conscious way and with unbiased advice.
It is probably fair to say most golfers spend more time thinking about and researching how to improve their set of clubs, combing through dozens of websites and consulting multiple experts and friends before making their choice. We can all apply the same discernment to how we grow and manage our hard-earned wealth.
There is no undo button in golf or investing
Golf can also be a uniquely unforgiving sport. In tennis, for example, if you hit a lousy shot, that particular game is far from over. Miss a two-foot putt, that shot is marked on your scorecard forever. Once you've hit a shot, you can never get it back.
In investing, the past is gone forever, too. Time lost and hindsight are constant frustrations. The market does not care if you are below your cost. The market does not care if you doubled your money on that stock in the last month, or if you missed out by sitting out for the last year.
You can only focus on your allocations today for your future.
You are playing against yourself
In golf, no one will move your ball. No one is moving the course. You are in total control of implementing your game. A good swing requires consistent practice, focus and discipline, so you can perform when the pressure is on and distractions are everywhere.
Successful investing also demands disciplined execution. This means sticking to your investment plan through market ups and downs, resisting the urge to panic during downturns or chasing fleeting highs. It means regular rebalancing to maintain your asset allocation, to improve the probability of success.
The true mastery in both pursuits comes from controlling your emotions, silencing the inner critic and maintaining a clear, long-term perspective. Patience, resilience and the ability to learn from every shot – good or bad – are the hallmarks of a champion, both on the course and in your financial life.
So, was this more about golf teaching us about investing or investing teaching us about golf? Whichever way you see it, improving your probability of success in managing wealth or playing golf will certainly lead to greater enjoyment in life.
The writer is chief executive officer and co-founder of Endowus

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
8 minutes ago
- Straits Times
CICT to remaining 55% of CapitaSpring, raise $500m from private placement to finance it
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox The Grade A office tower in Raffles Place has nearly 100 per cent committed occupancy as at end-June. SINGAPORE - CapitaLand Integrated Commercial Trust (CICT) on Aug 5 announced the proposed acquisition of the 55 per cent of CapitaSpring it does not already own at an agreed property value of S$1.05 billion. Of this, 45 per cent is from CapitaLand Development (CLD) and 10 per cent is from Mitsubishi Estate. The agreed property value for the whole 51-storey office tower in Raffles Place is $1.9 billion. The total acquisition outlay is estimated $482.3 million. Tan Choon Siang, CEO of CICT's manager said: 'CapitaSpring has consistently performed well, maintaining nearly 100 per cent committed occupancy as at 30 June 2025, underpinned by good quality tenants from diverse trade sectors. We are confident in the office tower's long-term potential to capture future growth, supported by sustained demand for quality Grade A office spaces and limited supply in the core CBD. 'Our Singapore exposure will increase from approximately 94 per cent to 95 per cent of our portfolio property value, advancing our strategic goal to deepen our presence in this core market.' On a pro forma basis, the acquisition is expected to deliver a distribution per unit (DPU) accretion of 1.1 per cent, assuming CICT had held and operated 100 per cent of CapitaSpring's commercial component from Jan 1 to June 30, 2025. CICT intends to finance it (excluding the acquisition fee related to the acquisition of CLD's 45 per cent interest, which will be paid in CICT units) using proceeds raised through a private placement, which is expected to raise $500 million. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. World Israel to decide next steps in Gaza after ceasefire talks collapse Singapore 'I wish I can hear her sing again,' says boyfriend of Yishun fatal crash victim Asia What's it like to deal with brutal US tariffs? Ask Malaysia Singapore Singapore launches review of economic strategy to stay ahead of global shifts Singapore A look at the five committees reviewing Singapore's economic strategy Opinion Keeping it alive: How Chinese opera in Singapore is adapting to the age of TikTok Life Glamping in Mandai: Is a luxury stay at Colugo Camp worth the $550 price tag? The proposed placement of over 237.5 million new units will have a minimum offering price of $2.105 per unit. The issue price range between $2.105 and $2.142 represents a discount of between around 4.1 and 5.7 per cent to the volume weighted average price (VWAP) of $2.2334 per unit for trades of the units executed on Aug 4. The new units are expected to be listed on the Singapore Exchange on Aug 14. CICT's manager estimates that the quantum of DPU held as at the close of Aug 13 under the cumulative distribution to be at between 6.92 cents and 7.02 cents. It also announced on Aug 5 that CICT posted a 3.5 per cent year-on-year rise in its first half DPU to 5.62 cents, which will be paid on or around Sept 18. Distributable income for the six months ended June grew 12.4 per cent to $411.9 million, compared with $366.5 million in the year-ago period. This increase was attributed to the income contribution from ION Orchard, which was acquired on Oct 30, 2024, better performance from existing properties and lower interest expenses, partially offset by the divestment of 21 Collyer Quay CICT units were halted from trading before the market opened on Aug 5. They closed on Aug 4 at $2.24, up 2.3 per cent or five cents.

Straits Times
8 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Indonesia police detain former eFishery CEO who faked data
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox The company claimed revenues of US$752 million in the first nine months of 2024, while the true number was just US$157 million. JAKARTA – Indonesian police have detained the co-founder and former chief executive officer of eFishery, who has previously admitted faking financial information at the once high-flying aquaculture startup. Gibran Huzaifah was detained along with two other former executives, Angga Hadrian Raditya and Andri Yadi, according to a text message from the director of special economic crimes at the National Police's Criminal Investigation Agency, Helfi Assegaf. DealStreetAsia earlier reported the detentions. There was no immediate indication the three former executives have been charged with any wrongdoing or named as suspects. All three have been held since July 31, according to the police. Gibran has told Bloomberg News he faked accounts at eFishery , which since the scandal has been administered by FTI Consulting. By the time it collapsed, the scheme had blown up into a multinational web of fake shell companies and padded accounts. The company claimed revenues of US$752 million (S$970 million) in the first nine months of 2024, while the true number was just US$157 million, according to an internal investigation. 'You see yourself in the mirror and when you do something wrong, you know that you're not proud of yourself,' Gibran said during a five-hour conversation on the scheme. 'I thought I would just do it to survive.' Several high-profile firms had invested in eFishery, including Japan's SoftBank Group and Singapore's Temasek Holdings. Bloomberg

Straits Times
8 minutes ago
- Straits Times
When Trump changes his mind, Republicans find a way to fall in line
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Mr Donald Trump has a pattern of accepting results that benefit him and denigrating those he dislikes as being rigged or part of a scam. WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump and his top aides used to be all too happy to praise the numbers from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. In February, Mr Trump displayed a chart in the Oval Office showing that the United States had gained an estimated 10,000 manufacturing jobs. When the bureau's March report came out, Ms Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, celebrated the 'GREAT NEWS!' on social media. And as recently as last week, Vice-President J.D. Vance promoted data from the bureau that showed an increase in jobs among US-born residents. That was then. After the bureau put out a less-than-impressive jobs report on Aug 1, Mr Trump fired Ms Erika McEntarfer, the agency's commissioner, and claimed the figures were rigged. (In the way of proof, he said it was 'my opinion'.) Now, many Trump allies who walk in lock step with the president are in an awkward position. They have to justify tarnishing the reputation of the very bureau whose work they had cited freely in the past. Some began arguing that there were too many revisions, long a part of the process in calculating jobs data. Others accused the bureau of lacking transparency. Some simply argued that the president had the right to fire whomever he likes. Still others repeated Mr Trump's claim of rigged data. Senator Markwayne Mullin who voted for Ms McEntarfer's confirmation in 2024, accused her on Fox News of generating 'fake reports'. 'I'm glad she's out of a job,' he said. Senator Roger Marshall who also voted for Ms McEntarfer, accused her of incompetence. 'Legacy media's wrong on why the BLS chief was fired,' Mr Marshall wrote on social media. 'It's not 'bad numbers' – it's incompetence. She inflated job numbers by 800,000 pre-election, then missed by 250,000 last two months. How can the Fed make sound decisions with such flawed data? Trump was right to act.' Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer, who in March had hailed the bureau's statistics showing strong job growth, backed Mr Trump's concerns about Ms McEntarfer in a post on social media. A spokesperson for Mr Vance – who had promoted the bureau's work the same day that Mr Trump fired Ms McEntarfer – said he was 'completely aligned with President Trump and was glad to see him dismiss the BLS commissioner'. Appearing on NBC's 'Meet the Press,' Mr Kevin Hassett, the director of the White House National Economic Council, declined on Aug 3 to furnish detailed evidence that would substantiate the president's claims that data had been manipulated. Instead, Mr Hassett, who in the past has cited staff at the bureau as 'professionals', said, 'The president wants his own people there so that when we see the numbers, they're more transparent and more reliable.' On CBS' 'Face the Nation,' Mr Jamieson Greer, the US trade representative, cited the bureau's use of revisions, even though they are part of a normal process of shoring up statistical data to ensure it is accurate. 'There are always revisions, but sometimes you see these revisions go in really extreme ways,' Mr Greer said. 'And it's, you know, the president is the president. He can choose who works in the executive branch.' The White House distributed a document accusing Ms McEntarfer, a Biden appointee who was confirmed by a vote of 86-8 in the Senate, of a 'lengthy history of inaccuracies and incompetence'. 'The fact of the matter is that BLS has had clear problems with the reliability and accuracy of its employment statistics since the start of the Covid pandemic over five years ago,' the White House said in a statement on Aug 4. Mr Trump has a pattern of accepting results that benefit him and denigrating those he dislikes as being rigged or part of a scam. He has objected to the results of the Emmys, falsely claimed that President Barack Obama did not win the popular vote and asserted that his erstwhile rival Senator Ted Cruz of Texas 'stole' a primary victory from him in Iowa in 2016. After losing the 2020 election, Mr Trump spread the lie that the election had been stolen from him. And since returning to office, he has lashed out at the sources of bad news for his administration, including judges who rule against him. In May, when he received a mix of good and bad economic news, Mr Trump said the 'good parts' of the economy were his, while the 'bad parts' belonged to the previous administration. Mr Stephen J. Farnsworth, political science professor at the University of Mary Washington, said even though much of the economic news Ms McEntarfer delivered to the Trump White House was positive, 'that wasn't enough.' 'The firing is a warning to other government officials that Trump pays very close attention to whether the news makes him look good or not,' he said. 'The larger issue is what this means for markets and for investors. If we're talking about an environment where the impartiality or accuracy of government statistics is called into question, it's much harder for people to make rational and informed choices.' While it remains to be seen whom Mr Trump will appoint to the position, the vote will serve as a test for Republican senators. 'The key question for the Congress is: To what extent will they insist on a competent professional to be confirmed for this position going forward?' Prof Farnsworth said. NYTIMES