&w=3840&q=100)
Brics condemns strikes on Iran, call for upholding international law
During the high-level meeting, the grouping formally inducted Indonesia as a full member and welcomed ten other nations -- including Nigeria, Kazakhstan, Bolivia, and Vietnam -- as new BRICS partner countries, signalling a major expansion of the bloc's outreach.
In the Rio de Janeiro Declaration released after the summit, the BRICS leaders outlined wide-ranging priorities across global peace, multilateralism, and development. Among the key issues addressed was the Middle East security situation, including a strong condemnation of recent military strikes on Iran.
As per the Rio de Janeiro Declaration, the attacks on civilian infrastructure and peaceful nuclear facilities under full IAEA safeguards also violated international law and relevant IAEA resolutions. It underscores that nuclear safeguards, safety, and security must always be upheld--even in armed conflicts--to protect people and the environment. The leaders reiterated support for diplomatic initiatives aimed at addressing regional challenges and urged the UN Security Council to be seized of the matter.
The leaders also expressed concern about ongoing conflicts in many parts of the world and the state of polarization and fragmentation in the international order. It noted the alarming trend of increasing global military spending at the cost of development financing for developing countries. They advocated for a multilateral approach that respects diverse national perspectives on global issues, including sustainable development, climate change, and poverty eradication.
The joint statement urged the international community to take politico-diplomatic measures to de-escalate conflict and emphasized the indivisibility of global security. It called for strengthening preventive diplomacy and the active role of regional organizations in peacebuilding, in accordance with the UN Charter. The leaders reaffirmed their support for cooperation on UN peacekeeping, AU peace operations, and global mediation efforts.
Highlighting humanitarian concerns, the leaders condemned violations of international humanitarian law such as attacks on civilians, obstruction of aid, and the targeting of humanitarian workers. It stressed that such violations deepen human suffering and jeopardize post-conflict recovery. They underscored the need for accountability and welcomed BRICS members' efforts to uphold humanitarian law.
On the 25th anniversary of UNSC Resolution 1325, the joint declaration reaffirmed commitment to the Women, Peace and Security agenda, emphasizing women's equal, full, and meaningful participation in peace and security processes, from prevention to post-conflict reconstruction.
It also recalled national positions on the conflict in Ukraine, appreciated mediation initiatives such as the African Peace Initiative, and expressed hope for a peaceful and sustainable resolution through dialogue.
Turning to the Middle East, the leaders reiterated grave concern over the situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, condemning Israeli strikes on Gaza and obstruction of aid. They called for strict adherence to international law, a permanent ceasefire, withdrawal of Israeli forces, release of detainees, and unrestricted aid delivery. They reaffirmed support for UNRWA and endorsed the two-state solution based on 1967 borders, including East Jerusalem as Palestine's capital.
It welcomed the Lebanon ceasefire and demanded full implementation of UNSC Resolution 1701 while urging Israel to withdraw from occupied Lebanese territory. They reaffirmed commitment to Syria's sovereignty, condemned terrorism and occupation, and welcomed the lifting of sanctions to aid Syrian reconstruction.
The BRICS leaders also endorsed "African solutions to African problems," supported AU-led peace efforts, and called for stronger backing of missions in Sudan and the Horn of Africa. It condemned ongoing violence in Sudan, called for a ceasefire, and urged urgent humanitarian assistance.
They also addressed the deteriorating situation in Haiti, urging Haitian-led dialogue to restore security and development. It emphasized UN cooperation to tackle Haiti's multifaceted crisis.
The leaders strongly condemned terrorism in all its forms, including the April 22 Jammu and Kashmir attack, and welcomed the BRICS Counter-Terrorism Working Group's efforts. They denounced attacks on Russian civilian infrastructure and urged accountability under international law.
On financial integrity, they reiterated their commitment to combating illicit financial flows, terrorism financing, drug trafficking, and corruption. It highlighted cooperation through BRICS working groups and the UN Convention against Corruption, calling for asset recovery and technical assistance.
They also voiced concern over nuclear risks, reaffirmed their commitment to disarmament, and supported the UNGA conference on establishing a WMD-free zone in the Middle East. They also endorsed efforts to prevent weaponization of outer space and supported legally binding treaties and transparency measures.
On cybersecurity, they reaffirmed its commitment to a secure, stable, and interoperable ICT environment. It welcomed the UN Convention against Cybercrime and urged all countries to sign and ratify it promptly to strengthen legal cooperation. They also supported responsible state conduct in cyberspace and deeper BRICS collaboration on ICT security and cybercrime prevention.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Where things stand with Trump's tariffs
Businesses hoping for clarity on where Trump tariffs land will likely have to wait a bit longer. The administration on Monday pushed back some of its most punishing duties by another three weeks to August, following a 90-day delay. Legal challenges to Trump's ability to implement tariffs unilaterally are further extending the cloudy outlook for tariff policy and could result in a reversal of some of the duties already in place. Here's what to know: What's happening with so-called reciprocal tariffs? Dozens of countries face so-called reciprocal tariffs if they don't strike trade deals with the U.S. by August 1. The tariffs were set to take effect on July 9 following a 90-day pause, but Trump on July 7 announced a three-week extension in order to negotiate trade deals. The reciprocal duties, which initially proposed tariffs as high as 125% on China and applied to more than 80 nations, were first announced April 2. They were in place for just a few hours on April 9 before they got pushed off for several months. If they take effect again, the targeted countries would pay the steeper rate in lieu of the 10% global baseline tariffs Trump has already imposed across nearly all U.S. imports. (The reciprocal duties in many instances don't match the duties imposed on U.S. exports.) Trump said his original 90-day reprieve was spurred by more than 75 countries showing a willingness to open negotiations regarding trade, trade barriers, tariffs, currency manipulation and other matters. Which countries has Trump singled out in regard to reciprocal tariffs? On July 7, the administration sent letters to more than a dozen countries threatening to raise tariff rates unless each secured trade deals with the U.S. by Aug 1. The White House didn't specify how the countries were chosen. Rates set in the letters have, so far, ranged from 25% to 40% and are generally in line with the original reciprocal rates set out in April. Both Japan and South Korea, which together export millions of cars to the U.S., face 25% tariffs, according to the letters. Trump on July 7 also threatened an additional 10% levy on countries siding with Brics, or a group of countries including Brazil, Russia, India and China. Where do tariffs stand with China, Mexico, Canada, the European Union and the U.K.? China: The Trump administration has for now settled on a tariff of 55% on Chinese imports, a level that reflects rates that existed before Trump came to office in January. In April, the president slapped a rate of up to 145% on China before he dialed it down to 30% in May for 90 days. He stuck with that rate after the nations reached a tentative trade deal in June. That rate is added to 25% tariffs that were in place before he took office. Mexico and Canada: Trump ordered 25% duties on the import of goods from Mexico and Canada to take effect in March, before exempting products that fall under the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement. The 2020 trade agreement generally allows products to enter duty-free if businesses can show they comply with certain rules regarding the origins of those products' components. The 25% tariffs on Mexico and Canada took effect in March with the exception of energy products like crude oil and natural gas, which face a 10% tariff. The EU: European Union nations face a 10% baseline tariff and a possible ramp-up to 50% if an agreement isn't reached by August 1. The Wall Street Journal reported in early July that EU officials said they are nearing the outline of a potential deal. The U.K.: The U.S. has a fairly balanced trading relationship with the U.K. and the two nations reached a tentative trade deal that keeps tariffs at 10% for now. The deal also temporarily shields the U.K. from the 50% steel and aluminum tariffs. What about tariffs related to specific goods? Tariffs of 25% on imported vehicles took effect April 3 and on auto parts May 3. Auto goods covered under the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement are exempt. Steel and aluminum imports to the U.S. have faced 50% tariffs since June 4, up from an earlier 25% rate. The U.K. is exempt from these tariffs. Trump has considered more sector-specific tariffs, including on pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, automobiles, critical minerals and copper. His administration in April opened investigations into computer chips and pharmaceuticals under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, which allows the president to impose tariffs on goods deemed essential for national security. How are lawsuits affecting tariffs? Trump's tariffs have been challenged in several U.S. courts, raising the odds that some of his duties will be reversed and refunded in the coming months. The U.S. Court of International Trade in May struck down Trump's 10% April 2 tariffs as well as higher, so-called reciprocal tariffs, ruling that the president didn't have the authority to impose them under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977. A federal appeals court then allowed the tariffs to remain in place pending appeal. Arguments are set for July 31. The ruling doesn't affect tariffs applied to sectors like autos, steel and aluminum. Separately, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R., Iowa) and Sen. Maria Cantwell (D., Wash.) have floated a bill stating that any tariffs imposed by the president would expire after 60 days unless Congress voted to approve them. This explanatory article may be updated periodically. Write to Chao Deng at
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Macron's London visit is less about Starmer or UK-France ties and more about Europe, rest of the world
The significance of this visit extends beyond bilateral relations. As Europe's only nuclear-armed powers and permanent members of the UN Security Council, the UK and France hold unique influence read more French President Emmanuel Macron gestures after a meeting with European leaders on Ukraine and European security at the Elysee Palace in Paris, France. File image/Reuters French President Emmanuel Macron will begin his three-day visit to London today (July 8), marking the first such occasion by an EU leader since 2020 Brexit. The visit begins with a warm reception from King Charles, who has extended a royal invitation, highlighting the renewed commitment to strengthen UK-France relations. Macron will engage in high-level talks with UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, with the agenda spanning critical global issues. King Charles will host a banquet at Windsor Castle on Tuesday evening—chosen as Buckingham Palace undergoes renovations—where he will emphasise the need for collaborative action on military threats and climate change. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In his address, he is expected to say, 'For centuries our citizens have admired each other, amused each other, and imitated each other,' underscoring the deep historical ties between the two nations. More from World Macron beats Trump with a royal invite to UK, but Starmer may not dump US prez for French bromance Soft power opportunity This state visit serves as a 'soft power' opportunity to bolster partnerships in trade, diplomacy, and defence, especially amid uncertainties over the US stance on supporting Ukraine militarily. The visit kicks off with ceremonial spectacles on Tuesday, featuring senior royals greeting Macron and celebrating the 'entente cordiale'—a nod to the 1904 Anglo-French agreement—marking the first French state visit since 2008. On Thursday, a UK-France summit at Downing Street, hosted by Starmer, will likely address the pressing issue of curbing illegal migration via small boats crossing the Channel, a persistent challenge for both nations. Ties between the two European powers nosedived since Brexit unfolded five years ago. The situation turned from bad to worse in coming years due to a series of developments. The 2021 AUKUS submarine deal—where the UK, US, and Australia formed a security pact, cancelling a prior $90 billion France-Australia submarine contract—strained ties between the two countries. The AUKUS announcement prompted the French defence minister to cancel talks with her UK counterpart following the deal's revelation. Additionally, former UK Prime Minister Liz Truss famously declined to classify Macron as a 'friend or foe,' a remark that deepened the rift and bruised Franco-British diplomacy. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Efforts to mend relations The efforts to mend the ties began in 2023 with the resumption of bilateral meetings after a five-year hiatus under prime minister Rishi Sunak. Starmer, who campaigned against Brexit during his political rise, met Macron prior to the UK election, further laying the groundwork for a thaw. This visit builds on that momentum, reflecting a shared intent to move past post-Brexit discord. Why It Matters for Europe The significance of this visit extends beyond bilateral relations. As Europe's only nuclear-armed powers and permanent members of the UN Security Council, the UK and France hold unique influence. Their discussions will likely focus on defence ties and support for Ukraine, especially as geopolitical uncertainties—particularly from the US—require a united European front. This collaboration could shape the continent's security landscape at a critical juncture. Macron's three-day visit, concluding on July 10, underscores a pivotal moment for UK-France relations, aiming to reset ties and address evolving challenges.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Daily Briefing: Elbow room in Trump tariffs?
Good morning, Kashmir is reeling under its hottest spell in half a century, resulting in unusual scenes in the Valley. With temperatures soaring, the demand for cooling appliances has exploded. One household appliance seller, Owais Ahmad, says his stock of air conditioners has already run out. He went from selling 100-150 ACs a year to the same in just the first three days of July alone. Cooler sales have also more than doubled. The searing heat has even pushed residents toward the Valley's water bodies for relief, tragically leading to several drowning incidents. While Kashmir has occasionally experienced hot days before, this prolonged heatwave is unprecedented. Experts point fingers at a familiar duo: global warming and rapid urbanisation. On that note, let's get to the rest of today's edition. In a new phase of his trade war, US President Donald Trump sent out letters to several countries, announcing sweeping tariffs that would kick in beginning August 1. He posted letters to at least 14 countries on his social media platform, Truth Social. This included key allies, Japan and South Korea, each facing a 25 per cent charge, and smaller US exporters. The letter hinted at opportunities for additional negotiations till the new deadline. But it also warned: If you decide to ramp up your tariffs, we will do the same equally. When a reporter asked about his initial claim of '90 trade deals,' Trump responded that they had made trade deals with the UK and China and 'were very close on making a deal with India.' He added that they had met with others but weren't keen on pursuing a deal with them. What does this mean for India? The trade talks have hit a speed bump as Washington wants to open up the agriculture sector in India, a politically sensitive arena that New Delhi has drawn a red line around. Indian officials hope that there could be some elbow room with the fresh timelines, and they could ink a mini-interim trade deal for certain goods. However, the US has clarified that August 1 is not the 'new deadline', but an outer limit for countries to speed things up. The August 1 deadline is not 'a 100 per cent firm', Trump said, adding that they were open to doing 'something in a different way' if any countries called them up. The second front: India is also facing Trump's threats on another front, with the US President warning of 10 per cent additional tariffs on any nation aligning with the 'anti-American policies of BRICS nations'. The BRICS coalition, initially represented by Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, has now grown to include 10 nations, which means it accounts for 45 per cent of the global coalition. BRICS members have said that while they 'do not seek to replace the US dollar as a medium of exchange', they aim to 'offer a viable alternative that will aid the market in its perpetual mission for efficiency'. Paper trail: In an ongoing Express series, where we track the progress of the electoral roll revision across districts in Bihar, the spotlight today is on document No.6 on the Election Commission's list of 11 to prove citizenship. As voters scramble to assemble their papers, authorities have been flooded with applications for domicile or residential certificates. Ironically, residents can submit an Aadhar card, which is not on the EC's list, as proof of residence to obtain a domicile certificate. Over 9 lakh applications are pending with officials. In arms: In the aftermath of Operation Sindoor, the government has pivoted towards a leaner equipment procurement model to cut out delays. This means a greater push for the private sector to participate in defence manufacturing and produce indigenous arms. It is learnt that authorities have already contacted stakeholders in the matter. Missing: In February 2023, a group of nine men from Gujarat set sail on a small vessel from the Caribbean island of Dominica to Antigua. Their final destination was the United States, where they hoped to 'live the American dream'. Then, they went missing. Two years later, closure eludes their family members. Some have knocked on the court's doors but to no avail. Thackeray trouble: The reunion of the Thackeray cousins (Shiv Sena (UBT)'s Uddhav and MNS chief Raj) has put the Congress on edge. This alliance, yet to be formalised, has put the grand old party in a double bind, as it won't want to rub shoulders with Raj, who's famous for his anti-migrant and anti-Muslim rhetoric. With crucial civic body polls around the corner, it can't afford to distance Uddhav either. Read national political bureau chief Manoj C G's insightful report on the Congress's dilemma. Hindi in Hindutva: The Thackeray cousins' reunion was prompted by a surge of Marathi pride, triggered by the state government's now-scrapped proposal for a three-language formula. Columnist Suhas Palshikar argues that those opposing Hindi have overlooked a deeper issue: the Hindi lobby's broader goal of establishing a national language to foster national unity. This drive to create a single national language, he suggests, is rooted in a desire for uniformity, which aligns closely with the ideological framework of Hindutva politics. On the line: Authorities often rely on phone tapping to catch criminals (anyone remember the HBO show The Wire?). But what does India's law say about tapping suspects' phones to gather evidence before a crime is committed? It all boils down to two caveats: 'public emergency' and 'in the interest of public safety'. The government can authorise interception in either of these cases. Amaal Sheikh explains the law through two High Court rulings. Read. The world's about to get a front-row seat to some of the most elusive mysteries of the cosmos. The Vera C Rubin Observatory, perched atop the Cerro Pachon mountain in Chile, will constantly scan the sky of the southern hemisphere for 10 years, gathering 20 terabytes of astronomical data every night. Its most unique feature is the Simonyi Survey Telescope, a technical marvel, equipped with the world's largest digital camera. 🎧 Before you go, tune in to today's '3 Things' podcast episode, where we talk about the debate over the words 'socialist' and 'secular' in the Preamble, Pakistani athletes competing in Indian sporting events, and the flow of refugees from Myanmar to Mizoram. That's all for today, folks! Until tomorrow, Sonal Gupta Sonal Gupta is a senior sub-editor on the news desk. She writes feature stories and explainers on a wide range of topics from art and culture to international affairs. She also curates the Morning Expresso, a daily briefing of top stories of the day, which won gold in the 'best newsletter' category at the WAN-IFRA South Asian Digital Media Awards 2023. She also edits our newly-launched pop culture section, Fresh Take. ... Read More
