logo
Marine conservation group claims damage to seabeds is a ‘national scandal'

Marine conservation group claims damage to seabeds is a ‘national scandal'

The conservation charity Open Seas made the comments as it published its Ocean Witness report, a major survey of seabeds within Scotland's marine protected areas (MPAs).
The report – published in the run-up to the global UN Ocean Conference in Nice, France in June – is based on more than 300 seabed surveys that were carried out during a five-month period, with the work done in collaboration with Greenpeace UK.
It found that while habitats like maerl beds – which are formed by special seaweeds in shallow seabeds – and seagrass meadows are 'crucial parts of our biodiversity', it claimed in some areas these 'remain unprotected from destructive fishing practices'.
Open Seas – which successfully took the Scottish Government to court in 2023 – said while MPAs had been brought in 'to safeguard Scotland's most vulnerable marine ecosystems', it added that 'numerous MPAs lack effective management measures'.
As a result, it claimed this allowed 'harmful fishing practices', such as bottom trawling and scallop dredging to persist within their boundaries.
'This ongoing damage not only undermines the intended conservation goals but also threatens the very habitats these MPAs were established to protect,' the report stated.
Open Seas said its surveys 'uncovered clear evidence that in many cases these so-called 'protected' areas are merely lines on a map with little real world impact on marine conservation'.
One of the examples given was the Papa Westray MPA, which is located at the north end of the island of Papa Westray in Orkney.
The group said that despite the area being designated as an MPA 'there are still no restrictions against trawling and dredging within or even near the area'.
This, the report said, made it 'yet another example of a protected area that exists in name and not in practice'.
The Open Seas research found that marine habitats in areas such as Papa Westray as well as Loch Creran in Argyll and Bute and the Sound of Jura on the west of Scotland are 'actively degraded'.
Open Seas accused the Scottish Government of failing to meet international targets under the UN convention on biological diversity and the global biodiversity framework.
The campaigning charity also claimed Scottish ministers have 'broken their own promises to protect the most sensitive and important' marine habitats.
Open Seas director Phil Taylor said: 'Scotland's marine protections are failing by design.
'Despite public statements and legal commitments, the Scottish Government is allowing destructive fishing inside supposedly protected areas.
'These failures are not only national scandals – they breach Scotland's international obligations to halt biodiversity loss and restore the health of our seas.
'We have heard repeated promises to deliver for our seas and the coastal communities who rely on them from Scottish ministers – sadly those promises have been broken just as regularly.'
Mr Taylor continued: 'These are not just technical oversights – they are policy choices that carry environmental, legal and reputational risks.
'Scotland likes to be seen as a leader on the environment. But, as this report shows, we are still dragging our heels while the seabed is being dragged into decline. That must change, starting now.'
Will McCallum, co-executive director of Greenpeace UK, said: 'The lessons learnt in Scotland must be applied in all UK waters – allowing destructive industrial fishing practices like bottom trawling in marine protected areas is causing damage to fragile marine ecosystems and results in severe ecosystem degradation which is bad for everyone.'
However, he said the research had also shown that 'where areas are meaningfully protected, marine life can recover and flourish' – adding that this 'should give us hope for the oceans'.
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'Management measures for the most vulnerable sites in the MPA network were implemented in 2016.
'Putting in place the remaining fisheries management measures for MPAs and further measures for the 11 Priority Marine Features most at risk from bottom trawling outside MPAs remains a top priority for this Government.
'Fisheries management measures will be implemented in 2025 for Offshore MPAs and as soon as possible for Inshore sites following the completion of the required statutory assessments and public consultation.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The 35 surnames that could mean you are related to the royal family
The 35 surnames that could mean you are related to the royal family

Edinburgh Live

time8 hours ago

  • Edinburgh Live

The 35 surnames that could mean you are related to the royal family

Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info Many of us are keen to delve into our family tree, uncovering our roots and potential relatives. The era of laboriously trawling through heritage archives and census data is a thing of the past, thanks to various online platforms like MyHeritage that have made this task straightforward and accessible. Currently, MyHeritage is offering a 14-day free trial, allowing folks to map out their family tree, discover new kin and explore billions of historical records. They've even compiled a list of 35 surnames that could possibly suggest a connection to royalty. The firm proposes that certain last names have historically been linked with the aristocracy and could strongly hint at a Royal bloodline. READ MORE - Jet2 'sorry' as mum and kids 'traumatised' at being refused to flight home READ MORE - Motorist gets petty revenge on 'entitled' neighbour who kept parking on their drive If users bear one of these 35 surnames, they might be in for a surprise when they start digging into their family history. While possessing these surnames doesn't assure a Royal connection, it provides a brilliant starting point for those intrigued by their ancestry, reports the Mirror. To learn more, individuals simply need to head over to MyHeritage and start constructing their family tree using the platform's tools that enable users to input names, dates, photos and stories to share with potential relatives, before delving into historical archives filled with census data, birth and death certificates, as well as marriage records. MyHeritage also offers DNA testing services, giving customers insights into their ethnic heritage and linking them up with family members. For those seeking alternatives, Ancestry is another DNA service on offer, providing genetic analysis from £79 to help users connect with kin and delve into their familial origins. 23andMe is also in the mix, offering DNA tests that include ancestral breakdowns and personalised health insights, with prices starting at £89. Here's the exhaustive roll call of 35 surnames that might hint at a distant connection to royalty: Windsor: The current British royal family's surname since 1917. Tudor: The Welsh dynasty that produced monarchs like Henry VIII and Elizabeth I. Stuart: A Scottish house that ruled England and Scotland in the 16th and 17th centuries. Plantagenet: A royal house that provided England with monarchs from Henry II to Richard III. Capet: The dynasty that ruled France from 987 to 1328. Bourbon: A European royal house that ruled France, Spain, and other territories. Habsburg: A prominent royal house of Europe, known for ruling the Holy Roman Empire. Hanover: The British royal house from George I to Queen Victoria. Valois: A cadet branch of the Capetian dynasty that ruled France. Lancaster: A branch of the Plantagenet dynasty, known for its role in the Wars of the Roses. York: Another Plantagenet branch, also central to the Wars of the Roses. Bruce: A Scottish royal house, with Robert the Bruce being a notable king. de Valois: A French royal house that produced several kings. de Medici: An influential Italian family that produced royalty and popes. Savoy: A royal family that once ruled parts of Italy and France. Orange-Nassau: The Dutch royal family. Oldenburg: A European royal house that includes the current Danish royal family. Glucksburg: A branch of the House of Oldenburg, associated with Danish and Norwegian royalty. Romanov: The last imperial dynasty to rule Russia. Baskerville: A noble family name with historical ties to English aristocracy. Darcy: A surname associated with medieval nobility and landowners in England and Ireland. Neville: A powerful English noble family with significant influence during the medieval period. Percy: An aristocratic English family known for their role in British history. Astley: A noble surname linked to the English peerage. Capell: A distinguished English family with historical ties to the aristocracy. Howard: A prominent aristocratic family in the UK, holding the title of Dukes of Norfolk. Seymour: The family of Jane Seymour, third wife of Henry VIII, with ties to the Dukedom of Somerset. Grey: Associated with Lady Jane Grey, England's nine-day queen. FitzAlan: A powerful medieval family, former Earls of Arundel. Courtenay: A noble family with connections to English and French royalty. Manners: The surname of the Dukes of Rutland, a high-ranking noble family. Russell: Connected to the Dukes of Bedford, an influential aristocratic lineage. Cavendish: The surname of the Dukes of Devonshire, a powerful British noble family. Talbot: A noble family holding the Earldom of Shrewsbury. Spencer: The family name of Princess Diana, tying it to the modern British royal family. MyHeritage has earned a commendable 4-star rating on Trustpilot. A pleased customer shared: "Immediate accurate statistics of my immediate family members." Another user praised the platform, saying: "Regular updates of discoveries, positive results. This site is not just about the money, it is about genuine results for the family history researcher." A different user expressed satisfaction with the site's usability: "My family history has expanded and the format is easily understood. Changes are quick and easy. Thank you,". Yet, the service didn't hit the mark for everyone, as one individual reported: "I don't fully understand it. I can't find a user guide, difficult to navigate, Help Center does not always understand my problems." Conversely, another budding genealogist recounted their positive experience: "Finding related families and information relating to individuals has been a wonderful experience. MyHeritage has made it even easier to trace ancestors and verify relations." The DNA tests and platform can be found on the MyHeritage website.

Calls to stop wind farm in public forest home to Scottish wildcats rejected by Supreme Court
Calls to stop wind farm in public forest home to Scottish wildcats rejected by Supreme Court

Scotsman

time10 hours ago

  • Scotsman

Calls to stop wind farm in public forest home to Scottish wildcats rejected by Supreme Court

Claims have been made the wildcats in the forest are hybrids - a result of wildcats interbreeding with domestic or feral cats. Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Calls to stop more turbines in a forest with a population of wild cats have been rejected by the courts for a third time. Wildcat Haven, an organisation dedicated to conserving wildcats in the UK, has been fighting against plans for a second wind farm at the Clashindarroch Forest, near Huntly. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The development was granted consent by Scottish ministers in 2023. The campaign group, a community interest company, first lodged a petition calling for a judicial review into the decision to approve the wind farm. This was rejected by the Court of Session, twice. The proposed wind farm has been controversial with the local community and wildcat campaigners Wildcat Haven then lodged a third appeal with the Supreme Court which was rejected this week. The courts said the applicant did not raise an arguable point of law in its appeal. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Wildcat Haven claims there are 13 wildcats living in the forest which is one of, if not the largest forest in Aberdeenshire. It is also known for its cross-country skiing trails and the Huntly Nordic Ski Club. Today only a few wildcats remain in remote parts of Scotland, though it has been claimed none are believed to be 'pure-bred' – numbers are so low that some experts have concluded the species is 'functionally extinct' in the wild Vattenfall, the developer, already has an existing wind farm in the forest. The Swedish company claims the wildcats recorded in its survey work and that of Forestry Land and Scotland and Scottish Wildcat Action have been identified as hybrids - a result of wildcats interbreeding with domestic or feral cats. Wildcat Haven disputed this claim, with director of the organisation Paul O'Donoghue describing the company's findings as 'truly shocking.' He said the new 14-turbine development would be 'a disaster' for the wildcats, arguing research has shown such developments threaten the species. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Mr O'Donoghue added: 'We have been fighting for seven years. The forest is still there, the wildcats are still there and we are prepared to fight for another seven years and longer, to protect those precious wildcat and their beautiful forest home.' Matt Bacon, Vattenfall's UK head of onshore wind market development, said: 'The Supreme Court decision marks the fourth time this matter has been before the courts, and the consent has been upheld at every level of the UK judicial system.'

Number of primary school pupils falls by 5.6% in two years
Number of primary school pupils falls by 5.6% in two years

BBC News

time12 hours ago

  • BBC News

Number of primary school pupils falls by 5.6% in two years

The number of primary school pupils in Jersey has fallen by 5.6% in the last two years, a study group has Centre Jersey (PCJ) examined data from Public Health Jersey which found the number of babies born in Jersey had fallen by almost 10% in 2024 compared to the year report also found four schools across the island had recorded declines of more than 10%.The charity said that with fewer children to teach, it was likely people would call for smaller class sizes rather than fewer schools. It said: "Jersey has an unusual structure of primary school provision - there are 24 separate schools with an average of 254 students at each, however, six of the schools have over 350 students while nine have fewer than 200."There may well be a need for some restructuring particularly among the smaller schools... in practice there will be pressure for smaller class sizes rather than fewer schools." PCJ said it was hard to see how the government could address the falling birth rate without potential "financial incentives" to encourage people to have more said: "More generally, if the high cost of living in Jersey is causing a reduction in the number of young people who might otherwise have chosen to live in Jersey to choose not to do so then this can be tackled only by measures to reduce the cost of living, specifically the cost of housing."The government announced that it had launched a new 25-year strategy to improve the island's public infrastructure to address the island's high cost of housing and ageing infrastructure.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store