Misconduct In Matrimonial Life Can Cost Government Job Too, Says Madras High Court
A public servant is expected to maintain honesty, integrity and good conduct both inside the office and in the society, the court observed
The Madurai bench of the Madras High Court recently observed that misconduct arising from personal matrimonial disputes, too, could be grounds for termination in government service, including contractual appointments.
The judgment came in an appeal filed by the Executive Secretary of the District Health Society, Ramanathapuram, and other officials, who had challenged a 2018 single-judge order that reinstated KS Subha Karuthukhan, a dental assistant, who was disengaged following his involvement in a criminal case related to a matrimonial dispute.
Karuthukhan had been working on a contractual basis at the Government Upgraded Primary Health Centre in Bogaloor. His services, originally for a one-year period, had been renewed periodically until 2017, when the authorities terminated his engagement following his implication in a criminal matter.
The single judge bench, while ruling in his favour in 2018, had held that involvement in a matrimonial case should not become a roadblock for someone serving in a government post, particularly on a contractual basis.
However, a division bench comprising Justice SM Subramaniam and Justice Dr AD Maria Clete disagreed with this interpretation.
Referring to the Tamil Nadu Government Servants' Conduct Rules, 1973, the court held that misconduct, even in personal relationships, can be considered a valid basis for departmental action. The bench emphasised that government employees—permanent or contractual—are expected to maintain integrity and good conduct not just within the office, but also in society.
'A public servant is expected to maintain honesty, integrity, and good conduct both inside the office and in the society," the court noted, underlining that such standards are not limited to official duties alone.
Further, since the respondent's contract had already expired in 2017, the court said there was no question of reinstatement. The appeal was allowed, and the previous writ order was set aside.
First Published:
June 20, 2025, 18:22 IST
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
5 hours ago
- The Hindu
Tamil Nadu govt. urges Madras HC to exempt ‘Ungaludan Stalin' and ‘Nalam Kaakum Stalin' schemes from prohibitory order
The Tamil Nadu government has approached the Madras High Court urging it to clarify that its interim order prohibiting the use of the name of any living personality in the nomenclature of government schemes would not be applicable to 'Ungaludan Stalin' and 'Nalam Kaakum Stalin' schemes. Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice Sunder Mohan on Thursday (August 3, 2025) accepted a request made by Advocate General P.S. Raman for an early hearing of the modification petition since the Nalam Kaakum Stalin scheme was all set to be launched across the State on Saturday (August 2, 2025). The judges said, the petition, if filed by Friday, would be taken up for hearing on Monday (August 4, 2025). Within a couple of hours, a modification plea was filed by the State government in the High Court Registry along with a detailed affidavit sworn by Public department secretary Reeta Harish Thakkar. The affidavit said the public outreach programme titled 'Ungaludan Stalin' had been in operation for quite sometime now and even the public interest litigation petitioner Shanmugam, in whose case the interim order was passed, had not sought any ex-parte interim order against that scheme. Similarly, a Government Order for the Nalam Kaakum Stalin scheme, aimed at taking healthcare to the doorsteps of the beneficiaries, was issued on June 3, 2025 itself, the Public Secretary said, and contended that only the launch was scheduled to be held on August 2, 2025 by conducting health camps in all districts. Further, stating that the pamphlets, brochures, application forms and other related documents for the scheme had already been printed, Ms. Thakkar said, enormous efforts taken to launch the scheme on Saturday would go waste if the prohibitory interim order was made applicable to it. 'The scheme has been introduced in the name honourable Chief Minister who is a constitutional authority and it cannot be construed to have been introduced in the name of a political personality. Usage of photos of former Chief Ministers is also not expressly prohibited by the Supreme Court,' her affidavit read. Stating that the government was prepared to contest the main PIL petition by filing a detailed counter affidavit, the secretary said: 'The present petition is being filed for the limited purpose of seeking clarification so that the order may not be applicable to the Nalam Kaakum Stalin scheme that is being launched tomorrow.'
The Hindu
8 hours ago
- The Hindu
Madras High Court quashes Government Order cancelling allotment of Kalaignarin Kanavu Illam houses to Maraimalai Ilakkuvanar and Thilagavathy
The Madras High Court has quashed a Government Order (G.O.) issued on March 4, 2024, cancelling the allotment of houses at Shenoy Nagar and Anna Nagar in Chennai to noted Tamil writers Maraimalai Ilakkuvanar and G. Thilagavathy, also a retired IPS officer, under the Kalaignarin Kanavu Illam scheme. Justice N. Anand Venkatesh agreed with senior counsel Rev. Fr. Xavier Arulraj, representing both writers, that another G.O. issued on January 26, 2024, modifying the eligibility criteria for the beneficiaries of the scheme, could be given only prospective and not retrospective effect. The judge pointed out that the government had introduced the scheme on the 97th birth anniversary of former Chief Minister M. Karunanidhi in 2022. It was intended to honour Tamil scholars by allotting houses to those who had received literary awards such as the Jnanpith Award. Accordingly, a G.O. was issued on November 16, 2022, allotting houses to 10 beneficiaries for 2022-23. The two writ petitioners were among them, and they were allotted houses at Shenoy Nagar and Anna Nagar after their individual preference was ascertained. However, in January 2024, the government decided that the Tamil scholars who had already owned houses would be ineligible for allotment of houses under the scheme. The decision was given retrospective effect and the allotments made to the petitioners in 2022 were cancelled in March 2024. Disapproving of the decision, Justice Venkatesh said the 2022 G.O. had stated that the scheme was intended to honour the award received by the scholars and not the awardee per se. When such was the stance, he wondered what forced the government to make a complete reversal in 2024. Even if the government wanted to change its policy, it ought to have been given prospective and not retrospective effect, he concluded.
The Hindu
8 hours ago
- The Hindu
SC/ST Commission reviews ‘caste killing', hands over compensation to Kavin's kin
Retired Madras High Court Judge and Chairman of Tamil Nadu State Commission for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes S. Tamilvanan chaired a meeting here on Friday in the wake of the murder of Scheduled Caste youth C. Kavin Selvaganesh on Sunday. Justice Tamilvanan said caste killings, which triggered instant panic and tension among the public, should not be allowed and approved by civil society as every girl above the age of 18 and the 21-year-old boy could choose their life partner. Hence, this murder should not be treated as a fallout of 'caste issue'. 'The official machinery, especially Revenue and Police departments, has played its part in a stupendous fashion as per law after this caste killing. While all real culprits should be brought before law, innocents should not be affected. Since an Act against caste killing is the need of the hour, the Commission will press the State and the Union governments to pass a suitable legislation,' Justice Tamilvanan said. District Collector R. Sukumar, Deputy Commissioners of Police Vinodh Santharam and Vijayakumar and District Revenue Officer M. Suganya participated in the meeting. Later, Justice Tamilvanan visited the family of Kavin Selvaganesh at Arumugamangalam in Thoothukudi district after the cremation and handed over a cheque for ₹6 lakh as the first instalment towards compensation being given to the SC families in case of the murder of its member by an upper caste or intermediate caste member.
