Packaging faces disruption from new market forces
A recent report by McKinsey & Company, titled "No Ordinary Disruption: Winning with New Models in Packaging 2030," outlines five key trends poised to reshape the sector over the next decade.
The rapid growth of e-commerce is placing increased pressure on packaging systems.
As online shopping becomes more prevalent, there is a heightened need for packaging solutions that ensure product protection during transit, optimize space, and meet sustainability criteria.
This shift necessitates innovations in packaging design and materials to accommodate the unique challenges of e-commerce logistics.
Environmental concerns and regulatory measures are pushing the packaging industry toward more sustainable practices.
The European Union's Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR) aims to reduce packaging waste and promote recyclability. In response, companies are exploring biodegradable materials, reusable packaging systems, and designs that facilitate recycling.
These efforts align with the broader goal of establishing a circular economy within the packaging sector.
Advancements in digital technology are enabling smarter packaging solutions.
The integration of QR codes, RFID tags, and IoT devices allows for real-time tracking, improved inventory management, and enhanced consumer engagement.
These technologies also support sustainability by providing information on recycling and product origins, thereby fostering transparency and informed consumer choices.
As the packaging industry navigates these transformative trends, companies are encouraged to invest in research and development, adapt to changing consumer preferences, and collaborate across the supply chain to remain competitive in a rapidly evolving market.
"Packaging faces disruption from new market forces" was originally created and published by Packaging Gateway, a GlobalData owned brand.
The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
6 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump's Tariffs Are Already Stunting World Growth While Markets Shrug
As Donald Trump barrels toward his latest tariff deadline, the damage to the global economy from American protectionism is becoming increasingly evident, even if financial markets seem to have decided they can live with it. The US president has announced preliminary agreements with the European Union, Japan and a handful of others that raise tariff rates, and he's promising to impose even higher duties on Aug. 1 for countries that haven't cut deals. It all amounts to another step change in the trade barrier that Trump has erected around America, which is starting to reshape trade and investment patterns worldwide.
Forbes
6 minutes ago
- Forbes
The Risk Of Rushing: Details Murky On Trump, Van Der Leyen Trade Deal
President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen shakes hands with President during a ... More meeting at Trump Turnberry golf club on Sunday in Scotland. (Photo by) President Trump and European Union President Ursula von der Leyen shook hands on a deal Sunday to stave off 30% tariffs on U.S. imports from the E.U., which could have been effective on Friday, though it remains unclear what the deal is. Perhaps what they really agreed to is to stall for more time. Historically, trade agreements take a great deal of time and review before being announced. That said, it appears that most if not all U.S. imports from the European Union will face a 15% tariff. That's one area of disagreement if not among the two parties, then at least among the first reporting on the limited 'details.' It also appears that most U.S. exports to the 27 nations of the European Union will not have a tariff. That's another area of disagreement, at least in the early reporting. That 15% tariff on U.S. imports is up slightly from the 10% 'baseline' tariff already in place with all countries of the world since Trump began the global trade war to reduce the U.S. deficit, which is still increasing. It is, of course, significantly higher than the 1.2% tariff rate on U.S. imports from the European Union that preceded it. (The 'deal' would seem to lower the 25% tariff in place on passenger vehicle imports into the United States.) On the U.S. export side, the zero tariff rate would replace a rate of 2.8%, so not a big change. But a spokesperson for the European Union would not respond to a 'request for comment about Trump's claim." Here's where it gets really important: Does the 15% tariff on E.U. imports include critical medicines and the compounds used to make those medicines, imports into the United States that Ireland and other European nations dominate? President Trump says no, according to one news source. 'We have 15% for pharmaceuticals,' Von der Leyen said, according to another. I wrote last week about the risk of the trade war on Americans' access to important medicines because of the United States' reliance on Europe for so many medicines and a great deal of the chemical compounds used to produce drugs here. Regardless of whether pharmaceuticals are hit with 15% tariffs or not, it is not hard to imagine that whatever tariffs are ultimately imposed will put pressure on prices as the U.S. government collects revenues from the European Union and a host of other nations. One thing on which Trump and van der Leyen did agree was that making a deal was important to both sides, given the strength of the trading relationship. The United States' top 15 trade partners, which account for 44.40% of all U.S. trade, including 44.22% of all U.S. exports and 44.51% of all imports, includes the following seven European Union nations: Overall, the trade with just these European Union nations is relatively balanced, with those seven accounting for 21.38% of all U.S. trade, including 20.27% of all exports and 22.05% of all U.S. imports. The overall deficit with these five nations is $149.61 billion. The percentages for all 27 European nations is similar on total trade and U.S. exports but it drops on imports, since many of the other countries are without the same buying power. Overall, the European Union is accounting for 20.22% of all U.S. imports and 18.57% of all U.S. exports through May, the latest data available from the U.S. Census Bureau. Gaining clarity on the issues will be important. Six of the 10 U.S. imports from the European Union where the E.U. was a dominant source were in the area of pharmaceuticals and with chemical compounds used to make medicines in this country. The same six in 10 statistic is true of U.S. exports to the 27-nation European Union. For example, 99.22% of $42.95 billion in U.S. imports in the insulin, hormone and steroid category (HS code 2937) through May were from the European Union, with 98.48% coming from Ireland, according to my analysis of the latest U.S. Census Bureau data. It is the top U.S. import from the European Union this year. The same category is a top U.S. export to the European Union, accounting for 53.85% of the $4.94 billion in U.S. exports to the world, ranking fourth overall to the European Union. But the 15% tariffs would affect a broad range of exports and imports. The European Union is responsible for 79.77% of the $2.97 billion in wine imports into the United States through May and 80.78% of $2.15 billion in perfumes. While these are the U.S. import categories that the European Union dominates by global market share, they are not the largest by value. Among those not mentioned above for market share that are among the top 10 by value from the European Union are: It is, of course, not clear whether those last two would face tariffs or not. Switching over to the U.S. export side, the European Union has an appetite for the broad nut category (HS code 0802) that is dominated by shelled almonds and pistachios in the shell, with 37.49% of the $4.09 billion total in U.S. exports through May headed to the European Union. In addition, the E.U. has a thirst for the alcoholic spirits category (HS code 2208) that is dominated by bourbon and whiskey, with 46.66% of the total $1.08 billion sent to the world. Any decrease in tariffs on these would certainly be welcome. During the press conference announcing the framework for a deal, Trump emphasized that the European Union would be increasing its purchase of U.S. energy and, he hoped, cars. The European Union, Trump said, would be buying $750 billion in U.S. energy products, though it was not clear over what period of time or even which ones, specifically. In 2024, U.S. exports to the world of oil, gasoline and other refined petroleum products, and natural gas such as LNG – the dominant categories – was less than $300 billion. And most refined petroleum exports stay in the Western Hemisphere. But the European Union is a big market for U.S. exports of oil, petroleum gas and cars. One thing is clear: There is more work to be done before it is clear what the deal on which Trump and van der Leyen shook hands actually is.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump reaches agreement with E.U. to impose 15% tariff, with exceptions for key industries
President Donald Trump on Sunday announced a trade agreement with the European Union that would set tariffs at 15%, ending what had been months of uncertainty surrounding trade with the United States' largest trade partner. The tariff rate is a reduction from the 30% that Trump threatened on July 12 and the 20% he said he would impose on April 2. Announcing the agreement, Trump said the E.U. will not impose a tariff on U.S. imports. He added this agreement was 'satisfactory to both sides.' Potentially more tariffs on the way European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said Sunday alongside Trump that the pact 'will bring stability. It will bring predictability. That's very important for our businesses on both sides of the Atlantic.' However, Trump said 50% tariffs on steel would remain unchanged and more tariffs could still be on the way for pharmaceutical products, which Ireland is one of the top sources of. Trump recently threatened 200% tariffs on pharma goods. In the meeting with von der Leyen, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said semiconductor tariffs could also be announced in the coming weeks. Outlining parts of the agreement, Trump said "the European Union is going to agree to purchase from the United States $750 billion worth of energy." He said the E.U. would also invest $600 billion into the United States. It was not immediately clear what form that investment would take or over what time period it would be deployed. Trump added that E.U. nations will also be purchasing "a vast amount of military equipment," though a definitive purchase amount was not yet set. The European Commission has been bulking up its military supplies but has been focused on buying primarily from European companies so far. Trump said this arrangement would lead to the "opening up of all of the European countries, which I think I could say were essentially closed." However, the E.U. buys hundreds of billions of dollars in U.S. goods each year. In 2024, that value was nearly $400 billion. The agreement appears to closely mirror the trade agreement announced with Japan on Tuesday, under which Japanese imports will face a 15% import duty, which was also lower than Trump earlier threatened. In a press briefing after the meeting with Trump, von der Leyen said that the 15% tariff would not stack on top of any other tariffs already in place. She said the U.S. and E.U. have both agreed to apply zero tariffs to a number of categories of imports: all aircraft and component parts, certain chemicals, generic pharmaceuticals, semiconductor equipment and some agricultural products. 'We will replace Russian gas and oil by significant purchases of U.S. [liquified natural gas], oil, and nuclear fuels,' she said. Von der Leyen said she estimates the union will buy $250 billion worth of the energy products per year over the course of a three-year period. 'Fifteen percent is not to be underestimated but it is the best we could get,' she added of the still high rate of duties that exports from the 27 European countries will face. 'Fifteen percent is certainly a challenge for some, but we should not forget it keeps access to the American market.' She described the meeting with Trump as 'very difficult because we started far apart from each other.' In the end, she said it was 'good and satisfactory.' But last year, the average U.S. tariff on imports from the European Union was just 1.2%, according to Capital Economics' chief Europe economist. Ireland's prime minister said in a post on X that he welcomed the deal but "it does mean that there will now be higher tariffs than there have been and this will have an impact on trade between the EU and US, making it more expensive and more challenging." Germany's prime minister responded by saying, "A trade conflict has been averted that would have hit the export-oriented German economy hard. This is especially true for the automotive industry, where the current tariffs will be almost halved from 27.5% to 15%. This is precisely where the rapid reduction of tariffs is of utmost importance." The European Union has been in active negotiations with Lutnick and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer for weeks and had believed it was extremely close to a deal before Trump suddenly fired off a letter on Truth Social saying he would hike tariffs to 30%. The E.U.'s top trade negotiator made multiple trips across the Atlantic to meet with his U.S. counterparts and was set to speak by phone with Lutnick again Wednesday, according to a spokesperson for the E.U. 'Imposing 30% tariffs on E.U. exports would disrupt essential transatlantic supply chains, to the detriment of businesses, consumers and patients on both sides of the Atlantic,' von der Leyen said after Trump's July letter. Immediately after the letter, the E.U. said it would continue working toward an agreement of some type by the new deadline of Aug. 1. But the bloc continued to simultaneously prepare an extensive list of U.S. products against which it could apply retaliatory tariffs if an agreement weren't reached amid fears that Trump could end talks. Some of those products included Boeing aircraft, U.S. vehicles and imports from politically sensitive states such as bourbon from Kentucky and soybeans from Louisiana. At the time of the announcement, the E.U. had about $100 billion worth of retaliatory tariffs ready to deploy. Agricultural and business groups had warned that 30% tariffs on the European Union could dramatically impact the price and availability of wines, cheeses and pasta, and called the proposed levy 'incomprehensible.' Cars and other vehicles produced in the E.U. could still face increased prices. 'The costs for our companies have already reached the billions — and with each passing day, the total continues to grow,' the German auto trade group VDA told NBC News in a statement on July 14. The 27 countries of the European Union are the United States' largest trading partner — its $605 billion worth of imports into the U.S. surpass Mexico, Canada and even China. The most valuable category of imports in 2024 was drugs and pharmaceuticals primarily from Ireland, followed by autos, aircraft and other heavy machinery from nations such as France and Germany. Trump has separately threatened to impose a 200% tariff on any drugs imported into the U.S., though it would not be applied for at least 18 months. It was unclear if the deal with the E.U. would prevent that. This article was originally published on
