logo
Tariffs have "a profound effect" on new car prices — but may boost value of your used car

Tariffs have "a profound effect" on new car prices — but may boost value of your used car

Yahoo22-03-2025
On April 2, a month-long reprieve that U.S. automakers were given from a 25% tariff on Canadian and Mexican imports is set to expire.
That means car prices are expected to rise dramatically, given that they'll also be impacted by President Trump's 25% tariff on steel and aluminum, which went into effect last week.
The steel and aluminum tariffs alone are 'going to have a profound effect on the prices of vehicles,' Joe Giranda, director of sales and marketing for CFR Classic, told Salon. Combined with the tariff on Mexico and Canada — countries that provide supplies for U.S. automakers — he said he expects prices to rise by as much as $4,000 to $10,000 per vehicle.
So, what does this uplifting economic news mean for you? That depends.
If you were already planning on buying a car, experts agree: Buy it before Trump's tariffs take effect.
'If buying a new car was in your plans for the first half of the year, and you've been saving for a down payment and have worked the car into your budget, then you should do some car shopping,' Melanie Musson, an auto industry expert with AutoInsurance.org, told Salon.
Used car prices tend to increase alongside new car prices, Musson said. Experts also encourage consumers to make mechanical repairs to their cars before the tariffs take effect, too, since tariffs will likely raise the price of auto parts.
Shoppers who already have a vehicle they can sell or trade in may find themselves in a better situation, Musson said. 'If new cars are more expensive, your used car will likely be worth more, which will help offset the cost of a new car,' she told Salon.
But for anybody who wasn't planning on buying a new car, the advice from experts is clear: Don't make financial decisions from a place of fear.
'There's no need to put yourself in a position where you could be financially strapped just because you're afraid that car prices could increase,' Musson said. 'No one knows for sure what will happen, and this is not a time to panic.'
Nearly 92% of American households have at least one car, according to Forbes Advisor; a fifth of U.S. households have three. Much of this is because America is built for car ownership: Urban walkable areas account for just 1.2% of the nation's land mass, and the average American now lives 27 miles away from their job — a figure that may be distorted by remote workers living further away from their workplaces than regular commuters.
For most American workers, it's not a practical option to live without a car if you can afford one. Unless you're living in a handful of mostly expensive, East Coast cities with robust public transit, you're often left to rely on an underfunded, unreliable and disparately connected patchwork of a transit system, one that might turn a 15-minute commute into one that takes an hour or more. 'North America really is unique in the world in the lack of good public transit,' the author Jake Berman told The Guardian.
So if you can afford to own a car, it makes sense that the attitudes around car ownership in the U.S. dictate that you should own a car (and, to please the ever-present Joneses, as nice a car as possible).
We don't have an inherent need for cars, though, anymore than we have an inherent need for airplanes. Cars give us access to the thing we need: transportation to and from the places we frequent, as well as the places we want — or need — to get to quickly. Our vehicles, like all of our most expensive purchases, should enhance our lives, or at least add more to our lives than the financial stress removes. And while the benefits of car ownership are often enormous, the downsides — maintenance costs, filling and refilling the tank, the perpetual risk of emergency repairs — can be significant, and likely to intensify in the coming months.
Depending on what type of city or town you're in, the question 'Could you live without a car?' might feel impossible under any circumstances (for most Americans, it's probably the latter). But if it feels possible — if, say, you live in an urban area, have a regular routine that'd be bikeable, own multiple cars in your family or are simply considering a lifestyle shift away from certain polluters — it's worth crunching the numbers on at least one alternative to permanent car ownership: day-to-day car rentals.
The gig economy's answer to Hertz and Enterprise is a slew of apps that allow individuals to rent out their cars in the way Airbnb allows folks to rent out their houses. The mobile app Turo is perhaps the most popular option (or at least the one I encounter the most). Day rates for most car rental companies tend to range from $50 to $100, while Turo charges around $49 per day to rent a car in Los Angeles. So, for the purposes of this exercise, let's say it costs $80 per day to rent a car, adding a little cushion for gas and unforeseen costs.
If you own a car, you're paying for a few things: gas, monthly insurance and potentially a car payment. The average American driver spends around $200 a month on gas and around $220 for full-coverage car insurance. That's $420 a month right there. New car owners with a monthly car note pay an average of $742, per month, while used cars owners have an average monthly payment of $525, according to Experian data.
So, let's average out that monthly car note to $600. Combined with gas and insurance, it costs American car owners around $1,000 a month for the gift of said ownership. And at $80 per day, a consumer could afford to rent a car for 12 days a month and still save $40.
Of course, that's a crude analysis. And it also feels worth mentioning that my last car payment, for a 2019 Kia Optima, was around $425 a month — well below the figure we used here. Still, at the very least, perhaps this exercise is a nudge to consider what ideas might be calcified in your consumer psyche as hard and fast truths about our spending lives — what you need to have, how you need to live — that may not be serving you, your wallet or your overall well-being.
I'll also confess that I write this all as a car owner living in Brooklyn, New York, where it's more of a headache to own a car than to go without (we traded in the Optima for an old SUV). We've lived here for around two years with this car, and I tell myself that when our two senior pups decide to 'move to Santorini,' we'll sell it.
But then I think about how frequently I use it to drive to estate sales and was able to haul home a vintage chair for pennies on the dollar, or pop into Manhattan to pick up a designer bookcase some rich, disassociated banker is selling for $20. Never mind the parking tickets I get each month, or the speeding tickets I can't seem to escape as a driver raised on Houston's infamous Interstate 45, or the fact that walks and subway rides leave me feeling far more connected to humanity than a trip in my cramped metal box.
Suffice it to say, some engrained consumer habits can fester for years if left unaddressed — long beyond the point that they're serving you.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China, US to extend tariff pause at Sweden talks by another 90 days, SCMP reports
China, US to extend tariff pause at Sweden talks by another 90 days, SCMP reports

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

China, US to extend tariff pause at Sweden talks by another 90 days, SCMP reports

(Reuters) -Beijing and Washington are expected to extend their tariff truce by another three months at trade talks in Stockholm beginning on Monday, the South China Morning Post (SCMP) reported on Sunday, citing people familiar with the matter. During the expected 90-day extension, the U.S. and China will agree not to introduce new tariffs or take other actions that could further escalate the trade war, the report said. While the earlier discussions in Geneva and London focused on "de-escalation", the latest meeting the Chinese delegation will also press Trump's trade team on fentanyl-related tariffs, the report further said, citing three sources familiar with the matter. Reuters could not immediately verify the report. The White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The third round of U.S.-China talks is set to be held in Stockholm on Monday to tackle longstanding economic disputes at the centre of the countries' trade war. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Why tariffs may not be a big deal after all
Why tariffs may not be a big deal after all

Miami Herald

time27 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Why tariffs may not be a big deal after all

Key Points: Tariffs initially caused market anxiety and a 19% S&P 500 decline from February to April.A feared spike in inflation from tariffs hasn't materialized yet. Companies have largely managed tariffs by negotiating lower prices, absorbing costs, or modest price increases, keeping overall inflation mostly in have rebounded as the tariff impact proved less severe than expected. Better-than-forecast outcomes and ongoing trade deals have lifted the S&P 500 to an all-time estimated tariff duties are not being collected because of enforcement complexity. This, along with over 50% of imports not being subject to tariffs, has lessened the drag on the economy. It wasn't that long ago that President Donald's Trump's tariff strategy kicked up a hornet's next of debate. Those favoring tariffs, which are taxes on imports, argue that they are the best way to kick-start U.S. manufacturing. Opponents believe tariffs are inflationary, sparking higher prices that can derail the U.S. economy, risking recession. The truth may wind up landing somewhere in the middle. Tariffs can slow an economy, particularly if they increase quickly and significantly, like what President Trump originally proposed this spring. However, billionaire fund manager Ken Fisher, founder of Fisher Investments, points out that in the U.S., tariffs' impact may be more muted than expected. Image source:Legendary fund manager Paul Tudor Jones equated the originally proposed tariffs as the biggest new tax since the 1960s. In February, President Trump enacted 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico. He also implemented a 25% tariff on autos, a 10% tariff on all imports, and after much wrangling, a 30% tariff on China. Related: Billionaire fund manager explains why so many missed the stock market rally The end result of those tariffs is that the average effective tariff rate currently is 20.2%, the highest since 1911, according to the Yale Budget Lab. JPMorgan Chase calculates the effective tariff rate was 2.3% in 2024, and is about 17% currently. Either way, a big bump in import taxes led many to worry that U.S. companies would be forced to pass along higher-than-normal price increases, causing inflation to spike and household and business spending to fall. That concern contributed heavily to the S&P 500's 19% tumble from all-time highs in February to the low in April. While risk remains that companies will see revenue growth and earnings slow because of the impact of tariffs, so far, inflation remains manageable. The Consumer Price Index for June showed headline inflation of 2.7%, up from 2.4% in May, but below the 3% inflation rate registered in January. It appears as of now that companies are successfully navigating the tariff hit, mostly through a combination of negotiating lower prices with exporters, absorbing some of the costs, and more modest price increases. More Tariffs: Luxury carmakers have a more aggressive tariff battle planTop 6 cars, SUVs, & trucks that may avoid tariffs, Consumer Reports saysAmazon's quiet pricing twist on tariffs stuns shoppersLevi's shares plan to beat tariffs, keep holiday prices down Of course, some industries - such as autos, appliances, apparel, and furniture - are hit harder by tariffs. Still, overall, inflation has yet to reach levels suggesting a major retrenchment in spending that could further weaken the economy. The better-than-hoped outcome, coupled with optimism that ongoing trade deals, such as the one recently reached with Japan, which lowered tariffs to 15% from 25%, would result in lower tariffs than initially feared, has helped the stock market recover all of its losses since February. The S&P 500 closed on July 26 at an all-time high. Ken Fisher founded Fisher Investments, a money manager with $332 billion in assets under management, in 1979. Over his 45-plus year career, Fisher has seen a lot of good and bad economies and markets. Related: Another automaker is forced to shift strategy due to tariffs He's not a fan of tariffs, saying previously that they historically hurt the country imposing them more than the country they've been imposed upon. Still, he also points out that the widespread threat associated with a tariff-driven economic recession may not be as big as some make it out to be. "Tariff terror abounds, but 'tariffied' investors miss what markets don't," wrote Fisher on X. "While universal tariffs are foolish and a real economic negative, their real world bite is often muted." Fisher had previously forecast that enforcing tariffs would be incredibly difficult, and that we'd see significant difficulty in collecting them. He also opined that high tariffs would likely cause the black-market import business to soar. He appears to be right. "Through June, roughly 39% of estimated tariffs duties were actually collected - far less than many feared - owing to tariff enforcement's complexity," said Fisher. "Markets move on the gap between reality and expectations, and it's always bullish when reality settles in better than overly dour expectations." Fisher also pointed out that over 50% of imports aren't subject to tariffs. This isn't to say that the U.S. economy would be better off without tariffs in terms of growth, but only that the drag on the economy may not be as bad as originally feared. According to Yale Budget Lab, current tariffs are reducing U.S. GDP this year by about 0.8%. In short, the stock market priced in a worst-case outcome from tariffs, providing plenty of room for positive surprises. Anything less than terrible can be viewed as a win that may lift analysts expectations for revenue and profit growth - the lifeblood of stock market returns. Related: Legendary fund manager has blunt message on 'Big Beautiful Bill' The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store