logo
Texas special session 2025: Flood relief, THC regulation, property taxes and GOP-led redistricting push

Texas special session 2025: Flood relief, THC regulation, property taxes and GOP-led redistricting push

CBS News2 days ago
The 30-day special session of the Texas Legislature is set to begin Monday, July 21. The agenda includes 18 legislative priorities determined by Gov. Greg Abbott.
Several of the priorities listed address the recent devastating floods in Central Texas. Also on the list is regulating hemp-derived THC, property tax relief and a highly controversial proposal to redraw Texas's Congressional map in the middle of the decade.
Following Abbott's announcement of the agenda, the Texas Democratic Party released a statement criticizing him for including flood relief in the upcoming special session agenda, arguing he already has the emergency authority to provide aid without legislative approval.
"This session will be costly to Texas taxpayers and appears to serve Republican special interests rather than Texans," the statement said. "Texas leadership should be laser-focused on flood relief and prevention. Any attempts to pull attention away from these relief efforts are a gross injustice to all of the Texans affected by this natural disaster."
Eye on Politics reporter Jack Fink spoke with Jasper Scherer, politics editor at the Texas Tribune, and Brad Johnson, senior reporter at The Texan ahead of the packed session.
"It's pretty bold," Johnson said. "I'm not sure how they're going to get all this done in the span of 30 days ... this is quite a slate even for a regular session."
Scherer agreed that the session seems heavy with "lots of lots of kind of long time conservative wish list items that the governor's thrown on."
"It's going to be fascinating to see if they can get any of it done," he said.
Abbott placed four items on the agenda related to flood and disaster response efforts including flood warning systems, flood emergency communications, relief funding for Hill Country flood and natural disaster preparation and recovery.
More than 100 people are dead and dozens remain missing after catastrophic flash floods swept through Central Texas over the July 4 weekend, making it the second-deadliest flood disaster in Texas history. The Guadalupe River surged more than 26 feet in just 45 minutes, overwhelming communities in Kerr County and beyond.
Kerr County, the epicenter of the devastation, did not have warning systems along the Guadalupe River due to local concerns about cost.
In separate interviews for Eye On Politics, Republican state Sen. Paul Bettencourt of Houston and Democratic state Rep. Joe Moody of El Paso said they agree with comments made by Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick in the wake of the flooding that the state can foot the bill for flood warning systems.
Another item on the agenda is the regulation of hemp-derived THC products.
The legislature passed a measure known as SB 3 during the regular session, heavily pushed by Patrick, that would have banned nearly all THC products. Opponents argued that the bill would kill a booming industry in Texas and cost tens of thousands of jobs, and take away access to products used by veterans and others as alternatives to opioids for pain relief.
Abbott sided with the opponents, vetoing SB3 and instead calling for legislation that would regulate the products and prohibit their sale to people under 21.
Democratic state Rep. Mihaela Plesa of Dallas told Jack in a one-on-one interview Texas should look to neighboring states as a model.
"We need to make sure that veterans have access to the medicines they need, and people who are chronically ill have that freedom." Plesa said. "Oklahoma has a medical cannabis program that also has something like regulations of THC and low-dose hemp and the delta-8s and delta-9s. Louisiana has a program as well, and so does New Mexico. So I think that we can just look at our neighbors' needs to see what they're doing, what works for them, and how they're protecting their consumers."
In asking state lawmakers to redraw the state's congressional districts, Abbott cited a letter he and Attorney General Ken Paxton received from the U.S. Department of Justice on July 7.
The letter claimed that four House districts with majorities of people of color, and all held by Democrats, were racial gerrymanders in violation of the U.S. Constitution. Critics and redistricting experts have raised doubts about that argument; In an ongoing federal lawsuit against the existing congressional map, the state has argued race was not a factor in drawing district boundaries.
Last month, the New York Times reported that President Trump wanted Abbott to call a special session so lawmakers could create additional Republican districts to help the GOP retain its narrow majority House of Representatives. The president's party almost always loses seats in Congress in the midterms; Democrats gained 41 House seats and the majority in 2018, Mr. Trump's first term, and Republicans picked up 9 seats to claim the majority in 2022, during President Biden's term.
Most lawmakers contacted by CBS News Texas either declined to comment on the New York Times report or said they did not know anything other than what was reported.
Mr. Trump himself said recently that he wants a "simple redrawing" of Texas' congressional map where Republicans pick up five seats.
Republican state Rep. Brian Harrison of Ellis County filed 10 bills concerning property tax relief, including proposing a constitutional amendment to abolish ad valorem taxes altogether. In a previous interview for Eye On Politics, Harrison said he believes that property taxes didn't go far enough in the regular session.
"We did absolutely nothing meaningful on property taxes," Harrison said. "Ask any property taxpayer in the state of Texas if they believe the legislature succeeded this session, I can tell you what the answer is going to be no."
"If they gave us one job this session, it was to cut their property taxes immediately and put our state on a path to full elimination. And quite frankly, I offered budget amendments over 30 of them on our budget, and I identified $90 billion that we could cut out of our budget and we could have cut people's property taxes in half, or about 40% almost immediately," he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tucker Carlson Spits Out 2-Word Response To Trump's Claim That He Called The President To Apologize
Tucker Carlson Spits Out 2-Word Response To Trump's Claim That He Called The President To Apologize

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Tucker Carlson Spits Out 2-Word Response To Trump's Claim That He Called The President To Apologize

Tucker Carlson is disputing Donald Trump's claim that he apologized for accusing the president of being 'complicit' in Israel's military attacks on Iran last month. Just days after the former Fox News host made the comments in a June 13 newsletter posted on his website, the POTUS alleged to reporters in the Oval Office that the conservative pundit reached out to him to bury the hatchet. 'He called and apologized the other day because he thought he had said things that were a little bit too strong, and I appreciate that,' Trump said on June 18. Trump also referred to Carlson as 'kooky' in a pointed June 16 post on his social platform Truth Social. 'Somebody please explain to kooky Tucker Carlson that, 'IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON!'' he wrote. In a new interview with German newspaper Bild, Carlson denied that the call ever took place. After the outlet's editor-in-chief, Paul Ronzheimer, asked Carlson if Trump's claims about the phone call were true, he replied, 'Okay... no.' 'No? It's not true?' Ronzheimer questioned again. 'No, I will say this … I don't care. I really like Trump. I campaigned for Trump. I just, to say it again, I agree with Trump, I have agreed with Trump on the issues,' Carlson said in the interview released Sunday. The political commentator went on to say that despite Trump's statement about the call not being factual, he would be 'happy to apologize' to the president. 'I'd be happy … I am the first to apologize because I am most mindful of my limits, and my own absurdities and the nonsense that I have spouted over the years,' Carlson said. 'Like, I don't think I'm God, and so I'm happy to apologize. And you can ask anyone who knows me, I'm an apologizer.' Ronzheimer then doubled down, asking Carlson, 'So you're apologizing now, publicly? Do I understand right?' Carlson responded: 'I don't know what I'd apologize for. I didn't attack Trump then. I disagreed with him … I don't think anything [was said] that would warrant an apology.' White House officials didn't immediately respond to HuffPost's requests for comment. The day after Carlson's newsletter published, Trump denied the U.S. had any involvement in Israel's attack on Iran in a June 13 post on Truth Social. 'The U.S. had nothing to do with the attack on Iran, tonight,' Trump wrote. 'If we are attacked in any way, shape or form by Iran, the full strength and might of the U.S. Armed Forces will come down on you at levels never seen before.' On June 21, U.S. forces struck three Iranian nuclear sites in a 'very successful attack,' Trump said in a televised Oval Office address. He added that Tehran's nuclear program had been wiped out. Watch Carlson's interview below. Related... Tucker Carlson Says These Companies Are Creating 'Race Hate' — And It's Not What You'd Expect Tucker Carlson Just Made A Shocking Claim About Fox News Tucker Carlson Unleashes Bizarre Theories On Why Pam Bondi Is Hiding Epstein List

Washington D.C. mayor doesn't expect President Trump to block Commanders stadium deal after calling for name change
Washington D.C. mayor doesn't expect President Trump to block Commanders stadium deal after calling for name change

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Washington D.C. mayor doesn't expect President Trump to block Commanders stadium deal after calling for name change

Even after President Donald Trump weighed in with multiple social media posts on Sunday threatening to block the deal, Washington D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser isn't worried about the Commanders' return to the city. Bowser, speaking Monday after Trump called for the Commanders to revert back to their old nickname that was widely seen as offensive, doesn't expect they'll have to worry about Trump or Congress intervening in the Commanders' new stadium deal. While the D.C. Council still needs to approve the deal officially, that could be done in a matter of weeks. 'I don't think that's an eventuality we have to plan for,' Bowser told ESPN of Trump blocking the deal. 'What we have to do as a city is do our part. And so our part is we've come up with a great deal, we have a great plan, we've done the community outreach, now is the time for the council to approve it.' Trump made multiple posts Sunday calling on both the Commanders and the Cleveland Guardians to revert back to their old team nicknames. The Commanders rebranded from the 'Washington Redskins' in 2020, and the Guardians retired their old 'Indians' moniker and the 'Chief Wahoo' logo ahead of the 2022 season. Both team names and the old Cleveland logo drew plenty of criticism in the years leading up to the change. The Commanders have not yet addressed Trump's posts, though new team owner Josh Harris has been clear that the team won't be going back to their old name. The Guardians shut the idea down on Sunday. Though he didn't get into specifics, Trump threatened to block the Commanders' new stadium deal if they didn't change their name. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt insisted Monday that Trump's threat was real, though it's unclear what he could realistically do on that front. The Commanders announced plans earlier this year for a $3.7 billion deal to build a stadium on the old Robert F. Kennedy Memorial Stadium site in Washington. The team is set to contribute $2.7 billion of that deal, and is looking for the rest to come from the city, along with retail shops, housing and more on the property. The goal is to open for the 2030 season. "Let me be clear, we're on the 1-yard line and it's time to get over the line," Bowser said, via ESPN. "I can't even imagine having to start all over on this. There's nobody waiting in the wings with $2.7 billion. And so this stadium is a catalyst and it will attract other investments. Any impediment to it getting done should be discouraged. 'When you're on the 1-yard line, you want to carry it over, right? That's all you want. No fumbles, no interceptions, let's just get it over the line. And that's what we're focused on." As for the stadium deal itself, Bowser insists that she thinks Trump knows it is a good one for everyone involved. 'This is what I believe,' she said. "I've had the opportunity to speak on a couple of different occasions with the President about this site and about our team. And I can say this without equivocation, he is a Jayden Daniels fan and he said himself and the presser we were at, that this is probably the best site of any site he's seen for a stadium. I have to think that that's what I've heard him say and that's what we'll stick with."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store