State Rep. Steven Xiarhos rear-ended in Braintree crash. No injuries reported.
State Rep. Steven Xiarhos, R-West Barnstable, was involved in a hit-and-run on Route 3 north near Exit 40 in Braintree on June 18, according to the state police.
Xiarhos was not seriously injured, although his car had significant damage, according to his statement posted on Facebook.
Around 10 a.m., a 31-year-old man from Quincy driving a black Infinity G37 crashed into the rear of Xiarhos' car, according to statements from police and the office for Xiarhos. The driver then left the scene.
State police were able to locate the car, with damages consistent to the crash, later that day on Willard Street in Quincy, according to the state police. The driver was allegedly showing signs of impairment and was arrested by state police. The man faces charges of leaving the scene of property damage, driving under the influence (drugs), negligent operation and driving with a suspended license.
State police took the man to the state police barracks for booking.
Desiree Nikfardjam is a reporter covering breaking and trending news. She graduated from Columbia University's Graduate School of Journalism. You can reach her at DNikfardjam@gannett.com.
Thanks to our subscribers, who help make this coverage possible. If you are not a subscriber, please consider supporting quality local journalism with a Cape Cod Times subscription. Here are our subscription plans.
This article originally appeared on Cape Cod Times: State Rep. Xiarhos not injured following hit-and-run in Braintree
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
2 days ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
How Zohran Mamdani's win in the New York City mayoral primary could ripple across the country
(The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.) Lincoln Mitchell, Columbia University (THE CONVERSATION) Top Republicans and Democrats alike are talking about the sudden rise of 33-year-old Zohran Mamdani, a state representative who won the Democratic mayoral primary in New York on June 24, 2025, in a surprising victory over more established politicians. While President Donald Trump quickly came out swinging with personal attacks against Mamdani, some establishment Democratic politicians say they are concerned about how the democratic socialist's progressive politics could harm the broader Democratic Party and cause it to lose more centrist voters. New York is a unique American city, with a diverse population and historically liberal politics. So, does a primary mayoral election in New York serve as any kind of harbinger of what could come in the rest of the country? Amy Lieberman, a politics and society editor at The Conversation U.S., spoke with Lincoln Mitchell, a political strategy and campaign specialist who lectures at Columbia University, to understand what Mamdani's primary win might indicate about the direction of national politics. Does Mamdani's primary win offer any indication of how the Democratic Party might be transforming on a national level? Mamdani's win is clearly a rebuke of the more corporate wing of the Democratic Party. I know there are people who say that New York is different from the rest of the country. But from a political perspective, Democrats in New York are less different from Democrats in the rest of country than they used to be. That's because the rest of America is so much more diverse than it used to be. But if you look at progressive politicians now in the House of Representatives and state legislatures, they are being elected from all over – not just in big cities like New York anymore. Andrew Cuomo, the former governor of New York, ran an absolutely terrible mayoral campaign. He tried to build a political coalition that is no longer a winning one, which was made up of majorities of African Americans, outer-borough white New Yorkers and orthodox and conservative Jews. Thirty or 40 years ago, that was a powerful coalition. Today, it could not make up a majority. Mamdani visualized and created what a 2025 progressive coalition looks like in New York and recognized that it is going to look different than the past. Mamdani's coalition was based around young, white people – many of them with college degrees who are worried about affordability – ideological lefties and immigrants from parts of the Global South, including the Caribbean and parts of Africa, South Asia and South America. When you say a new kind of political coalition, what policy priorities bring Mamdani's supporters together? Mamdani reframed what I would call redistributive economic policies that have long been central to the progressive agenda. A pillar of his campaign is affordability – a brilliant piece of political marketing because who is against affordability? He came up with some affordability-related policies that got enough buzz, like promising free buses. Free buses are great, but it won't help most working and poor New Yorkers get to work – they take the subway. He has been very critical of Israel and has weathered charges of antisemitism. In the older New York, progressive politicians such as the late Congressman Charlie Rangel were very hawkish on Israel. What Mamdani understood is that in today's America, the progressive wing of the Democratic Party does not care if somebody is, sounds like or comes close to being antisemitic. For those people, calling someone antisemitic sounds Trumpy, and they understand it as a right-wing hit, rather than the legitimate expression of concerns from Jewish people. Some liberals think that claims of antisemitism are simply something done just by those on the right to damage or discredit progressive politicians, but antisemitism is real. Therefore, Mamdani's record on the Jewish issue did not hurt him in the campaign, but he needs to build bridges to Jewish voters, or he will not be able to govern New York City. How else did Mamdani appeal to a base of supporters? He got the support of 'limousine liberals' – including rich, high-profile, progressive people. His supporters include Ella Emhoff, a model and the stepdaughter of Kamala Harris, and the actress Cynthia Nixon, but there were many others. Supporting Mamdani became stylish – almost de rigueur – among certain segments of affluent New York. Mamdani is also a true New Yorker and the voice of a new kind of immigrant. His parents are from Uganda and India. But he is also the child of extreme privilege – his mother, Mira Nair, is a well-known filmmaker, and his father is an accomplished professor. Mamdani went to top schools in New York and knows how to play in elite circles and with white people. He is a Muslim man whose roots are in the Global South, but he is not threatening because he knows how to speak their language. To people of color and immigrants, Mamdani is also one of them. Because of Mamdani's interesting background, he brought the limousine liberals together with the aunties from Bangladesh. Finally, on the charisma scale, Mamdani was so far ahead of other Democratic candidates. Who is going to make better TikTok videos – the good-looking, young man whose mother is a world-famous movie producer, or the older guy who is a loving father and husband but gives off dependable dad, rather than hip young guy, vibes? Is New York City so distinct that you cannot compare politics there to what happens nationwide? I think that nationwide or at the state level there is a potential for something similar to a Mamdani coalition, but not a Mamdani coalition exactly. But in a place like Oklahoma, there are people who are in bad economic shape and who will also respond positively to an affordability-focused, Democratic political campaign. Mamdani remade a progressive New York coalition for this moment. Other progressives politicians should copy the spirit of that and reimagine a winning coalition in their city, state or district. When Trump was campaigning, he focused at least on making groceries cheaper. Mamdani is one of the few Democrats who took the affordability issue back from Trump and addressed it head on and in a much more honest and relevant way. Trump has the phrase, 'Make America Great Again!' That's a popular slogan on baseball caps for Trump supporters. If Mamdani wanted to make a baseball cap, he could just print 'Affordability' on it. Boom. Other Democratic politicians can take that approach of affordability and reframe it in a way that works in Kansas City or elsewhere.
USA Today
2 days ago
- USA Today
Mahmoud Khalil's case, his free speech rights and the legal battle ahead: What to know
Though Mahmoud Khalil was released from federal custody on June 20, his legal counsel says the fight with President Donald Trump's administration is far from over and continues to raise key free speech issues. The administration said it intended to appeal New Jersey U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz' ruling to release Khalil from U.S. Customs and Immigration Enforcement custody. He was being held at a Louisiana detainment facility for more than three months following his March 8 detention. Farbiarz said on June 20 that there was no evidence that Khalil, a Columbia University graduate, would be a flight risk or danger to the community if he was released. The administration has cited a provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 in its effort to deport Khalil, a lawful permanent resident who was born in Syria. The clause allows the secretary of state to remove individuals from the country if they have reason to believe the person's actions or presence undermines foreign policy interests. Earlier in June, Farbiarz said the application of the provision to Khalil's case violated his First Amendment right to free speech. Trump has referred to Khalil as a 'radical, foreign, pro-Hamas student.' Khalil's lawyers have said there is no evidence he supports the organization, which the federal government has long designated as a terror group. David Keating, president of the Institute for Free Speech, said he doesn't think international students or visa holders should 'take any comfort from (Khalil's release) at all." While Khalil's case garnered publicity and resources for his defense, Keating said that may not be the case for others if the Trump administration targets student protesters at a larger scale. The administration's actions thus far stand to have a 'pretty stark' chilling effect on students, he said, adding that they may prompt some to reconsider their plans to study in the U.S. 'I think we're sending a really bad lesson about freedoms in America,' Keating said. 'We should be a beacon of freedom to the world, and I think one way to do that is to let even temporary visitors express their political views.' White House says Khalil's case is 'not about free speech' The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) similarly believes the 'fight for free speech is far from over,' according to FIRE attorney Conor Fitzpatrick. The organization filed an amicus brief in support of Khalil that said Secretary of State Marco Rubio having the authority to deport non-citizens based on his sole assessment 'places free expression in mortal peril.' Farbiarz ruled against granting Rubio such authority earlier in June, saying that the government's actions were chilling Khalil's right to free speech and negatively impacting his career and reputation, which "adds up to irreparable harm." White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson told USA TODAY that Khalil's case was 'not about 'free speech.'' 'This is about individuals who don't have a right to be in the United States siding with Hamas terrorists and organizing group protests that made college campuses unsafe and harassed Jewish students,' Jackson said, adding that the administration 'expect(s) to be vindicated on appeal' and 'look(s) forward to removing Khalil from the United States.' While Fitzpatrick said individuals who disagree with the administration's stance and actions toward Khalil can write to Congress or attend rallies to make their voices heard, the fate of student protesters like Khalil ultimately lies in judges' hands. 'Realistically, a lot of this is going to have to be resolved in the courts,' he said. 'There's only so much activism can do on that front.' ACLU lawyer says Khalil's case has 'McCarthyite overtones' The American Civil Liberties Union, which is part of Khalil's legal counsel, was 'overjoyed' by his release, but the organization said its celebration is tempered by the reality of the long legal road ahead. 'I'd say this is a victory in a critically important battle, but it's a long war and we intend to fight it all the way through,' ACLU attorney Brian Hauss told USA TODAY. Hauss noted that the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed noncitizens' right to First Amendment protections in 1945's Bridges v. Wixon decision. The case surrounded the government's attempt to deport a man based on his alleged affiliation with the Communist Party. There are 'similar McCarthyite overtones' in Khalil's case, Hauss said, referencing the senator who spearheaded the government's anticommunist crusade. While it's 'certainly possible' that a deportation case involving student protesters could end up at the Supreme Court, which has reversed long-standing rulings such as Roe v. Wade in recent years, Hauss said he's optimistic the court would rule in their favor given its rulings upholding the First Amendment in recent years. 'For the Supreme Court to step back from those freedoms would be truly surprising, and I hope I'm not surprised,' he said. Another high-profile case related to Khalil's surrounds Tufts University student Rumeysa Ozturk, who was arrested in Boston in March after writing a pro-Palestinian opinion article that criticized the school's response to the Israel-Gaza war in its student newspaper. A federal judge in Vermont ordered Ozturk to be released in May. Contributing: Hannan Adely and Michael Loria BrieAnna Frank is a First Amendment Reporting Fellow at USA TODAY. Reach her at bjfrank@ USA TODAY's coverage of First Amendment issues is funded through a collaboration between the Freedom Forum and Journalism Funding Partners. Funders do not provide editorial input.
3 days ago
NYC Mayor Eric Adams kicks off reelection bid and casts Mamdani as having a 'silver spoon'
NEW YORK -- New York Mayor Eric Adams set out Thursday to persuade skeptical voters to grant him a second term, hosting a kickoff event for his independent reelection bid after a corruption indictment, a controversial dismissal and a decision to drop out of a the Democratic primary. Standing on the steps of City Hall, Adams sought to draw a contrast between himself and the likely Democratic candidate, Zohran Mamdani, casting the young liberal as a child of privilege with no real political achievements or realistic policies. 'This election is a choice between a candidate with a blue collar and one with a silver spoon,' Adams said. 'A choice between dirty fingernails and manicured nails.' Two days ago, progressive upstart Mamdani declared a stunning Democratic primary victory over former Gov. Andrew Cuomo, the presumed favorite despite a sexual harassment scandal that forced him from office four years ago. Results will be finalized after the city's ranked choice vote-counting resumes July 1, and the winner advances to November's election against candidates including Republican Curtis Sliwa, the founder of the Guardian Angels anti-crime group. Adams, 64, is a retired police captain who later became a state senator and Brooklyn's borough president. He presents himself as a champion of working-class New York, public safety and an upbeat, self-believing attitude he calls 'swagger' — the kind of drive that propelled a house-cleaner's son to become the second Black mayor of the nation's most populous metropolis. Mamdani, 33, is the son of an award-winning filmmaker and an anthropology professor at Columbia University. He graduated from a private liberal arts college, worked as a foreclosure prevention counselor and had a side-hustle as a rapper before first being elected to the New York Assembly in 2020. Despite his short resume, the democratic socialist has picked up significant momentum with an energetic campaign centered on improving the cost of living. Adams, still a registered Democrat, pulled out of the primary to run as an independent candidate in April, shortly after a federal judge dismissed the corruption case against him. Adams, who had struggled to raise money, argued the legal saga had sidelined him from the campaign trail. He has done little in the way of campaigning since then. But as the results in Tuesday's primary were coming in, showing Mamdani with a commanding position, Adams underscored his own independent run with a post on social media that 'the fight for New York's future begins tonight.' Adams has seemed to relish a general election matchup with Mamdani, whose relative political inexperience and criticisms of law enforcement could afford Adams a viable reelection lane. Democratic nominees generally enjoy strong tailwinds in a city where about two-thirds of registered voters are Democrats. But New Yorkers elected an unaffiliated mayor as recently as 2009, when incumbent Mike Bloomberg won a third term after leaving the Republican Party. The big question for Adams: whether he can overcome his shaky standing with voters. He might woo moderate and business-focused Cuomo supporters uneasy about Mamdani. Though Cuomo himself is mulling an independent campaign that would put him on the general election ballot as well.
