
Naming country linked to UNC3886 attack not in Singapore's best interest at this point in time: Shanmugam
Speaking to reporters on the side of the Cyber Security Agency of Singapore's (CSA) Exercise Cyber Star, the national cybersecurity crisis management exercise, Mr Shanmugam said that when it comes to naming any country responsible for a cyber attack, 'we always think about it very carefully'.
Responding to a question from CNA on reports tying the group to China, Mr Shanmugam said: 'Media coverage (and) industry experts all attribute UNC3886 to some country … Government does not comment on this.
'We release information that we assess is in the public interest. Naming a specific country is not in our interest at this point in time.'
UNC3886 has been described by Google-owned cybersecurity firm Mandiant as a "China-nexus espionage group" that has targeted prominent strategic organisations on a global scale.
Mr Shanmugam had announced on Jul 18 that Singapore is actively dealing with a "highly sophisticated threat actor" that is attacking critical infrastructure, identifying the entity as UNC3886 without disclosing if it was a state-linked actor.
He said the threat actor poses a serious danger to Singapore and could undermine the country's national security, and added that it was not in Singapore's security interests to disclose further details of the attack then.
When asked the following day about UNC3886's alleged links to China and possible retaliation for naming them, Mr Shanmugam, who is also Home Affairs Minister, said this was "speculative".
"Who they are linked to and how they operate is not something I want to go into," he said.
Responding to media reports in a Jul 19 Facebook post, the Chinese embassy in Singapore expressed its "strong dissatisfaction" at the claims linking the country to UNC3886, stating that they were "groundless smears and accusations against China".
'In fact, China is a major victim of cyberattacks," it wrote.
"The embassy would like to reiterate that China is firmly against and cracks down (on) all forms of cyberattacks in accordance with law. China does not encourage, support or condone hacking activities."
On Friday, Mr Shanmugam also gave his reasons for disclosing the identity of threat actors like UNC3886.
'We look at the facts of each case (and) the degree of confidence we have before we can name. And when we decide to name the threat actor, we look at whether it is in Singapore's best interest,' said Mr Shanmugam, who is also the home affairs minister.
In this case, the threat, attack and compromise to Singapore's infrastructure was 'serious enough' and the government was confident enough to name UNC3886 as the perpetrators, he said.
'Here, we said this is serious. They have gotten in. They are compromising a very serious critical infrastructure. Singaporeans ought to know about it, and awareness has got to increase. And because of the seriousness, it is in the public interest for us to disclose,' said Mr Shanmugam.
ATTACKS HAVE HAPPENED ELSEWHERE
Mr Shanmugam was accompanied at Friday's exercise by Minister for Digital Development and Information Josephine Teo, who is also Minister-in-Charge of Cybersecurity.
Held at the Singapore Institute of Technology in Punggol, the exercise saw teams from critical sector organisations tackle cybersecurity challenges based on key threats, such as advanced persistent threats (APTs) and attacks on critical systems.
APTs are a type of prolonged cyberattack typically carried out by well-resourced threat actors.
'There're close to about 500 participants today. They come together, put a face to a name, exercise real life scenarios, things which have happened elsewhere,' said Mr Shanmugam, emphasising that such incidents are 'not theoretical'.
During the event, Mr Shanmugam was shown a demonstration of an attack on a port, where crane operations were paralysed and energy supply was cut off.
He was also briefed on the response plan for when the public transport system gets attacked, with millions of people commuting and the fare systems are targeted.
'You have to exercise, you have to bring people together. Government has got a high level of knowledge.'
The private sector, meanwhile, is focused on getting things done for their business, he added.
'Now, they need their knowledge and abilities to also increase. So we've got to work together,' said Mr Shanmugam.
Mrs Teo had announced earlier this week that owners of Singapore's critical information infrastructure will, from later this year, be required to report to CSA any incidents suspected to be caused by APTs.
Mr David Koh, chief executive of CSA, said: 'With cyberattacks increasing in frequency and sophistication, it is important for the government to work closely with Singapore's critical sectors and companies to enhance crisis response capabilities and ensure the continual delivery of essential services.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Independent Singapore
3 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
Maid says, 'My employer attached a tracking device on me to track my whereabouts during my day off'
SINGAPORE: In a now 'self-destructed' post from the Direct Hire Transfer Singapore Maid / Domestic Helper Facebook group, one foreign domestic worker spilled the beans about how her employer doesn't just monitor her work — they apparently monitor her entire existence, even on her day off. 'Every day off, my employer keeps tracking me through my spare key. It got a tracking device connected to her phone,' the maid revealed. Looks like her employer has gone full-blown 'Mission: Impossible' instead of the usual suspicious texts or clingy check-in calls. The spare house key — something meant for emergencies — allegedly came with an attached tracking device that's synced to the employer's phone. The maid didn't say if it beeps when she gets near bubble tea shops or if it vibrates every time she steps into a shopping mall, but the implication was clear: freedom of movement is monitored, and personal time isn't entirely… personal. And it doesn't end there. 'Sometimes when I do marketing, she sets me 1 hour for my market time…' So on top of tracking the maid's whereabouts during her day off, she's also reportedly on a literal kitchen timer when sent out for groceries. Go over the 60-minute mark, and she gets a call from her employer to investigate what her helper is up to. This digital leash is enough to raise eyebrows (and hackles). In recent years, debates over the rights and treatment of domestic workers have only intensified, especially with stories like this shining a light on questionable employer behaviour. While many Singaporean households treat their helpers like extended family, stories like this one remind us that others are, well… treating them like state secrets. Breach of personal privacy While the use of tracking devices on pets and children has grown in popularity (GPS collars and smartwatches), placing one on a domestic helper — especially without consent — enters murky ethical waters. Some would argue it's a breach of personal privacy. Singapore's Ministry of Manpower (MOM) doesn't specifically address GPS tracking of helpers in its employment guidelines, but it does encourage employers to respect their helpers' dignity and rest days. Constant surveillance and rigid time limits probably aren't what MOM had in mind when they promoted open communication and mutual respect in employer-helper relationships. Spy tech can backfire! It's no secret that some employers worry about what their helpers do on their day off — whether it's concerns about safety, social circles, or even moonlighting, but placing a tracker on a human being — without full transparency — is likely to backfire. Many in the group suggested that if safety was genuinely a concern, there were better ways to address it: open conversation, mutual agreements, shared location apps — used with consent. However, in this case, it seems the employer skipped the chat and went straight for spy tech. Group members collectively state that: 'This kind of behaviour gives good employers a bad name. Most helpers already live where they work. They deserve trust and autonomy, especially on their day off. Tracking them like this is just not okay.' Humanity must come first It's unclear why the post was deleted. Perhaps the maid feared retaliation from group members or even from her spying employer. Maybe someone advised her to take it down to avoid conflict, or perhaps the tracker started buzzing suspiciously as she typed. Whatever the reason, the conversation it sparked isn't going away anytime soon. Because at the heart of it is a bigger question: How far is too far when it comes to managing domestic helpers? Singapore prides itself on efficiency and order, but even in the most efficient systems, humanity must come first. After all, trust can't be installed with a tracking chip. In other news, another Maid asks, 'Dear employer, how do you just lie on the sofa every day holding your mobile phone? Do you realize that servants are also human and feel tired?' Let's just hope this maid's employer isn't tracking her helper, too.


CNA
3 hours ago
- CNA
Ong Beng Seng admits to abetting obstruction of justice
Property tycoon Ong Beng Seng has been convicted of abetting former transport minister S Iswaran in obstructing the course of justice. He pleaded guilty, nearly a year after being charged in relation to the corruption case involving Iswaran. Ong's defence has requested a fine, citing his ill health. The prosecution is not objecting. Jeraldine Yap has the details.


CNA
3 hours ago
- CNA
Singapore reviews economic strategy, 5 committees to publish recommendations by mid-2026
Singapore is reviewing its economic strategy, amid upheaval in global trade driven by US tariffs. Five committees have been set up to focus on key areas like attracting global investments, preparing for emerging tech and protecting workers. Chaired by political office holders, each committee brings together union representatives and private sector leaders. Their goal is to develop strategic recommendations, which will be published by mid-2026. DBS Chief Economist Dr Taimur Baig talks about how the Economic Strategic Review will impact the Singapore Economy 2030 vision launched back in 2022. He also explains how developing a new long-term strategy now will secure Singapore's economic certainty.