logo
Apple has no plans for a flip-style foldable iPhone and that's a shame

Apple has no plans for a flip-style foldable iPhone and that's a shame

Apple loyalists will finally get a taste of what a foldable iPhone feels like, in 2026. Or at least that's what sources like Bloomberg and analyst Ming-Chi Kuo have been hyping up for a while now. Of course, Apple is late to the party — roughly seven years — but the hype is insanely high for a couple of reasons.
Apple has reportedly managed to eliminate the crease on the inner folding screen, achieving a near-seamless flat look. Second, Apple is said to have fortified the hinge mechanism, a crucial weakness of foldable phones that leads to nasty unfolding problems and expensive repairs.
Recommended Videos
On the flip side, reports suggest it will be quite pricey and might hit the shelves with a two-thousand-dollar premium. Samsung's foldables aren't exactly budget-centric, but the industry has also carved a niche where flip-style phones serve the foldable enthusiasts with a much more palatable price tag.
The likes of Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 and Moto Razr have cultivated a solid following of their own, but it seems Apple is not particularly psyched by that idea. For now, at least. 'That's not something currently on the table for Apple,' says a Bloomberg report.
Apple knows software
Not experimenting with a clamshell-style foldable smartphone is a missed opportunity, especially when you look at Apple's strengths and recent software developments. I often come across posts that discuss Apple's attention to detail, from corner radius to color transitions.
Everything looks immaculate, and a quick peek at Apple's design guidelines will give you an idea of just what Apple expects from the software running on its hardware. If there's a company that can nail UI interactions on a small cover display, it's Apple, or at least do better than the rest.
Samsung continues to restrict what you do with apps on the Galaxy Z Flip 6's smaller external display. If you really want to get the full experience, you must download the Good Lock module, or pick one of the cover screen apps.
Then there are a handful of system-level restrictions when it comes to app interactions, such as handling 2FA prompts on the cover screen or making payments. Motorola takes a much more liberal approach here, but Android's native app-scaling woes ruin the experience for a handful of apps, especially social media.
There is no perfect cover screen on the current crop of clamshell foldable phones out there. Apple, given its focus on design uniformity and tight conformity to scaling rules, could have done a much better job.
Just take a look at the dissonance between Android on phones and the wearOS experience on smartwatches. Now, compare it with the familiar feel as you switch from watchOS on an Apple Watch to the iPhone in your hand.
In 2025, Apple's Liquid Glass design makeover further unified the look of its operating systems across screens of all sizes. Even on the 'mobile side,' Apple's new windowing system on iPadOS 26 has fully embraced the ethos of freely resizable app windows.
I can't imagine iOS interactions on a 4-inch external display struggling with natural app interactions. Even if Apple didn't go as immersive as the Moto Razr or the upcoming Galaxy Z Fold 7 — and adopted a smaller cover display — I am fairly confident that Apple would offer a more thoughtful cover screen experience.
Apple must break the monotony — at scale
Ask any industry watcher (or even fan) about Apple's biggest missed opportunities in the past few years and you will predominantly get two answers. Foldable phones and AI. The latter is slowly making progress, but a foldable device will be absent from Apple's portfolio until next year.
Samsung introduced its first foldable phone back in 2019. It was a botched start, but the company has come a long way since, both in terms of hardware stability as well as functionality. Soon, rivals from China caught up.
As of 2025, the race is no longer about making foldable phones, but making the best one. The race is so hot that Samsung has lost the lead on multiple fronts. The likes of Honor are making foldable phones that are nearly as thick as an average iPhone.
Oppo's Find N5 has nearly eliminated the crease problem, allows 80W charging, and even throws a remote Mac facility into the mix. The iPhone has remained more or less the same over the past few generations, save for minor tweaks to the design and incremental camera upgrades.
The lack of exciting upgrades runs so deep that I often find myself recommending a generation older — or two — iPhones to my acquaintances, and save some money while at it. In hindsight, that's just how boringly good iPhones have been in the past few years.
Even the most notable year-over-year changes in the past few years have focused more on creative professionals than the average user. Tricks like LOG capture, ProRAW image, cinematic recording, and multi-cam video capture are more tailored towards creative folks, and not an average user.
Apple is expected to step out of its comfort zone, somewhat, with the rumoured iPhone 17 Air slated to arrive in the fall season. That phone appears to be nothing more than a slimmer iPhone, and with its own set of inherent compromises, such as a smaller battery and only a single camera at the back.
Moreover, Apple won't be the only player in the game. Samsung has already done the 'ultra slim phone' trend with its revived Edge family, and Chinese smartphone labels have knocked on those doors, as well. More are expected to follow the trend, including much smaller players such as Tecno.
The right kind of foldable
What Apple needs is a flip-style foldable phone, one that would blend freshness as well as affordability in the same package. Look no further than the Motorola Razr 2025, which blends plenty of aesthetic pizzaz and a near-seamless external display with a $700 price tag.
Even if you factor in the 'expected' Apple brand premium, a clamshell folding iPhone shouldn't cost more than $1,200, the same as a flagship 'Pro Max' iPhone. For comparison, the Galaxy Z Flip 6 goes for $1,100 in the US market.
But more than just bragging rights and catching up with the competition, a flip-style iPhone would have injected some serious innovative energy into the iPhone portfolio without pushing it beyond the reach of an average iPhone buyer.
A book-style foldable iPhone serves as a great showcase of Apple's engineering chops — just like the Vision Pro — but it's far from a mainstream success recipe. A flip-style folding iPhone that costs nearly half as much sounds a lot more soul-stirring, and pocket-friendly, too.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EU tech rules not included in U.S. trade talks, EU Commission says
EU tech rules not included in U.S. trade talks, EU Commission says

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

EU tech rules not included in U.S. trade talks, EU Commission says

By Foo Yun Chee and Bart H. Meijer BRUSSELS (Reuters) -The European Union on Monday pushed back against U.S. criticism of its landmark tech rules that many feared could be included in ongoing trade negotiations with the United States and subsequently watered down. Adopted recently, the Digital Markets Act (DMA) seeks to rein in the power of Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, China's ByteDance and The Digital Services Act (DSA) requires big online platforms to do more to tackle illegal and harmful content. Both legislations have come under fire from the U.S. administration which says it unfairly targets U.S. tech companies. "The legislations will not be changed. The DMA and the DSA are not on the table in the trade negotiations with the U.S.," spokesperson Thomas Regnier told a daily news conference. He said the EU would not brook any interference from foreign governments on how it enforces its landmark rules which come with hefty fines for violations. "We are not going to adjust the implementation of our legislation based on the actions of third countries. If we started to do that, then we would have to do it with numerous third countries," Regnier said. The EU handed out its first fines to Apple and Meta earlier this year, with both risking further daily fines if regulators find that they have yet to comply with the rules in the coming months. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

What to Expect From Intuitive Surgical's Next Quarterly Earnings Report
What to Expect From Intuitive Surgical's Next Quarterly Earnings Report

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

What to Expect From Intuitive Surgical's Next Quarterly Earnings Report

With a market cap of $191.3 billion, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) designs, manufactures, and markets advanced robotic systems that support minimally invasive surgeries. Its flagship products include the da Vinci Surgical System and the Ion endoluminal system, which enhance surgical precision and expand diagnostic capabilities. The Sunnyvale, California-based company is expected to announce its fiscal Q2 2025 earnings results on Thursday, July 17. Ahead of this event, analysts are expecting ISRG to report a profit of $1.52 per share, up 3.4% from $1.47 per share in the year-ago quarter. The company has exceeded Wall Street's bottom-line estimates in the past four quarters. In Q1 2025, Intuitive Surgical surpassed the consensus EPS estimate by 3.7%. Holiday Trading, Trade Negotiations and Other Key Things to Watch this Week Alphabet's Strong Free Cash Flow Makes GOOG Stock a Value Buy Options Flow Alert: Bulls Making Their Move in GOOGL Stock Get exclusive insights with the FREE Barchart Brief newsletter. Subscribe now for quick, incisive midday market analysis you won't find anywhere else. For fiscal 2025, analysts expect the surgical robot maker to report EPS of $6.23, down 3.9% from $6.48 in fiscal 2024. However, EPS is expected to rebound and grow nearly 18% year-over-year to $7.35 in fiscal 2026. ISRG stock has climbed 19.9% over the past year, outperforming the S&P 500 Index's ($SPX) 12.6% gain and the Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund's (XLV) 8.2% decline over the same period. Shares of Intuitive Surgical rose 1.9% following its Q1 2025 results on Apr. 22, primarily because the company beat analysts' expectations, reporting adjusted EPS of $1.81 and revenue of $2.3 billion. The company placed 367 da Vinci systems, including 147 of its next-generation da Vinci 5 systems. Additionally, the global procedure growth of 17% and a 15% increase in the installed base to 10,189 systems reinforced investor confidence. Analysts' consensus rating on Intuitive Surgical stock is cautiously optimistic overall, with a "Moderate Buy" rating. Out of 28 analysts covering the stock, 19 recommend a "Strong Buy," two have a "Moderate Buy" rating, six give a "Hold" rating, and one "Strong Sell." This configuration is slightly more bullish than three months ago, with 18 analysts suggesting a "Strong Buy." As of writing, ISRG is trading below the average analyst price target of $589.92. On the date of publication, Sohini Mondal did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Why The Slow And Steady Adoption Of Passkeys Is A Good Thing
Why The Slow And Steady Adoption Of Passkeys Is A Good Thing

Forbes

time33 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Why The Slow And Steady Adoption Of Passkeys Is A Good Thing

Kevin Dominik Korte: IT Innovation Strategist, Board Member. Expert in identity management, AI and open-source solutions. Since its initial launch in mid-2022, passkey technology has led a relatively quiet existence without garnering much attention. However, an increasing number of websites have recently started supporting the new concept of passwordless sign-ins. Built on the FIDO2 and WebAuthn standards, passkeys have been heralded as the long-awaited solution to replace insecure passwords. The technology quickly gained the support of tech giants, major brands and open-source enthusiasts. After all, it promises an end to phishing and credential theft, bringing with it phishing resistance, no shared secrets and seamless biometric integration. Two years since the first implementations, we've seen an uptick in adoption on consumer websites, as the FIDO alliance highlighted on the occasion of the first "World Passkey Day" on May 1. To date, almost half of the top 100 websites offer passkey integration. Unfortunately, success on the consumer side of things is only half the story. Enterprise adoption remains stubbornly slow. While passkeys offer security and usability advantages, sprawling legacy systems and complex regulatory obligations have caught enterprises between the allure of innovation and the inertia of established processes. Let's dive into the three major types of problems slowing down broader passkey adoption. Despite technological advances, passkeys also come with several technical disadvantages in enterprise settings. The keys are device-bound, relying on secure enclaves or hardware security modules to store private keys. Transferring them between different devices hinges on proprietary and incompatible protocols. Apple's passkeys do not seamlessly interoperate with Android and vice versa, leaving IT departments to wrestle with compatibility gaps and inconsistent user experiences. This dependency introduces a host of complications for organizations, such as employees switching between corporate laptops and desktops, bring-your-own-device policies and shared workstations. Unlike passwords, which are platform-agnostic, passkeys require careful orchestration across a fragmented ecosystem of devices, operating systems and browsers. While some enterprise password solutions offer support for passkey technology, this adds another piece of software to the growing list of applications. And then there's legacy integration. Enterprises have invested in their IT systems, and many legacy systems rely on non-web applications. Passkey was not available yet when IT departments mapped out their application and system requirements. As a result, retrofitting these environments demands significant engineering resources, ongoing maintenance and specialized expertise in protocols like WebAuthn. The cost and complexity of such projects can be daunting, especially when weighed against the perceived incremental benefit over existing multifactor authentication (MFA) solutions companies already have in place. It's no wonder many organizations choose to maintain parallel authentication systems, undermining the very security and efficiency gains that passkeys are meant to deliver. Beyond the technical, there is the human element as well. Decades of password-centric workflows have defined habits for users and administrators. The introduction of passkeys represents a fundamental shift. It's not only how people log in, but also how they think about it. For passkeys to be widely adopted, we must change how people perceive authentication, passwords and cybersecurity in general. The adoption rates of similar security technologies, like MFA, and the responses to cybersecurity training give us a flavor of the challenges that lie ahead when it comes to convincing administrators, who in turn have to convince their end users. Yet, IT departments are even more worried about the lack of fallback and reset processes. These threaten to disrupt established help desk routines. What happens when a device is lost, stolen or otherwise compromised? How do you provision passkeys for temporary staff, contractors or disabled users who cannot use biometrics? While it's true that most IT departments have long-established procedures for these questions, they will face these questions again when transitioning to passkeys. The lack of unified support for passkey resets and recoveries compounds the issue. Today, passkey recovery depends on proprietary cloud services or complex key escrow arrangements, which may not align with corporate security policies or regulatory requirements. Until we find a standardized solution for these operational questions, IT leaders will remain hesitant to mandate passkeys as the sole authentication method. Even if we solve the human and technical issues, regulatory and compliance considerations will slow deployment. Enterprises operate under stringent compliance mandates, including GDPR, HIPAA and PSD2. While passkeys offer strong security guarantees, they introduce new ambiguities around data privacy, especially involving biometric data. Biometrics are typically stored locally and never transmitted, but organizations must still demonstrate compliance and reassure stakeholders that sensitive data is adequately protected. Further, IT and HR have to harmonize these arrangements with bring-your-own-device and similar IT policies. What's more is IT departments must carefully plan and secure partial deployments and transition periods. Partial adoption creates security blind spots, though, combining the shortcomings of passwords and passkeys. We're Getting There: Incremental Progress Is A Feature, Not A Bug Despite these headwinds, surveys suggest that nearly 90% of enterprises are piloting or already using passkeys for customer-facing deployments. However, only a fraction of them have rolled out passkeys organization-wide. On the enterprise side, the most successful implementations have taken a phased approach. High-risk user groups are migrated to passkeys first while existing authentication methods remain an option for everyone else. This incremental strategy allows organizations to realize immediate gains. It reduces phishing, improves security and enhances the user experience, while gradually building the trust and expertise needed for broader adoption. Ultimately, the slow path to enterprise passkey adoption is not a failure of technology but a reflection of the complex realities of large-scale IT. As with any paradigm shift, success depends on a pragmatic blend of technical innovation, user education and regulatory alignment. For now, passwords may be on notice, but writing their obituary—at least in the enterprise—would be premature. Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store