📋 Vasco line-up set for Copa Sudamericana clash with Melgar
It's a more than decisive night for Vasco in the Copa Sudamericana.
Soon, starting at 7 PM (Brasília time), the Cruz-Maltino faces Melgar.
The match is at São Januário and is valid for the sixth and final round of Group G of the competition.Group Situation 📊
Lanús leads with 11 points and has already secured a direct spot in the round of 16.
The advantage to secure second place is with Melgar, who has seven points.
The Cruz-Maltino appears with five and needs to win or win in front of their fans.
Whoever qualifies will have a playoff (home and away) against a team that finished third in their Libertadores group to seek the round of 16 in the Sudamericana.
And such a spot for the playoffs will guarantee $500,000 (R$ 2.8 million).
Vasco 💢
After a good victory over Fortaleza, Vasco struggled to advance in the Copa do Brasil and was defeated in the derby against Fluminense.
Fernando Diniz is only missing one starter: Hugo Moura, who was sent off in the last round of the Sudamericana. Paulinho is another who is suspended.
Jair won the "battle" with Matheus Carvalho and will be a starter.
Coutinho returns after being absent against Fluminense due to suspension.
Another new feature is in defense: Lucas Freitas is back.
Melgar 🇵🇪
The Cruz-Maltino rival led by Wálter Ribonetto comes from one victory and four draws in the Peruvian league.
They have 25 points against 26 of Universitario, the leader, and Alianza Lima.
The mission is to have good performance when in possession of the ball, as they have the same five goals scored as Vasco - three of them in the draw between both in the first leg.
Photo: Matheus Lima/Vasco
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
President Lee must dispatch Han Duck-soo as special envoy to Washington
SEOUL, July 21 (UPI) -- With U.S. President Donald Trump having officially declared that a 25% reciprocal tariff on all South Korean exports will take effect Aug. 1, the need for swift diplomatic engagement has become urgent. Sending a special envoy to Washington is no longer a matter of protocol, but a strategic imperative. The envoy's role would be to engage directly with senior U.S. officials -- possibly even with President Trump himself -- to address a range of high-stakes issues, including tariff negotiations, defense cost-sharing and bilateral cooperation on trade, energy and investment. Yet despite the urgency, reports indicate that the Lee Jae Myung administration is struggling to finalize its choice, as political debate and hesitation continue to delay the process. According to media reports, some within the ruling camp are calling for a full reconsideration of the nomination. Kim Chong-in, the former interim leader of the conservative People Power Party and the reported nominee, has publicly expressed displeasure at this development stating, "Did I ever ask to be sent [as a special envoy]?" The presidential office has offered only a vague response, likening the speculation to "being asked about a divorce before a wedding." These remarks suggest that Kim may have been tentatively considered, but mounting political resistance has likely caused the administration to retreat from that choice. Meanwhile, with the Aug. 1 deadline fast approaching, the task of appointing a credible and effective envoy remains unresolved. There is little time left. With Trump's tariff decision already formalized, South Korea must now act with urgency. The appointment of a special envoy is no longer optional -- it is a strategic necessity. Whoever is chosen must be capable of navigating the complex political and economic landscape in Washington and engaging directly with senior U.S. officials on the full range of critical bilateral issues -- from tariffs and defense cost-sharing to investment and energy cooperation. In this context, the government must prioritize credibility, clarity and results. That is why former Prime Minister Han Duck-soo emerges as a compelling choice. While Kim Chong-in is widely respected as a seasoned economic policymaker and negotiator, he may not be the right person for this delicate moment. In 2021, he publicly criticized Trump on social media -- a fact that likely has not gone unnoticed in Washington. Trump, famously reactive to criticism and guided by a highly transactional worldview, recently doubled tariffs on Brazil after President Lula voiced opposition. Sending an envoy with a history of confrontation could risk derailing already fragile talks. Han, on the other hand, has no prior personal relationship with Trump, but is said to have developed a warm rapport with him during a phone call. Trump reportedly praised Han's fluent English, perhaps sensing a sense of familiarity -- Han is a Harvard-trained economist, while Trump graduated from the Wharton School. That small personal connection may make a big difference in setting the tone of the conversation. In a high-stakes negotiation, personal chemistry matters. Compared to Kim, Han is more likely to establish a constructive dialogue with Trump -- something South Korea urgently needs. Beyond personal rapport, Han brings unmatched policy credentials. He is one of Korea's foremost experts in trade and economic diplomacy, having served across the Ministry of Commerce and the Ministry of Trade and Industry, and as the country's first chief trade Nngotiator. He also was ambassador to the United States, and uniquely, he has served as prime minister under progressive and conservative administrations --Roh Moo-hyun and Yoon Suk-yeol -- earning bipartisan respect. From trade and security to American politics and protocol, Han is arguably the most qualified figure to handle a volatile and transactional counterpart like Trump. His greatest asset may be his ability to engage the U.S. president without a translator -- an advantage that cannot be overstated at the negotiating table. The stakes are especially high. The envoy will not only be tasked with addressing tariffs, but also with resolving disputes over non-tariff barriers, securing investment opportunities like the Alaska LNG project and navigating difficult defense-related negotiations -- including cost-sharing for U.S. troops stationed in Korea. Any misstep could have long-term consequences for Korea's economic and strategic position. And Trump is no ordinary interlocutor. To understand who Trump is, one need only look back to a 2016 interview in a Korean newspaper. "I sleep 28 hours a week and read 28 hours a week," he said. He is not merely a real estate developer, but a lifelong student of negotiation strategy. One of his favorite books is The Art of War by Sun Tzu, whose first principle is to win without fighting. In fact, Trump authored The Art of the Deal in 1987 -- a book that transformed him from an unknown businessman into a household name. Facing a leader like Trump requires more than policy expertise; it requires strategic insight and mental discipline. Yet, sending Han as special envoy may seem politically unthinkable at this moment. From the perspective of many in Lee's coalition, Han is a deeply controversial figure. He served as prime minister under former President Yoon Suk-yeol, who is currently in jail awaiting trial on treason charges following his administration's failed martial law declaration. Han was seen by many progressives as being aligned with the previous government and even at odds with Lee himself. For some, nominating Han as envoy may appear to betray the spirit of political reform. But this is precisely where Lee has a chance to lead. If he truly seeks national unity and international credibility, now is the time to rise above partisanship and prioritize the national interest. Over the past few weeks, he has surprised many by making gestures of political inclusion -- retaining a minister from the previous administration, meeting with opposition leaders and even encouraging dialogue with the business community. These steps have stabilized markets, lifted investor confidence and helped push his approval rating above his election-day result. Appointing Han as special envoy would be a natural extension of that leadership style. Whether or not Han succeeds in negotiations, the act of appointing him would signal the seriousness and maturity of the Lee administration to both domestic and international audiences. In moments like this, personal risk is often the price of statesmanship. What's needed now is not just diplomacy -- but a decision. Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
13 Phrases That Make You Sound Emotionally Unavailable
When you're trying to connect with someone, the last thing you want is to come off as emotionally unavailable. It's not always easy to spot these moments in ourselves. Sometimes, the words we choose can make us seem distant even when we don't mean to. Here are 13 phrases that can unintentionally push people away and how they might be interpreted by others. By being mindful of these, you might find it easier to open up and foster deeper relationships. 1. "I'm Just Not Good With Feelings." When you say you're not good with feelings, it can come across as a way to dodge emotional conversations. It can signal to others that you're not willing to put in the effort to express yourself, which might make them feel undervalued. Experts like Dr. Brené Brown emphasize the importance of vulnerability in building connections. According to her research, vulnerability is essential for fostering trust and intimacy in relationships. When you dismiss your ability to deal with emotions, it might seem like you're closing the door on these fundamental aspects. Not being good with feelings is a common sentiment, but it can create a wall between you and others. It can be helpful to acknowledge this and express a willingness to improve rather than just accepting it as a permanent state. Saying something like, "I struggle with sharing my feelings, but I'm willing to try," can make a big difference. It shows a willingness to engage and grow, which can be incredibly appealing and reassuring to those around you. Remember, it's not about being flawless, but about being open to development. 2. "I'm Fine." The phrase "I'm fine" can be a conversation stopper, especially when it's clear that you're anything but fine. This statement can be a way to avoid opening up about what's truly going on beneath the surface. It's often used as a shield to protect oneself from vulnerability or further questioning. However, it can also leave the other person feeling shut out, as if their concern or interest in your well-being is unwelcome. This can create a disconnect and make it hard for relationships to deepen. If you tend to default to "I'm fine," consider exploring why it feels challenging to share more. It might be beneficial to practice offering a bit more information, such as "I've had better days," or "I'm feeling a bit overwhelmed, but thank you for asking." This approach opens the door for connection and support. People appreciate honesty, and sharing just a little more can invite more meaningful interactions. Ultimately, breaking the habit of hiding behind "I'm fine" can pave the way for more authentic connections. 3. "I Don't Need Anyone." Saying "I don't need anyone" can come off as a declaration of emotional independence, but it can also feel like a rejection to those who care about you. This statement can resonate with a sense of isolation or self-reliance that might be misinterpreted as aloofness. In a study by Dr. John Cacioppo of the University of Chicago, he found that humans are inherently social creatures, and relationships play a pivotal role in our mental health. When you claim not to need anyone, it can be perceived as a denial of this fundamental human connection. Even if you feel self-sufficient, expressing it in this way can make others feel unnecessary or unwanted. It might be healthier to recognize and communicate the value of having others in your life, even if you don't rely on them for everything. You could say, "I value my independence, but I also appreciate having people I can rely on." This acknowledges your self-reliance while still valuing the presence of others. It helps maintain a balance that respects your independence and the importance of human connection. 4. "I Don't Have Time For This." When you say, "I don't have time for this," it might sound like you're prioritizing other things over someone's feelings or the relationship itself. This phrase can make someone feel like an inconvenience or a low priority in your life. It suggests that whatever is happening isn't worthy of your attention. Over time, this attitude can drive a wedge between you and those who want to be close to you. Relationships require time and attention, and dismissing them can lead to misunderstanding and conflict. If you truly don't have time at the moment, it's more constructive to express it differently. For example, you could say, "I'm really swamped right now, but I want to make time for this. Can we talk later?" This not only shows that you care about the issue at hand but also that you're willing to make space for it in your schedule. It conveys respect for both your time and the other person's feelings. By being clear about your availability, you can avoid making someone feel like they're not worth your time. 5. "That's Just How I Am." Declaring "that's just how I am" can make it seem like you're unwilling to change or grow. This phrase might be perceived as a refusal to engage in personal development or compromise in relationships. Dr. Carol Dweck's work on the growth mindset suggests that adopting a mindset open to change and improvement can significantly affect personal and professional relationships. By stating you're just a certain way, it conveys a fixed mindset that can be off-putting to those who value adaptability and growth. Understanding yourself is essential, but it's also important to be open to change, especially in response to feedback from those you care about. Rather than shutting down the conversation, consider saying, "I know I have this tendency, but I'm working on it." This acknowledges your current state but also shows a willingness to evolve. It can make a big difference in how others perceive your openness to change. Embracing growth can lead to more rewarding and lasting connections. 6. "Whatever." The word "whatever" is often used to dismiss a topic or conversation, which can be incredibly frustrating for others. It can make you seem uninterested or unwilling to engage with what's being discussed. This phrase can have a dismissive tone that communicates a lack of respect for the other person's perspective or feelings. Over time, it can erode trust and create emotional distance. People might start feeling that their concerns or opinions don't matter to you. Instead of brushing things off with "whatever," try to offer a more thoughtful response. Even if you're not particularly invested in the subject, acknowledging the other person's feelings can go a long way. You might say, "I'm not sure I agree, but I'd like to understand where you're coming from." This keeps the dialogue open and shows that you're willing to engage. By replacing "whatever" with a more constructive approach, you can maintain a stronger emotional connection. 7. "I'm Too Busy For This." When you say, "I'm too busy for this," it can imply that you don't value the person or the relationship enough to make time for it. This phrase might make others feel like they're not important or worth your attention. According to a study by Dr. Julianne Holt-Lunstad at Brigham Young University, feeling valued and supported is crucial for strong interpersonal relationships. By dismissing someone with busyness, you might unintentionally undermine their sense of importance in your life. If you're feeling overwhelmed, it's better to communicate that in a way that respects the other person's needs. You could say, "I'm really busy right now, but this is important to me. Can we find a time that works for both of us?" This approach shows that you're not dismissing their concerns and are committed to making space for them. It's a way to balance your busy schedule with maintaining healthy relationships. Remember, being busy doesn't have to mean emotionally unavailable. 8. "It Is What It Is." "It is what it is" can be a conversation ender, suggesting resignation and a lack of willingness to discuss things further. This phrase implies that there's nothing to be done, which can be frustrating for those looking for engagement or solutions. It might make others feel like you're not invested in finding a way forward. Over time, this attitude can contribute to feelings of helplessness or stagnation in relationships. People may start to feel like their concerns aren't worth addressing. If you often find yourself resorting to "it is what it is," consider looking for ways to continue the conversation constructively. You could say, "This is the situation, but I'm open to discussing what we can do about it." This communicates that while you recognize the reality, you're also willing to explore options and work together. It shows a proactive approach to problem-solving and collaboration. By shifting your language, you can foster more dynamic and engaged interactions. 9. "I'm Not Ready For This." When you say, "I'm not ready for this," it can indicate hesitancy or fear of facing certain emotions or situations. This phrase might make others feel like you're not fully present or committed to the relationship. While it's okay not to be ready, communicating it in this way can leave others feeling uncertain or rejected. Over time, consistently expressing unreadiness can create a barrier to intimacy and trust. It can make the other person question whether you'll ever be ready to engage fully. Instead of dismissing the situation with unreadiness, try expressing your feelings more openly. You might say, "I'm feeling overwhelmed right now, but I want to work through this." This approach acknowledges your current state while also expressing a willingness to engage and move forward. It can be reassuring to those who care about you, showing that you're not closing off possibilities. By being honest about your feelings, you can create a path for healthier communication and connection. 10. "It's Not A Big Deal." Saying, "It's not a big deal," can minimize what someone else perceives as significant. This phrase can make others feel like their feelings or concerns are being dismissed. While something might not seem important to you, it could be crucial to someone else. This dismissal can lead to resentment or feelings of invalidation over time. It's important to recognize that different people have different perspectives on what's important. If you find yourself saying this often, consider acknowledging the other person's feelings instead. You could say, "It may not seem big to me, but I understand it's important to you." This shows that you respect their perspective and are willing to engage with it. It also fosters a sense of empathy and understanding, which are key ingredients for healthy relationships. By validating others' feelings, you can build a foundation of trust and respect. 11. "You Know How I Am." The phrase "you know how I am" can be used to justify certain behaviors or reactions. While it might feel like a way to explain yourself, it can also come off as a refusal to take responsibility or change. Over time, this can wear on relationships, making others feel like they have to accommodate your unchanging behavior. It can create a static dynamic where growth and improvement are stifled. This can lead to frustration and a sense of being stuck. Instead of using this phrase, try to take accountability for your actions. You might say, "I know I tend to do this, and I'm working on it." This approach shows self-awareness and a commitment to growth. It can be refreshing and encouraging for those around you who might feel impacted by these behaviors. By expressing a willingness to change, you can foster more dynamic and supportive relationships. 12. "I Can't Help It." Saying "I can't help it" can sound like you're denying any responsibility for your actions or feelings. This phrase can make others feel like you're not willing to try to change or improve the situation. It might be seen as a way to avoid accountability, which can be frustrating for those affected by your behavior. Over time, this can erode trust and create a sense of helplessness in relationships. People might start feeling like they're dealing with someone who isn't interested in growth. If you find yourself saying "I can't help it," consider reframing it to show a willingness to change. You could say, "I struggle with this, but I'm working on finding better ways to handle it." This shows that you're aware of the issue and are making an effort to address it. It can be encouraging for others to see that you're committed to personal development. By shifting your language, you can promote healthier and more trusting interactions. 13. "I Just Don't Care." The phrase "I just don't care" can be a conversation killer, making it seem like you're indifferent to the topic or the person. This statement can be hurtful, as it implies a lack of interest or investment. It might make others feel like their feelings or concerns are not worth your time. Over time, this attitude can create distance and erode the connection between you and those who care about you. People want to feel like what they bring to the table matters. If you often say "I just don't care," try to communicate your feelings differently. Instead, you might say, "I'm struggling to engage with this right now, but I'm here for you." This shows that even if you're having difficulty connecting with the topic, you still value the relationship. It helps maintain a sense of support and care that is crucial for healthy relationships. By being more mindful of your language, you can foster a climate of empathy and connection. Solve the daily Crossword
Los Angeles Times
4 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Dodgers Dugout: Jaime Jarrín discusses Vin Scully, Fernando Valenzuela and Muhammad Ali
Hi, and welcome to another edition of Dodgers Dugout. My name is Houston Mitchell. Doesn't it feel like Chris Taylor and Austin Barnes were released last season? No, that was this season. We received many questions for Jaime Jarrín, who was kind enough to take time out of his day to answer some of those questions. Deputy sports editor Ed Guzman conducted the interview by phone. Because Jarrín was the longtime Spanish-language broadcaster for the Dodgers, it seemed appropriate for a couple of the questions and answers to be in Spanish. In the case of multiple people asking the same questions, the person who asked the question first gets credit for the question. Questions without a name were asked by Guzman. From Virgilio Del Rio: How did you prepare to become a sports broadcaster? Jarrín: Well, before becoming a sports broadcaster, I was a newsman. I used to write news, I edited news, that was my experience. Sportscasting, I learned that when I came to this country. But back home, for four years, I was a newsman writing news, editorials and things like that. (Follow-up question from Guzman): Once you were a broadcaster here in the States, did you ever want to broadcast games in English or were you always just focused on doing it in Spanish? Jarrín: I always wanted to do it only in Spanish. I never really wanted to go into English-language because I thought that it was my duty to do this in Spanish. So I'm very proud to have done it all in Spanish. From Jerry Smith of Los Angeles: You called the 'Thrilla in Manila' between Muhammad Ali and Joe Frazier. What was that like? Jarrín: It is my greatest experience doing sports because the atmosphere in Manila was unbelievable. I was there for I think it was two days before the fight and it was like a carnival there. Muhammad Ali was walking the streets around the arena, you know, promoting the fight and signing many things. And he was a great, great promoter. So it was unbelievable. And the day of the fight, it was so hot, so rainy, and the fight was held at 10 o'clock in the morning (to accommodate the international viewing audience). It was really a great, great experience. From Alex Andrade of Paramount: How difficult or easy is it to switch from calling boxing versus calling a baseball game? Jarrín: Well, it's totally different. In boxing, I was the blow-by-blow announcer. So I didn't have time to do commentary. Besides, I had a commentator with me, Mr. Cuco Conde, who was a very famous boxing promoter in Cuba. So in my case, I just narrate the fight. In boxing, you have to follow the action through the blows that are thrown by the fighters. In baseball, you have time to describe what's going on, you have time for anecdotes, important dates and things like that. From Mark Layne: Do you have a favorite story about Vin Scully? Jarrín: I was very fortunate. It was a privilege to spend so much time with him because on the road we were always together, having lunch together, then dinner at the ballpark. Same thing here in Los Angeles. We always had dinner together before the games. And to see how nice he was with everybody; he never refused to shake hands with anybody; he never refused to take a picture with anybody. He was very, very special. As a baseball announcer, as a sports announcer, he was the best of the best of all time. But as a human being, he was exceptionally beautiful. Something very special I have to mention is the fact that when my wife passed away six years ago, he was the first one to call me and he talked to me for about 20 minutes. It was the most beautiful call I ever received. The way that he talked about my wife, about our friendship, the way that he handled the language, his intonation, his delivery on the phone. It was really, really something very, very unique that I will never, never forget. Very touching. Very touching. From Paul Aist of Ventura: In your opinion, did Tommy Lasorda shorten Fernando Valenzuela's career by overusing him? Jarrín: In a way, probably, but it was because Fernando wanted to stay in the games. He used to tell me, 'Jaime, when I start something, I like to finish that. And when I start a game, I want to finish that.' So I'm sure that Lasorda wanted to take him out earlier in many games, but he insisted on staying on. The Baseball Hall of Fame induction ceremony is later this month for the newest class. What do you remember about your induction into the Hall of Fame in 1998? Jarrín: I remember very well the phone call that I received from the head of the Hall of Fame in Cooperstown. Around 8 o'clock in the morning, I got a telephone call. They told me, 'Please, Jaime, be around a telephone because probably you are going to be inducted into the Hall of Fame.' And the telephone rang at around 9:30 in the morning. And it was the head of Cooperstown. And he said, 'Jaime, it's my pleasure to let you know that you have been selected to be inducted into the Hall of Fame this year along with Don Sutton and Larry Doby.' You can imagine how excited I was. My wife, Blanca, was standing there next to me near the phone. And she saw my face, my reaction, and she started crying. And that was really something very, very special, something that is in my heart for the rest of my life. It was very emotional. It was very, very incredible. And then the ceremony in Cooperstown is something very unique, very special. I would say that before the ceremony, they put you with all the Hall of Famers in a room. And there were about, I would say, 25, 28-30 Hall of Famers. And to be there among them, it was, to me, like being in heaven. I couldn't believe that I would be there next to Henry Aaron, next to Willie Mays and Sandy Koufax and Tom Seaver and all those Hall of Famers. It was something special, and that changed my life. Because before that, I was one of the many, many announcers doing baseball. But after the Hall of Fame, owners of the different ballclubs, GMs and people like that, they would look for me to take a picture, to shake my hand, to introduce themselves. So really, it was a turning point. Fantastic. How much do you watch this year's team? Well, I follow every single game on TV. When I go to the ballpark, I go to the field, I go to the clubhouse, I say hello to the ballplayers. Then I go to the press box because I like to see the writers because they were so nice with me, English or Spanish. They wrote beautiful things about me, about my career. I like to see the employees at the press box. Then I stay for three, four or five innings and come home. So it's perfect. The perfect combination. But I follow the team through TV when I am not at the ballpark, yes. ¿Qué opina usted sobre el pitcheo del equipo de esta temporada? El pitcheo deja mucho que desear debido a las lesiones. Los Dodgers durante el invierno fueron en busca de verdaderos ases del montículo y lograron contratar a varios de ellos. Pero dos de ellos han estado lesionados todo el tiempo y eso ha desbalanceado completamente el desempeño del equipo de lanzadores. Debido a las lesiones, también hemos tenido prácticamente cada juego en que los abridores únicamente lanzan tres o cuatro innings, máximo. Y eso ha minado mucho la fortaleza del bullpen. Y el bullpen se ha visto dismal en verdad, en lo que a potencia se debe debido al uso cotidiano prácticamente de todos los días. Espero que en este descanso los Dodgers logren consolidar el excelente elenco de lanzadores que necesitan para poder llegar y ganar la Serie Mundial. Hemos escuchado el cuadrangular de Kirk Gibson en la Serie Mundial en la transmisión de Vin Scully, y también en el relato de Jack Buck. Pero uno no puede encontrar el relato de ese jonrón de usted o de René Cárdenas. ¿Por qué no hay modo de escuchar ese relato? La simple respuesta: porque en aquel entonces, lamentablemente, la estación de radio y los mismos Dodgers no se preocuparon en guardar las transmisiones. No tenemos ninguna, ninguna grabación de ninguno de los juegos de los Dodgers hasta hace pocos años. Es un misterio, en verdad. KWKW y KTNQ, las dos emisoras que estuvieron con los Dodgers en esos años, no se preocuparon en mantener grabaciones de eso. Y por eso es que no existe absolutamente nada en lo que respecta a nuestras transmisiones. Es una lástima, en verdad, pero es la realidad. From Bruce Campbell of Los Angeles: Your wife, Blanca, died in 2019. What would you want people to know about her? Well, you know, it was such a heavy blow to myself and my family, my two sons, Jorge and Mauricio. What can I tell you? She was such a beautiful person. She was so supportive of me. All the accolades that I have gained is thanks to her because she was behind me all the time. She never complained about my being absent because I used to travel with the Dodgers and sometimes, road trips took 16 days, 19 days. And she was so generous with people and everything. The Jaime and Blanca Jarrin Foundation has expressed a desire to uplift underserved students by awarding scholarships to those pursuing careers specifically in law and journalism. Why those two areas? Jaime: Jorge can answer that because he is on top of everything. He can express very well the goals of the foundation. I was very pleased when Jorge and Mauricio, along with my three grandsons, joined forces to create a foundation in order to preserve the image and the name of my wife, Blanca, who was a very generous person. So I was delighted when they told me about the project. And now, I just try to help my family as much as possible. Jorge and the rest of the family work very hard in trying to create the funds that we need for the scholarships. Jorge Jarrín, Jaime's son, who sat in on the interview: That's easy, actually. You know, when we started this foundation in honor of my mom, in the back of my mind, I also knew the importance, as my father was nearing the twilight of his career, looking for a way to maintain and uphold the legacy that he has created as an immigrant coming to this country. You know, he knows the trepidation and the fear that comes naturally to an immigrant coming to a nation where he doesn't necessarily really speak the language, doesn't really know a lot of people, is looking to establish roots so that he can, in turn, he or she, in turn, can bring their family so that they can create a better life. So, that's that legacy. And when my mom passed away, I thought, this is the way to do that. Speaking selfishly for a moment, this is a way to accomplish two things. To honor the memory of my mom who created such an environment for us growing up that we never felt neglected. We never felt that we missed out on anything because my father was gone all the time. And there was no guilt. There was nothing negative along that line. And so, knowing that my father, at this point, had been speaking to Latino homes for 60-plus years, I know how people react when they see my father for the first time, when they talk to him, when they have a chance to meet him in person. Because he represents, for many, their childhood growing up, their relationships with their parents, their grandparents, aunts and uncles. He gave them that commonality of which they can talk about together. So, knowing that impact that he has on people, we thought it's one thing to give scholarships. But for a lot of Latinos, to get a scholarship from Jaime Jarrin is even more special. We call them the Jarrín Scholars. And the reason we did journalism, to get back to your original question, journalism and law, two reasons: The journalism honoring the career that my father chose to create, the path that he took. And the law, because we have been fortunate in addition to the Los Angeles Dodgers to have a long and steady career as a spokesperson for Los Defensores. Los Defensores is an organization, it is a cooperative legal marketing firm that represents a network of Spanish-speaking attorneys who are there to help people, Latinos, who don't know the language well, who are intimidated, who may be undocumented. But there are certain rights that they're entitled to under the law, under the Constitution. And we try to empower Latinos to speak up for themselves, to not be afraid, to not be intimidated. So my father has had a 40-year career of being the voice of Los Defensores, too. So it only made sense that because of our association with Los Defensores that we also single out law because overall, we're seeking to help those who are eventually going to be making decisions that affect us as a community and as a society. We want to empower them, we want to help them to be the best that they can be. Unfortunately, you look at for example the state of California, 49% of which are Latinos, and yet less than 3% Latinos pass the bar examination to become attorneys. Less than 6% of the attorneys in the United States are Latinos. Yet it doesn't reflect the numbers of our community in terms of its makeup of demographics, so there's something not right here. And we're trying to get those in a four-year college the help that they need, not only financially but because I've had students say to me: you saw me, you recognized me, and you're willing to invest in my future. Because that's what it is, it's an investment and it's a validation that we see them, we recognize them, we want to support them. That's it in a nutshell. —Thank you to Jaime Jarrín for taking time from their day to answer reader questions. The Jaime and Blanca Jarrín Foundation are having 'Wine Night at the Ravine,' at the centerfield plaza in Dodger Stadium on Aug. 19. For more information and tickets, click here. We'll talk about Mookie Betts and the Dodgers continuing to scuffle (if they still are). Betts was benched Saturday to get a mental reset, then was moved to the leadoff spot Sunday, with Shohei Ohtani moving to the two spot. It has been a tough stretch. They score six runs, the opponent scores seven. But if they hold the opponent to two runs, the Dodgers score just once. When they hit well they don't pitch, when they pitch well they don't hit. And they don't field well most of the time. Freddie Freeman was hit on the wrist by a pitch Sunday and had to leave the game. X-rays were negative, according to the Dodgers, but a wrist injury isn't good for hitters. Luckily for them, the Giants are playing worse, and the Padres are playing just OK. Monday: Minnesota (David Festa, 3-3, 5.25 ERA) at Dodgers (Shohei Ohtani, 0-0, 1.00 ERA), 7:10 p.m., Sportsnet LA, AM 570, KTNQ 1020 Tuesday: Minnesota (Simeon Woods Richardson, 5-4, 3.95 ERA) at Dodgers (Yoshinobu Yamamoto, 8-7, 2.59 ERA), 7:10 p.m., Sportsnet LA, AM 570, KTNQ 1020 Wednesday: Minnesota (Chris Paddack, 3-9, 5.14 ERA) at Dodgers (Tyler Glasnow, 1-1, 3.10 ERA), 1:10 p.m., Sportsnet LA, AM 570, KTNQ 1020 *-left-handed Pitching injuries continue to be an issue in MLB. How it's impacting pitchers at all levels Is there a way to mitigate pitching injuries? The Rays (and Dodgers) may shed some light New mural at Dodger Stadium honors Fernando Valenzuela Dave Roberts gives Mookie Betts a day off as season-long slump continues 'As lucky as we could be.' Dodgers' Max Muncy already recovering better than expected Shaikin: Why the small-market Milwaukee Brewers might be America's team Four major questions the Dodgers face in the second half of the season The Dodgers retire Fernando Valenzuela's number. Watch and listen here. Have a comment or something you'd like to see in a future Dodgers newsletter? Email me at and follow me on Twitter at @latimeshouston. To get this newsletter in your inbox, click here.
