Fact check debunks Elon Musk–Neuralink story involving sick child
A heartwarming story circulating online about Elon Musk personally funding medical treatment and arranging a Neuralink brain implant for a young girl has been confirmed to be entirely fabricated.
The claim, which gained traction on social media in late March 2025, stated that Musk stepped in to help Lily Thompson, a 7-year-old girl suffering from a rare neurological condition. Posts included an image allegedly showing Musk beside the child in a hospital bed, with captions celebrating his generosity and involvement.
According to the story, Musk paid over $2 million in medical expenses and arranged for an experimental Neuralink chip to be implanted in Lily's brain, leading to a near-miraculous recovery.
However, a fact check reveals that no credible evidence supports any part of the claim.
Timeline and evidence contradict the story The timeline presented in the original article from News.Citestesitu.com was implausible. It claimed that Musk learned of the child's case on March 22, yet she had supposedly undergone surgery and begun recovering by the article's publication on March 23—an impossible sequence of events.
Additionally, searches for associated hashtags like #MuskSaves and #NeuralinkMiracle yielded little to no relevant results, despite claims that social media "erupted with praise."
A Google search found no legitimate news coverage of the incident, which would almost certainly have been reported widely if true.
AI-generated content
Experts also flagged the image and text as likely AI-generated. The article and associated image were analyzed using AI detection tools, including ZeroGPT, GPTZero, WasItAI, and Decopy AI, all of which indicated a high probability that the content was created by artificial intelligence.
Photo: Facebook page Just the Facts
Neuralink's real clinical trials don't involve children
Neuralink began human trials in 2024 with a chip implanted in an adult quadriplegic man. While the patient has spoken positively about his experience, there has been no recovery of motor function. He primarily uses the chip to play computer games, and hopes to control a wheelchair in the future.
Elon Musk confirmed in January 2025 that only three adults had received the implant so far, with plans to expand to 30 additional adult volunteers later this year. According to Neuralink's official eligibility guidelines, only legal adults can participate in its trials—no children have been approved.
Family, name, and story not real
There is no medical record, public report, or news article confirming the existence of Lily Thompson in connection to Neuralink or Elon Musk. The narrative appears to be a completely fictional tale designed to go viral—likely for engagement or to paint Musk in a flattering light.
The story about Elon Musk paying a child's medical bills and arranging a Neuralink brain implant is false. It lacks evidence, features AI-generated content, and contradicts known facts about Neuralink's ongoing trials. Readers are advised to verify such claims with credible sources before sharing.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
15 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Stanford study warns AI chatbots fall short on mental health support
The study also found commercial mental health chatbots, like those from and 7cups, performed worse than base models and lacked regulatory oversight, despite being used by millions. PHOTO: PEXELS Listen to article AI chatbots like ChatGPT are being widely used for mental health support, but a new Stanford-led study warns that these tools often fail to meet basic therapeutic standards and could put vulnerable users at risk. The research, presented at June's ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, found that popular AI models—including OpenAI's GPT-4o—can validate harmful delusions, miss warning signs of suicidal intent, and show bias against people with schizophrenia or alcohol dependence. In one test, GPT-4o listed tall bridges in New York for a person who had just lost their job, ignoring the possible suicidal context. In another, it engaged with users' delusions instead of challenging them, breaching crisis intervention guidelines. Read More: Is Hollywood warming to AI? The study also found commercial mental health chatbots, like those from and 7cups, performed worse than base models and lacked regulatory oversight, despite being used by millions. Researchers reviewed therapeutic standards from global health bodies and created 17 criteria to assess chatbot responses. They concluded that AI models, even the most advanced, often fell short and demonstrated 'sycophancy'—a tendency to validate user input regardless of accuracy or danger. Media reports have already linked chatbot validation to dangerous real-world outcomes, including one fatal police shooting involving a man with schizophrenia and another case of suicide after a chatbot encouraged conspiracy beliefs. Also Read: Grok AI coming to Tesla cars soon, confirms Elon Musk However, the study's authors caution against viewing AI therapy in black-and-white terms. They acknowledged potential benefits, particularly in support roles such as journaling, intake surveys, or training tools—with a human therapist still involved. Lead author Jared Moore and co-author Nick Haber stressed the need for stricter safety guardrails and more thoughtful deployment, warning that a chatbot trained to please can't always provide the reality check therapy demands. As AI mental health tools continue to expand without oversight, researchers say the risks are too great to ignore. The technology may help—but only if used wisely.
Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business Recorder
Google hires Windsurf execs in $2.4 billion deal to advance AI coding ambitions
Alphabet's Google has hired several key staff members from AI code generation startup Windsurf, the companies announced on Friday, in a surprise move following an attempt by its rival OpenAI to acquire the startup. Google is paying $2.4 billion in license fees as part of the deal to use some of Windsurf's technology under non-exclusive terms, according to a person familiar with the arrangement. Google will not take a stake or any controlling interest in Windsurf, the person added. Windsurf CEO Varun Mohan, co-founder Douglas Chen, and some members of the coding tool's research and development team will join Google's DeepMind AI division. The deal followed months of discussions Windsurf was having with OpenAI to sell itself in a deal that could value it at $3 billion, highlighting the interest in the code-generation space which has emerged as one of the fastest-growing AI applications, sources familiar with the matter told Reuters in June. OpenAI could not be immediately reached for a comment. OpenAI to release web browser in challenge to Google Chrome The former Windsurf team will focus on agentic coding initiatives at Google DeepMind, primarily working on the Gemini project. 'We're excited to welcome some top AI coding talent from Windsurf's team to Google DeepMind to advance our work in agentic coding,' Google said in a statement. The unusual deal structure marks a win for backers for Windsurf, which has raised $243 million from investors including Kleiner Perkins, Greenoaks and General Catalyst, and was last valued at $1.25 billion one year ago, according to PitchBook. Windsurf investors will receive liquidity through the license fee and retain their stakes in the company, sources told Reuters. 'Acquihire' deals Google's surprise swoop mirrors its deal in August 2024 to hire key employees from chatbot startup Big Tech peers, including Microsoft, Amazon and Meta, have similarly taken to these so-called acquihire deals, which some have criticized as an attempt to evade regulatory scrutiny. Microsoft struck a $650 million deal with Inflection AI in March 2024, to use the AI startup's models and hire its staff, while Amazon hired AI firm Adept's co-founders and some of its team last June. Google offers new proposal to stave off EU antitrust fine, document shows Meta took a 49% stake in Scale AI in June in the biggest test yet of this increasing form of business partnerships. Unlike acquisitions that would give the buyer a controlling stake, these deals do not require a review by U.S. antitrust regulators. However, they could probe the deal if they believe it was structured to avoid those requirements or harm competition. Many of the deals have since become the subject of regulatory probes. The development comes as tech giants, including Alphabet and Meta, aggressively chase high-profile acquisitions and offer multi-million-dollar pay packages to attract top talent in the race to lead the next wave of AI. Windsurf's head of business, Jeff Wang, has been appointed its interim CEO, and Graham Moreno, vice president of global sales, will be president, effective immediately. The majority of Windsurf's roughly 250 employees will remain with the company, which has announced plans to prioritize innovation for its enterprise clients.
Express Tribune
a day ago
- Express Tribune
Can we trust Musk's X?
More than 90 per cent of X's (formerly Twitter) Community Notes – a crowd-sourced verification system popularised by Elon Musk's platform – are never published, a study said on Wednesday, highlighting major limits in its effectiveness as a debunking tool, reported AFP. The study by the Digital Democracy Institute of the Americas (DDIA), which analysed the entire public dataset of 1.76 million notes published by X between January 2021 and March 2025, comes as the platform's CEO Linda Yaccarino resigned after two years at the helm. The community-driven moderation model – now embraced by major tech platforms including Facebook-owner Meta and TikTok – allows volunteers to contribute notes that add context or corrections to posts. Other users then rate the proposed notes as "helpful" or "not helpful." If the notes get "helpful" ratings from enough users with diverse perspectives, they are published on X, appearing right below the challenged posts. "The vast majority of submitted notes – more than 90 percent – never reach the public," DDIA's study said. "For a program marketed as fast, scalable, and transparent, these figures should raise serious concerns." Among English notes, the publication rate dropped from 9.5 per cent in 2023 to just 4.9 per cent in early 2025, the study said. Spanish-language notes, however, showed some growth, with the publication rate rising from 3.6 per cent to 7.1 per cent over the same period, it added. A vast number of notes remain unpublished due to lack of consensus among users during rating. Thousands of notes also go unrated, possibly never seen and never assessed, according to the report. "As the volume of notes submitted grows, the system's internal visibility bottleneck becomes more apparent – especially in English," the study said. "Despite a rising number of contributors submitting notes, many notes remain stuck in limbo, unseen and unevaluated by fellow contributors, a crucial step for notes to be published." 'Viral misinformation' In a separate finding, DDIA's researchers identified not a human but a bot-like account – dedicated to flagging crypto scams – as the most prolific contributor to the program in English, submitting more than 43,000 notes between 2021 and March 2025. However, only 3.1 per cent of those notes went live, suggesting most went unseen or failed to gain consensus, the report said. The study also noted that the time it takes for a note to go live had improved over the years, dropping from an average of more than 100 days in 2022 to 14 days in 2025. "Even this faster timeline is far too slow for the reality of viral misinformation, timely toxic content, or simply errors about real-time events, which spread within hours, not weeks," DDIA's report said. The findings are significant as tech platforms increasingly view the community-driven model as an alternative to professional fact-checking, which conservative advocates in countries such as the United States have long accused of a liberal bias. Studies have shown Community Notes can work to dispel some falsehoods such as vaccine misinformation, but researchers have long cautioned that it works best for topics where there is broad consensus. Some researchers have also cautioned that Community Notes users can be motivated by partisan motives and tend to target their political opponents. X introduced Community Notes during the tenure of Yaccarino, who said on Wednesday that she had decided to step down after leading the company through a major transformation. Yaccarino's departure No reason was given for the former CEO's exit, but her resignation came as Musk's artificial intelligence chatbot Grok triggered an online firestorm over its anti-Semitic comments that praised Adolf Hitler and insulted Islam in separate posts on X. In a short reply to her post on X, Musk wrote: "Thank you for your contributions." Yaccarino – a former NBCUniversal advertising executive – took over as X's CEO in June 2023, replacing Musk who had been serving in the role since his $44 billion acquisition of Twitter in October 2022. Her appointment came as Musk sought to focus on product development while bringing in an experienced media manager to restore advertiser confidence. The company has faced significant challenges since Musk's acquisition, including an exodus of advertisers and concerns over content moderation policies. Critics have cited a rise in violent content, racism, antisemitism and misinformation on X. Yaccarino's background in advertising was seen as crucial to rebuilding business relationships. In her statement, Yaccarino praised the "historic business turn around" achieved by the X team and suggested the platform was entering "a new chapter" with xAI, Musk's artificial intelligence company. xAI in March acquired X in an all-stock deal that valued the social media platform at $33 billion, making it a subsidiary of Musk's AI company. "X is truly a digital town square for all voices and the world's most powerful culture signal," she wrote, adding that she would be "cheering you all on as you continue to change the world." Analyst Jasmine Enberg from Emarketer said that being CEO "was always going to be a tough job, and Yaccarino lasted in the role longer than many expected." "Faced with a mercurial owner who never fully stepped away from the helm and continued to use the platform as his personal megaphone, Yaccarino had to try to run the business while also regularly putting out fires," she told AFP. Yaccarino's sudden exit "suggests a possible tipping point" in their relationship, even if the reasons are for now unknown. During her tenure, X introduced new features including Community Notes, a crowd-sourced fact-checking system, and announced plans for "X Money," a financial services feature as part of Musk's vision to transform the platform into an "Everything App." It also coincided with Musk's endorsement and financial backing of Donald Trump, which saw the South African-born multi-billionaire catapulted into the White House as a close advisor to the president, before a recent falling out.
