logo
Lord Krishna was first mediator...: Top court raps UP Govt in Banke Bihari Temple case

Lord Krishna was first mediator...: Top court raps UP Govt in Banke Bihari Temple case

India Today2 hours ago
During the ongoing hearing in the Banke Bihari Temple case on Monday, the Supreme Court remarked that Lord Krishna was also a mediator. The top court's observation came while it was contemplating an interim committee to look after the management of the iconic Shri Banke Bihari temple at Vrindavan, in Mathura district of Uttar Pradesh.'When you talk about mediation, he was the first mediator available. So we also try to mediate,' Justice Surya Kant remarked.advertisement'This is an area of extraordinary importance. We don't want to exclude anyone,' the bench said, while granting time to counsel for Uttar Pradesh to seek instructions regarding the interim arrangement.
The court also called out the Uttar Pradesh government for the manner in which the state secured an order impacting the management of the Banke Bihari temple without the court hearing its current representatives.'We don't expect the state to do this. You went behind their backs without even giving notice,' the court said.The top court was hearing petitions filed by the temple priests challenging the Banke Bihari Temple Trust Ordinance, 2025, and also seeking modification of the Supreme Court's earlier order permitting the Uttar Pradesh government to utilise funds for the Shri Banke Bihari Temple in Vrindavan.This is not the first time the government has been questioned by the top court. In May, when this case was heard by a different bench, Justice B.V. Nagarathna questioned why the state decided to "hijack" a litigation between two private parties.Startling Conduct, Alleges PetitionerSenior Advocate Shyam Divan, appearing for the petitioners, alleged that the state had 'sneaked in' and obtained a court order — originally related to another temple — without notice to the Banke Bihari temple's existing management. The court, he claimed, had no opportunity to hear the temple management before the May 15 order was passed, which was now being used to justify the ordinance.Calling the move 'startling,' Divan argued that the Banke Bihari temple is a private temple, and the state had no right to interfere without proper legal procedure.Court Questions State's ApproachThe ASG, representing the UP government, contended that the temple was not private, and those objecting to the ordinance were unauthorised persons. But the Court was not convinced.'Show us where this court ever intended to hear a temple representative? Why was there no public notice? We don't expect the state to move in this manner; the state should have informed,' the bench remarked.Giving an example of how initiatives have been taken around the Golden Temple, the court added: 'Such initiatives can be taken at times instead of using legislative or executive power. You think people will say no if you speak to them? Instead, you went behind their backs.'advertisementThe court repeatedly asked the state: 'What stopped you from acquiring the land legally and paying compensation?'The court, however, clarified that the temple funds will have to be utilised for development and can't be pocketed by private persons in the name of a private temple.Interim Committee LikelyIn light of the controversy, the Supreme Court said it is inclined to form an interim management committee headed by a retired High Court judge. The local collector may also be included in the committee.The panel would oversee day-to-day temple affairs until the High Court decides on the validity of the ordinance.'Religious tourism is important. Heritage must be maintained. But there must be an ecosystem where pilgrims feel a sense of order, not mismanagement,' the court remarked.The state has been directed to take instructions and revert. The bench clarified that the ordinance can be challenged under Article 226 before the High Court but stressed that, in the meantime, a balanced interim arrangement may be necessary.- EndsTune InMust Watch
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Will present our case before SC in solution-oriented manner: Saini
Will present our case before SC in solution-oriented manner: Saini

Indian Express

time22 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Will present our case before SC in solution-oriented manner: Saini

The Haryana government has decided to put forth its stance in front of the Supreme Court on August 13 on the contentious SYL standoff with Punjab. Chief Minister Nayab Singh Saini said this after coming out of a meeting on the SYL issue with Punjab Chief Minister Bhagwant Singh Mann. Union Jal Shakti Minister C R Patil chaired the meeting. Later speaking to media persons in New Delhi, Saini said that 'a significant step forward was taken during the meeting on the ongoing dialogue over water sharing between Haryana and Punjab. The talks were held in a cordial and cooperative atmosphere'. 'The issue has been under discussion for a long time, and earlier deliberations held on July 9 had already indicated a positive shift. This time, we have moved a step further. The discussions were held in an even more constructive environment. Haryana will present its case in a positive and solution-oriented manner before the Supreme Court on August 13. We are confident that a fair and favourable resolution will be achieved,' Saini added. In response to a question, the CM said that the Indus Waters Treaty is a separate subject, and in that context, Rajasthan will also be entitled to its share of water. From Haryana's side, Rajesh Khullar (Chief Principal Secretary to the Chief Minister), Anurag Rastogi (Additional Chief Secretary, Irrigation and Water Resources Department), and other senior officers accompanied Saini to the meeting.

UCC panel meets CM Patel, likely to submit report by month-end
UCC panel meets CM Patel, likely to submit report by month-end

Indian Express

time22 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

UCC panel meets CM Patel, likely to submit report by month-end

The five-member committee, led by retired Supreme Court Judge Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai, met Chief Minister Bhupendra Patel to update him on its progress in assessing the need for a Uniform Civil Code (UCC) and drafting a law for its implementation. The committee, formed by the Gujarat government, briefed the CM on its work advancements on Tuesday. Sources told The Indian Express that the committee's term ends on August 31 and it is likely to submit a report by that time without seeking further extension. 'The committee is likely to submit its report by August end when its term is ending. The panel is unlikely to seek further extension,' sources added. After the report is submitted, sources said, the Gujarat government is expected to form a sub-committee to take formal action on its assessment. Recently, the Gujarat High Court had rejected a petition seeking directions to reconstitute the panel to include minority members, upholding the state government's right to constitute it. Apart from Desai, the four other members of the committee include retired IAS officer C L Meena, advocate R C Kodekar, former vice chancellor Daxesh Thakar and social worker Geetaben Shroff. During Tuesday's meeting, Law Minister Rushikesh Patel and Minister of State for Home, Harsh Sanghavi, were also present along with senior officials of the state government such as additional chief secretary to the Chief Minister, M K Das, Secretary to the Chief Minister, Vikrant Pande, and in-charge law secretary Upendra Bhatt among others. The committee was formed by CM Patel in February this year.

Driver's murder: YSRCP MLC's wife moves Andhra Pradesh high court over investigation notices
Driver's murder: YSRCP MLC's wife moves Andhra Pradesh high court over investigation notices

Time of India

time36 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Driver's murder: YSRCP MLC's wife moves Andhra Pradesh high court over investigation notices

Vijayawada: Lakshmi Durga, the wife of YSRCP MLC Ananta Uday Bhaskar (alias Ananta Babu), has moved the high court challenging the notices issued by the investigating officer in the case involving the murder of Subrahmanyam, the MLC's former driver. She sought directions to quash the notices issued under section 160 of CrPC as part of further investigation of the case. The counsel for the petitioner argued that the notices issued to Lakshmi Durga are contrary to the directions issued by the high court, which categorically said the investigation officer should conduct only a further investigation, not a reinvestigation of the case. However, in the absence of placing any new material on record, issuing notices to Lakshmi Durga would be a reinvestigation, not a further investigation, the counsel argued. Arguing on behalf of the police, public prosecutor Menda Lakshmi Narayana said the petition is infructuous as the notices have already been issued to others and statements have been recorded. He said there have been many judgements by the Supreme Court where the apex court said the investigation officer can summon anyone as part of further investigation of the case. He sought time to submit the details of Supreme Court orders setting forth judicial precedence in the matter. Considering the arguments, Justice Venkata Jyotirmayi Pratapa posted the matter for further hearing to Thursday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store