'Very dangerous': Waipiro marina rubber-stamped for fast track
Photo:
supplied / Jay Howell
The Bay of Islands community is shocked that a fast-tracked marina proposal will progress to the next stage.
The approval on Monday by Minister of Infrastructure Chris Bishop comes with no support from local iwi and hapū Ngāti Kuta, Patukeha, and Ngāti Hine.
"We are deeply concerned and do not understand how the minister could disregard the united oppositon to this proposal from across the district," Kohu Hakaraia of Patukeha hapū said.
Bishop has been approached for comment, however, Hakaraia said they "refute" the minister's previous statements that the marina is regionally or nationally significant.
The proposed build of a commercial marina will offer berthage for 200-250 recreational boating vessels with 14 spaces for 50-metre superyachts.
The cost of each berth depends on the vessel size - a 10-20m slot would cost between $80,000 - $640,000 while a 20-30m berth could be priced up to $1.2 million.
A public boat ramp, a parking lot, fuelling services, and hospitality and retail venues would also be constructed on reclaimed seabed with sand dredging used during construction and for maintanence.
It is estimated to bring an economic impact of $177.9 to $218.8 million in value-added GDP and generate just under 150 full time jobs in construction, operations, and boat maintenance over a 30-year period.
The proposed plan for up to 250 boating vessels
Photo:
supplied
Those opposing the Waipiro Marina Project have called for transparency and accountability from the two companies - Hopper Developments and Azuma Property - and hoped the decision would go back to a Resource Management Act process.
"As hapū and community, we feel that our voices have not been adequately heard," Hakaraia said.
Both companies did not respond to requests for comment.
An online petition has rallied 14,600 signatures disagreeing with the use of fast-track legislation for the site and
Far North Mayor Moko Tepania had also pledged to write a personal letter
.
There has also been a stern no from boaties.
Russell Boating Club members voted at their AGM in June to oppose use of the Fast Track Approvals Act 2024 with regards to the Bay of Islands project.
Life member and former commodore of the club Jay Howell said the area was a quiet, treasured destination for locals to "anchor up and enjoy getting away from the hustle and bustle of Russell and the western flank of the Bay of Islands".
The proposed marina and boat ramp would overwhelm the waterways with boat traffic, he said.
Plus, the Ōpua-Okiato Vehicle Ferry crossing already brought long lines of cars that worsened in the summertime, Howell said.
"That ferry is going to get overwhelmed by traffic. There aren't any alternatives really. They can't add more ferries and more ferry capacity, they're already at capacity.
"There's infrastructure issues that Fast-Track just overlooks all of that and allows somebody [who isn't local] to make a decision that it has big ramifications locally."
Boating and tourism businesses in Ōpua and Paihia were already struggling, he noted, and the marina could take business away from existing commercial centres making businesses less economically viable.
A low tide aerial shot of Waipiro Bay.
Photo:
supplied
Environmental benefits stated in the application included the creation of new marine environments, and improved ability to monitor and manage international and domestic boats that could be carrying foreign invasive species, like seaweed pest exotic caulerpa.
Howell was also a member of the Eastern Bay of Islands Preservation Society. He was concerned that the influx of a couple of hundred extra boats would cause
further decline of the whale and dolphin populations
- something he had noticed in the last 15 years of living there.
"Private boats just follow them around and don't leave them alone, and the marina will just exacerbate that situation out here."
In addition, scallop beds and mussels in the area had already been decimated due to overharvesting. Te Rāwhiti residents would lose one of their main pipi beds.
"There's all these impacts that the human activities are having on the marine environment in the area, and the marina will certainly put a lot more burden on all of that," Howell said.
Another member of the Preservation Society, Sandra Scowen, said the area should be protected from large-scale commercial development and preserved for future generations.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
10 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Takapuna finds formula for higher retail, hospitality spending
Part of Takapuna's shopping district. (File pic) Photo: Takapuna Business Association Businesses in Takapuna on Auckland's North Shore believe they have cracked a way to get people spending more amid the tough economic headwinds. Its businesses are reporting a 10.1 percent surge in spending at hospitality sites in June alone, and a 3 percent rise in overall spending in the first half of this year. Those hikes come at the same time as a raft of downward economic indicators. Last month Stats NZ reported food prices were up 4.6 percent and household savings dropped $392 million. Inflation is on the up , and Infometrics says electronic card spending was down in the year to March and that consumer spending remained weak. On Wednesday it was announced the unemployment rate has risen to 5.2 percent , the highest level since 2020. The Takapuna Business Association acknowledged times were hard for consumers, retailers and hospitality venues alike. "Things are definitely tight - high cost of living, inflation is still ramping up a little bit - so people are just being more considerate and careful about where they're spending their hard-earned money," chief executive Terence Harpur told RNZ. The business association said it was years of investment in infrastructure, events and urban planning in Takapuna that had led to people spending there. "We've seen some strong transport and accessibility improvements, we're also changing the centre to be more pedestrian friendly," Harpur said. "We've got a wonderful new town square, an upgraded high street, new parking buildings, a new beachfront playground area and all of those things increase the dwell time when people come. They enjoy the environment and they stay around for a bit longer and they tend to spend more when they spend more time there," he said. Harpur said Takapuna was having success when "that's simply not the case" in many parts of Auckland. "Retail spending across Auckland has actually been really tough, especially around the central city area has been tough. "My heart goes out to those small business in those areas," he said. "It is tough out there though and a lot of retailers are doing it tough but I'm hoping this is a little bit of a beacon of light for retailers and hospitality out there that there are some greenshoots and people are still spending money, and if you provide the right product and the right service that you can still be attracting customers and getting that money coming through your business," Harpur said.
RNZ News
40 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Pilots lose Employment Relations Authority battle with Jetstar
Jetstar argued there was no entitlement to an alternative holiday. Photo: 123RF Jetstar is entitled not to offer its pilots an alternative day off if they are on call on a public holiday but do not have to work, the Employment Relations Authority says. The New Zealand Air Line Pilots' Association went to the authority alleging breaches of the Holidays Act and collective agreement for pilots. It argued that pilots were entitled to an alternative holiday when they were on standby during a public holiday, even if they were not called to work. The association - and two pilot members, Richard Greenslade and Greig Johnston - argued the restrictions on the pilots on standby were such that they could not enjoy a holiday as they normally would. They: The association said the limitations were made more onerous when pilots had to ensure they were contactable at all times while on standby. Pilots were restricted from observing occasions of national, religious or cultural significance and celebrating with friends and family. Jetstar argued there was no entitlement to an alternative holiday. It said that some of the restrictions were inherent for any employee on standby, and requirements such as abstaining from alcohol were not unique to standby pilots. Authority member Alex Leulu said there was no dispute that an employee on call would face some degree of restriction, including not being able to fully observe occasions of national, religious or cultural significance with some family and friends. "Given the nature of the pilot's role in this case, issues such as health and safety meant the Jetstar restrictions on the consumption of alcohol and medication were reasonable. The other restrictions such as limitation on activities and the requirement to attend work were not significantly onerous and were not outside the usual bounds of planning one might be expected to undertake knowing they are rostered to be on standby. "Johnston's evidence also focused on him residing in Bombay and the logistical difficulties and restrictions he faced trying to attend work within two hours after being called to duty while on standby. "It is difficult to understand how Jetstar could account for any restriction on a pilot based upon where they decide to reside. Where a pilot resides is ultimately a decision by the pilot knowing their employment obligations. Little weight can be given to Johnston's evidence in this regard." Leulu said the restrictions were not enough to conclude that pilots did not have a whole public holiday while on standby. "I accept the Jetstar pilots who are on standby during a public holiday are not entitled to an alternative holiday unless they are called to duty." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
40 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Pilots on standby on public holidays not entitled to alternative day off
Jetstar argued there was no entitlement to an alternative holiday. Photo: 123RF Jetstar is entitled not to offer its pilots an alternative day off if they are on call on a public holiday but do not have to work, the Employment Relations Authority says. The New Zealand Air Line Pilots' Association went to the authority alleging breaches of the Holidays Act and collective agreement for pilots. It argued that pilots were entitled to an alternative holiday when they were on standby during a public holiday, even if they were not called to work. The association - and two pilot members, Richard Greenslade and Greig Johnston - argued the restrictions on the pilots on standby were such that they could not enjoy a holiday as they normally would. They: The association said the limitations were made more onerous when pilots had to ensure they were contactable at all times while on standby. Pilots were restricted from observing occasions of national, religious or cultural significance and celebrating with friends and family. Jetstar argued there was no entitlement to an alternative holiday. It said that some of the restrictions were inherent for any employee on standby, and requirements such as abstaining from alcohol were not unique to standby pilots. Authority member Alex Leulu said there was no dispute that an employee on call would face some degree of restriction, including not being able to fully observe occasions of national, religious or cultural significance with some family and friends. "Given the nature of the pilot's role in this case, issues such as health and safety meant the Jetstar restrictions on the consumption of alcohol and medication were reasonable. The other restrictions such as limitation on activities and the requirement to attend work were not significantly onerous and were not outside the usual bounds of planning one might be expected to undertake knowing they are rostered to be on standby. "Johnston's evidence also focused on him residing in Bombay and the logistical difficulties and restrictions he faced trying to attend work within two hours after being called to duty while on standby. "It is difficult to understand how Jetstar could account for any restriction on a pilot based upon where they decide to reside. Where a pilot resides is ultimately a decision by the pilot knowing their employment obligations. Little weight can be given to Johnston's evidence in this regard." Leulu said the restrictions were not enough to conclude that pilots did not have a whole public holiday while on standby. "I accept the Jetstar pilots who are on standby during a public holiday are not entitled to an alternative holiday unless they are called to duty." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
