
First Sea Lord's ‘affair' exposed after husband filed complaint
Last month, Sir Ben Key was forced to step back from all duties over allegations of misconduct, which are under investigation by the Ministry of Defence (MoD).
It was alleged that, in breach of the Navy's service standards, the 59-year-old was having an affair with a junior ranking staff member.
It is understood that the non-serving husband of the female member of staff reported his findings to the Ministry of Defence after he discovered the 'consensual' relationship between Sir Ben and his wife.
He felt as though the head of the Navy should be held to the same standards as those below him as Sir Ben has regularly spoken out about poor behaviour of those under his command in the past.
A source familiar with the events told The Telegraph: 'The husband was upset, because this is a man who prides himself on his Christian values and how he was raised by missionaries – but was doing this with someone else's wife.'
'Tried to go away quietly'
Sir Ben, who is married with three children, had previously announced that he would retire as First Sea Lord this summer, despite being considered a frontrunner to become the next Chief of the Defence Staff.
Earlier this week, The Telegraph reported that Air Marshal Sir Richard Knight, currently Chief of the Air Staff, will take over the post in the autumn when Admiral Sir Tony Radakin stands down.
It is understood Sir Ben tried to go away 'quietly' when he learnt that his extra-marital affair had been discovered, but that the Chief of the Defence Staff insisted there would be an investigation before his official retirement in order not to be accused of a 'cover-up'.
The source added that a number of female officers within the Navy felt they deserved a public apology from Sir Ben over what they deemed to be 'double standards'.
'The female naval workforce feel shockingly let down by his moral high stance and hypocrisy,' the source said.
'Judged for their professional conduct'
Earlier this year, during a parliamentary defence select committee discussing women in the Armed Forces, Sir Ben expressed his disapproval of inappropriate relationships within the military.
He said: 'We are absolutely determined to create a Royal Navy in which people are judged for their professional conduct, welcomed for the contribution that they make, and accepted for who they are.
'Behaviours that run counter to that will not be accepted, and particularly those around unwelcome sexual behaviours.
'We have removed people from the service, including those who have commanded, where we have discovered that their behaviours were not appropriate, or we have removed people from positions of responsibility before situations have got out of hand.'
As a serving member of the military, Sir Ben will probably have fallen foul of the Navy's 'service test', which prohibits relationships between commanders and their subordinates. The military also does not allow behaviour that could harm another serving member's marriage.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Ellen DeGeneres supports Rosie O'Donnell after Trump threatens to revoke her citizenship
Ellen DeGeneres showed public support for Rosie O'Donnell, whose US citizenship President Donald Trump threatened to revoke, just three months after Rosie accused Ellen of never saying 'anything political in her life.' It all began Saturday when the 79-year-old Republican politician vowed on Truth Social: 'Because of the fact that Rosie O'Donnell is not in the best interests of our Great Country, I am giving serious consideration to taking away her citizenship. 'She is a threat to humanity, and should remain in the wonderful country of Ireland, if they want her. God bless America!' On Sunday, the 67-year-old canceled comedian - who boasts 293.1M social media followers - shared Donald's post and gave a shout-out to the 63-year-old comedian: 'Good for you @rosie.' Ironically, the lesbian funnywomen have never shared more in common - being former TV titans who both left the States for the UK following Trump's re-election last November. 'I've never really known Ellen to say anything political in her life, so I was surprised to read that she left because of President Trump. Like, that shocked me, actually,' Rosie (born Roseann) marveled to Us Weekly last April. 'I've been a political person my whole life, not better or worse, it's just a different way to be in the world. I was very clear about the reason why I was leaving.' O'Donnell continued: 'It's not like we're tenaciously opposed to each other. We're just very different people. We have had some stuff in the past that we never resolved. And not in any way as, as partners or lovers or anything like that, just as friends and comedians, but I wish her the best. I seriously do.' The Long Island native's 'past' comment was referring to when DeGeneres told the late Larry King that she didn't know Rosie and was not her friend, which deeply upset her because they were close in the nineties. 'Ellen wrote [in a text], "I'm really sorry and I don't remember that,"' Rosie recalled to THR in 2023. 'It would never occur to me to say "I don't know her" about somebody whose babies I held when they were born. It wouldn't be in my lexicon of choices to ever say. When she was in a perplexing situation and people were saying things about her, I said, "Let me stand next to you and say that I'm Lebanese, too." When it was a downward media time for me, she didn't do anything.' The 34-time Emmy winner is reportedly 'never coming back' to the States after moving to a farmhouse in Cotswolds, England where she and her wife Portia DeGeneres are raising chickens and goats. Last Thursday, Ellen and the 52-year-old retired actress enjoyed seeing the 'amazing' Billie Eilish at The O2 Arena in London, and they'll celebrate their 17th wedding anniversary on August 16. DeGeneres notoriously got 'kicked out of show business for being mean' after her former self-titled daytime talk show ended following 19 seasons after being hit with racism, workplace bullying, and sexual harassment claims in 2022. It all began Saturday when the 79-year-old Republican politician vowed on Truth Social: 'Because of the fact that Rosie O'Donnell is not in the best interests of our Great Country, I am giving serious consideration to taking away her citizenship. She is a threat to humanity, and should remain in the wonderful country of Ireland, if they want her. God bless America!' On Sunday, the 67-year-old canceled comedian - who boasts 293.1M social media followers - shared Donald's post and gave a shout-out to the 63-year-old comedian: 'Good for you @rosie' DeGeneres is reportedly 'never coming back' to the States after moving to a farmhouse in Cotswolds, England where she and her wife Portia DeGeneres are raising chickens and goats (pictured June 13) Last Thursday, the 34-time Emmy winner and the 52-year-old retired actress enjoyed seeing the 'amazing' Billie Eilish at The O2 Arena in London, and they'll celebrate their 17th wedding anniversary on August 16 Ellen notoriously got 'kicked out of show business for being mean' after her former self-titled daytime talk show ended following 19 seasons after being hit with racism, workplace bullying, and sexual harassment claims in 2022 Meanwhile, Rosie and her child Dakota 'Clay' O'Donnell (R, pictured last Tuesday) are getting acclimated to Dublin and she's 'in the process' of getting Irish citizenship The New Orleans-born funnywoman now keeps busy running her age-positive skincare company, Kind Science By Ellen, as well as her lifestyle brand, ED Ellen DeGeneres. Meanwhile, O'Donnell and her child Dakota 'Clay' O'Donnell are getting acclimated to Dublin and she's 'in the process' of getting Irish citizenship. The 12-time Emmy winner - whose grandparents hailed from the country - adopted the non-binary 12-year-old during her two-year marriage to late ex-wife #2 Michelle Rounds, which ended in 2015.


The Sun
37 minutes ago
- The Sun
New twist in mystery of ‘UNICORN' skull found near King Arthur's castle as officials warn it was removed ILLEGALLY
A 'UNICORN' skull found near King Arthur's castle was removed illegally, officials warned. The Sun told how the mysterious fake object was spotted by Canadian tourist John Goodwin, 46, in Cornwall last weekend. 2 But now it has emerged the skull was taken from a Site of Specific Scientific Interest — at St Nectan's Glen in Tintagel. Anyone removing items from an SSSI can be fined or imprisoned. Zooarchaeologists from Historic England last night said the skull belonged to a horse — but it had a cow's horn attached. It said: 'It does look very well made.' John traded it for beer at a pub and is now on holiday in Greece before flying home. A barman at the Stonehenge Inn, Wilts, is looking after the skull. The manager said: 'He took it home, it was freaking me out here. 'I'm sure he'll happily to return it." Mysterious 'UNICORN' skull found near King Arthur's castle 2


Daily Mail
43 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
You can hardly blame the union for pushing at a door ministers unbolted: DANIEL HANNAN
When in opposition, Labour made a series of contradictory promises. The party would pay public sector workers more and make it easier for unions to call strikes. Yet it would also make sure that there was enough economic growth to cover these rises. Now it is discovering how incompatible those promises are. Ministers are furious with junior doctors – now called resident doctors – for calling more strikes only a year after getting a huge pay rise. Yet, at the same time, Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner is scrapping the minimum turnout that a trade union needs before launching legal strike action – a threshold that the doctors barely cleared in their recent ballot. Under the current rules, a strike requires the approval of 50 per cent of eligible union members. The BMA strike got 55 per cent which, as the Health Secretary Wes Streeting points out, is hardly a massive mandate. Yet his Government is lifting the requirement altogether. You can hardly blame the union for pushing at a door that ministers are theatrically unbolting. We are in for strikes of the most disruptive kind. The Corbynite clique that runs the BMA is being bellicose, convinced that the way to bring pressure on ministers is to make life as uncomfortable as possible for the general public. Its members are starting with five days of strikes at the end of this month, and it has told them not to give hospitals advance notice, so as to maximise the disruption to managers. 'You do NOT have a legal responsibility to disclose whether you are striking,' says Ross Nieuwoudt, co-leader of the BMA's resident doctors' committee, on X. At the same time, the union has recommended that its consultants charge £4,000 if they are asked to come in to cover for the striking juniors. As doctors used to say, this will hurt. It makes me feel almost sorry for Streeting. His first decision was to give junior doctors a massive pay bump: 28.9 per cent in phases, the last tranche of which comes into their bank accounts next month. The doctors' union, the BMA, trousered the money and, for a brief while, the doctors called off their industrial action. Now, a year later, they are back for more. Like the Vikings paid off by Ethelred the Unready, it turned out that they had withdrawn only briefly, their longships laden with silver, before deciding that the old deal was not good enough, and demanding another 29 per cent. Until now, public opinion has tended to favour the striking doctors. This is not because they have a better case than other workers – we almost all ended up getting a real-terms pay cut because of the lockdown – but because we grew up with a high opinion of medical professionals. People often quote Nigel Lawson's observation that the NHS is the closest thing the English have to a religion. But what Margaret Thatcher's Chancellor went on to say next was perhaps the more relevant insight. 'For a bunch of laymen, who called themselves the Government, to presume to tell the priesthood that they must change their ways in any respect whatsoever was clearly intolerable. And faced with a dispute between their priests and ministers, the public would have no hesitation in taking the part of the priesthood.' So it has proved – until now. A poll in The Guardian over the weekend showed that public support for the strikes had fallen from 52 per cent last year to 26 per cent now. Perhaps it reflects a growing sense that, however much the NHS budget increases, things don't seem to improve. We have more doctors and nurses on higher salaries, but it is harder than ever to see a GP. There is often a perception lag in politics and, until recently, Britain's unimpressive health outcomes were attributed to an imagined lack of funding. In fact, our health spending has been above-average for a wealthy country since the massive budget increases of the Blair/Brown years. Our lower survival rates and poorer outcomes are almost entirely a result of our insistence, unique in the world, on maintaining a wholly state-run healthcare system. Which brings us to the irony of these strikes. BMA members fanatically defend the Marxist principle on which the NHS is run: production according to ability, distribution according to need. Yet they don't like the application of the same principle to their own salaries. How do ministers suppose other trade unions will respond to their changes? Every government worker will want the kind of deal given to the doctors; and, thanks to Rayner's legislation, they can now easily call a strike to get it. Meanwhile, the country is borrowing £150billion a year just to meet its existing obligations. It turns out that being in government involves making, rather than just talking about, tough choices. Who knew?