Welfare rebellion looms for Starmer despite concessions to Labour rebels
The concessions included protecting people claiming personal independence payment (Pip) from changes due to come into effect in November 2026, and rowing back plans to cut the health-related element of universal credit.
But backbench anger has continued to simmer, with a statement from Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall laying out the concessions on Monday receiving a negative response.
Asked whether he was 'confident' that the concessions had done enough to secure passage of the Universal Credit and Personal Independent Payment Bill, disabilities minister Sir Stephen Timms would only tell Sky News: 'I certainly hope it passes.'
Some 126 Labour MPs had previously signed a 'reasoned amendment' proposed by Treasury Committee chairwoman Dame Meg Hillier that would have stopped the legislation if approved.
That rebellion appeared to have been averted after Dame Meg described concessions agreed on Friday as a 'workable compromise'.
But in the Commons on Monday, she was one of several senior Labour figures to raise concerns about the Government's revised proposals, while another MP involved in negotiations, Debbie Abrahams, suggested ministers had rowed back on what had been agreed.
A second amendment rejecting the Bill has been put forward by York Central MP Rachael Maskell with the backing of 138 disability groups, saying disabled people had 'yet to have agency in this process'.
Ms Maskell's amendment is reported to have been signed by only around 35 Labour MPs – far fewer than the 83 needed to overturn Sir Keir's majority, but enough to deliver the largest rebellion of his premiership just before the first anniversary of Labour's election victory.
Other sceptical MPs are expected to abstain on Tuesday, but could vote against the Bill next week if there are no further concessions.
One of the chief concerns revolves around a review of Pip to be carried out by Sir Stephen and 'co-produced' with disabled people.
His review is not expected to report until autumn next year, making it difficult to incorporate his findings into the Pip changes due to take place at the same time.
Ms Abrahams suggested the timing meant the outcome of the review was 'pre-determined', while Sarah Owen, another select committee chairwoman, warned it could create a 'three-tier' benefit system.
Groups including Disability Rights UK and Disabled People Against Cuts criticised the Government's claim that Sir Stephen's review would be 'co-produced' with them and urged Labour rebels to stand firm.
They said: 'The Government have made it very clear that they are intent on slashing the support that so many disabled people rely on to work and live independently, no matter how many disabled people tell them what a harmful policy this will be.'
Tory leader Kemi Badenoch said her party's MPs would vote against the proposals, describing them as 'not serious welfare reform' and saying ministers had 'watered down the small savings Labour were making'.
The original proposals were expected to save £4.8 billion by 2030, but Ms Kendall revealed on Monday that the revised proposals were likely to save less than half that figure.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
17 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Overseas students using higher education as ‘backdoor' to stay in UK
A paper from centre-right think tank Policy Exchange has called for the graduate visa route to be scrapped for all students other than those on postgraduate research degrees. The current model is 'not working' as individuals are using the student visa as a route to longer-term migration, the report has suggested. In May, the Labour Government announced plans to reduce the graduate visa route, which allows overseas students to live and work in the UK for up to two years after their studies, to 18 months. Under changes introduced by the former Conservative government in January 2024, international students in the UK have been banned from bringing dependants with them since – apart from some postgraduate research courses or courses with government-funded scholarships. But the report said the changes do not go 'far enough' and it called for bolder action to ensure study at UK universities is not 'a migration backdoor'. The paper said: 'Most fundamentally, the purpose of student migration should be to study, not to provide a backdoor route to longer term migration or settlement. 'Yet increasingly studying in the UK has become a pathway for widespread and sustained immigration.' The number of international students in the UK increased by 66% between 2014/15 and 2023/24, the report suggested. Two in five (40%) of those who arrived on student visas transferred to a different visa type within one year in 2023 – up from just 3% in 2019, according to the paper. Zachary Marsh, research fellow in education at Policy Exchange and author of the report, said: 'UK universities must return to the business of selling education, not immigration. 'Whilst international students can provide valuable economic benefits, the current system drives migration by those who have no interest in study but instead see the student and graduate visa as an open door to working in the UK. 'The Government and universities must go further to clamp down on those gaming the system. 'A more muscular approach is needed to restore public confidence that international students are good for our universities and wider economy and society.' The report has also suggested that overseas students 'may be crowding out UK students' at some universities. Shadow education minister Neil O'Brien is due to address a Policy Exchange event in London on Wednesday on higher education and migration to coincide with the launch of the think tank's report. Mr O'Brien is expected to say: 'It's not just taxpayers who are losing out. 'The current system isn't working for too many students, who are promised great things but find themselves having to pay back huge sums on very low wages. 'Too many students are being ripped off and we have to ask whether there are better uses of taxpayers' money that will leave young people better off.' Tim Bradshaw, chief executive of the Russell Group, a group of 24 research-intensive universities, said: 'In an increasingly competitive global market, the UK needs to maintain an attractive offer for international students. 'This includes the graduate visa route, which allows international graduates to remain in the UK to work and contribute to the economy for a period after their studies. 'We know that international student recruitment, like any immigration policy, needs to be robust and fair to maintain people's trust in the system. 'Our universities are committed to working with Government to eliminate any abuse of the system and ensure places go to those who are here to study and meet the standards needed to succeed on their course.' A Government spokesperson said: 'A series of measures have already been laid out in the Immigration White Paper to restore control over the system, including reducing the graduate visa from two years to 18 months. 'We will also ensure international graduates move into graduate level roles. This is what the Graduate route was created to facilitate access to, and will also help meet the UK's workforce needs, as part of our Plan for Change. 'We will also crack down further on abuse of our immigration system by strengthening requirements for universities, requiring tighter enforcement on visa approvals, course enrolments and student completions whilst continuing to welcome international students that support our world-leading universities.'
Telegraph
20 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Starmer's benefits Bill turns to farce
Sir Keir Starmer has rendered his flagship welfare cuts legislation 'pointless' in a farcical climbdown to win the support of Labour rebels. A planned crackdown on the personal independence payment (Pip), which helps disabled people with extra costs, was dropped just 90 minutes before the crunch vote. The late concession came when it appeared dozens of rebels were still willing to vote down the package, even though it had already been gutted last week to appease critics. Even with the change, 49 Labour MPs voted against the Bill – the biggest rebellion of the Starmer premiership, which marks its one-year anniversary this week. Government ministers faced ridicule from Labour critics, who dubbed the handling of the changes 'shambolic', 'unedifying' and a 'total clusterf--- of Godzilla proportions'. The U-turn means that almost all of the £4.6 billion of annual savings the Bill was meant to deliver have been lost, increasing the chance of new tax rises this autumn. Labour Left-wingers are expected to seize on Sir Keir's weakness and push for further policy changes, such as a new raid on wealth or relaxed rules on immigration. The mishandling of the welfare package, despite a working majority in the House of Commons of 165, is also likely to fuel Labour calls for an overhaul in Number 10. The Prime Minister threw his support behind Morgan McSweeney, his chief of staff blamed by some welfare rebels, in Cabinet meeting on Tuesday morning. Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative leader, said: 'This is an utter capitulation. Labour's welfare Bill is now a total waste of time. It effectively saves £0, helps no one into work, and does not control spending. 'It's pointless. They should bin it, do their homework, and come back with something serious. Starmer cannot govern.' Mel Stride, the Tory shadow chancellor, said 'This farcical climbdown is the most humiliating moment of Labour's first year in office.' He added: 'This isn't serious government, it's chaos. Labour has bottled welfare reform, left a multi-billion-pound hole in the nation's finances, and set the country on course for higher taxes or a debt spiral. It doesn't have to be this way.' The total disability and incapacity benefits bill is set to continue rising, from £76 billion last year to £98 billion by the end of the decade, piling pressure on the public finances. Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, faces a black hole that some estimates suggest could run to tens of billions of pounds, meaning she risks being forced into a new tax raid in her autumn Budget. Helen Miller, the deputy director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, said the changes would not save any money by 2029-30. She said: 'This is a Government with a majority of 165 that is seemingly unable to reform either pensioner winter fuel payments or working-age disability benefits. That doesn't bode well for those hoping this Government will grasp the nettle and address the deeper, structural challenges facing the UK public finances.' Labour rebels, some of whom are emboldened by forcing billion-pound changes on the Starmer administration, told The Telegraph they will push for new wealth taxes this autumn. One Labour rebel told The Telegraph: 'I'd say the new review will last longer than the PM. His sell-by date just got a lot closer after this week.' Andy McDonald, a Labour MP who voted against the welfare plan, said of wealth taxes: 'It is the broadest shoulders argument. 'Distributed to each according to his need.' That's not Marx, it's the Bible.' A second Labour rebel told The Telegraph: 'I think it is inevitable. I don't think the Chancellor has got any options left.' Sir Keir had been facing a huge rebellion last week when 127 Labour MPs – around one in four – signed an amendment to effectively block the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill. In an attempt to quash the revolt last week, Mr McSweeney, Angela Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, and Sir Alan Campbell, the Chief Whip, personally negotiated a compromise that meant all current recipients of disability benefits would not be affected by the changes. Instead, the new system would kick in from November 2026. A review of the most contentious part – toughening the eligibility for Pip – would also return that autumn. But on Tuesday afternoon, ministers were forced to make yet another alteration, removing the entire section of the Bill referring to changes to Pip. The sudden extra concession, which removed the most important part of the legislation just before the key vote, suggested government whips were not confident the legislation would pass. It eventually did by 335 votes in favour and 260 votes against - a much tighter result than expected given how drastically it had been watered down. As well as the 49 Labour MPs who voted against the Bill, 19 abstained. The concession was announced by Sir Stephen Timms, the minister for social security and disability, during the Commons debate just 90 minutes before votes were due to be called. It came just hours after Liz Kendall, the Work and Pensions Secretary, had insisted there would be no further changes. Ms Kendall, who told broadcasters there were 'lessons to learn' after the result, was the driving force behind the Bill and is likely to face questions over her position. Labour rebels were left infuriated that the Government was continuing to force through a Bill which had lost the vast majority of its major elements, rather than pulling the legislation entirely. Paula Barker, the Labour MP for Liverpool Wavertree: 'Whilst grateful for the concessions, this has further laid bare the incoherent and shambolic nature of this process. It is the most unedifying spectacle that I have ever seen.' Ian Lavery, the Labour MP for Blyth and Ashington, urged the Government to withdraw the 'hodgepodge of a Bill which means nothing to nobody'. Ms Lavery said: 'This is crazy, man. This is outrageous, man. This Bill isn't fit for purpose.' 'I went out for a banana – and the whole thing changed' Mary Kelly Foy, the Labour MP for the City of Durham, expressed shock at what had happened after she returned to the Commons after leaving for a snack. Ms Foy said: 'I popped out for a banana earlier on and, when I came back in, things had changed again. So I'm even more unclear on what I'm voting on.' The Tories were also critical of how the legislation had been handled. Simon Hoare, the Conservative MP for North Dorset: 'I have never seen a Bill butchered and filleted by their own sponsoring ministers in such a cack-handed way. 'Nobody can understand the purpose of this Bill now. In the interest of fairness, simplicity and natural justice, is it not best to withdraw it, redraft it and start again?' Around 800,000 claimants of Pip had been expected to lose money under the original cuts package, including 370,000 current recipients. The changes have now been shelved. It means the Government is still expected to spend £28.5 billion on Pip by the end of the decade. Already 3.8 million people get the payments, according to official figures. Sir Stephen will continue with his review, announced last week as part of the initial concessions deal, into Pip eligibility and report back in Autumn 2026. But government sources were unable to say if any of the original changes would be kept. That includes the most contentious element, which was to increase the number of points someone must get in an assessment for the payments. The legislation still contains the halving of the health top-up in Universal Credit for new claimants and the scrapping of the work capability assessment, as well as an increase in the amount of standard Universal Credit.
The Sun
20 minutes ago
- The Sun
Scrapping the Rwanda migrant deterrent scheme has been Labour's biggest act of self-harm
French farce NEXT week Britain will roll out the red carpet for the State visit of French President Emmanuel Macron. Someone should give him a tour of our asylum hotels instead. 1 After all, Macron's done precious little for the £480million we handed him to stop the boats. A record 20,000 have now crossed the Channel illegally in 2025 and been taken straight to free accommodation. Clearly, it's not just the migrants taking British taxpayers for a ride. Yesterday, French cops gave a demonstration of their expensive drones, cars and a beach buggy — all of which we helped pay for. Presumably their most-used bit of kit is new binoculars used by the gendarmes to make sure migrants are firmly on their way to Dover. Scrapping the Rwanda scheme has been Labour's biggest act of self-harm. Ministers are left making lame claims about smashing the people-smuggling gangs, while handing migrants millions more in legal aid to fight removal. Desperate Britain is now considering a 'one-in-one-out' returns agreement. In theory, the French set up asylum processing hubs and for every migrant with a genuine claim that they forward to Britain, we send an illegal back. But given their uselessness, how many will the French actually process? How car washes are being fined £3m a year for hiring illegal migrants to work - is your local firm among them? Migrants will keep chancing their luck until they know for a fact they will definitely be deported. Lost control WHAT total chaos. Normally, a Government with a huge majority would mark its first year in office by trumpeting a raft of great achievements. Sir Keir Starmer's Number Ten has chosen to blast itself in both feet. Last week's U-turn to try to salvage his flagship benefits bill was bad enough. Last night's second capitulation to Labour rebels renders it almost meaningless. No savings worthy of the name. No reform. No clue. We can now look forward to a second year in which Labour jacks up our taxes to fill the financial black hole. Still, at least the Prime Minister's Left-wing MPs will be happy. They look like the ones in control now. Cost of Red Ed In fact bills will go UP by a cumulative £104 by 2031 thanks to a massive upgrade of the network and green taxes. His uselessness would almost be considered funny. If it wasn't costing hard-up families yet another fortune.
