logo
End of FEMA program affects drinking water, building code updates, tornado shelter in SD

End of FEMA program affects drinking water, building code updates, tornado shelter in SD

Yahoo12-05-2025
A footbridge spans Spring Creek in South Dakota's Black Hills. Hill City had hoped to use Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities funding for a floodplain study of the creek. (Seth Tupper/South Dakota Searchlight)
Drinking water upgrades for Mobridge, efficiency boosting software systems for Rapid City and a tornado shelter for Chancellor are among the South Dakota projects that now count as formerly funded by the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
FEMA announced the axing of its Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) grant program last month in a press release lambasting the Biden-era creation as 'wasteful' and 'politicized.'
The 2021 program aimed to direct $1 billion in funding toward infrastructure projects to help communities across the U.S. 'reduce their hazard risk' as they 'build capability and capacity.'
Go to the Federal Fallout page for Searchlight coverage of Trump administration firings, funding freezes, spending cuts, grant cancellations, tariffs and immigration enforcement.
The press release from the Trump administration's incarnation of FEMA says all awards from 2020 through 2024 are rescinded, and that all the money that hasn't been distributed won't be. The unspent $882 million will flow into the U.S. Treasury or be reallocated by Congress, the release says.
FEMA falls under the leadership of Homeland Security Secretary and former South Dakota governor Kristi Noem.
The program 'was more concerned with political agendas than helping Americans affected by natural disasters,' the FEMA release says. 'Under Secretary Noem's leadership, we are committed to ensuring that Americans in crisis can get the help and resources they need.'
The South Dakota Democratic Party issued a press release of its own on the cessation of the grant program, one trashing Noem's agency and Trump's policies as damaging to South Dakota communities.
'Because of these cuts, city and county leaders will now have to scramble to either figure out where the rest of the money will come from, or ditch their projects altogether, leaving their communities vulnerable to disasters' wrote Shane Merrill, chair of the state party.
According to a tally of federal cuts compiled and updated weekly by the administration of Noem's successor, Gov. Larry Rhoden, $8.9 million in South Dakota projects were set to benefit from BRIC grants. Based on South Dakota Searchlight calls to local governments involved in the projects, it's unclear if that total figure represents the amount of grant money lost, or the total project costs including other funding sources.
Some BRIC money was collected and spent before the shuttering of the program. The city of Mobridge got $311,000 for phase one of a three-phase project to replace the piping that delivers Missouri River water from Lake Oahe to the city's water treatment plant on its way to residents' taps.
That first round of BRIC money paid for engineering, planning and a dive team survey, all undertaken in preparation of the second round of BRIC funding, which Mobridge Finance Officer Heather Beck said would've set the physical piping upgrade portion of the project in motion.
'We had been told by the FEMA folks that if phase one is awarded, they had never seen the second phase not get awarded,' Beck said.
The anticipated grant assistance with the pipe rebuild was a boon to Mobridge's larger $11.2 million drinking water project. Water bills paid by the north-central South Dakota community's residents are enough to keep the city 'self-sustaining' for the most part, Beck said, but the cost of major upgrades can be a heavy one to spread around.
We had been told by the FEMA folks that if phase one is awarded, they had never seen the second phase not get awarded.
– Heather Beck, Mobridge city finance officer
'With only 3,200 people, it takes more from them to be able to pay for these projects,' Beck said.
The city's on the lookout for more state or federal funding sources now, Beck said. The city had taken in some grant funding from the American Rescue Plan Act for the wider water treatment project already, but 'a lot of that $11.2 million has had to be borrowed.'
City leadership has reached out to South Dakota's congressional delegation in hopes that some of the grant funding can be restored through a program that's not shuttered.
Mobridge's nearly $4 million BRIC-funded project, with grant funding passed through to the city by Walworth County, was the largest project on the $8.9 million list of grant-supported projects in South Dakota. The city was set to pay 20% of the cost, meaning it lost out on about $3.2 million.
The project with the second-highest price tag on the state's tally of lost grant funding was $2.6 million. That project was meant to help Rapid City cover the labor costs of updating its fire codes, pay for software that would allow citizens or companies to submit documents like building permits or developer plans online, and to upgrade its computing systems to connect departments and avoid duplicate work between departments managing development and permitting.
A letter from Mayor Jason Salamun to the U.S. Senate majority leader, South Dakota Republican John Thune, says the work aligns 'with the priorities of the Trump-Vance administration.'
Noem's honorary degree sparks protest; meanwhile, a student she's trying to deport earns a doctorate
'Our project was specifically designed to enhance operational efficiency within our local government, ultimately saving taxpayer dollars and reducing administrative burdens for both city staff and the general public, including housing developers,' the letter reads.
Rapid City's share of the project was $623,093; the BRIC program was set to cover a little under a million dollars.
The city also hoped to create an inventory of potentially hazardous buildings, although Grants Division Manager Jamie Toennies said decisions on what the city might do to address those buildings would come later.
'Opportunities are there to proactively keep the buildings from getting in worse shape,' she said.
The city is on the lookout for more funding sources, Toennies said, as 'we had identified this need before this grant.'
The third-largest South Dakota project was $485,973 for the town of Chancellor, home to 316 people and one large ethanol production plant. According to a map of FEMA-funded mitigation projects maintained by the state, the town was in line for BRIC support of a severe wind and tornado shelter.
Hill City, a city of around 1,000 in Pennington County, had asked for, but wasn't awarded, money for a floodplain study of Spring Creek, which runs through town. Finance Officer Stacia Tallon said the federal share of the $167,200 project would have helped the city determine where to put replacement box culverts to mitigate flood risk, and to map out areas that might be safe for building.
The box culvert piece of the project in particular is still necessary, Tallon said, although it's unclear when or how the city will be able to move forward with the plans.
'We're still looking at them, but they've been kind of put on the back burner,' Tallon said.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

U.S., EU reach historic trade deal
U.S., EU reach historic trade deal

Yahoo

timea minute ago

  • Yahoo

U.S., EU reach historic trade deal

U.S., EU reach historic trade deal originally appeared on TheStreet. The U.S. and the European Union reached a historic trade deal on July 27. President Donald Trump said the EU is going to purchase energy worth $750 billion and military equipment worth hundreds of billions of dollars from the U.S. The EU has also agreed to invest $600 billion in the U.S. Tariffs for automobiles and everything else will be 15%, he added and continued that the EU has agreed to open up their countries at "zero tariff." "That basically concludes a deal." European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said the EU agreed to 15% "across the board" tariffs and said the trade deal with the U.S. will bring stability. Bitcoin reflected a rebound following the announcement of the historical trade deal and was trading at $119,063.02 at the time of writing. China, US to reportedly extend tariff pause by 90 more days Earlier also, Bitcoin witnessed a similar but sharper rebound — from around $118,500 to around $119,500 before it retreated to around $118,900 — following the news report by the South China Morning Post that the U.S. and China are expected to extend their tariff truce by another 90 days when both superpowers meet to resume trade talks in Stockholm on July tariff war has led to an enormous impact on the crypto markets so far. When the president hiked tariffs on Apr. 2, the total crypto market cap dipped from $2.74 trillion to $2.42 trillion on Apr. 8. Next, when he paused tariffs for all countries for 90 days on Apr. 9, China remained the main exception as the U.S.'s tariff hikes against it continued. Nonetheless, the market sighed a breath of relief and began quickly recovering to reach $2.71 trillion on Apr. 12. As trade talks between the two countries took place, they agreed to remove most high tariffs imposed since Apr. 2, but the deadline of this pause is set to expire on August 12. The total crypto market cap stood at $3.94 trillion at the time of writing. Meanwhile, Bitcoin hit a record high of $123,091.61 on July 14 as uncertainty around the tariffs continued — reflecting the king coin's resilience. U.S., EU reach historic trade deal first appeared on TheStreet on Jul 27, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jul 27, 2025, where it first appeared. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

GOP leans into Trump administration's Obama accusations
GOP leans into Trump administration's Obama accusations

Axios

time2 minutes ago

  • Axios

GOP leans into Trump administration's Obama accusations

Some Republican lawmakers on Sunday platformed the administration's recent claims that Obama-era officials waged a Russia-related conspiracy against President Trump — but stopped short of endorsing the president's allegations of "treason." The big picture: Trump is again bemoaning a years-long grudge against the widely held conclusion that Russia interfered in the 2016 election, following new accusations from Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard of a " treasonous conspiracy" from former President Barack Obama to sabotage Trump's first term. The initial accusations centered around findings from the Obama-era intelligence community that Russia didn't alter vote tallies by hacking election infrastructure. But as Axios' Zachary Basu and Tal Axelrod note, no serious investigation ever claimed Russia changed them. Last week, Gabbard declassified a report from 2020 that she alleges proves the Obama administration "conspired to subvert the will of the American people" and engaged in a "years-long coup against" Trump. In a rare rebuke, a spokesperson for Obama slammed the administration's claims as "a weak attempt at distraction." Driving the news: Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) called for an investigation into the matter Sunday on NBC's "Meet the Press." "If there is evidence of a crime being committed or suspected evidence of a crime being committed, create a special counsel to look at it," he said. "I think that's the best way to go." Asked by NBC's Kristen Welker whether the new controversy was an attempt to distract from the ongoing fallout from the administration's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, Graham argued he was trying to shed light on "something we didn't know before." The other side: Rep. Jason Crow (D-Colo.), a member of the House Intelligence Committee, slammed Gabbard as a "weapon of mass distraction" on "Fox News Sunday," arguing there was "no new information" released. "It's new to you, but all of this information has been available to the House Intelligence Committee, including in 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, when all these investigations and reviews were done under the first Trump administration," Crow said, later adding that no information had been "purposefully hidden." In 2020, a Republican-led Senate panel affirmed the intelligence committee's conclusion that Russia meddled in the election and preferred Trump over Hillary Clinton. Zoom in: But Rep. Rick Crawford (R-Ark.), the chair of the House Intel Committee, slammed what he called the "Russia collusion hoax" in a "Fox News Sunday" interview, describing it as "a fraud perpetrated on the American people at the expense of President Trump." But "with regard to the claims of treason, I'll leave that to the courts to make that determination," he noted. The bottom line: As Trump launches fresh attacks against his predecessors, questions about his administration's handling of the disgraced financier's case are still rippling through Washington. The competing narratives of the ongoing Epstein fallout, over which the president has cried "hoax," and the reinvigorated anger over the Russia investigation are in many ways both rooted in Trump's vision of a "witch hunt" that's plagued his political career, Axios' Basu notes. Trump quickly seized on the Obama storyline, sharing a seemingly AI-generated video of the former president being arrested earlier this month, and more recently, an edited photo of himself pursuing Obama in a car chase.

It's a year of rapid change, except when it comes to Trump's approval numbers, AP-NORC polling finds
It's a year of rapid change, except when it comes to Trump's approval numbers, AP-NORC polling finds

Boston Globe

time2 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

It's a year of rapid change, except when it comes to Trump's approval numbers, AP-NORC polling finds

Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Advertisement But even those shifts are within a relatively narrow range, which is typical for Trump. Advertisement Those long-term trends underscore that Trump has many steadfast opponents. But loyal supporters also help explain why views of the president are hard to change even as he pursues policies that most Americans do not support, using an approach that many find abrasive. Trump has not had a traditional honeymoon period in his second term. He did not in his first, either. The recent slippage on immigration is particularly significant because that issue was a major strength for Trump in the 2024 election. Earlier in his second term, it was also one of the few areas where he was outperforming his overall approval. In March, about half of US adults approved of his handling of immigration. But the July AP-NORC poll found his approval on immigration at 43 percent, in line with his overall approval rating. Other recent polls show growing discontent with Trump's approach to immigration. Advertisement 'I understand wanting to get rid of illegal immigrants, but the way that's being done is very aggressive,' said Donovan Baldwin, 18, of Asheboro, N.C., who did not vote in the 2024 election. 'And that's why people are protesting because it comes off as aggression. It's not right.' Ratings of Trump's handling of the economy, which were more positive during his first term, have been persistently negative in his second term. The July poll found that few Americans think Trump's policies have benefited them so far. Even if he is not a fan of everything Trump has done so far, Brian Nichols, 58, of Albuquerque, is giving him the benefit of the doubt. Nichols, who voted for Trump in 2024, likes what he is seeing from the president overall, though he has his concerns both on style and substance, particularly Trump's social media presence and his on-again, off-again tariffs. Nichols also does not like the push to eliminate federal agencies such as the Education Department. Despite his occasional disagreements with Trump, though, Nichols said he wants to give the president space to do his job, and he trusts the House and Senate, now run by Republicans, to act as a safeguard. 'We put him into office for a reason, and we should be trusting that he's doing the job for the best of America,' Nichols said. Trump has spent the past six months pushing far-reaching and often unpopular policies. Earlier this year, Americans were bracing themselves for higher prices as a result of his approach to tariffs. The July poll found that most people think Trump's tax and spending bill will benefit the wealthy, while few think it will pay dividends for the middle class or people like them. Advertisement Discomfort with individual policies may not translate into wholesale changes in views of Trump, though. Those have largely been constant through years of turmoil, with his favorability rating staying within a 10-percentage-point range through the COVID-19 pandemic, a felony conviction, and attempted assassination. To some of his supporters, the benefits of his presidency far outweigh the costs. Kim Schultz, 62, of Springhill, Fla., said she is thrilled with just about everything Trump is doing as president, particularly his aggressive moves to deport anyone living in the country illegally. Even if Trump's tariffs eventually take effect and push prices up, she said she will not be alarmed. 'I've always had the opinion that if the tariffs are going to cost me a little bit more here and there, I don't have a problem with that,' she said. Across the country, Hildenbrand dislikes Trump's personality and his penchant for insults, including those directed at foreign leaders. But he thinks Trump is making things happen. 'More or less, to me, he's showing that he's on the right track,' he said. 'I'm not in favor of Trump's personality, but I am in favor of what he's getting done.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store