
Jewish organizers are increasingly confronting Trump: ‘The repression is growing, but so is the resistance'
They spoke as alumni and as Jews to condemn the university's investments in Israel, its repression of pro-Palestinian speech, and its capitulation to the Trump administration's assault on academic freedom in the name of fighting antisemitism on campus. They had planned to burn their Columbia diplomas in protest, but the rain got in their way, so many ripped them to pieces instead.
'As a Jewish person, I'm really appalled at the idea that they are trying to make it sound as if opposing genocide is somehow antisemitic,' said Josh Dubnau, a professor at Stony Brook University who received a PhD from Columbia in 1995 and led the protest. 'There are thousands of us who don't believe in the right of the Jewish people to ethnically cleanse Palestine. There were Jews thousands of years before Zionism, and there will be Jews when Zionism is in the dustbin of history.'
Another alumnus, who graduated last year after being suspended over her participation in campus protests, wore a graduation gown and carried the photo of one of nearly 15,000 Palestinian students killed in Gaza during the current war.
'We have a particular duty to show up as Jews because we are not being actively targeted in the way that Palestinian students, Muslim students and Arab students are,' said the student, who asked to remain anonymous. 'It's our duty to weaponise our privilege as Jewish students.' New York police arrested her along with another protester after they set their Columbia diplomas on fire.
Nineteen months into Israel's war in Gaza and the US protest movement it prompted, allegations of antisemitism on campuses have become one of the primary pretexts for the Trump administration's multipronged attack on higher education, including billions in funding cuts, demands universities submit to a string of measures curtailing their academic freedom, and the detention and attempted deportation of international students who expressed pro-Palestinian views.
But increasingly, Jewish students, faculty and alumni are pushing back against the exploitation of antisemitism charges to justify repressive policies they say do not represent their Jewish values. They have written letters, led protests, lobbied legislators and denounced what they say is the systematic exclusion of Jewish perspectives that are critical of Israel from the national conversation over antisemitism.
Jewish Americans – some identifying as 'anti-Zionists', others with a range of views about Israel – have been at the forefront of the movement against the war in Gaza. Last summer, some 200 people, almost all Jewish, were arrested at a protest on Capitol Hill a day before a visit by Benjamin Netanyahu. Earlier this year, more than 350 rabbis, along with more Jewish creatives and activists, signed a New York Times ad denouncing Trump's proposal to ethnically cleanse Gaza.
But Jewish-led organising has broadened in recent months. As Jewish Americans continue to protest the war, they are also taking on Trump's onslaught against higher education in the name of Jewish safety, rallying around detained students and condemning what they view as the exploitation of antisemitism in the service of a rightwing political project. In yet another New York Times ad, several former heads of leading Jewish advocacy groups, including conservative ones like Aipac and Hillel International, criticised US Jewish groups that 'have been far too silent about the stunning assault on democratic norms and the rule of law' under Trump.
'The repression has been growing, but so has the resistance,' said Marianne Hirsch, a retired literature professor at Columbia University, who researches memory and the Holocaust and is outspoken against efforts to conflate criticism of Israel with antisemitism. 'I'm seeing a really cross-generational, Jewish faculty, student, and community mobilisation against this narrative.'
Jewish Americans' views on Israel, the war in Gaza, antisemitism on campuses and the Trump administration's actions are far more complex than mainstream political discourse may suggest.
A recent poll by the Jewish Voters Resource Center found that a majority of Jewish Americans are concerned about antisemitism and say they are 'emotionally attached' to Israel, although older respondents poll much higher on both questions than younger ones. But the survey also found that 64% disapprove of Trump's policies to purportedly combat antisemitism, and 61% believe arresting and deporting pro-Palestinian protesters contribute to increased antisemitism. A rightwing Israeli thinktank found last year that one-third of American Jews believe Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.
While large numbers of Jewish students point to feelings of ostracization on campus in the last year and a half, their views on the campus protests vary widely. A qualitative study of the experiences of Jewish students, published this month, criticizes representations of campus life that 'compartmentalize students into either/or categories, diminishing nuances between them'. The authors point to 'a need for nuanced discussions about Israel, antisemitism, and Jewish identity that respect generational differences and diverse perspectives'.
But tackling complex questions – for instance, about when anti-Zionism veers into antisemitism – has become difficult in an increasingly repressive climate. 'It is making it impossible to have discussions in the classroom,' said Joel Swanson, a Jewish studies professor at Sarah Lawrence College.
Swanson noted that many Jewish Americans are now mobilising against precisely the kind of repression their ancestors came to the US to escape. 'The very liberal principles that have enabled Jewish thriving in the United States are being chipped away at systematically, one by one,' he said.
Many of those who identify as anti-Zionist have found a home under the umbrella of Jewish Voice for Peace, a pro-Palestinian Jewish group whose membership has doubled since the war started – to 32,000 dues-paying members – and whose student chapters were banned from several campuses during last year's protests. In Baltimore, earlier this month, members of the group's dozens of chapters gathered for a national convening. Over four days of workshops at the heavily secured event, participants talked about organising from campuses to religious spaces to promote a 'Judaism beyond Zionism', as the conference tagline read, as well as address authoritarianism in the US.
As US universities have become political battlefields, much Jewish organising is happening on campuses and academic spaces.
Responding to what they view as a crisis in their scholarly field precipitated by Israel's atrocities in Gaza, Hirsch, the Columbia scholar, and others have launched a multidisciplinary Genocide and Holocaust Studies Crisis Network, a group of mostly Jewish academics invoking their expertise to advocate against universities capitulating to authoritarianism.
Jewish faculty and students have also organised in defense of pro-Palestinian students detained by the Trump administration. Following the arrest of Mahmoud Khalil, a Palestinian permanent resident and Columbia University graduate who has been detained for nearly three months with no charges, more than 3,400 Jewish faculty across the country signed a letter to denounce 'without equivocation, anyone who invokes our name – and cynical claims of antisemitism – to harass, expel, arrest, or deport members of our campus communities'. Several Jewish students and faculty wrote letters to the court in support of Khalil. And Jewish groups and synagogues filed a court briefing in support of Rümeysa Öztürk, a Turkish Tufts University student who was detained over an op-ed critical of Israel and released earlier this month as her case continues.
'Jewish people came to America to escape generations of similar predations,' they wrote. 'Yet the images of Ozturk's arrest in twenty-first century Massachusetts evoke the oppressive tactics employed by the authoritarian regimes that many ancestors of [our] members left behind in Odessa, Kishinev, and Warsaw.'
Faculty and students have also denounced congressional hearings against antisemitism on campuses that they say misrepresent their experiences and exclude their perspectives. As their president prepared to face legislators for a fresh round of antisemitism hearings in Congress this month, Jewish faculty and students at Haverford College issued a statement saying that their voices 'have absolutely not been represented in the current public discussion of antisemitism' and questioning the credibility of mostly non-Jewish, Republican legislators leading the battle over antisemitism on campuses.
Earlier this month, a group of Jewish students from Columbia University visited Congress to talk to legislators about their participation in campus protests that politicians paint as antisemitic, bringing their views 'to lawmakers who are almost never hearing from that specific perspective', said Beth Miller, the political director of Jewish Voice for Peace's action group, who accompanied the group.
As the Trump administration has sought to justify its repressive measures in their names, many American Jews have found themselves invoking their Jewishness in a public way for the first time. 'We've been criticising identity politics and the way everything gets siloed into identities, and suddenly we find ourselves saying 'as Jewish faculty' or 'as the daughter of Holocaust survivors',' said Hirsch.
'I've always tried to steer clear of having a public Jewish identity. I never felt like I had to advertise it,' echoed Joshua Moses, an anthropology professor at Haverford. 'But this moment kind of demands it.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
22 minutes ago
- The Independent
Senior Pentagon adviser, who alleged colleague called the cops on him, fired by Pete Hegseth
A senior Pentagon staffer and adviser to Pete Hegseth has been ousted, marking at least the sixth person under the Defense Secretary to quit within his first six months in office, according to reports. Justin Fulcher, who recently made headlines after accusing a colleague of calling the Pentagon police on him, will no longer serve as a senior adviser to Hegseth, three sources told CBS News Saturday. Fulcher began at the Defense Department working under Elon Musk's DOGE before he was promoted in April to serve as a senior adviser to Hegseth, the Washington Post reported. At the time, Fulcher, along with several other aides to Hegseth, joined a new Defense Department leadership team created in the wake of Signalgate, where top officials gave The Atlantic editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg a front-row seat as they discussed impending strikes on Houthi terrorists in Yemen. Fulcher made headlines earlier this month, after a Washington Post report revealed he allegedly stormed out of a meeting and complained to his boss, Hegseth, that Yinon Weiss, Elon Musk's pick to lead DOGE, had reported him to the Pentagon Force Protection Agency. Since January, at least six of Hegseth's top advisers have left the department, according to the Post. The former Fox News personality entered the role with little prior experience and has drawn criticism for his early missteps. Meanwhile, Fulcher, who previously ran a telehealth startup that went bankrupt, seemingly overstated his credentials before he was hired to work at DOGE, including claiming a doctorate in international relations and affairs from Johns Hopkins, according to a Forbes report from earlier this year. In a statement to the Post, chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said it was 'not fair' to characterize Fulcher's departure as a firing and called him a 'great guy.' The Defense Department released a statement on behalf of Fulcher that read: "As planned, I've completed 6 months of service in government to my country. Working alongside the dedicated men and women of the Department of Defense has been incredibly inspiring. "Revitalizing the warrior ethos, rebuilding the military, and reestablishing deterrence are just some of the historic accomplishments I'm proud to have witnessed. Still, this is just the beginning. "None of this could have happened without Secretary Hegseth's decisive leadership or President Trump's continued confidence in our team. "I'm grateful to both, and to the extraordinary civilians and service members who turn vision into action every day. "I will continue to champion American warfighters in all future endeavors and remain impressed by the work of the Department of Defense." In a text message to the Post, Fulcher reiterated that his departure was 'perfectly amicable' and that he had only planned to work there for six months.


The Independent
22 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump's team wanted Kilmar Abrego Garcia to face ‘American justice.' He could be deported again before trial
Donald Trump's White House is doing everything it can to make sure Kilmar Abrego Garcia never steps foot on U.S. soil as a free man – even if that means setting him free in another country while he faces criminal charges in this one. Federal prosecutors want to bring his smuggling case to trial as soon as possible. But if he's released from pretrial detention, immigration officials intend to arrest and deport him before a trial even begins, according to government lawyers. Abrego Garcia has pleaded not guilty, and his trial is set to begin January 27, 2026. He could be in another country by then. The administration spent weeks insisting Abrego Garcia would never be allowed back to the country after admitting he was wrongfully deported in March. Yet he was abruptly flown back to the United States from El Salvador last month to face a criminal indictment in Tennessee. At a press conference announcing his return, Attorney General Pam Bondi said Abrego Garcia would face 'American justice.' In recent court hearings in two different states, where judges are presiding over a criminal case and his wrongful removal lawsuit, Justice Department lawyers said they would only move forward with his criminal prosecution if he remains in custody while awaiting trial. If he is released on bail, they would let Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents arrest him and send him out of the country, again. Maryland District Judge Paula Xinis hauled Trump administration officials to court this month to understand what, if anything, the government intends to do with Abrego Garcia when he's released from pretrial custody. Department of Homeland Security officials admitted that ICE intends to arrest him, but they don't yet know where he will be deported. Government attorneys had previously announced plans to deport him to a 'third country' instead of his native El Salvador. 'There's been no decision made, as he is not in ICE custody,' Thomas Giles, assistant director for ICE enforcement and removal operations, testified last week. ICE intends to take custody of Abrego Garcia 'as soon as possible,' Giles said. Where he will await his removal from the country will depend on available space in immigration detention centers, according to Giles. Last month, Magistrate Judge Barbara Holmes determined there is no legal basis to keep him in pretrial detention. She set potential conditions for his release, including wearing an ankle bracelet and living with his brother in Maryland. The federal judge overseeing his criminal case will decide next week whether to uphold that ruling. On July 16, Tennessee District Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw Jr. said his decision will not be determined by what ICE wants to do. 'Frankly we don't know what is going to happen to him in that regard,' the judge said. But he said he was 'having a hard time understanding' arguments from federal prosecutors that there were no conditions under which Abrego Garcia — who does not have a criminal record — could be out of jail while awaiting trial. Holmes also appeared to reject the government's characterization of Abrego Garcia as a dangerous MS-13 gang member, human trafficker and serial abuser following claims from administration officials and government attorneys that 'defy common sense.' Under cross examination from defense attorney Sean Hecker, Homeland Security Investigations Special Agent Peter Joseph admitted that he did not know that one of the government's central informants in the case gave conflicting statements about Abrego Garcia's alleged gang ties in several interviews with federal agents. He also testified that he didn't know that the informants were in contact with other potential cooperators — at least three of whom sought deals with the government to legally remain in the United States in exchange for their testimony. Three of the witnesses are related, and Joseph admitted it was 'always a possibility' that they coordinated their stories to secure a better deal for themselves. 'They're family,' Crenshaw shot back. 'Family talk.' But it won't be Crenshaw's decision that decides whether Abrego Garcia walks free. That will be up to Judge Xinis in Maryland. She is expected to decide whether to block the Trump administration from deporting him a second time. Xinis has signaled that she will order the government to give him at least two days' notice, should the judge overseeing his criminal case release him from pretrial custody. Abrego Garcia was 16 years old when he fled gang violence in El Salvador and illegally entered the United States in 2011. Abrego Garcia, now 29, was living and working in Maryland with his wife and child, both American citizens, and two children from a previous marriage, when ICE agents arrested him in March. After government lawyers admitted in court documents that he was removed from the country due to a procedural error, federal judges and a unanimous Supreme Court ordered the Trump administration to 'facilitate' his return. A 2019 order from an immigration judge had blocked his removal to El Salvador over humanitarian concerns, and Supreme Court justices unanimously agreed the Trump administration had 'illegally' defied that order. Still, the government spent weeks battling court orders while officials publicly said he would never step foot in the United States as they characterized him as a serial abuser and criminal gang member. But emails and text messages provided to members of Congress appear to show Trump administration and government lawyers were sympathetic to his wrongful removal and made efforts to get him out of El Salvador before the case made headlines causing major headaches for the White House. Erez Reuveni, a 15-year veteran of the Justice Department who was working in the Office of Immigration Litigation, was closely involved with several high-profile immigration cases in the first months of Donald Trump's presidency when he was fired in April. He supplied members of the Senate Judiciary Committee with a massive trove of internal messages showing the lengths the administration was taking to label Abrego Garcia a member of MS-13 as they tried to figure out if they were violating court orders by keeping him in El Salvador. Before the case exploded into a national story at the center of the president's anti-immigration agenda, administration officials spent several days discussing the feasibility of returning Abrego Garcia or ensuring that he would be protected from the gang violence he fled as a teenager. The messages also revealed simmering tensions between Justice Department attorneys who worked the cases in court and lawyers for Homeland Security who were directed to advance the president's agenda, regardless of legal risks. Meanwhile, Abrego Garcia was , according to his legal team. His attorneys alleged he experienced 'severe beatings, severe sleep deprivation, inadequate nutrition, and psychological torture' while locked up inside. 'Last time they put Kilmar Abrego Garcia on a plane, he didn't know where that plane was going until it landed at the airport in El Salvador,' his attorney Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg told reporters last week. 'That's more or less what they want to do again, and that's what we're here to stop.'


Daily Mail
22 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
The REAL reason the Epstein 'client list' is never getting released
Jeffry Epstein's rumored 'client list' will never be released to the public by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), according to a former agent. John Kiriakou, an ex-CIA officer who was jailed for nearly two years in 2012 for sharing the agency's interrogation techniques to the press, shared his views on the controversial pedophile - including his opinion on the alleged list of clients. Kiriakou, who sat down for an episode of Patrick Bet-David's podcast, told the media personality that he believes the alleged list will not see the light of day because it holds incredibly valuable intelligence information that the CIA would never hand over simply because the public demanded to see it. The CIA whistleblower specifically said he believes that Epstein, 66, was employed by Israel's intelligence service, Mossad - and that is why the list will not come out. 'I believe that he was a Mossad access agent. It makes perfect sense to me,' Kiriakou said. It has never been established that Epstein had ties to Mossad. 'Jeffry Epstein, in my view, is a textbook case of an access agent. I've said this before, but I think it's important and it bears repeating,' he told Bet-David. 'If you are a foreign intelligence service and you want information from Bill Clinton, or Bill Gates, or Alan Dershowitz, or important people, you want secret information from them—you're not going to recruit them. 'They don't need anything from you. They don't have any financial vulnerabilities. So you do the next best thing: you recruit someone who has access to them, and you finance this person... he has a private island.' He went on to mention Virginia Giuffre, who led the fight to bring Epstein to justice and claimed she was trafficked to have sex with Prince Andrew. Giuffre died by suicide at the age of 41 in April. In response to Bet-David's question on who Kiriakou thinks has seen the alleged list, the former agent replied: 'I think it's actually more than most people realize.' 'Virginia Giuffre and five other young women in their statements, in their lawsuit, told us there were rooms with banks of monitors... monitoring every room and every bathroom,' he continued. 'So if there were clients—and I believe there were—and they were having sex with minors—and I believe they were—every single person who was hired to monitor those screens would have known. 'I believe there was a list, a client list. There had to have been. We know there was a black book—it sold at Sotheby's for heaven's sake. So where is it? Was it destroyed? And even if it was, why didn't Ghislaine Maxwell try to use it to save herself?' In recent weeks, Donald Trump 's administration has faced increasing scrutiny for their handling of the 'list' and the release of videos from inside New York's Metropolitan Correctional Center, where Epstein was housed until his death in 2019. The scandal and alleged 'cover up', has prompted a rebellion in the MAGA world, as many of Trump's loyal supporters believe Attorney General Pam Bondi should be fired after promising to release all Epstein-related files. Bondi came under fire a couple weeks ago after the Department of Justice said Epstein's 'client list' never existed. She also squashed speculation that Epstein's 2019 jail cell death was anything other than a suicide. Following the memo from his DOJ, which sparked a MAGA civil war, Trump became irate and said during a cabinet meeting that everyone should move on. He has now called his supporters 'weaklings' for believing a Democrat-run 'hoax.' When asked about the president going back and forth on the issue, Kiriakou said he does not believe the rumor that the administration is holding the files back because the president is implicated in them. 'I don't believe that for a second,' he said. Kiriakou isn't the only one who believes Epstein allegedly worked for Mossad, as Tucker Carlson made the same claim earlier this month. The former Fox News host issued the conspiracy theory that Epstein was an Israeli agent who blackmailed US politicians. 'The real question is, why was he doing this, on whose behalf, and where did the money come from?' Tucker asked about Epstein's mysterious fortune while speaking to a crowd of young voters in Florida. 'And those are the questions that need to be answered. And I think it's entirely fair to ask them.' Carlson denounced the DOJ's findings, going on to share his own theory about Epstein's sinister scheme. Carlson questioned where all of the billionaire's wealth came from, going from a math teacher to 'having multiple airplanes, a private island, and the largest residential house in Manhattan.' 'And no one has ever gotten to the bottom of that because no one has ever tried. And moreover, it's extremely obvious to anyone who watches, that this guy had direct connections to a foreign government,' he claimed. He said the reason Epstein's connection to the Middle Eastern nation is not discussed publicly was because 'we have been somehow cowed into thinking that's naughty.' 'There is nothing wrong with saying that. There is nothing hateful about saying that. There's nothing anti-Semitic about saying that. There's nothing even anti-Israel about saying that,' Tucker asserted. 'And the effect of making that off-limits has been to create a lot of resentment and I'll say it, hate online, where people feel like they can't just say, 'What the hell is this? You have the former Israeli prime minister living in your house?"' Carlson was likely referring to Epstein's close ties with the former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak. Barak met with him dozens of times - and even allegedly stayed over at Epstein's place - starting in 2013. 'You have all this contact with a foreign government. Were you working on behalf of them? Were you running a blackmail operation on behalf of a foreign government?' he asked the stunned listeners. Carlson also claimed that 'every single person in Washington DC' shares his sentiment, and none of them 'hate Israel.'