Post falsely claims US embargoed weapons deal with Nigeria over anti-gay law
'If you google, you will see a story of how a US President placed an arms embargo on Nigeria fighting ISIS then Boko Haram because the African nation passed a homophobic bill (sic),' reads an X post shared more than 800 times since February 15, 2025.
Boko Haram and other extremist groups have waged a 15-year insurgency in northeastern Nigeria that has killed more than 40,000 people and displaced millions (archived here).
'I get it; minority rights are essential, but Boko Haram?' adds the post written by Kalu Aja, an X user who shares economy-related content with more than 300,000 followers.
Aja links to a 2015 article quoting a former US congressman as saying the Barack Obama administration 'refused to help Nigeria with Boko Haram' because of the anti-gay stance of the Nigerian government (archived here).
A year earlier, the Nigerian government criminalised public displays of affection between same-sex couples and restricted the work of civil society organisations that defend the rights of gay people (archived here).
However, this was not the reason the United States cited for blocking the sale of weapons to Nigeria a decade ago.
Over the years, the Nigerian army has been accused of various human rights violations (archived here).
Thousands have also been killed in accidental airstrikes by the Nigerian Air Force (archived here).
In 2014, the US government under Obama blocked Israel's sale of US-made helicopters to Nigeria to fight Boko Haram terrorists, invoking the Leahy Law that prohibits the United States from assisting foreign security forces that violate human rights (archived here and here).
James Entwistle, the US ambassador to Nigeria at the time, said the proscription did not amount to an arms embargo (archived here).
In defence of the law, Patrick Leahy, a former US senator whom it is named after, said the Nigerian government should be serious about eliminating human rights abuses (archived here).
This elicited complaints from Goodluck Jonathan, Nigeria's president at the time, and from Muhammadu Buhari, his successor (archived here and here).
Buhari criticised the application of the Leahy Law and said the allegations of military abuses were unproven (archived here).
But neither of the former leaders accused the US of withholding military aid because of Nigeria's Same Sex Marriage (Prohibition) Act (SSMPA).
In 2018, during his first term, US President Donald Trump approved the sale of helicopters and fighter jets to Nigeria, pledging stronger support for the fight against terrorism (archived here).
Three years later, however, further sales of military equipment to Nigeria were put on hold, again over concerns of human rights violations by the army (archived here).
In the end, this deal was also approved in April 2022 (archived here).
In February 2024, Christopher Musa, Nigeria's chief of defence staff, said the military had been unable to purchase weapons because of lingering human rights concerns (archived here).
Four months later, the Nigerian Air Force announced plans to acquire 50 military aircraft but there were no details on the cost or source of the equipment (archived here).
AFP Fact Check has debunked several claims about US-Nigeria ties, including one that Trump's deportation order does not affect Nigerians.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Why the Strait of Hormuz remains critical for the global economy
As oil prices are climbing after the attacks on Iran by Israel and then the US, investors are closely watching the fate of a narrow sea passage in the Middle East. The Strait of Hormuz is vital for gas and oil exporters in the Gulf region, as this is the only route by sea to export large volumes of oil and gas produced among the oil-rich countries in the region. This narrow passage is located between Oman and Iran, connecting the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea. It is about 167 km long, and at its narrowest point, 39 km wide. According to the Joint Maritime Information Centre, June 2024 averaged 114 vessels transiting the strait daily and so far traffic in June 2025 is consistent with this. On 21 June, for instance, there were 122 vessels passing through the strait. The passage is deep enough and wide enough to handle the world's largest crude oil tankers, and it is one of the world's most important oil chokepoints (narrow channels along widely used global sea routes that are critical to global energy security). Related Oil price drops, shares jump as Trump announces Israel-Iran ceasefire Israel-Iran conflict fuels best month for energy stocks since 2022 The health of the world economy depends on the flow of oil from this region. Oil tankers on average carry through the strait 20 million barrels per day (b/d), or the equivalent of about 20% of global petroleum liquids consumption, according to the US Energy Information Administration analysis. 'A potential Iranian blockade of the Strait of Hormuz would send shockwaves through the global economy," Professor Guido Cozzi, Chair of Macroeconomics at the University of St. Gallen, said to Euronews. He added that any disruption to the oil flow in this narrow waterway would drive up energy prices, fuel inflation, and strain supply chains. Related What's at stake for Europe if the Strait of Hormuz is blocked? Continental Europe and China are losing the most, both heavily reliant on imported energy and lacking domestic buffers. "They would face rising costs, slower growth, and heightened inflation without any upside," Cozzi said. Meanwhile, the US and the UK would see their exports become more competitive, as they are sourcing the majority of their energy from elsewhere. And if the strait would be closed, pushing prices up globally, that would benefit Western producers more than it would harm them, according to the professor. Besides oil, global natural gas supply could also be seriously impacted, as Qatar, one of the world's biggest natural gas exporters uses the narrow seaway to export about 77 million metric tons of liquefied natural gas (LNG) a year. This is one-fifth of the global LNG supply. "Alternative supply routes for Middle Eastern oil and gas are limited, with pipeline capacity insufficient to offset potential maritime disruptions through the Persian Gulf and Red Sea,' S&P said in an analysis. 'Any Iranian closure of the Strait of Hormuz would affect not only its own exports but also those of Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Kuwait and Qatar, potentially removing over 17 million b/d of crude oil from global markets,' added the analysis, saying that Saudi Arabia and the UAE have pipelines that can circumvent the strait. Analysts expect oil prices to skyrocket and surpass $100 a barrel if Iran decides to close the passage. Though insurance for the oil tankers passing through the strait increased and the situation is quite tense, according to the Joint Maritime Information Centre, there are no indications of threats to commercial shipping. Related The dollar sees a rebound after US strikes Iran, but can it continue? After US attacks on three Iranian nuclear sites, on 22 June, the Parliament in Tehran voted to close down the strait. A step that has never been taken. The decision is pending approval by the Islamic Republic's Supreme National Security Council. Iran threatened several times in the past that it would cut this artery of oil in the past but it never followed through with the threat. US Vice-President JD Vance called the move 'suicidal' for Iran's economy on Sunday at a press conference. Creating a major disruption in the strait would be extremely difficult due to various economic, political and military forces present in the region today, said the Robert Strauss Center for International Security and Law in an analysis. Experts agree that Iran itself has a lot to lose and very little to gain as it would cut its own oil exports to major trade partners such as China. Besides losing a key source of revenue, Iran would also anger its oil-producing neighbours whose support they may not be able to afford to risk. Related Oil rises and Europe's markets open lower after US strikes on Iran If Iran decides to close the passageway, another question is, for how long? The duration could be key, as global stockpiles are currently sufficient. The nations in need have at least 5.8 billion barrels of crude and fuel stockpiled between them, according to Bloomberg. This shows a healthy buffer, compared to the annual 7.3 billion barrels a year, passing through the strait. According to Barclays, other possible scenarios include Iran trying to target the Strait of Hormuz using missile attacks, making ships and insurance firms hesitant to use Hormuz. They could also consider mining the strait, which would hit traffic to a greater extent. There are also less aggressive ways to further disturb commercial shipping through Hormuz. For instance, the widespread jamming of GPS signals could make it harder to navigate safely in certain conditions. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Why the Strait of Hormuz remains critical for the global economy
As oil prices are climbing after the attacks on Iran by Israel and then the US, investors are closely watching the fate of a narrow sea passage in the Middle East. The Strait of Hormuz is vital for gas and oil exporters in the Gulf region, as this is the only route by sea to export large volumes of oil and gas produced among the oil-rich countries in the region. This narrow passage is located between Oman and Iran, connecting the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea. It is about 167 km long, and at its narrowest point, 39 km wide. According to the Joint Maritime Information Centre, June 2024 averaged 114 vessels transiting the strait daily and so far traffic in June 2025 is consistent with this. On 21 June, for instance, there were 122 vessels passing through the strait. The passage is deep enough and wide enough to handle the world's largest crude oil tankers, and it is one of the world's most important oil chokepoints (narrow channels along widely used global sea routes that are critical to global energy security). Related Oil price drops, shares jump as Trump announces Israel-Iran ceasefire Israel-Iran conflict fuels best month for energy stocks since 2022 The health of the world economy depends on the flow of oil from this region. Oil tankers on average carry through the strait 20 million barrels per day (b/d), or the equivalent of about 20% of global petroleum liquids consumption, according to the US Energy Information Administration analysis. 'A potential Iranian blockade of the Strait of Hormuz would send shockwaves through the global economy," Professor Guido Cozzi, Chair of Macroeconomics at the University of St. Gallen, said to Euronews. He added that any disruption to the oil flow in this narrow waterway would drive up energy prices, fuel inflation, and strain supply chains. Related What's at stake for Europe if the Strait of Hormuz is blocked? Continental Europe and China are losing the most, both heavily reliant on imported energy and lacking domestic buffers. "They would face rising costs, slower growth, and heightened inflation without any upside," Cozzi said. Meanwhile, the US and the UK would see their exports become more competitive, as they are sourcing the majority of their energy from elsewhere. And if the strait would be closed, pushing prices up globally, that would benefit Western producers more than it would harm them, according to the professor. Besides oil, global natural gas supply could also be seriously impacted, as Qatar, one of the world's biggest natural gas exporters uses the narrow seaway to export about 77 million metric tons of liquefied natural gas (LNG) a year. This is one-fifth of the global LNG supply. "Alternative supply routes for Middle Eastern oil and gas are limited, with pipeline capacity insufficient to offset potential maritime disruptions through the Persian Gulf and Red Sea,' S&P said in an analysis. 'Any Iranian closure of the Strait of Hormuz would affect not only its own exports but also those of Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Kuwait and Qatar, potentially removing over 17 million b/d of crude oil from global markets,' added the analysis, saying that Saudi Arabia and the UAE have pipelines that can circumvent the strait. Analysts expect oil prices to skyrocket and surpass $100 a barrel if Iran decides to close the passage. Though insurance for the oil tankers passing through the strait increased and the situation is quite tense, according to the Joint Maritime Information Centre, there are no indications of threats to commercial shipping. Related The dollar sees a rebound after US strikes Iran, but can it continue? After US attacks on three Iranian nuclear sites, on 22 June, the Parliament in Tehran voted to close down the strait. A step that has never been taken. The decision is pending approval by the Islamic Republic's Supreme National Security Council. Iran threatened several times in the past that it would cut this artery of oil in the past but it never followed through with the threat. US Vice-President JD Vance called the move 'suicidal' for Iran's economy on Sunday at a press conference. Creating a major disruption in the strait would be extremely difficult due to various economic, political and military forces present in the region today, said the Robert Strauss Center for International Security and Law in an analysis. Experts agree that Iran itself has a lot to lose and very little to gain as it would cut its own oil exports to major trade partners such as China. Besides losing a key source of revenue, Iran would also anger its oil-producing neighbours whose support they may not be able to afford to risk. Related Oil rises and Europe's markets open lower after US strikes on Iran If Iran decides to close the passageway, another question is, for how long? The duration could be key, as global stockpiles are currently sufficient. The nations in need have at least 5.8 billion barrels of crude and fuel stockpiled between them, according to Bloomberg. This shows a healthy buffer, compared to the annual 7.3 billion barrels a year, passing through the strait. According to Barclays, other possible scenarios include Iran trying to target the Strait of Hormuz using missile attacks, making ships and insurance firms hesitant to use Hormuz. They could also consider mining the strait, which would hit traffic to a greater extent. There are also less aggressive ways to further disturb commercial shipping through Hormuz. For instance, the widespread jamming of GPS signals could make it harder to navigate safely in certain conditions. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda sign US-mediated peace deal aimed at ending decades of bloody conflict
WASHINGTON (AP) — Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda sign US-mediated peace deal aimed at ending decades of bloody conflict.
