logo
Public-private pain: buying back Sydney's embattled Northern Beaches hospital faces uncertain prognosis

Public-private pain: buying back Sydney's embattled Northern Beaches hospital faces uncertain prognosis

The Guardian2 days ago
Just before the New South Wales parliament rose for the winter break, an unusual piece of legislation passed through both chambers late in the evening. It aimed to strengthen the arm of the Minns government in its negotiations to return the Northern Beaches hospital (NBH) to public ownership by threatening changes to the terms of the contract with its private partner, Healthscope.
NBH is the only public-private partnership (PPP) in NSW where public hospital services, including emergency care, are delivered by the private sector. The Labor government, a staunch critic of PPPs, has vowed it would not enter any such deals in the future. To underscore its stance, it has now passed legislation banning PPPs to deliver acute care.
After years of mounting debt and a string of complaints about care standards – including a toddler dying in a chair while waiting hours for care and a woman whose baby died in childbirth because an emergency caesarean was offered too late – the hospital went into receivership in May. Untangling its private components from its public ones and settling the terms of the government's buyback are proving painful.
The PPP was put in place by the previous Coalition government in 2013, despite a similar failed experiment by the Greiner government at Port Macquarie hospital almost two decades before.
The Minns government had resisted earlier calls to buy back NBH, but it has now been forced into action after Healthscope's collapse, with debt of $1.6bn.
Local MPs and staff at the hospital had long been sounding the alarm about the impact of the financial incentive for profit on patient care.
The independent Wakehurst MP, Michael Regan, has campaigned for a government buyback, proposing legislation that would return the hospital to public hands with no compensation at all.
With the financial future of a hospital serving more than 370,000 residents on Sydney's northern beaches uncertain, the government has concluded a buyback is its only option. It is adamant, however, that it does not want to pay a 'windfall gain' and so supported the amended legislation.
The Northern Beaches hospital continues to operate normally with a financial lifeline from the Commonwealth Bank, while a government-appointed taskforce negotiates with Healthscope's receivers, McGrathNicol.
Progress, however, has been slow.
The parties have not reached agreement over the price or exactly what it is that the government is going to buy.
One of the problems is that the private and public components at NBH are closely integrated, unlike some other hospitals, where the private facilities are often housed in a separate building with its own services.
NBH has separate wards, but many services – such as theatres, nursing staff, cleaning, , X-ray, pharmacy and pathology – are shared, with several operated by third-party private companies.
The building itself had also been sold to a property trust, which leases it back to Healthscope, adding further layers of complexity.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
The cost of building the hospital was well north of $1bn, with the government contributing $600m at the time. A report in 2015 said the total cost to taxpayers – for the building and for Healthscope providing the public hospital beds over the life of the contract to 2038 – was $2.14bn.
Healthscope also has rights to operate the private component until 2046.
But is it a lucrative deal or not?
It was revealed in a scathing independent report by the NSW auditor general, Bola Oyetunji, released in April that Healthscope was anxious to exit from running the public hospital part of NBH and had made two offers to the government to sell in 2023.
The special legislation passed in late June arguably tips the scales in the government's favour by making it clear that receivership is a breach and starts the clock ticking on a resolution.
'If a mutual agreement is not reached, the amendments would give the health minister the power to issue a termination notice to Healthscope,' the treasurer, Daniel Mookhey, said in a statement.
'In addition, the treasurer would have the power to ensure that compensation negotiations occur in a reasonable time frame and to appoint an independent person to determine compensation if agreement cannot be reached.'
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
But the approach by the government has drawn criticism from business and the opposition (which ultimately supported the bill) on the grounds that it amounts to retrospective alteration of a contract and raises the question of sovereign risk for future investors in NSW.
For the time being, the receivers and the taskforce appointed by the government are back at the table. A spokesperson for Mookhey said they are looking for a quick resolution.
The government has a pot of money available for the buyback of the hospital. The 2025-26 budget revealed unallocated funds of $860m. It could all go smoothly or it could end in the courts.
'We are continuing to engage in constructive discussions with the NSW government on the future ownership of Northern Beaches hospital,' Healthscope said in a statement. 'Given the government's policy position against further public-private partnerships in the health sector, we believe this is in the best interest of the Northern Beaches hospital staff, patients and wider community.'
There have been serious questions about NBH's ability to provide reliable healthcare since it opened in 2018. Staff reported shortages of basic supplies and an inefficient IT system where records were divided over several databases.
Some teething problems were resolved early on, but staff continued to be concerned about the tensions between profit and patient care.
The auditor general's April report confirmed critics' concerns, finding the PPP 'creates tension between commercial imperatives and clinical outcomes'.
It found the hospital had failed to act on warnings about risks to patient safety and outcomes, and its electronic medical record systems 'present quality and safety risks', which Healthscope and the government's Northern Sydney Local Health District had known about since the hospital opened in 2018.
In 2019, Healthscope was bought by a Canadian private equity firm Brookfield. High levels of debt intensified Healthscope's financial pressures and resulted in more concerns about how the PPP was operating.
At the same time, the private hospital sector was at war with private insurers over a reduction in payout amounts for in-hospital care, which added to financial pressures.
NBH – or at least its public hospital operations – will be returned to public ownership. The more likely outcome is that the government will buy the whole hospital, though this is not certain. It hopes the sale can be resolved quickly – and without blowing the budget.
That will be welcomed by nurses who want to be employed on the same terms as their colleagues working in government-owned hospitals, including better patient ratios.
For patients on the northern beaches, there will hopefully be an improvement in services, though Healthscope insists it already performs well compared with other similar hospitals.
One of the big changes is likely to be the types of operations offered at NBH. At the moment, more complex cases are channelled to the Royal North Shore hospital under opaque policies put in place by the Northern Sydney Local Health District. With the same ownership, there will be less incentive for this practice to continue.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Australia news live: Burke defends Segal over husband's donations to rightwing group; PM will walk tightrope in Xi meeting
Australia news live: Burke defends Segal over husband's donations to rightwing group; PM will walk tightrope in Xi meeting

The Guardian

time24 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Australia news live: Burke defends Segal over husband's donations to rightwing group; PM will walk tightrope in Xi meeting

Update: Date: 2025-07-14T20:35:04.000Z Title: Welcome Content: Good morning and welcome to our live news blog. I'm Martin Farrer with some of the stories that will make the news today and then it'll be Nick Visser to take you through the day. Tony Burke, the minister for home affairs, went on ABC's 7.30 last night to defend the antisemitism envoy, Jillian Segal, after it was revealed her husband had funded the rightwing lobby group Advance Australia. Segal said she had no involvement in it. More details on his comments soon. Anthony Albanese will meet China's president, Xi Jinping, the premier, Li Qiang, and Communist party chair Zhao Leji today – the three highest-ranking members of China's ruling committee – in what will be the centrepiece of the prime minister's six-day tour of the country. We'll have more on this shortly as well. And Hannah Thomas, the former Greens candidate who sustained a serious eye injury during her arrest at a protest in Sydney, will face court in Bankstown today. She is charged with hindering or resisting police and not following a move-on direction in an anti-Israel protest that police say was unauthorised. More coming up.

The NHS model is on its last legs — time to replace it
The NHS model is on its last legs — time to replace it

Times

time3 hours ago

  • Times

The NHS model is on its last legs — time to replace it

At last, the unthinkable is being seriously thought about healthcare in Britain. The NHS is bust. More and more billions are periodically thrown at it, but its waiting lists are horrendous and relative to other comparable countries it does poorly in life expectancy and healthy life chances. Only the US does worse. As the largest employer in Europe, the NHS has some 1.38 million full-time equivalent staff who absorb almost half the budget for day-to-day spending. It's virtually impossible to run efficiently, and examples abound of rotten management and excessive bureaucracy. So says a report by Policy Exchange, which declares that this has to end. From 1955 to 2023, real health expenditure per capita rose by about 850 per cent. At 9 per cent of GDP, government health spending is almost the highest of all developed countries and by some estimates will rise to more than 20 per cent of GDP by 2070. Without radical reform, says the report, other public spending would have to be squeezed or taxation would need to be increased to eye-watering levels. This would damage the economy so badly that 'it simply cannot be allowed to happen'. In his foreword, the former health secretary Sir Sajid Javid says Britain is now at a crossroads. The NHS model can't cope with spiralling demand. It's run entirely by the state and its agencies. By contrast, says Javid, the very best performing healthcare systems combine high levels of state subsidy, mandatory insurance, co-payments, and individual choice. The report accordingly proposes replacing the tax-funded NHS by compulsory insurance, backed up by a publicly funded safety net to cover the poor, plus some element of co-payment to incentivise people to look after themselves. It recommends the model adopted by the Netherlands in 2006 under which people choose their insurance providers, with the state's role reduced to regulating insurers and providing the safety net for those who can't afford to insure themselves. Dutch healthcare costs are now proportionately lower than in the UK, waiting lists are smaller and health outcomes generally better. It has been clear for years that European-style social insurance systems fulfil the moral obligations of the NHS while providing better outcomes. Yet the NHS has been treated by Conservatives and Labour alike as the most sacred of political cows. This is even though it's not just failing to deliver adequate healthcare but the enormous sums it's swallowing are seriously distorting the economy, diverting essential investment from services ranging from education to defence. However, the whole public sector is on its knees for which the NHS is not the principal cause. The criminal justice system, for example, is collapsing through sustained and serious underfunding. The retired senior judge Sir Brian Leveson has now controversially proposed to limit trial by jury to tackle the immense backlog of cases, some of which take years to come to trial and may have to be abandoned because of the passage of time. Limiting jury trial, however, won't solve the problem because the lower courts are also under immense strain, as are the prisons and the police. The essence of the problem is that for decades Britain has been living a lie. It has indulged itself in a welfare state without taking the measures to pay for it. This goes back to the end of the Second World War, when the Attlee government decided that the spirit of the times demanded the building of a brave new world based on collective provision and equality. Far less attention was paid to creating the wealth to pay for this nirvana. It was assumed that redistributing wealth from rich to poor would pay for it all. Society thus moved from making to taking, producing less and less while telling itself that it had a right to welfare provision and that the rich should stump up. No government (other than Margaret Thatcher's) was brave enough to deliver some essential home truths about spending above the country's means. Instead, governments lied that things were getting better and that more was being spent. In fact, the public sector was being salami-sliced to shuffle funds from one service to another; and all were being fleeced to pour more billions into the black hole of the NHS. The ultimate symbol of this irresponsibility, and a principal force behind Britain's slide from making to taking, has been the benefits system. According to the Centre for Social Justice, people claiming universal credit and payments for ill health will soon earn £2,500 more than through the minimum wage. The Office for National Statistics says nearly one in four working-age people are classified as disabled. The NHS Confederation says that in 2021-22, 63,392 people went straight from university on to long-term sickness benefits, with an incredible increase among 25 to 34-year-olds of 69 per cent in five years. Last week, Kemi Badenoch rightly said the UK was 'sitting on a ticking time bomb' of spiralling welfare dependency, spending more on sickness benefits than on defence. The NHS model must be replaced to provide the equitable and efficient provision of healthcare to which politicians pay such dishonest lip service, and to protect the economy from such damaging distortions. But the underlying issue of an unaffordable welfare state can only be tackled by a government brave enough to recreate the work ethic, and an economy that delivers the jobs to inspire it.

The militant strike ringleader who now controls the BMA
The militant strike ringleader who now controls the BMA

Telegraph

time4 hours ago

  • Telegraph

The militant strike ringleader who now controls the BMA

The militant Corbynista who helped inspire the first doctors' strikes in 40 years is now in charge of the British Medical Association (BMA). Dr Thomas Dolphin, a consultant anaesthetist in London, beat four other candidates to become chairman of the BMA council last month and will now lead it for at least three years in what is already looking like a painful tenure for Wes Streeting. Ironically, had things gone the way Dr Dolphin had planned, he would be in the House of Commons alongside the Health Secretary. But the Labour Party did not shortlist him to run as an MP at last year's general election, and now he faces them instead as agitator-in-chief. The 47-year-old has a base salary in excess of £126,000 and has spent the past 20 years building on his political ambitions, playing a pivotal role in turning the union into the militant group of strikers that it is today. He is part of a group of doctors who have 'ideologically captured' the BMA, according to insiders, and been labelled by critics as 'Trots' – a reference to the hard-Left ideals of Leon Trotsky, the Marxist revolutionary. Last year, Dr Dolphin was responsible for putting forward a motion – that was passed without debate – to reject the independent Cass review into children's transgender healthcare, which had called on the NHS to stop prescribing puberty blockers to children. More than 1,000 union members signed an open letter in revolt, and around 200 medics quit as a result, insiders claim. An activist during the days of Jeremy Corbyn, he campaigned alongside John McDonnell, the former shadow chancellor and socialist, and has been the election agent for Dawn Butler, the London MP for Brent East, in the last three elections. His rise to the top of the BMA has coincided with increasing levels of political activism and dissonance among members. He has been a critic of the Government and an outspoken member of the union since the days of Tony Blair – when the BMA says doctors were last paid fairly. In 2007, a young Dr Dolphin championed the BMA's calls for Patricia Hewitt, the former health secretary, to resign over a chaotic online application system for junior doctors that resulted in medics not being offered job interviews. He rose to become chairman of the union's junior doctors' committee and in 2012, supported doctors' first industrial action since the 1970s over pension reforms. He has been a hardline union activist and advocate of striking as a means to achieve results ever since. He made media appearances backing a series of junior doctor walkouts in 2016, despite by this point being a consultant and member of the BMA's consultant committee and council. In 2023, he fronted the senior doctors' own campaign for pay rises, claiming consultants had seen real-terms cuts to pay of 35 per cent since 2010, as they timed strikes to coincide with the junior doctors' walkouts and the Conservative Party conference. Although now he says, the union is 'non-partisan' and he is in a 'non-partisan role'. 'As in, I don't have any political affiliation as chair of council,' he told the Guardian last week. He also warned that the 29 per cent rise the junior doctors – now called resident doctors – are demanding is 'non-negotiable' and could mean strikes go on for years. Mr Streeting has also said that any increase on the 5.4 per cent pay award for 2025-26 was 'off the table', leaving both parties at an impasse. The Health Secretary said it was 'completely unreasonable' that the doctors would strike having received a 28.9 per cent salary uplift in three years. He is set to meet with the BMA's resident doctors' committee this week to see if there is a way to 'avert' the five-day walkout, which begins at 7am on 25 July. The rise of Dr Dolphin and like-minded political activists has coincided with the union increasingly alienating itself from the public and other doctors. Recent polling shows just one in five Britons strongly back the resident doctors' strikes, while senior medics have criticised the walkouts and even quit the union as a result. Its annual general meeting has attracted criticism for its increasing focus on political issues such as Palestine and Israel, its rejection of the Supreme Court's ruling on what a biological woman is and how single-sex care should be delivered, as well as the anti-Cass motion put forward by Dr Dolphin. The new chairman has also already written to Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, to criticise the Government's plans to 'restore control to our borders' outlined in the Immigration White Paper. He said plans to increase the years that people, including doctors, must spend in the UK to obtain settlement status from five to 10 years would 'create unnecessary stress and uncertainty', and that the BMA was also 'deeply concerned' about introducing 'stricter English language requirements for adult dependants including spouses'. On taking up the role of chairman last month, he told the BMA's 190,000 members: 'The fight to restore doctors' pay and pensions continues, with colleagues across the country furious that the promised 'journey' towards pay restoration that we were promised has already come to a grinding halt.' With consultants also holding an 'indicative ballot' on industrial action, the upcoming strikes look set to be just the first under Dr Dolphin's reign.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store