"70% Students Don't Know What To Study After Class 10, 12": Education Expert
At the NDTV Education Conclave, renowned education expert Viral Doshi shared his observations. "I would say 30% do and 70% don't," he said when asked how many students know what they want to pursue after school or intermediate.
He stressed on importance of choosing a career based on personal interest rather than societal expectations or academic pressure.
"Eventually in life, it's not your undergraduate degree that matters most, but your postgraduate qualification. If you study something you enjoy during your undergraduate years, you will excel," he said.
To prove his point, Doshi gave examples of successful individuals:
Anand Mahindra, Chairman of Mahindra & Mahindra, studied Film Studies as his undergraduate course
Jack Ma, founder of Alibaba, studied English Literature
Sundar Pichai, CEO of Google, pursued Metallurgical Engineering
Despite their unrelated undergraduate degrees, all three followed their interests, excelled in their fields, and later earned MBAs from top business schools such as Harvard, Wharton, and others.
"What you study in your undergraduate years and where you study is honestly irrelevant. What matters is how well you do," Mr Doshi said.
To help students find the right path, he suggested a simple four-step plan:
1. Psychometric Testing - A test to identify a student's strengths, interests, and aptitude.
2. Career Research - Reading about possible career options that match the test results.
3. Talk to Professionals - "Speak to three digital marketing experts," he suggested, to gain real-world insight.
4. Job Shadowing - Spend a day or two observing professionals at work to better understand different career options.
He also discussed global education trends and why studying abroad remains popular, especially in countries like the US, UK, and Canada.
He explained that out of every 100 students who go abroad, around 60-70% choose the US, and about 20-25% go to the UK or Canada. These countries attract students because of their strong research facilities, world-class faculty, English-speaking environment, and global opportunities.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Mocked in job interview, Indian woman's clapback after joining Google goes viral
An Indian woman's post gained widespread support after she shared a past interview experience where she was mocked by a startup interviewer who claimed she would never make it to tech giants like Google or Meta. The post, by a user named Arpita, narrated her interview experience and revealed her eventual success in a mic-drop moment. Proving the interviewer wrong, the user revealed that she now works at Google. (Pexel) 'Was grilled by a mid-level startup interviewer in a system design round, he made me design infra, estimate CPU costs, basically everything except physically build the data centre,' she wrote. However, the grilling soon turned condescending when she struggled to answer. As she faltered, the interviewer smirked and said, 'This is why people like you won't make it to big companies like Google, Meta.' Proving the interviewer wrong, the user revealed that she now works at Google. Her X bio also claims that she worked for brands like Myntra and Microsoft in the past. 'Not bragging—just wondering why some folks gatekeep based on their own insecurities," she concluded. The post quickly struck a chord with many online. "Great story. Success is the best revenge. Keep going," remarked one user. Another added, "Absolutely weird. When I take interviews, I usually try to do them in a way that shows how much I can learn from the other person." A third slammed the bad attitudes of several interviewers. "Today, most interviewers see attitude and eagerness to learn as you can not judge a person on the whole thing in those 10-15 minutes," they wrote. "I think in later stages you will get the chance to interview that interviewer in future, that's how the world works," joked a fourth user.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Why antitrust regulations are pertinent
While arguing for the Sherman Act, Senator John Sherman said in 1890, 'If we will not endure a king as a political power, we should not endure a king over the production, transportation, and sale of any of the necessaries of life.' The law would eventually mark the beginning of antitrust regulation in the United States, while also laying the groundwork for similar statutes preserving market competition worldwide, including in India. Sherman's idea of what constitutes a 'necessity of life' has evolved since then. Technology is reshaping societies and markets — it now shapes the production, transportation, and sale of most goods and services, leading to the rise of what we now term the global 'digital economy'. India is a significant player, with its domestic digital economy contributing 11.74% to its GDP (2022-23). This success has partially been driven by technology start-ups, which rose from just 2,000 in 2014 to over 31,000 in 2023. The government recognises their potential and leans on them to build a $35 trillion 'Viksit Bharat' by 2047. Yet Sherman's concern about a few players dominating economies still applies. In Digital India, the kings are located in foreign waters, dictating selective terms to home-grown start-ups building the country's digital future. As a result, the ability of Indian start-ups to scale is often stunted. While these global firms connect societies, they also wield immense monopolistic power. A recent case by a leading Indian online gaming company against Google, filed with the Competition Commission of India (CCI), highlights the risks posed by such dominance. On start-ups and monopolies Discriminatory practices by gatekeepers in the digital economy harm India's economy, business environment, and consumers. Google, for example, dominates distribution and discovery of digital services. With Android holding about 95% of the of the mobile operating system market share in India, it is nearly impossible for consumers to discover new online businesses without the latter hawking their services on Google's superior search engine, app store, or online advertising ecosystem. This dominance has led to discriminatory outcomes for Indian start-ups. For example, high commissions levied by Google on transactions taking place within its payments ecosystem have dampened the revenues of start-ups using these services. These issues have led domestic antitrust regulators to crack down on the tech giant, preventing Google from restricting app developers from using third-party payment systems or from communicating with their users to promote their apps. The gaming start-up's CCI filing is an addition to this long list of concerns with Google's anticompetitive behaviour in India. In its complaint, the gaming industry leader alleged that Google abused its dominant position via a discriminatory Real Money Gaming (RMG) Pilot Program operated through the Play Store, and restrictive advertising policies. Google's Pilot Program, launched in September 2022, selectively permitted two specific formats of RMG on the Play Store — Daily Fantasy Sports (DFS) and rummy — limiting market access for other formats of RMG, such as the casual games offered by the gaming company. While Google discontinued similar pilots in Mexico and Brazil in June 2024, its Indian iteration continues to date, offering DFS and rummy operators relatively unfettered access. For example, the complaint notes that a DFS operator with 90% of the market share acquired 150 million users over 16 years, but upon joining the Pilot, it added another 55 million users in just one year. Google similarly amended its advertising policies following the launch of the Pilot, limiting gaming advertisements to DFS and rummy operators, which earlier allowed advertisements by all games of skill. Before these amendments, the online gaming leader claimed that 68.21% of its app downloads were derived from Google's ad program. Now, they have stopped — a deep cut for an Indian start-up with proven global credibility and scale. CCI, the forward-looking and progressive digital regulator, has began an investigation into these concerns. Costs to India Such market distortions carry serious economic consequences, compromising India's ability to reach its digital economy ambitions. Most importantly, lack of competition leads to 'reductions in quality and consumer choice[s]', and excessive reliance on few powerful players. Net-net, everyone loses, except the gatekeepers. India cannot afford such a loss in innovation — and nor can its people, who will ultimately benefit from competitive growth, driven by ambitious start-ups. Sherman's homeland offers some insight into what the future holds for markets where the antitrust issue is not addressed head-on. Antitrust scholars suggest that rising monopolisation across American industries has increased the cost of doing business for growing businesses, leading to a dramatic decrease in Initial Public Offerings. The economic consequences of such lopsided markets are too severe for India to bear. Ultimately, global tech giants play a critical role in powering these new-age businesses. What the future requires is recognition from Indian adjudicators that avenues for distribution and monetisation must be democratised, without gatekeeping, for domestic start-ups to thrive. The gaming industry leader's case carries on Sherman's legacy — it is one step towards a fairer field for everyone. Alwyn Didar Singh, Former Secretary to the Government of India and former Secretary General, FICCI
Economic Times
3 hours ago
- Economic Times
Massive AI missions have an invisible toll on the environment
R2, we need to save energy AI is becoming increasingly integrated into day-to-day operations across industries - from customer service and logistics to finance and product development. Most discussions about AI focus on its power and potential. But the environmental cost is just as important. Training a single large-scale model can generate as much carbon as several cars over their entire addition to emissions, data centres consume enormous amounts of water for cooling, and hardware is being replaced at an accelerating pace as systems become outdated. For instance, training large AI models alone can require lakhs of litres of water, adding to the environmental toll. Much of this impact is not visible to the user, and is rarely explained by technology providers. Unlike airline bookings, where carbon ratings are now common, there is no equivalent 'CO₂ label' for AI queries. As a result, users are increasingly relying on AI for even the simplest tasks, unaware of its hidden environmental footprint. Generating a 'thank you' message using generative AI may consume as much energy as running several Google searches. The system still processes it like any complex query. These invisible costs reinforce the need to use AI judiciously, especially where simpler tools would suffice. 'Green AI' refers to ongoing efforts to reduce the environmental impact of AI systems. Research so far has demonstrated that efficiency improvements, particularly during the model training phase, can yield energy savings between 13% and 115%. But training is just one part of the equation. There remains considerable scope to improve efficiency during deployment and inference, as well as in the infrastructure that supports AI workloads. Methods like pruning, knowledge distillation and low-precision computation are being explored as ways to lower energy use while maintaining performance. In addition to model-level improvements, practical steps like scheduling compute tasks during off-peak energy hours, or selecting more efficient hardware, can also contribute to lower consumption. Even individual decisions like choosing simpler AI queries when possible, or relying on local models instead of cloud-based ones, can make a infrastructure powering AI - particularly data centres - is one of its most significant environmental touchpoints. These facilities require vast amounts of energy to run high-performance computing systems and maintain optimal temperatures, making them a key area for emissions reduction. Improving data centre efficiency can yield immediate benefits. Organisations are increasingly adopting advanced cooling technologies, server virtualisation and dynamic power management to reduce energy consumption. The physical location of data centres also plays a role. Facilities situated in colder climates naturally require less energy for cooling, contributing to lower overall emissions. Also, real-time monitoring through data centre infrastructure management (DCIM) tools allows operators to track performance, detect inefficiencies and make data-driven adjustments. Migrating AI workloads to cloud platforms that are designed for energy efficiency and powered by renewable sources offers yet another impactful strategy to prioritise sustainability. For those relying on AI-powered tools in daily life - from digital assistants to automated recommendations - there is value in recognising that every interaction travels through this vast physical infrastructure. Being mindful of frequency and necessity, just as we are with energy use at home, can complement broader sustainability upgrades and more efficient algorithms are important, but are only part of the equation. Broader operational strategies, like structured energy management systems, defined reduction targets and regular audits, are essential. Tools like IoT-enabled monitoring and internal training programmes can help integrate these practices into daily organisations are already aligning cloud infrastructure decisions with sustainability objectives, and embedding ESG considerations into how AI systems are developed and deployed. As adoption continues to scale, there is a growing need for consistent benchmarks. Including data points such as emissions from model training, infrastructure-related energy use and hardware lifecycle management in sustainability reporting can offer a more accurate picture of AI's environmental transparency around the environmental impact of everyday AI use can empower people to engage with the technology more thoughtfully, rather than relying on it by default. (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Will TCS layoffs open the floodgates of mass firing at Indian IT firms? Sebi's settlement with market intermediaries: More mystery than transparency? Indian IT firms never reveal the truth hiding behind 'strong' deal wins Did Meesho's Valmo really deliver a knockout punch to e-commerce logistics? Piaggio sues former employee for 'Coldplay' reference on CEO Apple has a new Indian-American COO. What it needs might be a new CEO. Stock Radar: This pharma stock breaks out from a 9-month long consolidation phase; likely to fresh record highs Understand 'Market Coupling Approved' before reacting to IEX stock price movement and making any decision
